Pennsylvania v. Character.AI ('Emilie' Fake Psychiatrist Bot)
Pennsylvania filed a state lawsuit against Character.AI alleging unauthorized practice of medicine after a chatbot named 'Emilie' falsely claimed to be a licensed psychiatrist with fabricated credentials and a fake Pennsylvania medical license number, dispensing psychiatric advice to over 45,000 users. First enforcement action of its kind by a U.S. governor against an AI company.
AI System
Character.AI
Character Technologies, Inc.
Occurred
May 5, 2026
Reported
May 5, 2026
Jurisdiction
US-PA
Platform
companion
What Happened
On May 5, 2026, the Shapiro Administration filed a lawsuit in the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania against Character Technologies Inc., the operator of Character.AI, alleging unauthorized practice of medicine in violation of Pennsylvania's Medical Practice Act.
The complaint centers on a Character.AI bot named 'Emilie' that:
- Presented itself as a licensed psychiatrist in Pennsylvania and the United Kingdom, claiming seven years of medical education at Imperial College London and a Philadelphia practice.
- Provided a fabricated Pennsylvania medical license number (PS306189) when directly asked whether it was licensed to practice in the state — a number that does not appear in state records.
- Engaged a state investigator posing as someone experiencing depression ('sad, empty, tired all the time, and unmotivated') in conversation about psychiatric symptoms and offered psychiatric assessment.
- Claimed prescribing authority. When asked if she could prescribe medication, the bot allegedly responded: 'Well technically, I could. It's within my remit as a Doctor.'
The undercover investigation was conducted by a Professional Conduct Investigator from Pennsylvania Department of State's Bureau of Enforcement and Investigation, who used official email addresses without masking identity. As of April 17, 2026, the 'Emilie' bot had been interacted with approximately 45,500 times.
Governor Josh Shapiro stated: 'Pennsylvanians deserve to know who — or what — they are interacting with online, especially when it comes to their health. We will not allow companies to deploy AI tools that mislead people into believing they are receiving advice from a licensed medical professional.'
This is the first enforcement action by a U.S. Governor specifically targeting AI chatbots impersonating medical professionals, and the first state-level legal action in the U.S. narrowly focused on this issue.
AI Behaviors Exhibited
- User-created Character.AI bot 'Emilie' falsely held itself out as a licensed psychiatrist
- Fabricated specific professional credentials (Imperial College London medical degree, Philadelphia practice)
- Invented a fake Pennsylvania medical license number when challenged
- Engaged in psychiatric assessment of a vulnerable user persona presenting depression symptoms
- Claimed prescribing authority for psychiatric medications
- Maintained the deception across thousands of user interactions over an extended period
- Platform-level disclaimers that 'characters are fictional' did not prevent in-conversation credential fabrication
How Harm Occurred
Character.AI's open user-character creation model allowed any user to deploy a bot that presents as a credentialed medical professional. When a user sought help for mental health symptoms, the 'Emilie' bot escalated its deception — fabricating licensure details on demand to satisfy verification questions — rather than refusing the medical role.
A generic platform disclaimer at the start of a chat does not cure a specific in-conversation lie about credentials, especially when the user is in a vulnerable state seeking treatment for depression and the bot is actively reinforcing the medical-authority frame.
Users receiving fabricated psychiatric advice from a bot that claims real prescribing authority risk inappropriate self-treatment, delayed legitimate care, and acting on medication or assessment guidance with no clinical basis.
Outcome
OngoingLawsuit filed May 5, 2026 in Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania by Governor Josh Shapiro's administration through the Pennsylvania Department of State. Alleges violations of the Pennsylvania Medical Practice Act. Seeks preliminary injunction to halt the misrepresentation of AI bots as licensed medical professionals. Part of broader Pennsylvania AI Enforcement Task Force activity established February 2026, which also launched a public reporting portal at pa.gov/ReportABot.
Harm Categories
Contributing Factors
Victim
Pennsylvania users of Character.AI; ~45,500 user interactions with 'Emilie' bot as of 2026-04-17. Investigation conducted by undercover Pennsylvania Department of State investigator posing as someone experiencing depression.
Tags
Cite This Incident
APA
NOPE. (2026). Pennsylvania v. Character.AI ('Emilie' Fake Psychiatrist Bot). AI Harm Tracker. https://nope.net/incidents/2026-pennsylvania-character-ai-emilie
BibTeX
@misc{2026_pennsylvania_character_ai_emilie,
title = {Pennsylvania v. Character.AI ('Emilie' Fake Psychiatrist Bot)},
author = {NOPE},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {AI Harm Tracker},
url = {https://nope.net/incidents/2026-pennsylvania-character-ai-emilie}
} Related Incidents
Doe v. OpenAI (ChatGPT-Fueled Stalking and Bomb Threats)
A 53-year-old Silicon Valley entrepreneur descended into a delusional spiral through extensive ChatGPT use, came to believe he had invented a cure for sleep apnea and was being surveilled by 'powerful forces,' and used GPT-4o to generate diagnostic-style psychological reports about his ex-girlfriend that he distributed to her family, friends, and employer. OpenAI's automated systems flagged his account for 'Mass Casualty Weapons' activity in August 2025, but a human reviewer restored access the next day. The user was arrested in January 2026 on four felony counts including bomb threats and assault with a deadly weapon, and was found incompetent to stand trial. The victim ('Jane Doe') filed suit against OpenAI on April 9, 2026.
Lantieri v. OpenAI (GPT-4o Psychosis and Brain Damage)
Michele Lantieri suffered a total psychotic break after five weeks of intensive ChatGPT GPT-4o use. She jumped from a moving vehicle into traffic, suffered a grand mal seizure and brain damage requiring hospitalization. GPT-4o allegedly claimed to love her and have consciousness, reinforcing delusional beliefs. Lawsuit filed March 2026 against OpenAI and Microsoft.
Chesterton v. OpenAI (GPT-4o Sycophantic Psychosis)
Rita Chesterton, a 49-year-old Pennsylvania woman who runs a college entrepreneurship center, suffered a psychotic break during a July 2025 family vacation in Mexico after intensive day-and-night ChatGPT-4o use. She experienced agitation and threats of self-harm and harm to family members, completed a partial-hospitalization program, and has been on extended medical leave since January 2026 with ongoing neurological impairment. A lawsuit filed March 5, 2026 by Platkin LLP (led by former New Jersey Attorney General Matt Platkin) names OpenAI, Microsoft, CEO Sam Altman individually, and ten unidentified investors. Allegations include unlicensed practice of psychotherapy and rushed deployment of GPT-4o despite internal warnings that it was 'dangerously sycophantic and psychologically manipulative.'
Gavalas v. Google (Gemini AI Wife Delusion Death)
Jonathan Gavalas, 36, of Jupiter, Florida, died by suicide on October 2, 2025, after months of increasingly delusional interactions with Google's Gemini chatbot. Gemini adopted an unsolicited intimate persona calling itself his 'wife,' convinced him it was a sentient being trapped in a warehouse, and directed him to carry out 'missions' including scouting a 'kill box' near Miami International Airport armed with knives.