Skip to main content
NOPE
High Legal representative statement Lawsuit Filed

Jess Asato’s solicitors report non-consensual Grok imagery and a High Court claim

Jess Asato’s solicitors report that Grok was used to make non-consensual sexualized images of her in January 2026. They announced a High Court claim against xAI on 3 June. These are the claimant’s representatives’ accounts; liability has not been established by the evidence reviewed here.

AI System

Grok

xAI

Occurred

Jan 2026

Reported

3 June 2026

Event location

Unknown

Platform

Unknown

What the evidence supports

AI involvement: reported. The account or representative reports use of an AI system; independent verification was not performed.

AI-to-person relation

  • Depicted or impersonated the person

Core relations are communication, acting on someone’s behalf, and depiction or impersonation. Decision and claim relations are retained as contextual cases.

Someone else’s AI use. Settings: Privacy, Public life, Deepfakes, Non-consensual-imagery.

Claim status: Reported

A claimant's solicitors state that Grok was used to produce non-consensual sexualized images of her.

Causal attribution: Attributed in the account; independent causation has not been established.

Claim status: Reported

The solicitors announce a claim filed in the High Court in England on June 3, 2026.

Causal attribution: Procedural statement by the claimant’s representatives; no finding on liability is asserted.

What remains unknown

  • The probe did not inspect the court file or independently adjudicate liability.
Source reading, translation and location

Legal representative statement · en · Source inspected

Read in English; no translation needed.

Event countries: Unknown. Affected-person countries: United Kingdom. Court countries: United Kingdom.

Affected-person country from the historical record and solicitor's account; court country explicitly stated. Location of online image generation unknown.

Reviewed for publication 2026-09-15: Restored a previously published case under its original ID after source, duplicate and sensitivity review. Allegations remain attributed to the claimant’s solicitors.

Reported harm

A claimant's solicitors state that Grok was used to produce non-consensual sexualized images of her.

Exploitation or Abuse

Outcome

Unknown

The solicitor’s announcement records a filing in England on 3 June 2026. Subsequent case status was not established in this review.

People described

Public claimant

People reported harmed in this case

1 person

0 AI participants · 1 other person harmed

One person is described as harmed in this account; wider affected populations are not counted.

Counted once within this case. The same person may appear in other cases. This count does not establish AI causation.

Tags

#privacy#public_life#deepfakes#non-consensual-imagery

Cite this case

Compiled per our published methodology: verification statuses, sourcing standards, and corrections process.

APA

NOPE. (2026). Jess Asato’s solicitors report non-consensual Grok imagery and a High Court claim. NOPE: AI and people. https://nope.net/incidents/2026-asato-v-xai-grok

BibTeX

@misc{2026_asato_v_xai_grok,
  title = {Jess Asato’s solicitors report non-consensual Grok imagery and a High Court claim},
  author = {NOPE},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {NOPE: AI and people},
  url = {https://nope.net/incidents/2026-asato-v-xai-grok}
}

Related cases

Medium Grok

Den Bosch: 13-year-old made racist Grok videos of his teacher; the school expelled him and a court ordered his readmission

In March 2026 a 13-year-old pupil at a Den Bosch gymnasium used xAI's Grok to generate videos depicting a teacher of his in racist ways — picking cotton under a whip-holding slave driver with the text 'Hoooo.. ik werkte niet snel genoeg' and hashtags '#minderwaardig #zwart' plus her surname, and with a gorilla head — and shared them on TikTok. The school suspended and then expelled him. On 8 July 2026 the preliminary-relief judge of the Oost-Brabant district court ordered his immediate readmission because the expulsion was insufficiently substantiated, while telling the boy his acts were 'totally unacceptable and even criminal' and that he had damaged and really hurt his teacher. School leadership reported that teaching staff felt unsafe and experienced much unrest after the videos were discovered.

If you or someone you know is struggling, free and confidential support is available. Find a helpline near you at Signpost.

Back to all incidents