Skip to main content

IL AI Employment Law

Illinois Human Rights Act AI Amendment (HB 3773)

Amends Illinois Human Rights Act to make it a civil rights violation for employers to use AI that discriminates based on protected classes in employment decisions. Requires notice to employees and applicants when AI is used in hiring, firing, promotion, or discipline.

Jurisdiction

Illinois

Enacted

Aug 9, 2024

Effective

Jan 1, 2026

Enforcement

Illinois Department of Human Rights

Public Act 103-0804; signed August 9, 2024; effective January 1, 2026

Illinois General Assembly

Why It Matters

Third US jurisdiction (after NYC LL144 and Colorado) to regulate AI in employment decisions. Includes private right of action through civil rights framework. Applies to employers of all sizes (1+ employee threshold).

Recent Developments

Effective January 1, 2026. Illinois Department of Human Rights released draft rules in late 2025 for Subpart J implementing notice requirements.

At a Glance

Applies to

Recruitment AIAutomated Decision System

Harms addressed

Who Must Comply

  • Employers with 1+ employees during 20+ calendar weeks in violation year
  • Employment decisions including hiring, firing, promotion, discipline, tenure, training

Applicability thresholds:

1 employees/20_calendar_weeks — Subject to law if employer has 1+ employees during 20+ calendar weeks

Safety Provisions

  • Prohibition on AI use that results in discrimination based on protected classes
  • Prohibition on using zip codes as proxy for protected classes in AI algorithms
  • Mandatory notice to employees when AI used in employment decisions
  • Mandatory notice to applicants when AI used in hiring process
  • Notice must explain AI use in easily understandable manner

Compliance & Enforcement

Key Dates

Jan 1, 2026

All provisions take effect

Penalties

Unspecified

Private Right of Action

Individuals can sue directly without waiting for regulatory action.

View on map

Illinois

Focus Areas

Algorithmic accountability
Active safeguards required

Cite This

APA

Illinois. (2024). Illinois Human Rights Act AI Amendment (HB 3773).

Related Regulations

In Effect US-IL

IL AIVIA

Requires notice, consent, and transparency for AI analysis of video job interviews. Early state-level AI employment regulation.

Enacted US-IL

IL SB 315

Frontier-model AI safety law requiring large AI developers to publish and annually update catastrophic-risk frameworks, undergo independent third-party safety audits, report safety incidents to the state, and protect whistleblowers. Would be the first US law mandating independent third-party audits of frontier AI developers.

In Effect US-NYC

NYC LL 144

First-in-world law mandating bias audits for AI hiring tools. Requires annual independent audits and public disclosure of results.

Enacted US-CA

CA SB 947

Adds Labor Code Part 5.5.5 on employers' use of automated decision systems (ADS). Bars using an ADS to violate labor or civil rights law, to infer an employee's protected status, or to predict and act against workers exercising legal rights; bars relying solely on an ADS for disciplinary or termination decisions and requires human corroboration where an ADS output is the primary basis; and requires a written post-use notice and, on request, a description of the employee's data used. Operative July 1, 2027.

Enacted US-CA

CA AB 2246

Repeals and replaces the California Age-Appropriate Design Code Act. Requires a business providing an online service, product or feature likely to be accessed by children to estimate the age of child users with a reasonable level of certainty or extend child protections to all users, to configure high-privacy defaults, and to take reasonable steps to prevent specified harms including severe psychological harm. Removes the exceptions to the data-collection prohibitions, lets children void contracts entered through manipulative design features, and states that it creates no private right of action.

Enacted US-CA

CA SB 503

Requires developers and deployers of AI clinical decision support systems used by health facilities, clinics and physician practices to make reasonable efforts to identify systems with a known or reasonably foreseeable risk of biased impacts on people with protected characteristics. Developers must mitigate those risks and give deployers an intended-use and risk statement plus documentation on training data, evaluation and data governance; deployers must regularly monitor the systems and mitigate.

Last updated February 11, 2026. Verify against primary sources before relying on this information.