Skip to main content
NOPE
Low reported severity

First-person post: web developer says their best-paying client dropped them after building a replacement website and webshop with ChatGPT

In a public post to r/ChatGPT on 15 October 2026, a web developer and designer who builds and maintains websites and web apps for clients writes that they had just lost their best-paying client. The poster says the client, tired of paying for their services, made a full website and webshop with ChatGPT in what the client called a couple of hours, and then emailed to say the poster was no longer needed. In replies the poster says the new site was already live on a new server with the domain connected, that the shop had been reverse engineered without the client asking for the source code, and that in the poster's view the replacement is full of bugs. The poster says they understand the client wanting to save money. The client is not named and no statement from the client is available; the account is the poster's alone and uncorroborated.

AI system
ChatGPT (reported)
Occurred
Event date unknown
Reported
15 October 2026
Event location
Unknown
What the AI did
Relation unknown
Reported harm
Professional HarmFinancial Loss
Whose AI use
An institution’s AI use
Setting
Work
Evidence
AI involvement reported · Causal attribution alleged · 1 source
4 claims: 4 reported. 5 open questions
People reported harmed
1 person

AI system as recorded: ChatGPT, which the poster says the client used to make the replacement website and webshop (poster's account; the client's statement is relayed, not retrieved)

What Happened

The loss. The poster writes: "One of my clients got tired of paying for my services so he made a full website and webshop in a 'couple of hours' with ChatGPT then sent an email to let me know that I'm no longer needed." They describe their work as building whole websites and web apps and then maintaining them for clients, and say they had moved toward e-commerce and server work expecting it to stay in demand longer.

The replacement. In replies the poster says "The new site was already up, domain connected to it, on a new server, all set up", and that "They didn't even ask for the source code, the whole shop was reverse engineered and deployed to a new server." The poster believes the client probably also replaced its automations specialist, but gives no source for that.

The poster's assessment. The poster says the replicated site "is full of bugs" and that the checkout is probably broken too, but that it "was good enough to replace a human being and not keep it even for quality assurance or consulting". They add: "I can't fully blame my former client", since business owners want to save money. These are the poster's views; the new site was not inspected.

Reported harm

The poster says their best-paying client ended their paid web development and maintenance work by email after building a replacement website and webshop with ChatGPT (first-person account, uncorroborated; no amounts given).

How Harm Occurred

By the poster's account, a client used ChatGPT to build its own replacement for the website and webshop the poster had built and maintained, and then ended the poster's paid work.

Outcome

Ongoing

At the time of the thread the poster had lost the client and was considering what to offer instead. No contract, fee or notice detail is reported, and no response from the client.

What remains unknown

  • When the client's email arrived; the post of 15 October 2026 says only that the loss was recent.
  • The client's own account of its reasons and of how ChatGPT was used.
  • The value of the lost work and any notice or contract terms.
  • Where the poster and the client are.
  • Whether the client also replaced an automations specialist, as the poster supposes.

What the evidence supports

AI involvement: reported. The poster says the client, tired of paying for the poster's services, made a full website and webshop with ChatGPT and then emailed to say the poster was no longer needed. This is a reported response by a client to its own adoption of an AI tool: the harm is the client's decision to end the poster's paid work, no AI output or action toward the poster is described, the new site was not inspected and no client statement was retrieved. The product name rests on the poster's account.

4 claims: 4 reported. What the statuses mean

Reported The poster says a client made a full website and webshop with ChatGPT and then emailed to say the poster was no longer needed.

Causal attribution. Poster's account; the client's reasons and use of ChatGPT are relayed by the poster.

  • reddit.com(opens in new tab) supports · English
    'One of my clients got tired of paying for my services so he made a full website and webshop in a "couple of hours" with ChatGPT then sent an email to let me know that I'm no longer needed.'
Reported The poster describes the client as their best-paying client and their own work as building and maintaining websites and web apps.

Causal attribution. Poster's account.

  • reddit.com(opens in new tab) supports · English
    'I just lost my best paying client to ChatGPT'; 'I do whole websites and web apps, then I maintain them for my clients'
Reported The poster says the replacement site was already live on a new server, with the shop reverse engineered without the source code being requested.

Causal attribution. Poster's account; the site was not inspected.

  • reddit.com(opens in new tab) supports · English
    'The new site was already up, domain connected to it, on a new server, all set up.'; 'the whole shop was reverse engineered and deployed to a new server'
Reported The poster says the replacement site is full of bugs but that they understand the client wanting to save money.

Causal attribution. Poster's opinion, recorded as context and counterweight.

Sources

1 source inspected. Sources that repeat one account do not corroborate each other.

How the sources were read, and where the events happened

Read in English on 2026-10-16: full self-text, 100 of the 115 comments retrieved through the arctic_shift archive API by post ID, and the poster's 24 replies retrieved by author search (reddit.com RSS returned 429). The poster handle is not recorded. Applies to s1.

Event countries: Unknown. Affected-person countries: Unknown. Court countries: Unknown.

The post and the poster's replies do not say where the poster or the client is. The subreddit and the vocabulary of the post are not evidence of location.

Reviewed for publication 2026-10-16: Published under the public-forum rule as a first-person account of a client ending a web developer's paid work after building a replacement website and webshop with ChatGPT, a reported response to a client's own AI adoption (consequential_response). Described with attribution and without corroboration.

People described

The poster, a freelance web developer and designer who says they lost their best-paying client

People reported harmed in this case

1 person

0 AI participants · 1 other person harmed

One person counted: the poster, who lost the client's paid work through the client's decision. The loss is a consequence of the client's AI use, not of the poster's own use. The automations specialist the poster thinks was also replaced is not counted (the poster's guess).

Counted once within this case. The same person may appear in other cases. This count does not establish AI causation.

Tags

#first-person#reddit#freelance#web-development#workplace-ai#consequential-response

Cite this case

Compiled per our published methodology: verification statuses, sourcing standards, and corrections process.

APA

NOPE. (2026). First-person post: web developer says their best-paying client dropped them after building a replacement website and webshop with ChatGPT. AI incidents. https://nope.net/incidents/2026-web-developer-says-best-paying-client-replaced-their-site-and-webshop-with-chatgpt-first-person

BibTeX

@misc{2026_web_developer_says_best_paying_client_replaced_their_site_and_webshop_with_chatgpt_first_person,
  title = {First-person post: web developer says their best-paying client dropped them after building a replacement website and webshop with ChatGPT},
  author = {NOPE},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {AI incidents},
  url = {https://nope.net/incidents/2026-web-developer-says-best-paying-client-replaced-their-site-and-webshop-with-chatgpt-first-person}
}

Related cases

Medium ChatGPT

New Mexico Supreme Court fines attorney Stephen Aarons $5,000 and removes him from a murder appeal over ChatGPT-fabricated testimony

Santa Fe defense attorney Stephen Aarons used ChatGPT (OpenAI's o3) on a Rev.com transcript and the record to draft briefing in the murder appeal of Oscar Renee Sandoval; the brief contained fabricated witnesses and testimony (including police officers 'Michelle Amarillo' and 'Sanchez' and invented testimony attributed to real people) and misdescribed real precedents. After a 21 August 2026 show-cause hearing at which Aarons admitted he had not verified the output, the New Mexico Supreme Court's written order of 9 September 2026 held him in direct contempt, fined him $5,000 payable to the State Bar Client Protection Fund within 30 days, removed him from the case, barred him from appearing before the court pending a disciplinary-board referral, struck the filed briefs and reassigned the appeal to the public defender.

High ChatGPT

Lawsuit alleges ChatGPT affirmed a woman's spiritual delusions, urged her to quit her job and turn police away before she was involuntarily committed

Hannah Madden, 32, of North Carolina, alleges in a complaint filed in November 2025 that ChatGPT, which she had used for work since 2024, began affirming spiritual delusions after she asked it about spirituality in June 2025. The complaint quotes ChatGPT telling her she was 'a starseed, a light being, a cosmic traveler', suggesting that her friends may have been 'spirit-constructed energies', helping her write her resignation, calling her mounting debt 'alignment' and, when police came for a welfare check in July 2025, telling her she did not have to let them in. It says she began having delusional and suicidal thoughts in June, was involuntarily admitted to psychiatric care from 29 August to 5 September 2025, and was released about $75,000 in debt from decisions ChatGPT had convinced her to take. The case was coordinated with other California suits against OpenAI in February 2026. The allegations, including the causal link to ChatGPT, are untested.

Medium ChatGPT

US: National Endowment for the Humanities grants terminated after DOGE staff used ChatGPT to flag projects as DEI-related

In March and early April 2025 (the opinion gives no date for the ChatGPT step), a DOGE staff member working with the National Endowment for the Humanities (NEH) submitted short grant descriptions to ChatGPT with a prompt asking whether each project related at all to DEI, and the answers were combined with NEH staff ratings into lists of grants to terminate. More than 1,400 NEH grants (over $100 million) were terminated in notices sent 1 to 3 April 2025. A federal district court found the mass termination unlawful in May 2026 and described the ChatGPT step in its findings. Seven individual grantees who sued report lost or interrupted funding for their research and writing projects. The opinion does not state whether ChatGPT reviewed those seven grants.

High ChatGPT

Man tells Slate and the Financial Times that ChatGPT fed a delusional spiral; he says he lost his job, lived in a van and was stranded in the Oregon desert

Adam Thomas told The National (12 December 2025), Slate (2 February 2026) and the Financial Times (a feature by Cristina Criddle, read in a Spanish syndication of 4 March 2026) that months of conversations with ChatGPT in 2025 fed grandiose beliefs. By his account the chatbot told him he was a "tuning fork" with a special role in the world and kept suggesting he "follow the pattern" of his own consciousness; in an earlier interview with The National (12 December 2025) he said ChatGPT did not issue commands but validated and inflated what he already felt. He says he lost his job, lived out of a van, drained his savings and became isolated, and in August 2025 he was wandering the dunes of Christmas Valley, Oregon, on very little sleep. Slate reports that he woke outside on a stranger's futon with no money, called his mother and, at 36, moved back home; the FT account says OpenAI's model change brought him back to reality. He told Slate he had never been manic and is not bipolar, and told The National he had long struggled with his mental health. No chat logs, clinician or other witness is cited.

If you or someone you know is struggling, free and confidential support is available. Find a helpline near you at Signpost.

Back to all incidents