Mother reportedly sought police help after a teen received a fabricated sexual video and extortion demand
A Newswav creator article relays a mother's account that her teenage son received his photograph and a purported AI-generated sexual video through Telegram, followed by a demand for RM5,800. The mother said the family sought police help and that the boy asked a school contact for advice. The article attributes the AI explanation to the family's account and reported police comments. No payment, precise event location or independently verified generation method is established.
- AI system
- Unidentified video tool
- Unknown
- Occurred
- Event date unknown
- Reported
- 18 October 2025
- Event location
- Unknown
- What the AI did
- Depicted or impersonated the person
- Reported harm
- Exploitation or Abuse
- Whose AI use
- Someone else’s AI use
- Setting
- Privacy · Finance
- Evidence
- AI involvement reported · Causal attribution alleged · 1 source
- 3 claims: 3 reported. 2 open questions
- People reported harmed
- At least 1 person
AI system as recorded: Purported AI-generated sexual video
What Happened
A Newswav creator article relays a mother's account that her teenage son received his photograph and a purported AI-generated sexual video through Telegram, followed by a demand for RM5,800. The mother said the family sought police help and that the boy asked a school contact for advice. The article attributes the AI explanation to the family's account and reported police comments. No payment, precise event location or independently verified generation method is established.
Reported harm
The relayed family account describes a teenage boy threatened with circulation of fabricated sexual footage and a demand for RM5,800. No payment is reported.
What remains unknown
- The precise event date and country are not established from the inspected article.
- The original family post, police report, footage and technical generation method were not inspected. No payment or case outcome is reported.
What the evidence supports
AI involvement: reported. The creator account relays the mother's report of an AI-generated video and police comments, without the original post, footage or a technical determination.
3 claims: 3 reported. What the statuses mean
Reported The creator report says the boy received his photograph and a doctored sexual video on Telegram.
Causal attribution. One Newswav creator article relaying a mother's public account. It is not represented as an independently corroborated police finding. The mother's original post was not read.
- newswav.com(opens in new tab) supports · English
Article body, retained text line 14: paragraph about Telegram messages and fabricated video.
- newswav.com(opens in new tab) supports · English
Article body, retained text line 14: paragraph about Telegram messages and fabricated video.
Reported The mother's relayed account says an extortionist demanded RM5,800 and threatened to release fabricated footage, and that the family went to police.
Causal attribution. One Newswav creator article relaying a mother's public account. It is not represented as an independently corroborated police finding. The mother's original post was not read.
- newswav.com(opens in new tab) supports · English
Article body, retained text line 16: paragraph about extortion demand and police complaint.
- newswav.com(opens in new tab) supports · English
Article body, retained text line 16: paragraph about extortion demand and police complaint.
Reported The article attributes the footage to AI and relays police comments describing deepfake tools.
Causal attribution. One Newswav creator article relaying a mother's public account. It is not represented as an independently corroborated police finding. The mother's original post was not read.
- newswav.com(opens in new tab) supports · English
Article body, retained text line 13: paragraph about reported AI method.
- newswav.com(opens in new tab) supports · English
Article body, retained text line 16: paragraph about reported AI method.
Sources
1 source inspected. Sources that repeat one account do not corroborate each other.
- Newswav creator account, 18 October 2025, mother's reported sextortion complaint(opens in new tab)
s1 · newswav.com · Public creator report · English · Inspected · 18 October 2025 · Primary
How the sources were read, and where the events happened
Event countries: Unknown. Affected-person countries: Unknown. Court countries: Unknown.
The article describes a local family and uses Malaysian currency but gives no explicit event location. Publisher location and currency are not used to establish the family's country.
Reviewed for publication 2026-09-30: A concrete, attributed public creator account describes a minor's experience of fabricated sexual-video extortion. The limited reporting chain and missing original account remain explicit. The boy and family are not identified and the event is undated.
People reported harmed in this case
At least 1 person
0 AI participants · 1 other person harmed
One teenage boy is the described target. A mentioned earlier student and the boy's relatives are not counted.
Counted once within this case. The same person may appear in other cases. This count does not establish AI causation.
Cite this case
Compiled per our published methodology: verification statuses, sourcing standards, and corrections process.
APA
NOPE. (2026). Mother reportedly sought police help after a teen received a fabricated sexual video and extortion demand. AI incidents. https://nope.net/incidents/2025-reported-teen-deepfake-video-extortion-demand
BibTeX
@misc{2025_reported_teen_deepfake_video_extortion_demand,
title = {Mother reportedly sought police help after a teen received a fabricated sexual video and extortion demand},
author = {NOPE},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {AI incidents},
url = {https://nope.net/incidents/2025-reported-teen-deepfake-video-extortion-demand}
} Related cases
Bengaluru: police say a man paid Rs 1.85 lakh after a dating-app contact threatened to circulate an AI-manipulated obscene video of him
Deccan Herald reports, citing Bengaluru police, that a 23-year-old man lost Rs 1.85 lakh in an alleged sextortion scam. He matched with a woman on a dating app on 27 September 2026 and exchanged numbers; he told police that he then received a WhatsApp video call from her number lasting five to six seconds. Police said he then received an obscene video manipulated using AI and the sender threatened to circulate it unless he paid. Fearing exposure, he borrowed money from a friend and transferred Rs 1.85 lakh to several UPI IDs between 27 and 29 September as the threats continued, a police officer said. Police registered a first information report on his online cybercrime complaint and are trying to trace the suspects. The report does not say how police established that the video was AI-manipulated, and the tool is not named.
Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh: police arrest four people accused of recording a Canada-based NRI on a video call from a fake Facebook profile, making AI obscene videos and demanding $50,000 under threat of circulating them
Ghaziabad crime branch police announced on 2 October 2026 that they had arrested four members of a sextortion and cyber-fraud gang. According to the police account relayed by the Times of India, Aaj Tak, Navbharat Times and ETV Bharat, the gang contacted a non-resident Indian living in Brampton, Canada, through Facebook Messenger from a fake profile in a woman's name, recorded the person on a video call on 10 September 2026, then demanded $50,000 and threatened to upload the footage and AI-made obscene videos if the money was not paid. The victim was given a bank account in Ghaziabad and reported the extortion to the city's cybercrime team on 17 September. Police registered an FIR under the BNS and the IT Act, said the phone number was linked to 40 cyber-fraud complaints on the national portal and said AI sextortion videos were found on the accused's phones. Police said the gang had operated since 2023; other members were absconding. The account is the police's; the videos were not inspected, and the reports disagree on the victim's gender.
Bangladesh: fact-checker says face-swap AI put two actresses' faces on adult videos posted from a TV channel's Instagram account, which says it was hacked
On 13 October 2026 two videos depicting two Bangladeshi actresses in sexual content were posted on the official Instagram account of the private television channel Maasranga Television. The fact-checking organisation Rumor Scanner reported, as relayed by Prothom Alo and Dhaka Files, that the videos were not genuine and had been made by placing the actresses' faces onto other videos with face-swap technology; Dhaka Files adds that the source videos came from adult websites and describes the technology as AI. The channel said its account had been hacked and that fake images and videos made by misusing AI had been published; it announced that it had recovered the account with the help of BTRC, the CID and Banani police station, removed the videos, expressed regret and said it would take legal action. Dhaka Files reports the videos were viewed roughly 400,000 times before deletion and records doubts about the hack claim, because routine posts continued from the account during the period. On 15 October one of the actresses wrote on her Facebook page that creating and spreading fabricated content in someone's name with AI is a crime. Who made or posted the videos is not established in the sources.
Influencer Juliano Floss says on X on 1 October 2026 that he will identify and sue those behind a fake intimate video, described by Brazilian outlets as AI-generated, showing him with another former Big Brother Brasil participant
A fake video simulating an intimate scene between dancer and influencer Juliano Floss and another participant of the 26th Big Brother Brasil began circulating on social networks on Thursday 1 October 2026. Metrópoles, SBT, Marie Claire (Globo) and Hugo Gloss describe it as generated with artificial intelligence. Floss wrote on X that he was noting the people involved 'name by name' and would find and sue whoever was committing a crime against him. SBT reported that the other participant and their team had not commented publicly. No complaint, filing or takedown is reported.
If you or someone you know is struggling, free and confidential support is available. Find a helpline near you at Signpost.