Skip to main content

NOPE · AI and people

AI incidents

Reports of AI-related harm and adverse experiences affecting people’s safety, wellbeing, rights and livelihoods. Explore what happened and the evidence available.

NOPE’s core concern is when AI communicates with a person, acts on their behalf, or depicts or impersonates them. The tracker is wider: it also records consequential decisions and claims about people. Each account is reviewed for publication; claims may remain uncorroborated or disputed. How we review and count cases

In this selection

Published cases
6
Countries with reported events
1
Located 6 of 6 cases · 0 unknown
Languages in checked sources
1
Recorded for 6 of 6 cases

3 cases have no reviewed AI-to-person relation yet: 1 not yet reviewed and 2 reviewed as unknown. Show these cases

These figures describe the cases collected by NOPE. Coverage varies with discovery, reporting and available evidence. They do not estimate how often AI-related harm occurs.

Response counts currently use each case’s principal recorded outcome. Further proceedings may be described in its account.

Cases in this selection, counted once in their first known event year. A series may continue beyond that year. Reporting and collection dates are excluded. NOPE has searched recent events more thoroughly than earlier years, so bar heights also reflect collection effort.

Reported severity MediumLow
More filters: AI relation, use, setting, sources and responses
Clear filters

6 of 560 published cases

16 Mar 2022United StatesFlock Safety license plate readers (reported)

A Houston driver was stopped by a Bexar County deputy, held for 76 minutes and searched after his work trip was reportedly flagged as suspicious with the use of licence-plate-reading cameras; a jury found the county violated the Fourth Amendment and awarded $76

In March 2022 a Bexar County Sheriff's deputy in Texas stopped a Houston man on Interstate 35 as he drove home from a work trip near the border, saying he had drifted over the fog line. The driver was questioned in the patrol car and refused consent to a search. A police dog was brought in and alerted, the truck was searched, and nothing was found. He was held for 76 minutes. His lawyers at the Institute for Justice say that, with the use of licence-plate-reading cameras, the quick trip to the border and back was flagged as suspicious and that officers then coordinated the stop through a group chat. One of them told the San Antonio Current that an AI-powered camera flagged the plate and that an anonymous law enforcement agent decided the trip looked suspicious. The San Antonio Current names the cameras as Flock's, and Reason describes them as AI-powered licence plate readers that flagged an abnormal driving pattern. On Monday 28 September 2026 (the reports say 'on Monday'; the date is worked out from their publication dates) a jury in federal court in San Antonio found that Bexar County had violated the driver's Fourth Amendment rights and awarded $76, one dollar for each minute. The county's lawyer said it plans post-trial motions and may appeal. The sheriff's office declined to comment on active litigation.

Contextual tracker case Medium reported severity Lawsuit Ongoing

AI involvement reported · Causal attribution alleged · 4 sources, 3 underlying accounts · Added 05/10/2026

Event date unknownUnited StatesFlock Safety license plate readers

Savannah, Georgia: a police corporal fired in August 2026 over misuse of the department's Flock license-plate-reader system admitted to six improper license plate searches, two involving the officer's wife and four involving one of her coworkers, according to WTOC's report of the appeal hearing

The Savannah Police Department in Georgia terminated four sworn officers and two civilian employees after an internal investigation, begun on 27 July 2026, found that employees had run searches on personal acquaintances and family members in the department's Flock license-plate-reader system. The Georgia Bureau of Investigation arrested four of the former employees on 21 August 2026. One of them, a former corporal charged with two counts of misuse of a license plate reader system and one count of violation of oath of office, appealed the firing. WTOC's 21 September 2026 report of the appeal hearing said the former corporal admitted to six improper license plate searches, two involving the officer's wife and four involving one of her coworkers. Neither person is identified, and no source says whether they knew of the searches. A decision on the appeal was pending.

Contextual tracker case Low reported severity Criminal Charges

AI involvement reported · Causal attribution alleged · 4 sources, 3 underlying accounts · Added 05/10/2026

7 Oct 2025 to 14 Oct 2025United StatesFlock Safety license plate readers

Menasha, Wisconsin: a police officer who searched his ex-girlfriend's vehicles on the Flock license-plate-reader network while off duty is sentenced to six months in jail

According to a criminal complaint reported by WBAY and NBC 26, a Menasha police officer used his department credentials while off duty in October 2025 to search the Flock automated license-plate-reader network for vehicles belonging to his ex-girlfriend, giving "welfare" as the reason. She had told Appleton police she was concerned he was using the system to track her car and check whether it was where she had said. Investigators found seven searches between 7 and 14 October, five of them for her cars. The officer was arrested in January 2026, charged with felony misconduct in office, pleaded no contest and resigned. On 17 August 2026 a judge rejected the agreed sentencing recommendation and imposed six months in jail followed by three years of probation. On 19 August 2026 the judge denied a defense request to release him on bond while he appeals the sentence, according to Fox 11.

Contextual tracker case Medium reported severity Criminal Charges

AI involvement reported · Causal attribution supported · 3 sources, 1 underlying account · Added 04/10/2026

May 2026United StatesFlock Safety license plate readers

Tulsa County, Oklahoma: a federal judge ruled on 1 October 2026 that a sheriff's deputy's warrantless search of a driver's month-long location history in the Flock and VehicleManager licence-plate-reader systems, run because her car had California plates, violated her Fourth Amendment rights, and suppressed all evidence obtained after the search; she had been held in pretrial detention since May

In an opinion and order of 1 October 2026 in a federal drug prosecution in the Northern District of Oklahoma, Judge Sara E. Hill found that a Tulsa County deputy sheriff followed a driver's car on the highway for no apparent reason other than its California licence plate and queried it in the Flock and VehicleManager automated licence plate reader (ALPR) systems, which 404 Media describes as an AI-powered surveillance system. The court found that the search returned more than 50 records of her whereabouts across the country over a month, that it was a warrantless search without probable cause in violation of her Fourth Amendment rights, and that all evidence obtained after the deputy began the ALPR search must be suppressed. The deputy had stopped her for a lane change, detained her for a dog sniff after she refused consent, and searched the car; 404 Media reports that he found 91 pounds of methamphetamine. The docket shows she was ordered detained pending trial in May 2026. After the ruling her lawyer asked the court to revoke the detention order, saying the evidence relied on to detain her is inadmissible. Flock told 404 Media it expects the ruling to be appealed.

Contextual tracker case Medium reported severity Criminal Charges

AI involvement reported · Causal attribution supported · 4 sources, 1 underlying account · Added 03/10/2026

2025United StatesUnidentified image tool (suspected)

Manhattan Airbnb: guest says host's damage-claim photos were manipulated or AI-generated, Airbnb first ordered payment then refunded her

The Guardian reported on 2 August 2025 that a London-based academic who rented a Manhattan apartment through Airbnb in 2025 was accused by the host of more than 12,000 pounds of damage, supported by photos including a cracked coffee table. She says differences between two photos of the table show they were digitally manipulated or AI-generated. Airbnb first told her to reimburse 5,314 pounds after reviewing the photos, then, five days after Guardian Money asked about the case, accepted her appeal, credited 500 pounds and, after she refused an 854-pound offer, refunded her booking cost of 4,269 pounds, and the host's negative review of her was taken down. Airbnb apologised. Airbnb told the host it could not verify the images he submitted and warned him. The host did not respond to the Guardian. No source establishes that AI was used.

Contextual tracker case Low reported severity

AI involvement suspected · Causal attribution alleged · 3 sources, 2 underlying accounts · Added 29/09/2026

1 Nov 2024 to 28 Jan 2026United StatesTurnitin AI-text detector

Adelphi accused Orion Newby of AI plagiarism after a detector flagged his paper; a Nassau County judge ordered the finding expunged

Orion Newby, an Adelphi University first-year student with language and auditory processing disabilities, received a zero in November 2024 on a World Civilizations paper after the professor suspected it was AI-generated and the university relied in part on AI-detection software; he was ordered to attend a plagiarism workshop and his appeal was denied, leaving him one finding from suspension or expulsion. Newby — who had written the paper with 15-20 hours of tutor support through the university's own disability program — said the detectors flagged his citations, and two other detectors scored the paper as human. After the family sued, New York State Supreme Court Judge Randy Sue Marber in Nassau County ruled on 28 January 2026 that Adelphi's finding and its denial of his appeal were 'without valid basis and devoid of reason' and ordered his record expunged. The family spent six figures on legal costs.

Contextual tracker case Medium reported severity Lawsuit Filed

AI involvement supported · Causal attribution supported · 3 sources, 2 underlying accounts · Added 15/09/2026

Cases may have several effects and sources. Mixed accounts qualify when they include a reported harm or adverse experience. People are counted within individual cases where sources support a number; we do not publish a collection-wide total of distinct people.

A source’s existence, the experience it reports and AI’s causal role are separate questions. A lawsuit records allegations unless a subsequent finding establishes them.

Methodology and corrections · Subscribe via RSS · Suggest a case or correction · Find support

Last dataset update: 05/10/2026. Dataset available under CC BY 4.0.