Skip to main content
Medium reported severity Investigation Opened

Google's AI flagged two fathers' medical photos of their toddlers as child abuse; accounts disabled, police investigated then cleared them, NYT reports

In February 2021 a San Francisco father took photos of his toddler son's medical condition after a nurse asked for photos before a video consultation; the doctor used them to diagnose the problem and prescribe antibiotics. The New York Times reported in August 2022 that when the photos were backed up from his Android phone to Google's servers, Google's artificial-intelligence tool for recognising never-before-seen child abuse images flagged them. Two days after the photos were taken his Google account was disabled for 'harmful content', which cost him more than a decade of email, contacts and photos and, through Google Fi, his phone number. Google reported him to the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children, and the San Francisco police obtained search warrants for his account; the investigator concluded that no crime had occurred. Google refused to reinstate the account after two appeals, the second with the police report, and later notified him that it was being permanently deleted. The Times reported a second father in Houston whose photos of his toddler, taken at a paediatrician's request, were also flagged; his Gmail account was disabled in the middle of buying a house, Houston police questioned and cleared him, and he did not get the account back. Google said it stood by its decisions and that its reviewers had found a further video in the San Francisco father's account that it considered problematic.

AI system
Google CSAM image classifier
Occurred
Feb 2021
Reported
21 August 2022
Event location
United States
What the AI did
Made a claim about the person · Informed a human decision about the person
Reported harm
Legal HarmOther Material Harm
Whose AI use
An institution’s AI use
Setting
Privacy · Health · Justice · Everyday life
Evidence
AI involvement reported · Causal attribution supported · 3 sources, 1 underlying account
7 claims: 7 reported. 3 open questions
People reported harmed
2 people

AI system as recorded: Google's machine-learning tool for recognising never-before-seen child sexual abuse images (used with hash matching), applied to photos backed up from Android phones to Google's servers, followed by human review

What Happened

The photos. On a Friday night in February 2021 a San Francisco father photographed his toddler son's medical condition with his Android phone. A nurse at the family's health-care provider asked for photos so a doctor could review them before an emergency video consultation; the doctor diagnosed the problem and prescribed antibiotics, which cleared it.

The flag and the account. The New York Times reports that when the photos were backed up to Google's servers, the artificial-intelligence tool Google developed in 2018 to recognise never-before-seen child abuse images flagged them, and that a human content moderator would have reviewed flagged photos before Google locked the account and reported it to the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children. Two days after the photos were taken, his account was disabled for 'harmful content' described as a severe violation of Google's policies that might be illegal. He lost emails, contacts and documentation of his son's first years, and because his phone plan was Google Fi he also lost his phone number, which locked him out of other accounts that sent security codes. Google rejected his appeal without explanation.

The police investigation. Google's review team also flagged a video in his account. In December 2021 he received a letter from the San Francisco Police Department telling him he had been investigated and enclosing search warrants served on Google and his internet provider in February 2021. The investigator wrote that the incident did not meet the elements of a crime and that no crime had occurred. A second appeal to Google with the police report failed, and he was later notified that his account was being permanently deleted.

A second father. The Times reports that the same thing happened the next day to a father in Houston who photographed his toddler's infection at a paediatrician's request. His Gmail account was disabled while he was buying a house, which made his mortgage broker suspicious; Houston police called him in during the autumn of 2021 and quickly cleared him, and he could not recover his account.

Google's position. Google told the Times and The Verge that it uses hash matching and artificial intelligence to identify such material, that its child-safety team reviews flagged content and consults paediatricians, and that it stood by its decisions although law enforcement cleared both men. It told the Times that its reviewers had not detected a rash or redness in the San Francisco father's photos and that a further video found in his account was also considered problematic; he said he did not remember it.

Limits. Both fathers are identified in the reporting only by first name. The photos and Google's notices were not inspected. Whether the human reviewer's decision added anything to the classifier's flag in these two cases is not stated beyond the Times' description of the general process.

Reported harm

The New York Times reports that Google's AI flagged two fathers' medical photos of their toddlers as child abuse material, after which Google disabled their accounts (losing years of email, photos and, for one, his phone number) and police investigated both before clearing them; Google refused to reinstate the accounts.

Outcome

Unknown

San Francisco police obtained search warrants for the father's Google account and his internet provider; the investigator wrote that the incident did not meet the elements of a crime. Houston police questioned the second father and cleared him. Google refused to reinstate either account and told the Times it stood by its decisions; the San Francisco father was notified that his account would be permanently deleted and had spoken with a lawyer about suing. No later reinstatement or lawsuit is reported in the sources read.

What remains unknown

  • Whether either account was ever reinstated or either father sued after August 2022.
  • What the human reviewer saw and decided in each case, beyond the general process the Times describes.
  • The content of the further video Google says it found, which the father does not remember.

What the evidence supports

AI involvement: reported. The New York Times reports that Google's artificial-intelligence tool for recognising never-before-seen child abuse images flagged the fathers' medical photos when they were backed up to Google's servers. That flag led Google to disable their accounts and report them, which led to the police investigations. Google confirms it uses AI alongside hash matching and that human reviewers check flagged content, so the AI flag informed the human decision.

7 claims: 7 reported. What the statuses mean

Reported In February 2021 a San Francisco father photographed his toddler son's medical condition after a nurse asked for photos before a video consultation, and the doctor used them to diagnose the problem and prescribe antibiotics.

Causal attribution. Background facts from the father's account to the Times.

  • nytimes.com(opens in new tab) supports · English
    'It was a Friday night in February 2021.'; 'The nurse said to send photos so the doctor could review them in advance.'; 'the doctor diagnosed the issue and prescribed antibiotics'
  • theguardian.com(opens in new tab) supports · English
    'The doctor used that image to diagnose'
Reported When the photos were backed up to Google's servers, Google's AI tool for recognising never-before-seen child abuse images flagged them; a human moderator reviews flagged photos before Google locks an account and reports it.

Causal attribution. The Times attributes the flag to Google's AI tool; the human review step is described as the general process.

  • nytimes.com(opens in new tab) supports · English
    'Google developed an artificially intelligent tool that could recognize never-before-seen exploitative images of children'; 'this technology flagged them'; 'A human content moderator for Google would have reviewed the photos after they were flagged by the artificial intelligence'
  • theguardian.com(opens in new tab) supports · English
    'automatically uploaded to the cloud, Google’s system identified them as CSAM'
Reported Two days after the photos were taken his Google account was disabled for harmful content; he lost email, contacts and photos, and his Google Fi phone number.

Causal attribution. The account loss followed directly from Google's flag and decision.

  • nytimes.com(opens in new tab) supports · English
    'His account had been disabled because of “harmful content” that was “a severe violation of Google’s policies and might be illegal.”'; 'he had to get a new phone number with another carrier'
  • theverge.com(opens in new tab) supports · English
    'ended up losing access to his emails, contacts, photos, and even his phone number'
Reported San Francisco police obtained search warrants for his Google account and internet provider, and the investigator concluded that no crime had occurred.

Causal attribution. The Times quotes the investigator's report; the report itself was not inspected.

  • nytimes.com(opens in new tab) supports · English
    'copies of the search warrants served on Google and his internet service provider'; '“I determined that the incident did not meet the elements of a crime and that no crime occurred,”'
  • theguardian.com(opens in new tab) supports · English
    'the San Francisco police department opened an investigation into him'
Reported Google rejected his appeals, including one with the police report, and later notified him that the account was being permanently deleted.

Causal attribution. Reported from the father's account to the Times.

  • nytimes.com(opens in new tab) supports · English
    'Google responded that it would not reinstate the account, with no further explanation.'; 'appealed his case to Google again, providing the police report, but to no avail'; 'his account was being permanently deleted'
Reported A Houston father whose photos of his toddler, taken at a paediatrician's request, were flagged the next day had his Gmail account disabled while buying a house; police called him in and cleared him, and he could not recover the account.

Causal attribution. Reported by the Times from the second father's account.

  • nytimes.com(opens in new tab) supports · English
    'the same scenario was playing out in Texas'; 'which made the broker suspicious until'; 'A detective from the Houston Police department called in the fall of 2021, asking him to come into the station.'; 'But he, too, was unable to get his decade-old Google account back'
Reported Google says it uses hash matching and artificial intelligence to identify child sexual abuse material, that its child-safety team reviews flagged content and consults paediatricians, and that it stands by its decisions although law enforcement cleared both men; it told the Times its reviewers saw no rash or redness and found a further video it considered problematic.

Causal attribution. Google's account disputes that the decisions were wrong.

  • nytimes.com(opens in new tab) supports · English
    'A Google spokeswoman said the company stands by its decisions, even though law enforcement cleared the two men.'; 'reviewers had not detected a rash or redness in the photos he took'
  • theverge.com(opens in new tab) supports · English
    'use a combination of hash matching technology and artificial intelligence to identify it and remove it from our platforms'; 'reviews flagged content for accuracy and consults with pediatricians'
  • theguardian.com(opens in new tab) supports · English
    'Google has said it will stand by its decision'

Sources

3 sources inspected, from 1 underlying account. Sources that repeat one account do not corroborate each other.

How the sources were read, and where the events happened

Read in English by the research agent (an AI) on 2026-11-02 through the Internet Archive capture web.archive.org/web/20221231230516id_/ of the article (HTTP 200; the live page returned 403); no translation and no human reviewer. Applies to s1.

Read in English by the research agent (an AI) on 2026-11-02 (HTTP 200); no translation. Relays the Times report; the Google statement it carries was emailed to The Verge. Applies to s2.

Read in English by the research agent (an AI) on 2026-11-02 (HTTP 200); no translation. Relays the Times report and carries a Google spokesperson statement. Applies to s3.

Event countries: United States. Affected-person countries: United States. Court countries: Unknown.

The Times places the first father in San Francisco and his investigation with the San Francisco Police Department, and the second in Houston, Texas, questioned by Houston police.

Reviewed for publication 2026-11-02: Google's AI classifier made a claim about each father's photos that informed Google's decision to disable his account and report him, after which police investigated and cleared him. The account rests on the New York Times report and Google's own statements, which dispute that the decisions were wrong.

People described

Two fathers in the United States (San Francisco and Houston) whose photos of their toddler sons' medical conditions, taken at the request of a nurse or paediatrician, were flagged as child sexual abuse material

People reported harmed in this case

2 people

2 AI participants · 0 other people harmed

Two account holders: the San Francisco and Houston fathers whose accounts were disabled and who were investigated. Their sons, counted by the CyberTipline among potential new child victims, and the San Francisco father's wife are not counted as harmed people.

Counted once within this case. The same person may appear in other cases. This count does not establish AI causation.

Cite this case

Compiled per our published methodology: verification statuses, sourcing standards, and corrections process.

APA

NOPE. (2026). Google's AI flagged two fathers' medical photos of their toddlers as child abuse; accounts disabled, police investigated then cleared them, NYT reports. AI incidents. https://nope.net/incidents/2021-us-google-ai-flagged-fathers-medical-photos-of-toddlers-as-child-abuse-accounts-disabled-police-cleared

BibTeX

@misc{2021_us_google_ai_flagged_fathers_medical_photos_of_toddlers_as_child_abuse_accounts_disabled_police_cleared,
  title = {Google's AI flagged two fathers' medical photos of their toddlers as child abuse; accounts disabled, police investigated then cleared them, NYT reports},
  author = {NOPE},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {AI incidents},
  url = {https://nope.net/incidents/2021-us-google-ai-flagged-fathers-medical-photos-of-toddlers-as-child-abuse-accounts-disabled-police-cleared}
}

Related cases

Medium Unidentified facial recognition system

Reno casino's facial recognition wrongly matched a patron to a barred man and police jailed him for about eleven hours, his federal lawsuit alleges

Jason Killinger, a UPS truck driver, alleges in a federal civil-rights complaint filed in July 2025 that on 17 September 2023 the Peppermill Casino in Reno reported to police that its AI facial recognition software had identified him as a man barred from the casino months earlier. According to the complaint, casino security handcuffed him, and the responding Reno police officer, told the system had found a 100 percent match, did not examine his other identification and took him to jail as an unidentified person, where fingerprints confirmed who he was. The complaint says he was handcuffed for about four hours, starting in the casino security office, spent about eleven hours in police and jail custody, and was treated the next day for bruised wrists. According to the complaint, he was then charged with trespassing, and a prosecutor dismissed the charge without prejudice at the bench trial. Casino.org reports that he settled a suit against the casino. In March 2026 the court let him add the City of Reno and a municipal liability claim over facial recognition policies, but refused a new wrongful arrest claim against the officer on qualified immunity grounds. In September 2026 the ACLU, the ACLU of Nevada and the Innocence Project filed a proposed amicus brief supporting him. His September 2026 motion for partial summary judgment says a Reno police detective later concluded that the match was wrong and that he and the barred man were different people, and it cites a declaration by a former casino security officer, who worked there from about October 2024, that the system often alerted at 100 percent on the wrong people; in a declaration reported by Casino.org, the officer said he had never known the system to misidentify anyone. The case is ongoing.

High Grok

St. Clair v. xAI: writer says Grok made sexualised images of her, including from a photo at 14; a Texas court refuses to dismiss xAI's forum suit against her

Ashley St. Clair, a writer and political commentator with about 1 million followers on X, sued xAI in New York on 15 January 2026. She alleges that from on or about 4 January 2026 Grok, prompted by other X users, altered photos of her into sexualized images and published them on X, including one made from a photo of her at 14. She says @Grok told her that her images would not be used or altered without explicit consent, but many more images followed. She also says X's reporting channel found no violation and that X removed her Premium subscription, verification checkmark and monetization. She says she has suffered serious pain, mental distress and humiliation. The same day, xAI sued her in federal court in Texas, arguing that its terms of service required her to sue there. On 23 June 2026 the New York federal court ordered her case transferred to Texas. On 8 July the Second Circuit stayed that order administratively while it considers her mandamus petition, which was still pending on 24 August. On 20 October 2026 the Texas court denied her motion to dismiss xAI's suit, which is set for trial on 1 March 2027. No court has ruled on her allegations about the images.

Low Abridge (reported)

Class action alleges San Diego health system Sharp's Abridge AI scribe recorded a patient's exam-room visit without consent and charted false consent

A proposed class action filed in San Diego Superior Court in late 2025 alleges that Sharp HealthCare, which began using the AI documentation app Abridge in April 2025, recorded doctor-patient conversations without telling patients, sent the audio to the vendor's servers and used it to generate draft medical notes. According to the lawsuit as reported by KPBS, the named plaintiff discovered that a July appointment at a Sharp clinic had been recorded only when he read his medical notes; the clinic apologised, acknowledged the recording and told him the file could stay on the vendor's servers for about a month. The complaint also alleges that Abridge inserted statements into charts that patients had been advised of the recording and had consented, when the plaintiff says that never happened. It seeks damages, corrected medical records and an order against using the tool without consent, and estimates that more than 100,000 patients may have been recorded. Sharp told reporters it could not comment on pending litigation. The allegations have not been tested in court in the sources read.

Medium Snapchat content-flagging system

Washington, Illinois: Snapchat flagged a student teacher's private joke to the FBI; she was arrested at her school and lost her placement

On 29 January 2025, a 22-year-old student teacher at a District 50 elementary school in Washington, Illinois, vented in a private Snapchat group chat with her boyfriend and two roommates after a third-grade student turned off her computer mid lesson-plan, asking whether she should 'shoot the child or just the whole school' (per sheriff's reports). Snapchat's systems flagged the message and warned the FBI, which notified the Tazewell County Sheriff's Office at 1:06 p.m. Deputies interviewed her at the school, confirmed she sent it as a joke, searched her phone and belongings with her consent and found no weapons, and arrested her on a disorderly conduct charge; they concluded she had spoken out of 'exasperation' with no intent to harm and no threat to the school. The district told parents she would not return to complete her educational assignment.

If you or someone you know is struggling, free and confidential support is available. Find a helpline near you at Signpost.