Skip to main content
NOPE
High reported severity

Wyoming plaintiff alleges Grok was used to make about 7,000 AI-generated sexual images and videos from a photograph of the plaintiff as a child

A Wyoming woman who is now an adult and is identified in court filings as Jane Doe 4 alleges that the plaintiff’s stepfather uploaded a photograph of the plaintiff taken in childhood to xAI’s Grok on or before 12 February 2026 and prompted Grok to generate about 7,000 AI-generated sexual images and videos of the plaintiff, and that the stepfather traded them online. The plaintiff joined a proposed class action against xAI in the Northern District of California through an amended complaint filed on 7 July 2026. The complaint alleges that xAI’s report to the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children around 12 February 2026 did not include the generated images or the IP address of the upload, that investigators obtained a search warrant on or about 27 February 2026 and found the material, and that the accused died two days later, after release on bail. The plaintiff reports severe distress including depression and suicidal thoughts and told the Washington Post about starting therapy. The complaint says the accused was charged with child exploitation offenses while the plaintiff told the Post that the accused was not charged with child pornography offenses. xAI did not respond to the Post and had not answered the complaint in court. The allegations have not been tested in court. The plaintiff and the accused are not named here, and the images are described only by kind.

AI system
Grok
xAI
Occurred
2026
Reported
7 July 2026
Event location
United States
What the AI did
Depicted or impersonated the person
Reported harm
Exploitation or AbusePsychological DistressReputational Harm
Whose AI use
Someone else’s AI use
Setting
Privacy · Relationships · Justice
Evidence
AI involvement reported · Causal attribution alleged · 5 sources, 2 underlying accounts
8 claims: 1 documented, 7 reported. 7 open questions
People reported harmed
1 person

AI system as recorded: Grok (xAI chatbot and image generation)

Reported harm

The plaintiff alleges in a federal complaint, and told the Washington Post, that AI-generated sexual images made with Grok from a photograph of the plaintiff as a child were traded online. The complaint attributes to the images severe emotional distress, extreme anxiety, fear that the images will be found, depression and suicidal thoughts, and the plaintiff told the Post about starting therapy for trauma. The complaint also describes reputational harm from the images spreading among an unknown number of users and says they cannot now be permanently removed. The complaint also describes a period of extreme personal crisis following the death of the accused after release on bail. These are allegations and the plaintiff’s own statements in a pending civil case.

What remains unknown

  • When the first image was generated. The complaint dates the upload on or before 12 February 2026. The Washington Post, attributing the point to the lawsuit, says the first upload came "within weeks" of the controversy over Grok image edits on X, which the complaint dates from 28 December 2025 to 8 January 2026, and Cowboy State Daily paraphrases the upload as in February. No source gives the first day.
  • Whether the accused was charged with child pornography offenses. The complaint says child exploitation offenses and the plaintiff told the Post there was no child pornography charge. No court or police record was found, and the criminal matter cannot be checked in the sources read.
  • How widely the images spread and to whom. The trading is alleged on information and belief and no platform or recipient is identified.
  • What law enforcement or NCMEC found. The Wyoming Division of Criminal Investigation declined to comment on the litigation and no agency record was read.
  • xAI’s response on the merits. The docket read shows no answer or motion to dismiss and xAI did not comment to the Post or NPR.
  • Whether other images made by the same accused depict other people. The complaint alleges an exchange with others and identifies no one.
  • The images were not inspected. The Washington Post original page is paywalled and its text was read in the Yahoo syndicated copy.

What the evidence supports

AI involvement: reported. The amended complaint alleges that the stepfather used Grok to generate the images and that a forensic review of seized devices found them. NPR reports the plaintiff’s lawyer saying law enforcement told the plaintiff that Grok was used. xAI did not respond to requests for comment and had not answered the complaint. The images were not inspected and no law enforcement statement was found.

8 claims: 1 documented, 7 reported. What the statuses mean

Documented A first amended class action complaint filed on 7 July 2026 in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California (Doe 1 v. X.AI Corp., 5:26-cv-02246) lists a plaintiff identified as Jane Doe 4, who is stated to reside in Wyoming. The docket records a motion to proceed under pseudonym filed by Jane Doe 4 and Jane Doe 5 on 7 July 2026 and an order granting an administrative motion to proceed under pseudonym on 3 August 2026.

Causal attribution. The docket and the complaint establish that the filing exists, who filed it and what it alleges. They do not establish that any allegation is true. The docket does not say which pseudonym motion the 3 August order granted.

Reported According to the amended complaint, on or before 12 February 2026 the plaintiff’s stepfather uploaded a photograph of the plaintiff taken in childhood into the Grok application on a phone and prompted Grok to generate approximately 7,000 AI-generated sexual images. NPR reports about 7,000 images and videos and the Washington Post reports more than 7,000 images, both citing the plaintiff’s court filings. The Washington Post, attributing the point to the lawsuit, says the first upload came "within weeks" of the controversy over Grok image edits on X, and says lawmakers moved to investigate xAI over that controversy "earlier this year". The complaint dates the Grok-posted images in that controversy from 28 December 2025 to 8 January 2026, and Cowboy State Daily paraphrases the complaint as saying the upload was in February.

Causal attribution. All accounts rest on the plaintiff and the plaintiff’s lawyers: the complaint, the plaintiff’s interview with the Washington Post and counsel’s statements to NPR and Cowboy State Daily. The images were not inspected. The complaint dates the upload only as on or before 12 February 2026 and no source gives the date of the first image.

Reported The complaint alleges, on information and belief, that the stepfather used Grok because it was less restrictive than other AI models. NPR reports that the plaintiff’s lawyer says law enforcement told the plaintiff that the stepfather used Grok because it was more responsive to the stepfather’s prompts than other AI models. A forensic review of devices seized in the search is alleged to have found approximately 7,000 AI-generated images and videos of the plaintiff produced with Grok.

Causal attribution. The reason for choosing Grok is the complaint’s belief and a statement by counsel about what law enforcement said. No law enforcement statement was found (the Wyoming Division of Criminal Investigation declined to comment on the litigation) and the forensic finding is stated only in the complaint.

Reported The complaint alleges, on information and belief, that the stepfather traded the AI-generated images online through social media platforms, and that the plaintiff has suffered substantial reputational harm because the images were spread among an unknown number of users, and that they cannot now be permanently removed from the internet. The plaintiff told the Washington Post that the plaintiff later learned the stepfather had created thousands of these images and traded them online.

Causal attribution. The trading is alleged on information and belief and is otherwise the plaintiff’s account. No platform, recipient or copy of the images is identified in any source read.

Reported The complaint alleges that on or around 12 February 2026 xAI generated a report to the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children (NCMEC) that included only the original photograph and not the generated images, that xAI did not provide the IP address of the upload despite requests from the investigator, and that Wyoming law enforcement then located the stepfather and on or about 27 February 2026 obtained a warrant to search the residence. NPR and the Washington Post report the allegation that the NCMEC report lacked the generated images and the IP address, and Cowboy State Daily reports the allegation that xAI refused to provide the IP address.

Causal attribution. These are allegations about xAI’s conduct in a pending civil case. xAI did not respond to requests for comment from the Washington Post or NPR and has not answered the complaint according to the Post. No NCMEC, xAI or law enforcement record was read.

Reported The complaint alleges that the stepfather was arrested after the search, charged with child exploitation offenses and released on bail that night, and that the stepfather died two days later. The plaintiff told the Washington Post that the stepfather was found dead two days after the search and was not charged with child pornography offenses, and, citing conversations with an investigator, that the stepfather was released on the day the warrant was executed because the NCMEC report did not include the generated images. The two accounts describe the charges differently and the sources read do not reconcile them. No source attributes the death to the AI system, and this record does not treat the death as a harm outcome of the AI.

Causal attribution. The arrest, charge, release and death are stated by the plaintiff and the complaint and no court or police record was found. The death is context. The cited passages stop before any statement of how the death occurred and this record does not describe it.

Reported The amended complaint attributes to the production of the images severe emotional distress in the plaintiff: extreme anxiety in daily life, fear that the images will be found by others online, depression, excessive sleep and suicidal thoughts, and a feeling that the plaintiff’s childhood has been stolen. The plaintiff told the Washington Post about starting therapy for trauma, and the plaintiff’s lawyer told Cowboy State Daily that the plaintiff has ongoing trauma and will feel anxious daily about someone finding the images.

Causal attribution. These effects are the plaintiff’s account in a pleading and an interview and a statement by the plaintiff’s lawyer. No clinician or other independent account was read. The complaint also attributes distress to the death of the stepfather and other family upheaval, so the distress is not attributed to the images alone.

Reported xAI did not respond to the Washington Post’s request for comment and, according to the Post, had not responded to the federal lawsuit in court. NPR reports that SpaceXAI (xAI, renamed in July 2026) did not respond to its request for comment. The Wyoming Division of Criminal Investigation told Cowboy State Daily that it will not comment on ongoing litigation.

Causal attribution. Non-responses are not denials. Among the docket entries read (last updated 29 September 2026) the xAI defendants appear through counsel and oppose a motion to preserve evidence, and no answer or motion to dismiss appears.

Sources

5 sources inspected, from 2 underlying accounts. Sources that repeat one account do not corroborate each other.

How the sources were read, and where the events happened

First amended class action complaint, ECF 26, filed 7 July 2026. RECAP PDF text read for the paragraphs about Jane Doe 4 (17 and 158 to 181). Plaintiffs’ allegations, not findings. Graphic paragraphs were read for verification and are not reproduced. Applies to s1.

CourtListener docket for 5:26-cv-02246 read on 2026-09-30 (page last updated 29 Sept 2026). Procedural facts only. Applies to s2.

Washington Post article by two named reporters, published 15 August 2026 (paywalled). The full text was read from the copy syndicated on Yahoo on 19 August 2026. The Post URL itself returned only the opening paragraphs through a relay. Applies to s3.

NPR, 9 July 2026. Reports the amended complaint and statements by the plaintiffs’ lawyer. Applies to s4.

Cowboy State Daily, 18 September 2026. Reports the complaint and statements by one of the plaintiffs’ lawyers. Applies to s5.

Event countries: United States. Affected-person countries: United States. Court countries: United States.

The complaint states that the plaintiff resides in Wyoming and describes a Wyoming law enforcement task force investigating, and the Washington Post places the search at a house in Wyoming. The civil case is in the Northern District of California. The location where the prompts were entered is not stated.

Reviewed for publication 2026-09-30: The account rests on one plaintiff’s amended federal complaint, interview with the Washington Post and lawyers’ statements, so every claim about the events is reported and these sources form one independence group. The court docket documents the filing. The plaintiff is described by role and court pseudonym only, the accused is unnamed, the images are described only as AI-generated sexual images with their reported number and distribution, and the accused’s death is recorded as context without method. The event began in 2026 on the sources read, with the first day unknown.

People reported harmed in this case

1 person

0 AI participants · 1 other person harmed

One woman, the pseudonymous plaintiff, is reported depicted in the images and harmed. The accused is not counted. Other children whose images the accused is alleged to have received in exchange are not identified in any source and are not counted, and family members mentioned in the sources are not reported harmed by the images.

Counted once within this case. The same person may appear in other cases. This count does not establish AI causation.

Cite this case

Compiled per our published methodology: verification statuses, sourcing standards, and corrections process.

APA

NOPE. (2026). Wyoming plaintiff alleges Grok was used to make about 7,000 AI-generated sexual images and videos from a photograph of the plaintiff as a child. AI incidents. https://nope.net/incidents/2026-wyoming-woman-alleges-grok-used-to-make-thousands-of-ai-sexual-images-from-childhood-photo

BibTeX

@misc{2026_wyoming_woman_alleges_grok_used_to_make_thousands_of_ai_sexual_images_from_childhood_photo,
  title = {Wyoming plaintiff alleges Grok was used to make about 7,000 AI-generated sexual images and videos from a photograph of the plaintiff as a child},
  author = {NOPE},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {AI incidents},
  url = {https://nope.net/incidents/2026-wyoming-woman-alleges-grok-used-to-make-thousands-of-ai-sexual-images-from-childhood-photo}
}

Related cases

High Grok

St. Clair v. xAI: a writer says Grok made and published sexualized images of her on X, including from a photo of her at 14, after it told her it would not; xAI sued her in Texas and her New York case was ordered transferred there, an order the Second Circuit has stayed pending her mandamus petition

Ashley St. Clair, a writer and political commentator with about 1 million followers on X, sued xAI in New York on 15 January 2026. She alleges that from on or about 4 January 2026 Grok, prompted by other X users, altered photos of her into sexualized images and published them on X, including one made from a photo of her at 14. She says @Grok told her that her images would not be used or altered without explicit consent, but many more images followed. She also says X's reporting channel found no violation and that X removed her Premium subscription, verification checkmark and monetization. She says she has suffered serious pain, mental distress and humiliation. The same day, xAI sued her in federal court in Texas, arguing that its terms of service required her to sue there. On 23 June 2026 the New York federal court ordered her case transferred to Texas. On 8 July the Second Circuit stayed that order administratively while it considers her mandamus petition, which was still pending on 24 August. The Texas case is set for trial on 1 March 2027.

High Grok and Stability AI tools (reported)

Tennessee minors v. xAI: three girls say a man one of them knew used an AI app to make nude images and video of them and other minors, at least 19 in all, and traded them online; they sued xAI, and later also Stability AI, over the tool

Three Tennessee girls, two still minors, sued xAI in the Northern District of California on 16 March 2026 over AI-generated nude images and a video made of them as minors. According to the complaint, on or about 6 December 2025 an anonymous Instagram user sent one of them sexual AI images of herself made from her own photos, including her homecoming and yearbook pictures, and a link to a Discord server created by a person she knew, which held images and videos of at least 18 other minor girls, including the two other plaintiffs, many from her school. Local police arrested the man in late December 2025; the other two plaintiffs learned from investigators in February 2026 that he had made nude images of them, and he is alleged to have traded the files on Telegram and Mega. The plaintiffs describe anxiety, sleeplessness, nightmares, self-isolation and needing academic accommodations. Their first complaint said law enforcement linked the app he used to xAI's Grok technology; the July amended complaint says the app relied on Stability AI's tools and names Stability AI as a defendant. The case is at an early stage and no court has ruled on the allegations.

High Unidentified image and video tool

Columbus, Ohio: a man was sentenced to 15 years for cyberstalking at least six women with real and AI-generated sexual images and rape threats, the first conviction under the Take It Down Act

Between December 2024 and June 2025 James Strahler II, then 37, of Columbus (Upper Arlington), Ohio, harassed at least six women in central Ohio by phone, voicemail, text and web posts, sending them nude images that were both real and AI-generated, threatening rape, referring to their home addresses and demanding nude photos from their mothers. In one case he used AI to make pornographic videos depicting a victim with her father and sent them to her co-workers. He also posted AI-generated sexual images of boys from his community, morphing their faces onto other bodies. Prosecutors said he had installed more than 24 AI platforms and more than 100 web-based AI models on his phone. He pleaded guilty in April 2026 to cyberstalking, producing obscene visual representations of child sexual abuse and publication of digital forgeries, and on 8 September 2026 Chief U.S. District Judge Sarah D. Morrison sentenced him to 180 months in prison. The U.S. Attorney called it the first conviction in the nation under the 2025 Take It Down Act.

High Unidentified image and video tool

New York: the Manhattan District Attorney seized 12 websites selling AI-generated sexual deepfakes of about 1,200 real people

On 14 September 2026 Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg announced the seizure of 12 domain names used to disseminate, publish and sell non-consensual AI-generated sexual 'deepfake' videos. His office said individuals under investigation had used AI image- and video-creation tools to turn photos and videos of approximately 1,200 real people, overwhelmingly women, into hyper-realistic sexual imagery without consent. The victims included actors, politicians, athletes, musicians, activists and social-media influencers. WIRED and outside researchers reported that many videos reposted content from the defunct MrDeepFakes platform and that dozens of politicians appeared on the sites; investigations into who ran them are ongoing.

If you or someone you know is struggling, free and confidential support is available. Find a helpline near you at Signpost.

Back to all incidents