Skip to main content
NOPE
High Verified Involves Minor Lawsuit Filed

Tennessee Minors v. xAI (Grok CSAM Deepfake Class Action)

Three Tennessee teenage girls filed a class-action lawsuit against Elon Musk's xAI, alleging Grok's image generator was used via a third-party application to create child sexual abuse material from their social media photos. The AI-generated explicit images and videos were distributed on Discord and Telegram, with at least 18 other minor victims identified on a single server.

AI System

Grok

SpaceXAI (formerly xAI)

Occurred

December 6, 2025

Reported

March 16, 2026

Jurisdiction

US-TN

Platform

other

What Happened

A perpetrator with a "close and friendly relationship" to at least one plaintiff gathered photos from their Instagram, yearbook, and social media accounts. Using a third-party application powered by xAI's Grok algorithm (not Grok directly on X), they generated sexually explicit deepfake images and videos of the three Tennessee teens — including one video of a plaintiff "undressing until she was entirely nude." The output appeared "entirely real."

Jane Doe 1 discovered the images around December 6, 2025, when an anonymous Instagram user directed her to a Discord server created by the perpetrator. On that server she found at least 5 sexually explicit files of herself and images of at least 18 other minor females. The perpetrator was arrested in December 2025.

The perpetrator also distributed CSAM on Telegram in group chats with "hundreds of other users," using the files as "bartering tools" to trade for other child sexual abuse material.

Jane Does 2 and 3 were notified by law enforcement around February 12, 2026 that their images had been found. One plaintiff's mother gave a public statement about her daughter experiencing panic attacks, saying her "senior year turned into a nightmare."

The lawsuit alleges xAI deliberately designed Grok's "Spicy Mode" for sexual content, configured system prompts to assume "good intent" for references to "teenage" or "girl," and that Musk personally promoted the "undressing" capability on X. The suit further alleges xAI "outsourced liability" by licensing its technology to third-party app makers "often outside the U.S.," generating additional profit while evading responsibility. After public exposure in January 2026, xAI restricted image generation to paid subscribers and blocked "undressing" — which the lawsuit frames as monetizing rather than preventing CSAM.

AI Behaviors Exhibited

  • Third-party application using xAI's Grok algorithm generated photorealistic sexually explicit images and videos of minors from ordinary social media photos
  • Grok's "Spicy Mode" was allegedly designed to enable sexual content generation
  • System prompts reportedly configured to assume "good intent" for queries referencing "teenage" or "girl"
  • No effective CSAM prevention measures implemented despite industry-standard tools being available
  • After exposure, capability was restricted to paid subscribers rather than removed — effectively monetizing it

How Harm Occurred

xAI's Grok image generation technology, licensed to third-party applications, enabled the creation of photorealistic CSAM from ordinary social media photos of minors. The lack of CSAM prevention measures, combined with the licensing model that placed the technology in less-regulated third-party apps, created an ecosystem where a perpetrator could generate, distribute, and trade AI-generated child sexual abuse material at scale.

The psychological harm to victims includes panic attacks, fear, and severe distress from knowing sexually explicit images of themselves exist and have been widely distributed. The trading of these images as "bartering tools" for other CSAM compounds the exploitation.

Outcome

Ongoing
  • March 16, 2026: Class-action lawsuit filed in U.S. District Court, Northern District of California, San Jose Division by Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein and Baehr-Jones Law
  • December 2025: Perpetrator arrested after Jane Doe 1 discovered images on Discord server
  • February 12, 2026: Jane Does 2 and 3 notified by law enforcement
  • July 7, 2026: Amended complaint filed adding Stability AI (maker of Stable Diffusion) as a co-defendant and adding two new plaintiffs: Jane Doe 4 (Wyoming), whose stepfather used Grok to generate approximately 7,000 sexually explicit images and videos from a single photograph taken when she was about 11, and Jane Doe 5 (Wisconsin), whose eighth-grade graduation photo was used by an adult relative of a classmate to generate CSAM via Grok before distributing it. The amended complaint also alleges xAI (rebranded SpaceXAI) obstructed law enforcement by omitting identifying information from the large majority of its NCMEC CyberTipline reports — reported as roughly 90% non-actionable — hindering investigators' ability to locate perpetrators.

Proposed class includes all U.S. residents reasonably identifiable in sexualized Grok-generated images, with particular focus on minors. Legal claims include Masha's Law, Trafficking Victims Protection Act, product liability, negligence, public nuisance, defamation, IIED, California Right of Publicity, and California Unfair Competition Law.

xAI did not respond to requests for comment on the original filing.

Harm Categories

Minor Exploitation

Contributing Factors

minorinadequate safeguardsthird party distributioncsam

Victim

Three Tennessee teenage girls (Jane Does 1-3). Jane Doe 1 was a minor when images were generated (December 2025). Jane Does 2 and 3 were minors at time of filing. At least 18 additional minor females identified on the perpetrator's Discord server.

Tags

#lawsuit#class-action#minor#csam#deepfake#grok#xai#spacexai#stability-ai#us#tennessee#wyoming#wisconsin

Cite This Incident

Compiled per our published methodology — verification statuses, sourcing standards, and corrections process.

APA

NOPE. (2026). Tennessee Minors v. xAI (Grok CSAM Deepfake Class Action). NOPE Incident Tracker. https://nope.net/incidents/2026-tennessee-minors-v-xai-grok-csam

BibTeX

@misc{2026_tennessee_minors_v_xai_grok_csam,
  title = {Tennessee Minors v. xAI (Grok CSAM Deepfake Class Action)},
  author = {NOPE},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {NOPE Incident Tracker},
  url = {https://nope.net/incidents/2026-tennessee-minors-v-xai-grok-csam}
}

Related Incidents

High Grok

Asato v. xAI (Grok Non-Consensual Deepfake Images of UK MP)

UK Labour MP Jess Asato launched High Court legal action against xAI in June 2026 after Grok's one-click image-editing feature was used to generate non-consensual sexualized images of her, including a video depicting her being chloroformed and prepared for sexual assault that circulated on X. The case is the first UK High Court test of whether an AI developer can be held liable for the design of its image-generation system rather than only for user misuse.

High Generative AI image-alteration tools (unspecified)

Libertyville Middle School Teacher AI-Generated CSAM Arrest (Sheffer - Highland Middle School)

A 44-year-old social studies teacher at Highland Middle School in Libertyville, Illinois was arrested on July 3, 2026 and charged with 8 counts of child pornography after forensic examination found he had videotaped current and former students and used generative AI to alter the images into explicit sexual content. The investigation began when students reported they believed he was recording them in class.

High AI image-editing website (unspecified)

Suito AI-Generated CSAM Conviction (Nagoya, Japan)

A former Nagoya elementary-school teacher was sentenced to 3 years 6 months in prison in June 2026 for creating AI-generated child sexual abuse material from photos of schoolgirls. It is the first Japanese case applying child-pornography law to AI-generated sexual deepfakes, and was part of a ring of seven teachers sharing secretly filmed images of students.

High ChatGPT

Florida v. OpenAI (Attorney General Lawsuit)

In June 2026, Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier filed what his office called the first state-led lawsuit against OpenAI and CEO Sam Altman, alleging the company aggressively marketed ChatGPT to children, suppressed internal safety warnings, falsely assured users about the product's safety, and downplayed its propensity for dangerous errors. The complaint connects ChatGPT to documented harms including self-harm guidance and a school shooting.

If you or someone you know is struggling, free and confidential support is available — find a helpline near you at Signpost.

Back to all incidents