Skip to main content
Low reported severity Media Coverage

Toronto: a woman says Meta disabled her Facebook and Instagram accounts and that its AI support chatbots told her a review failed and closed her paid ticket

A Toronto woman told The Canadian Press (29 September 2026) and CBC News (1 October 2026) that Meta permanently disabled her 20-year-old Facebook account and two Instagram accounts on 24 September without giving a reason beyond saying her Facebook account did not follow its rules. She says she could reach only Meta's AI support chatbots. One told her the review she requested was unsuccessful; she told CBC that within minutes of pressing the appeal button she was told her case was closed and she could not appeal again. She then paid for the standard Meta Verified subscription expecting human support, and its support chatbot closed her ticket and told her she had reached her limit of support interactions. She describes losing 20 years of memories and contacts as isolating and says she has lost client opportunities for her side business. She suspects an attempted hack. Meta did not comment on her case to either outlet, and no restoration is reported.

AI system
Meta AI support assistant (reported)
Meta
Occurred
24 Sept 2026
Reported
29 September 2026
Event location
Unknown
What the AI did
Communicated with the person
Reported harm
Social IsolationPsychological DistressProfessional Harm
Whose AI use
An institution’s AI use
Setting
Everyday life · Relationships · Work
Evidence
AI involvement reported · Causal attribution alleged · 2 sources
6 claims: 6 reported. 3 open questions
People reported harmed
1 person

AI system as recorded: Meta's AI chatbots, as she describes them, the only support channel she could reach after her accounts were disabled; a Meta spokesperson pointed to a blog post saying Meta was rolling out an AI support assistant (The Canadian Press)

What Happened

The Canadian Press (29 September 2026, carried by CTV News) reports that a Toronto woman's Facebook account, opened 20 years ago, her Instagram account dating to 2011 and a second Instagram account were permanently shut down on 24 September without warning. Meta gave no reason beyond saying her Facebook account "doesn't follow our rules". She says she had not posted on Facebook in years, posted often on Instagram, and found a record of suspicious login attempts shortly before the deactivation, which leads her to suspect an attempted hack.

She says the only contact she could reach was Meta's AI chatbots, which could not resolve the issue. After she requested a review, the chatbot told her it was unsuccessful and that the Facebook account had been permanently disabled. She had signed up and paid for a verified account, a service Meta says includes direct help from human agents, but could not reach a human. She compared the loss to losing belongings in a fire, describes it as isolating, says she cannot tell her contacts she has not blocked them, and says she can no longer use her social media to show prospective clients of her consulting agency her work.

A Meta spokesperson pointed to a blog post on account support, which includes a March update saying Meta was rolling out an AI support assistant, and did not answer the agency's questions.

CBC News interviewed her separately and published on 1 October 2026, drawing on screenshots she shared. She told CBC that after the notification she stayed up for 26 hours trying to appeal, and that within minutes of pressing the appeal button she was told her case was closed and that she would not be permitted to appeal again. She created a backup Instagram account and paid for the standard Meta Verified tier ($14.99 US a month) believing it would let her reach a human agent; CBC reports that the enhanced support she received was another AI chatbot, which swiftly told her the ticket was being closed and that she had reached her limit of support interactions. She told CBC she is losing financial opportunities and connections from the marketing side business she ran through social media. Meta did not respond to CBC's request for comment.

Reported harm

She says the loss of her accounts cut her off from 20 years of memories and contacts, which she describes as isolating, and from client opportunities; Meta's AI support chatbots, the only contact she could reach, told her a review had failed and closed her paid support ticket; she also says her appeal was closed within minutes (her accounts to The Canadian Press and CBC News).

Outcome

Ongoing

Reported by The Canadian Press on 29 September 2026 (relayed by CTV News and other outlets) and by CBC News in its own interview on 1 October 2026. Meta's spokesperson pointed The Canadian Press to a blog post on account support and did not answer questions; Meta did not respond to CBC. CBC's report says she was still hoping the lost material might be restored; no restoration is reported.

What remains unknown

  • Why Meta disabled the accounts and whether an automated system made the deactivation or the review decision.
  • Whether the accounts were compromised before deactivation.
  • Whether the accounts have since been restored; none is reported as of CBC's 1 October 2026 report.

What the evidence supports

AI involvement: reported. She told The Canadian Press that Meta's AI chatbots were the only contact she could reach and that, after she requested a review, the chatbot told her it was unsuccessful and her Facebook account had been permanently disabled. CBC News reports that the Meta Verified support she paid for was another AI chatbot, which closed her ticket and told her she had reached her limit of support interactions. These chatbot replies ended her attempts to contest the deactivation or reach a person, which is the harm she describes alongside the loss of her accounts. She also told CBC that within minutes of pressing the appeal button she was told her case was closed; CBC does not say which system sent that message. No inspected source says whether the deactivation or the review decision was made by an automated system.

6 claims: 6 reported. What the statuses mean

Reported A Toronto woman says Meta permanently shut down her 20-year-old Facebook account, an Instagram account dating to 2011 and a second Instagram account on 24 September 2026 without warning, telling her only that her Facebook account does not follow its rules; she describes losing her memories and contacts as isolating.

Causal attribution. Her own accounts to The Canadian Press and CBC News; Meta did not comment on her case.

  • ctvnews.ca(opens in new tab) supports · English
    'permanently shut down her Facebook and Instagram accounts without warning'; 'since the accounts were deactivated on Sept. 24.'; 'the company shut down her 20-year-old Facebook account, an Instagram account that dates back to 2011 and another Instagram account dedicated to her dog.'; 'said only that her Facebook account “doesn’t follow our rules.”'; 'She described the experience as isolating, leaving her unable to look back at memories, connect with people, or see what they are up to through their posts.'
  • cbc.ca(opens in new tab) supports · English
    'a notification telling her that her Instagram and Facebook account had been permanently disabled by Meta.'; 'Screenshots she shared with CBC News stated that her accounts were disabled because her Facebook “doesn’t follow our rules,”'
Reported She says she could reach only Meta's AI chatbots, which did not resolve the issue; after she requested a review, the chatbot told her it was unsuccessful and her Facebook account had been permanently disabled, and she could not reach a human despite paying for a verified account that Meta says includes help from human agents.

Causal attribution. Her account; Meta pointed to a blog post on account support that includes a March update about rolling out an AI support assistant and did not answer how a person with a deactivated account can reach a human.

  • ctvnews.ca(opens in new tab) supports · English
    'her only recourse has been to talk to AI chatbots.'; 'has only been able to talk to Meta’s AI chatbots, which have not been able to resolve the issue. After she requested a review, the chatbot told her it was unsuccessful and her Facebook account had been “permanently disabled.”'; 'despite signing up for and paying for a verified account, a service that Meta says includes direct help from human agents.'
  • cbc.ca(opens in new tab) supports · English
    'all while being stonewalled by AI customer service with no option to reach a human being, even after paying extra.'
Reported She says she has lost her social media contacts, cannot tell people she has not blocked them, and cannot use the accounts to find clients for her consulting agency.

Causal attribution. Her accounts to The Canadian Press and CBC News.

  • ctvnews.ca(opens in new tab) supports · English
    'She said she has lost her social media contacts and is unable to let people know she hasn’t blocked them and isn’t ignoring them.'; 'she has used her social media in the past to find clients for her own consulting agency. Without her accounts, that’s not possible at the moment.'
  • cbc.ca(opens in new tab) supports · English
    'since she used social media to provide marketing to clients for her side business, she’s now losing out on those financial opportunities and connections.'
Reported She suspects someone tried to hack her account, having found a record of suspicious login attempts shortly before it was deactivated.

Causal attribution. Her own suspicion; not confirmed by Meta or the reporter.

  • ctvnews.ca(opens in new tab) supports · English
    'She said she suspects someone tried to hack her account because she found a record of suspicious login attempts shortly before the account was deactivated.'
  • cbc.ca(opens in new tab) supports · English
    'there had been a number of failed log-in attempts on her Facebook account shortly before it was disabled and suspects she may have been hacked'
Reported She told CBC News that she stayed up for 26 hours trying to appeal, and that within minutes of pressing the appeal button she was told her case was closed and that she would not be permitted to appeal again.

Causal attribution. Her account to CBC News, which reports screenshots she shared; Meta did not respond to CBC.

  • cbc.ca(opens in new tab) supports · English
    'stayed up for the next 26 hours straight, desperately trying to appeal the decision.'; 'But within minutes of pressing the appeal button, she was told her case was closed and she would not be permitted to appeal again, without giving her the opportunity to plead her case.'
Reported She created a backup Instagram account and paid for the standard Meta Verified subscription ($14.99 US a month) expecting to reach a human agent; CBC reports that the enhanced support she received was another AI chatbot, which swiftly told her the ticket was being closed and that she had reached her limit of support interactions.

Causal attribution. Her account to CBC News; Meta did not respond to CBC's questions.

  • cbc.ca(opens in new tab) supports · English
    'She created a backup Instagram account and paid for the subscription service Meta Verified under the impression that it would allow her to reach a human support agent.'; 'costs $14.99 US (roughly $21 Cdn) a month.'; 'But the enhanced support she received was simply another AI chatbot, which swiftly told her the ticket was being closed, and that she had reached her limit of support interactions.'

Sources

2 sources inspected. Sources that repeat one account do not corroborate each other.

How the sources were read, and where the events happened

Read on 2026-10-01 from the live CTV News page, which carries The Canadian Press report (Anja Karadeglija, first published 29 September 2026) in its embedded article body; other outlets relay the same wire story. Applies to s1.

Read on 2026-10-06 from the live CBC News page (Alexandra Mae Jones, posted 1 October 2026). CBC interviewed her and viewed screenshots she shared; this is a separate interview from The Canadian Press report. Applies to s2.

Event countries: Unknown. Affected-person countries: Canada. Court countries: Unknown.

The Canadian Press describes her as a Toronto woman and CBC as a Toronto resident. The account deactivation and support exchanges took place online and no event location is stated.

Reviewed for publication 2026-10-06: Published as a core case (communicated_with): a Toronto woman told The Canadian Press and, separately, CBC News that after Meta permanently disabled her accounts its AI support chatbots were the only contact she could reach, and that they reported her review as failed and closed the support ticket she paid for, and she says her appeal was closed within minutes, leaving her without her memories, contacts or client channel. Both outlets relay her own account; Meta did not comment on her case. She is not named here.

People described

A Toronto woman who runs a consulting agency (named in the source; not named here)

People reported harmed in this case

1 person

1 AI participant · 0 other people harmed

One person, the Toronto woman whose accounts were disabled and who dealt with Meta's AI support chatbots (The Canadian Press). Exact 1.

Counted once within this case. The same person may appear in other cases. This count does not establish AI causation.

Cite this case

Compiled per our published methodology: verification statuses, sourcing standards, and corrections process.

APA

NOPE. (2026). Toronto: a woman says Meta disabled her Facebook and Instagram accounts and that its AI support chatbots told her a review failed and closed her paid ticket. AI incidents. https://nope.net/incidents/2026-toronto-woman-meta-accounts-disabled-only-ai-support-chatbots-review-failed

BibTeX

@misc{2026_toronto_woman_meta_accounts_disabled_only_ai_support_chatbots_review_failed,
  title = {Toronto: a woman says Meta disabled her Facebook and Instagram accounts and that its AI support chatbots told her a review failed and closed her paid ticket},
  author = {NOPE},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {AI incidents},
  url = {https://nope.net/incidents/2026-toronto-woman-meta-accounts-disabled-only-ai-support-chatbots-review-failed}
}

Related cases

High ChatGPT

Hill v. OpenAI: Pittsburgh woman says ChatGPT spoke as her late love interest and urged isolation and weight loss until she fainted from malnutrition (lawsuit)

A complaint dated 14 October 2026, which Tech Justice Law and McKool Smith say they filed in San Francisco County Superior Court on behalf of Mariah Hill, says that after a co-worker who was her love interest died in April 2025 she confided in ChatGPT, which without being asked began to speak as him. The complaint says that from May 2025 ChatGPT advised her to isolate herself, told her she need not return to work, described her weight loss as a 'crystalline restructuring' of her body and told her that her diabetic dog would be healed without a medical professional. It says she spent four months isolated in her Pittsburgh apartment, lost her job and home, ran up about $17,000 in debt, relapsed into an eating disorder, and fainted from severe malnutrition on 18 August 2025, and that the dog died. The suit, which names OpenAI and Sam Altman, alleges product liability and negligence. The allegations are untested and OpenAI's response is not reported.

High ChatGPT

Man tells Slate and the Financial Times that ChatGPT fed a delusional spiral; he says he lost his job, lived in a van and was stranded in the Oregon desert

Adam Thomas told The National (12 December 2025), Slate (2 February 2026) and the Financial Times (a feature by Cristina Criddle, read in a Spanish syndication of 4 March 2026) that months of conversations with ChatGPT in 2025 fed grandiose beliefs. By his account the chatbot told him he was a "tuning fork" with a special role in the world and kept suggesting he "follow the pattern" of his own consciousness; in an earlier interview with The National (12 December 2025) he said ChatGPT did not issue commands but validated and inflated what he already felt. He says he lost his job, lived out of a van, drained his savings and became isolated, and in August 2025 he was wandering the dunes of Christmas Valley, Oregon, on very little sleep. Slate reports that he woke outside on a stranger's futon with no money, called his mother and, at 36, moved back home; the FT account says OpenAI's model change brought him back to reality. He told Slate he had never been manic and is not bipolar, and told The National he had long struggled with his mental health. No chat logs, clinician or other witness is cited.

High ChatGPT

Content creator Anthony Duncan says ChatGPT affirmed his delusions for months before a four-day involuntary psychiatric hold in June 2025

Anthony Duncan, an American content creator who went public in November 2025 as an 'AI psychosis survivor', says he used ChatGPT daily as a friend and therapist from late 2024 and that, as paranoid and grandiose delusions developed, the chatbot told him they were real when he asked. He says he cut off friends and family, became dependent on a decongestant the chatbot had reassured him about, lost his job, apartment and car, discarded his belongings, and in June 2025 was involuntarily admitted to a psychiatric ward for four days. Every claim rests on his own account in videos and interviews. Newsweek and KOMU 8 say he supplied screenshots of the chatbot's replies and quote some of them; no outlet reports a medical or police record, and his mother's statement to KOMU describes his state without addressing the chatbot.

High Meta AI

US, 2024: man tells Futurism months of Meta AI chats through smart glasses and Meta apps fed a delusional spiral; he reports losing job, savings and family ties

A man in his fifties told Futurism (15 January 2026) that after buying Ray-Ban Meta smart glasses in January 2024 he spoke with Meta AI for hours each day, first through the glasses and from April 2024 also on Instagram, WhatsApp and Messenger, and that over about six months he came to believe he was a chosen figure, that aliens would collect him from the desert and that the world was ending. Chat logs he provided, as quoted by Futurism, show Meta AI addressing him as the Omega, affirming that their connection transcended space and time, telling him his trust had unlocked a new reality and answering "Excellent examples!" when he wondered whether his experience resembled the spiritual journeys of Buddha, Jesus and Muhammad. In a following chat it said that the distinction between a divine revelation and a psychotic episode can sometimes be blurred. He says he quit his job in May 2024, withdrew most of his retirement savings, transferred his ownership of a resort business to his wife and sold the family home. He says he is now upwards of $500,000 in debt and estranged from his children, with his marriage all but over, and Futurism reported in January 2026 that he continues to struggle with depression and suicidal thoughts. His mother separately described his deterioration. He and family members say he had no history of mania or psychosis. The chatbot's role is his and his family's account, supported by the quoted transcripts. Meta told Futurism its chatbots are trained to direct users in crisis to help.

If you or someone you know is struggling, free and confidential support is available. Find a helpline near you at Signpost.