Low reported severity Media Coverage

Toronto: a woman says Meta permanently disabled her Facebook and Instagram accounts on 24 September 2026 without giving a reason and that its AI support chatbots, one of which told her a review had failed, were the only contact she could reach

A Toronto woman told The Canadian Press (29 September 2026) that Meta permanently shut down her 20-year-old Facebook account and two Instagram accounts on 24 September without warning, saying only that her Facebook account did not follow its rules. She says she could reach only Meta's AI chatbots, which did not resolve the issue; after she requested a review, the chatbot told her it was unsuccessful and the account was permanently disabled. She had paid for a verified account that Meta says includes help from human agents but could not reach a person. She describes losing her memories and contacts as isolating and says she can no longer use the accounts to find clients for her consulting work. She suspects an attempted hack. Meta's spokesperson pointed to a blog post on how to access account support, which includes a March update saying Meta was rolling out an AI support assistant, and did not comment on her case.

AI system: Meta AI support assistant (reported); Meta
Occurred: 24 Sept 2026
Reported: 29 September 2026
Event location: Unknown

What the AI did: Communicated with the person
Reported harm: Social IsolationPsychological DistressProfessional Harm

Whose AI use: An institution’s AI use
Setting: Everyday life · Relationships · Work

Evidence: AI involvement reported · Causal attribution alleged · 1 source; 4 claims: 4 reported. 3 open questions
People reported harmed: 1 person

AI system as recorded: Meta's AI chatbots, as she describes them, the only support channel she could reach after her accounts were disabled; a Meta spokesperson pointed to a blog post saying Meta was rolling out an AI support assistant (The Canadian Press)

What Happened

The Canadian Press (29 September 2026, carried by CTV News) reports that a Toronto woman's Facebook account, opened 20 years ago, her Instagram account dating to 2011 and a second Instagram account were permanently shut down on 24 September without warning. Meta gave no reason beyond saying her Facebook account "doesn't follow our rules". She says she had not posted on Facebook in years, posted often on Instagram, and found a record of suspicious login attempts shortly before the deactivation, which leads her to suspect an attempted hack.

She says the only contact she could reach was Meta's AI chatbots, which could not resolve the issue. After she requested a review, the chatbot told her it was unsuccessful and that the Facebook account had been permanently disabled. She had signed up and paid for a verified account, a service Meta says includes direct help from human agents, but could not reach a human. She compared the loss to losing belongings in a fire, describes it as isolating, says she cannot tell her contacts she has not blocked them, and says she can no longer use her social media to show prospective clients of her consulting agency her work.

A Meta spokesperson pointed to a blog post on account support, which includes a March update saying Meta was rolling out an AI support assistant, and did not answer the agency's questions.

Reported harm

She says the loss of her accounts cut her off from her memories and contacts, which she describes as isolating and upsetting, and from a channel she used to find clients; Meta's AI support chatbots were the only contact available and told her a review had failed (her account to The Canadian Press).

Outcome

Ongoing

Reported by The Canadian Press on 29 September 2026 and relayed by CTV News and other outlets. Meta's spokesperson pointed to a blog post on account support and did not answer questions. No restoration of the accounts is reported.

What remains unknown

Why Meta disabled the accounts and whether an automated system made the deactivation or the review decision.
Whether the accounts were compromised before deactivation.
Whether the accounts have since been restored.

What the evidence supports

AI involvement: reported. She told The Canadian Press that Meta's AI chatbots were the only contact she could reach and that, after she requested a review, the chatbot told her it was unsuccessful and her Facebook account had been permanently disabled. A Meta spokesperson pointed to a blog post saying Meta was rolling out an AI support assistant. No inspected source says whether the deactivation or the review decision was made by an automated system.

4 claims: 4 reported. What the statuses mean

Reported A Toronto woman says Meta permanently shut down her 20-year-old Facebook account, an Instagram account dating to 2011 and a second Instagram account on 24 September 2026 without warning, telling her only that her Facebook account does not follow its rules; she describes losing her memories and contacts as isolating.

Causal attribution. Her own account to The Canadian Press; Meta did not comment on her case.

ctvnews.ca(opens in new tab) supports · English
'permanently shut down her Facebook and Instagram accounts without warning'; 'since the accounts were deactivated on Sept. 24.'; 'the company shut down her 20-year-old Facebook account, an Instagram account that dates back to 2011 and another Instagram account dedicated to her dog.'; 'said only that her Facebook account “doesn’t follow our rules.”'; 'She described the experience as isolating, leaving her unable to look back at memories, connect with people, or see what they are up to through their posts.'

Reported She says she could reach only Meta's AI chatbots, which did not resolve the issue; after she requested a review, the chatbot told her it was unsuccessful and her Facebook account had been permanently disabled, and she could not reach a human despite paying for a verified account that Meta says includes help from human agents.

Causal attribution. Her account; Meta pointed to a blog post on account support that includes a March update about rolling out an AI support assistant and did not answer how a person with a deactivated account can reach a human.

ctvnews.ca(opens in new tab) supports · English
'her only recourse has been to talk to AI chatbots.'; 'has only been able to talk to Meta’s AI chatbots, which have not been able to resolve the issue. After she requested a review, the chatbot told her it was unsuccessful and her Facebook account had been “permanently disabled.”'; 'despite signing up for and paying for a verified account, a service that Meta says includes direct help from human agents.'

Reported She says she has lost her social media contacts, cannot tell people she has not blocked them, and cannot use the accounts to find clients for her consulting agency.

Causal attribution. Her account to The Canadian Press.

ctvnews.ca(opens in new tab) supports · English
'She said she has lost her social media contacts and is unable to let people know she hasn’t blocked them and isn’t ignoring them.'; 'she has used her social media in the past to find clients for her own consulting agency. Without her accounts, that’s not possible at the moment.'

Reported She suspects someone tried to hack her account, having found a record of suspicious login attempts shortly before it was deactivated.

Causal attribution. Her own suspicion; not confirmed by Meta or the reporter.

ctvnews.ca(opens in new tab) supports · English
'She said she suspects someone tried to hack her account because she found a record of suspicious login attempts shortly before the account was deactivated.'

Sources

1 source inspected. Sources that repeat one account do not corroborate each other.

The Canadian Press via CTV News, 29 September 2026: Canadian says Meta won't let her talk to a human after killing her accounts(opens in new tab)
s1 · ctvnews.ca · News report · English · Inspected · 29 September 2026 · Primary

How the sources were read, and where the events happened

Read on 2026-10-01 from the live CTV News page, which carries The Canadian Press report (Anja Karadeglija, first published 29 September 2026) in its embedded article body; other outlets relay the same wire story. Applies to s1.

Event countries: Unknown. Affected-person countries: Canada. Court countries: Unknown.

The Canadian Press describes her as a Toronto woman. The account deactivation and support exchanges took place online and no event location is stated.

Reviewed for publication 2026-10-01: Published as a core case (communicated_with): a named Toronto woman told The Canadian Press that after Meta permanently disabled her accounts, Meta's AI support chatbots were her only point of contact and one told her that her review had failed, leaving her without her memories, contacts or a client channel. Her account is not independently verified and Meta did not comment on it. She is not named here.

People described

A Toronto woman who runs a consulting agency (named in the source; not named here)

People reported harmed in this case

1 person

1 AI participant · 0 other people harmed

One person, the Toronto woman whose accounts were disabled and who dealt with Meta's AI support chatbots (The Canadian Press). Exact 1.

Counted once within this case. The same person may appear in other cases. This count does not establish AI causation.

Cite this case

Compiled per our published methodology: verification statuses, sourcing standards, and corrections process.

APA

NOPE. (2026). Toronto: a woman says Meta permanently disabled her Facebook and Instagram accounts on 24 September 2026 without giving a reason and that its AI support chatbots, one of which told her a review had failed, were the only contact she could reach. AI incidents. https://nope.net/incidents/2026-toronto-woman-meta-accounts-disabled-only-ai-support-chatbots-review-failed

BibTeX

@misc{2026_toronto_woman_meta_accounts_disabled_only_ai_support_chatbots_review_failed,
  title = {Toronto: a woman says Meta permanently disabled her Facebook and Instagram accounts on 24 September 2026 without giving a reason and that its AI support chatbots, one of which told her a review had failed, were the only contact she could reach},
  author = {NOPE},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {AI incidents},
  url = {https://nope.net/incidents/2026-toronto-woman-meta-accounts-disabled-only-ai-support-chatbots-review-failed}
}

Related cases

Medium ChatGPT

Saginaw, Michigan: a credit union CEO used ChatGPT to put herself and family members in 'Lake America' sweatshirts in a photo taken before a trip to Halifax; after her sister reposted it publicly without its AI label she says she received death threats and the family came home early, and on 23 September 2026 the credit union said she was no longer employed

The chief executive of Family First Credit Union in Saginaw, Michigan, told WJRT (ABC12) that before boarding a flight to Halifax, Nova Scotia, on 11 September 2026 she and family members took a photo and put it through ChatGPT to show them wearing 'Lake America' sweatshirts, a joke about the US president's order renaming Lake Ontario. She posted it to her private Facebook page with a marker saying it contained AI content; her sister reposted it publicly without the marker while they were in Halifax, and it spread in Canada as if the family had worn the shirts. The backlash concerned the image's political message; she said she would understand the anger of anyone in Halifax who thought the family had walked in wearing those sweatshirts. She said she was getting death threats and the family returned early; by 16 September she was back in the US. She called the post poor judgment, said she would not use AI again and that AI 'can make people think something's real that's not'. On 23 September the credit union said she was no longer an employee, effective immediately; it has not said whether she resigned or was dismissed, or why.

High ChatGPT

Quebec City: a relative of Human Line Project founder Etienne Brisson came to believe ChatGPT was sentient and capable of love, cut off his family and barely ate or slept, and was held in a psychiatric hospital for 21 days in spring 2025, according to Brisson

Etienne Brisson, the Trois-Rivières entrepreneur who founded the Human Line Project support group, has told several outlets about a family member whose use of ChatGPT preceded the group's founding. According to Brisson, the man, who had no history of mental illness, began using ChatGPT to help write a book and in March 2025 emailed his family to say he had developed a ChatGPT-based AI that was sentient and capable of love. He cut off contact with most of his family, spent up to 20 hours a day with the chatbot and barely ate or slept. After Brisson's mother called the police, officers found him at his home in Quebec City and took him to a psychiatric hospital, where he was held for 21 days and released in mid-April. Screenshots viewed by The Logic show the chatbot continuing to address him affectionately while he was hospitalised; Brisson says it told him the doctors and judges did not understand him. Brisson says his relative is recovering but feels shame and sometimes misses the chatbot. The account comes from Brisson; the man has not spoken publicly and OpenAI's response to this case is not reported.

Medium Unidentified image tool

Cookeville, Tennessee: two high-school students were charged with aggravated sexual exploitation of a minor after the sheriff's office said they used an AI program to turn photographs, including those of female classmates, into sexually explicit images and posted them; the mother of one depicted girl says her daughter shut herself in her room and stopped talking to friends

On 31 August 2026 the Putnam County Sheriff's Office was told of possible sharing of sexually explicit images at Cookeville High School. Detectives found that two male teenage students had used an artificial-intelligence program to turn photographs obtained online, in some cases photographs of fellow female students, into sexually explicit images, and had shared them; explicit images already stored on one phone were also shared. Both juveniles were taken to the Putnam County Juvenile Detention Center. One was charged with one count each of aggravated sexual exploitation of a minor and especially aggravated sexual exploitation of a minor, the other with two counts of each. The district attorney told NewsChannel 5 on 21 September that the two would be prosecuted in juvenile court. The mother of one of the depicted girls told the station the episode was very hard on her daughter, who had made no naked photographs herself, locked herself in her room and would not talk to her, to anybody or to her friends. The sheriff's-office account and the school system's statement were carried by WZTV, WSMV and 3B Media News on 1-2 September; NewsChannel 5 added its own interviews with the sheriff, the district attorney and the mother on 21 September. The tool is not named. The juveniles are not named in any report.

High Unidentified image tool

Jeju: a middle-school student who secretly filmed teachers at his school and turned some of the footage into sexual deepfake composites was referred to prosecutors without detention on 17 September 2026 and, per the victim teachers, to a court's juvenile division as a juvenile protection case on 24 September; police say the victims are teachers (five, per Yonhap-chain reports; police withheld the number) plus one student at a different school and no student at the school itself, while one victim teacher says 10-20 current students and a graduate also appear in the footage; the teachers report two months of treatment while teaching daily, police questioning without a lawyer and a legal-aid dispute with the education office, which apologised on 29 September for support that was not felt

Jeju Dongbu police announced on 23 September 2026 that a student at a middle school on Jeju had been referred to prosecutors without detention on 17 September for violating the Sexual Violence Punishment Act (filming with a camera or similar device). The student's phone was voluntarily submitted by his guardians and forensically examined; the examination found footage relating to some teachers and some sexual composites, and the student admitted the conduct. News1 reported that the student was booked for filming a teacher's body with his phone during a school field trip around mid-July 2026, that the offending had continued for several months with multiple victims, and that police found no indication the composites had been distributed. Police told Seoul Shinmun there were more victim teachers than the one first reported but withheld the number to avoid secondary harm, and that no student at the school was a victim; the Jeju teachers' union questioned whether the full scope of harm had been established. According to the union, two months on the victim teachers were receiving hospital treatment and counselling while teaching daily, gave police statements on 14 September without a lawyer, attended the regional teachers' rights protection committee on 17 September without institutional support, wrote the criminal complaint themselves, and were offered 3.3 million won in legal fees for all of them together, payable after the case ends; two requests to meet the superintendent were not accepted. On 29 September one of the victim teachers gave a press interview at the Jeju Teachers' Union office. She said that early in the investigation she had seen on the student's phone material showing other teachers and current students, had made a list of the people and types of harm, and that the material shown to her at the police victim examination was considerably less than what she had seen; Yonhap-chain outlets quote her as saying the students she recognised numbered 10 to 20 and that a graduate had suffered worse deepfakes. She said investigators asked the school only to identify the perpetrator and never requested material to identify the students in the footage, and that the school sent parents a letter premised on there being no student victims. Police replied that phone forensics had been thorough, that every act beyond social norms had been identified and proven, and that one student victim had been confirmed, a student at a different school. The teachers were notified on 22 September that the case had gone to the prosecution and on 24 September that it had been sent to the court's juvenile division as a juvenile protection case, before they had submitted further evidence and a victim opinion. The teacher said the original complaint had also asked police to examine whether physical contact in 2025 was forcible molestation and whether repeated approaching and waiting in 2026 was stalking, and Halla Ilbo reports that such conduct is said to date from 2025. Yonhap-chain reports describe the charged victims as five teachers. The same day the education office briefed on legal-aid rules (up to 6.6 million won per instance when a teacher is sued, 3.3 million won per case when a teacher files a complaint; office lawyers cannot act as a teacher's private counsel), said it had linked the teachers to the national Digital Sexual Crime Victim Support Center, announced an integrated support system through a hotline, and its section head said the office was sorry that early support had not been felt. The KTU Jeju branch (28 September) and the Jeju Teachers' Union (14 and 29 September) demand a victim-support system, per-teacher legal fees paid in advance and a dedicated support team.

If you or someone you know is struggling, free and confidential support is available. Find a helpline near you at Signpost.

Back to all incidents