Girls at a Tasmanian school reportedly depicted in AI-generated sexual images shared in a boys' group chat
Police in Tasmania received a report about alleged illegal online activity involving a group of students at a school in the south of the state, and on 19 March 2026 a local outlet reported that the incident may have involved AI-generated content. On 29 April 2026 the ABC reported, citing Tasmania Police, that girls at the school had their likenesses used to make AI-generated sexual images. Two parents told the ABC that police said 21 girls had been identified as victims, that the AI-altered photos were shared in a boys' group chat and that the images appeared to have been taken from social media. Five boys are alleged to have created the images and have left the school. Tasmania Police said no charges were laid and the five youths were dealt with under the Youth Justice Act. The parents said their daughters felt isolated and unsupported, and the school principal denied that families were advised to withhold information from their children. The creation date and the AI tool are not reported.
- AI system
- Unidentified image tool
- Unknown
- Occurred
- Event date unknown
- Reported
- 19 March 2026
- Event location
- Australia
- What the AI did
- Depicted or impersonated the person
- Reported harm
- Exploitation or AbusePsychological Distress
- Whose AI use
- Someone else’s AI use
- Setting
- Education · Privacy
- Evidence
- AI involvement reported · Causal attribution alleged · 4 sources, 2 underlying accounts
- 7 claims: 1 disputed, 6 reported. 7 open questions
- People reported harmed
- At least 21 people
AI system as recorded: Unspecified AI image-manipulation software
Reported harm
Tasmania Police, as relayed by the ABC, said girls' likenesses were used to make AI-generated sexual images, and two parents said police told them 21 girls had been identified as victims. The parents said their daughters felt isolated, unsupported and unsure whom to talk to, and a mother's letter to the education minister describes confusion, isolation and shame among the girls. These are parents' accounts relayed by one outlet and no girl is quoted.
What remains unknown
- No source states when the images were created or first shared. The earliest date in the sources is early March 2026, when a parent said the incident was being talked about. An ABC item of 5 July 2026 describes the incident as occurring 'earlier this year', and an ABC podcast page of 8 May 2026 asks what teenagers were doing 'over the school holidays' and says the images 'might not have been created in the classroom'. Neither gives a date, so the event start date is unknown.
- The AI tool and the app or platform used for the group chat are not reported.
- The girls' ages and school years are not reported. The sources call them girls, students, daughters and children.
- The count of 21 comes from two parents relaying what police told them. Police published no count in the inspected sources, and the number of girls not yet told is unknown.
- A local outlet quotes a school letter referring to students from the school and from other local schools. Whether students from other schools created, received or were depicted in the images is not reported.
- How each girl was affected beyond the parents' accounts is not reported, and no girl is quoted.
- The identity of the five youths and any later police or school outcome beyond the dealt-with-under-the-Youth-Justice-Act statement are not reported.
What the evidence supports
AI involvement: reported. Tasmania Police, as relayed by the ABC, said girls' likenesses were used to make AI-generated sexual images, and two parents said police described the photos as AI-altered. The first local report (19 March 2026) said only that the incident may have involved AI-generated content. No AI tool is named and the images were not seen by the reviewer.
7 claims: 1 disputed, 6 reported. What the statuses mean
Reported Tasmania Police said, as reported by the ABC, that a number of girls at the school had their likenesses used to make AI-generated sexual images. Two parents said police told them the AI-altered photos were shared in a boys' group chat and appeared to have been taken from social media.
Causal attribution. A Tasmania Police attribution stated by the ABC and two parents' account of what police told them. The images and the AI tool were not verified by the reviewer and no tool is named.
- abc.net.au(opens in new tab) supports · English
have had their images used to make deepfake pornographic material, according to Tasmania Police.
- abc.net.au(opens in new tab) supports · English
who told them the AI-altered photos of the girls had been shared in a boys' group chat and that their images appeared to have been taken from social media.
- abc.net.au(opens in new tab) supports · English
The faked images of the girls were allegedly shared in a group chat by male students.
- pulsetasmania.com.au(opens in new tab) context · English
It is understood the incident may have involved the alleged use of AI-generated content.
Reported Two parents said police told them 21 girls had been identified as victims.
Causal attribution. Second-hand: two parents relaying a police figure to one ABC reporter. Police published no count in the inspected sources.
- abc.net.au(opens in new tab) supports · English
Parents of two of the children said they were told by police that 21 victims had been identified.
- abc.net.au(opens in new tab) supports · English
The parents said police told them 21 girls had been identified as victims.
Reported Five boys are alleged to have created the images and have left the school.
Causal attribution. An allegation the ABC states in the sentence after the parents' account of what police told them, without naming its source. No charge or finding establishes who created the images.
- abc.net.au(opens in new tab) supports · English
Five boys are alleged to have created the images and all have since left the school.
- abc.net.au(opens in new tab) supports · English
Five boys have left the school and police said no charges had been laid.
Reported Two parents said their daughters felt isolated and unsupported because they did not know whether peers had been told. One mother told the education minister in a letter that the girls' uncertainty about what they could say to students who had not been told had created confusion, isolation and shame among the girls.
Causal attribution. Parents' accounts relayed by the ABC. No girl is quoted and no clinical assessment is reported.
- abc.net.au(opens in new tab) supports · English
Both parents said their daughters were struggling with not being able to talk about it with their friends.
- abc.net.au(opens in new tab) supports · English
This has created an environment of confusion, isolation, and shame amongst the very girls who need support and solidarity the most.
- abc.net.au(opens in new tab) supports · English
The two parents told the ABC their daughters felt isolated and unsupported because they did not know if any of their peers had been told.
- abc.net.au(opens in new tab) supports · English
not knowing who to talk to
Disputed Two parents said senior school staff told them most parents were not going to tell their children they had been identified. The school principal wrote to families that at no time had families been advised or encouraged to withhold information.
Causal attribution. A parents' account and the principal's written denial, both relayed by the ABC. The dispute concerns the school's handling, not how the images were made.
- abc.net.au(opens in new tab) supports · English
the staff member told her most parents were not going to tell their children they had been identified in the material
- abc.net.au(opens in new tab) supports · English
I felt I was being encouraged not to tell my daughter
- abc.net.au(opens in new tab) supports · English
that most parents were not going to tell their daughters
- abc.net.au(opens in new tab) supports · English
and went on to advise them that most parents were not going to tell their children
- abc.net.au(opens in new tab) contradicts · English
At no time have families been advised or encouraged to withhold information from their child, nor to prevent their child from speaking with trusted adults.
Reported Tasmania Police received a report of alleged illegal online activity involving a group of students at a school in the south of the state. On 19 March 2026 Pulse Tasmania reported that, as the outlet understood it, the incident may have involved AI-generated content.
Causal attribution. A police spokesperson statement to Pulse Tasmania. The AI involvement is the outlet's understanding and is not attributed to police in this article.
- pulsetasmania.com.au(opens in new tab) supports · English
Tasmania Police has received a report regarding alleged illegal online activity involving a group of students at a southern Tasmanian school
- pulsetasmania.com.au(opens in new tab) supports · English
It is understood the incident may have involved the alleged use of AI-generated content.
Reported Police spoke to five young people and their parents. No charges were laid and the five youths were dealt with under the Youth Justice Act.
Causal attribution. Tasmania Police statements given to Pulse Tasmania (27 March 2026) and the ABC (29 April 2026). Both may relay one police position, so no independent corroboration is claimed.
- pulsetasmania.com.au(opens in new tab) supports · English
Police said they have spoken to five young people and their parents following concerns about inappropriate online activity.
- pulsetasmania.com.au(opens in new tab) supports · English
The youths were dealt with under the Youth Justice Act and no charges were laid.
- abc.net.au(opens in new tab) supports · English
Tasmania Police said no charges had been laid, with "the five youths being dealt with in accordance with the Youth Justice Act".
Sources
4 sources inspected, from 2 underlying accounts. Sources that repeat one account do not corroborate each other.
- ABC News (29 Apr 2026): parents criticise a Tasmanian school response after girls were targeted in an AI deepfake incident(opens in new tab)
s1 · abc.net.au · News report · English · Inspected · Shares an underlying account with another listed source · Primary
- ABC News (30 Apr 2026): the school principal's denial and one parent's response(opens in new tab)
s2 · abc.net.au · News report · English · Inspected · 30 April 2026 · Shares an underlying account with another listed source
- Pulse Tasmania (19 Mar 2026): police investigation of alleged online activity by students, AI-generated content understood to be involved(opens in new tab)
s3 · pulsetasmania.com.au · News report · English · Inspected · 19 March 2026 · Shares an underlying account with another listed source
- Pulse Tasmania (27 Mar 2026): no charges, five youths dealt with under the Youth Justice Act(opens in new tab)
s4 · pulsetasmania.com.au · News report · English · Inspected · 27 March 2026 · Shares an underlying account with another listed source
How the sources were read, and where the events happened
Full article body read (29 April 2026, updated 30 April). Related-story cards on the page were not used. Applies to s1.
Full article body read (30 April 2026, updated 1 May). Same reporter and same two parents as s1, so one independence group. Applies to s2.
Full article body read. Based on a police spokesperson statement and a school letter to parents. Publication date 19 March 2026 from the article header line in the saved text ('Thu March 19, 2026 5:00am'), which matches the published-time metadata in the saved html. Applies to s3.
Full article body read. Same outlet and same police and school chain as s3. Publication date 27 March 2026 from the article header line in the saved text ('Fri March 27, 2026 2:52pm'), which matches the published-time metadata in the saved html. Applies to s4.
Event countries: Australia. Affected-person countries: Australia. Court countries: Unknown.
The sources describe a school in Tasmania, Tasmania Police, a police statement citing the Youth Justice Act and the Tasmanian education minister. No court proceeding is reported.
Reviewed for publication 2026-09-30: Reports by the ABC (29 and 30 April 2026) and Pulse Tasmania (19 and 27 March 2026). All claims are reported except one that is disputed (the school's advice to parents): the victim count, the alleged creators and the images come from parents relaying police information and from police statements to the two outlets. The school, students, parents, principal and staff are not named and no image detail is given. No source dates the creation of the images, so the case is published undated and outside the 2026 event-year lane.
People reported harmed in this case
At least 21 people
0 AI participants · 21 other people harmed
Two parents told the ABC that police told them 21 girls had been identified as victims (ABC, 29 and 30 April 2026). The figure is a police count relayed by two parents to one reporter and repeated by the outlet. Police published no count in the inspected sources. 21 is used as a lower bound because it counts identified victims only.
Counted once within this case. The same person may appear in other cases. This count does not establish AI causation.
Cite this case
Compiled per our published methodology: verification statuses, sourcing standards, and corrections process.
APA
NOPE. (2026). Girls at a Tasmanian school reportedly depicted in AI-generated sexual images shared in a boys' group chat. AI incidents. https://nope.net/incidents/2026-tasmania-school-reported-ai-sexual-images-of-girls-shared-in-boys-group-chat
BibTeX
@misc{2026_tasmania_school_reported_ai_sexual_images_of_girls_shared_in_boys_group_chat,
title = {Girls at a Tasmanian school reportedly depicted in AI-generated sexual images shared in a boys' group chat},
author = {NOPE},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {AI incidents},
url = {https://nope.net/incidents/2026-tasmania-school-reported-ai-sexual-images-of-girls-shared-in-boys-group-chat}
} Related cases
Perth woman tells PerthNow men at a Scarborough pub covertly photographed her and a friend and used an AI program to make sexualised images shown to the pair
A Perth woman told PerthNow (report carried by The West Australian and The Nightly, 7 October 2026) that on a Friday night at a Scarborough venue a group of eight to ten men sitting nearby began bantering with her and a friend, and that one of them photographed her without her knowledge, put the photo into an AI program and altered it into sexualised content showing her kissing several of the men. According to her account the men passed the image around and showed it to the two women while laughing, and had also made sexual content from a photo of her friend. The women reported the men to the venue, which banned them, and to Western Australia Police; in messages seen by PerthNow a detective wrote that there was at that point no law covering AI-created photos or media, while a WA Police spokesperson said state legislation criminalises non-consensual distribution of intimate images including AI-altered ones and that a statutory review is considering possession. The man who allegedly made the image later messaged her that he had made it as a joke and apologised. The images are not reported to have been distributed online; the tool is not identified; the account is the woman's own, with the man's private messages and the police correspondence as described by the newspaper.
Cookeville, Tennessee: two high-school students were charged with aggravated sexual exploitation of a minor after the sheriff's office said they used an AI program to turn photographs, including those of female classmates, into sexually explicit images and posted them; the mother of one depicted girl says her daughter shut herself in her room and stopped talking to friends
On 31 August 2026 the Putnam County Sheriff's Office was told of possible sharing of sexually explicit images at Cookeville High School. Detectives found that two male teenage students had used an artificial-intelligence program to turn photographs obtained online, in some cases photographs of fellow female students, into sexually explicit images, and had shared them; explicit images already stored on one phone were also shared. Both juveniles were taken to the Putnam County Juvenile Detention Center. One was charged with one count each of aggravated sexual exploitation of a minor and especially aggravated sexual exploitation of a minor, the other with two counts of each. The district attorney told NewsChannel 5 on 21 September that the two would be prosecuted in juvenile court. The mother of one of the depicted girls told the station the episode was very hard on her daughter, who had made no naked photographs herself, locked herself in her room and would not talk to her, to anybody or to her friends. The sheriff's-office account and the school system's statement were carried by WZTV, WSMV and 3B Media News on 1-2 September; NewsChannel 5 added its own interviews with the sheriff, the district attorney and the mother on 21 September. The tool is not named. The juveniles are not named in any report.
Chile: Puente Alto students find AI-made fake nude images of female classmates, families say; school suspends those involved, Superintendency investigates
Teletrece reported on 3 October 2026 that on 10 July 2026 female students at a secondary school in Puente Alto, Chile, found fake sexual images of themselves and other students on a classmate's phone. Families say the images were made with AI tools from ordinary photos the girls had posted on Instagram, that four students took part in obtaining, editing and circulating them, and that the material reached other students. Some of the girls had panic attacks, according to their parents. The school suspended the students identified as responsible for 15 days; after their return, parents say, they mocked the girls, a fight followed, and a parent accuses the father of one of the students involved of threats and of loitering near the school, after which she says they filed reports with the PDI. The Superintendencia de Educación confirmed a formal investigation of the school.
Edmonton: two 14-year-old junior high students charged with making and possessing child sexual exploitation materials and voyeurism after police allege they used AI software to sexualise photos of female classmates taken at school without consent and from social media
The Alberta Law Enforcement Response Teams (ALERT) Internet Child Exploitation unit announced on 17 June 2026 that two 14-year-old boys at an Edmonton junior high school had been charged on 1 June with making and possessing child sexual exploitation materials and voyeurism. Police allege the boys took photos of girls at their school without consent and from the girls' social media accounts and used AI software to sexualise them; several students were identified as victims and police said the number could be more than ten pending forensic review. A teacher reported the matter to police in late March 2026 after students complained. Police said the evidence so far indicates the images were shared between the two boys rather than more widely, but that word of their existence spread through the school. The lead investigator said the girls were left with intense shame and embarrassment and that some are now too scared to post on social media. The software has not been identified; the school and the accused are not named to protect the victims. CBC, Global News, CTV News and The Canadian Press covered the release and news conference.
If you or someone you know is struggling, free and confidential support is available. Find a helpline near you at Signpost.