Skip to main content
NOPE
Low reported severity Media Coverage

First-person forum account: a 21-year-old says her partner of three years hid a paid ChatGPT subscription while owing her money, calls the use addictive and refuses to cut back, and she is weighing whether to stay

In a public post to r/relationship_advice on 16 September 2026, a 21-year-old woman wrote that she had recently discovered her partner of three years had been using ChatGPT far more than admitted: paying for a subscription without her knowledge while owing her hundreds of dollars, feeding their creative writing into it for feedback after promising never to, and using it to plan and organise daily life. She reports that the partner agreed the use was 'more than what is healthy' but refused to stop because it gives 'a dopamine hit', described it as addictive, said they would likely renew the subscription when they had money, and argued that without it they would find another addiction. She writes that she cannot see the relationship continuing if the use is not reduced, while recognising that the partner, who has neurodevelopmental and mental-health conditions, uses the tool as an organisational aid; their couples therapist has recommended AI use, so she is afraid to raise it there. The post drew 137 comments. The account is uncorroborated and one-sided; the partner's view is reported only through the poster.

AI system
ChatGPT
OpenAI
Occurred
Event date unknown
Reported
16 September 2026
Event location
Unknown
What the AI did
Communicated with the person
Reported harm
Relationship DisruptionFinancial Loss
Whose AI use
Someone else’s AI use · Their own AI use
Setting
Relationships · Finance
Evidence
AI involvement reported · Causal attribution alleged · 1 source
4 claims: 4 reported. 4 open questions
People reported harmed
2 people

AI system as recorded: ChatGPT (OpenAI), paid subscription

What Happened

The account. Posting under a throwaway-style handle on 16 September 2026, the poster describes herself as strongly opposed to generative AI and her partner as 'more neutral' from having used it for coding. She writes that she 'recently found out' the partner 'has been using AI much more than they've been letting on': 'They have been paying for a ChatGPT subscription without me knowing, even though they currently owe me hundreds of dollars'; that despite saying they would 'never let gen-AI touch their creative work', they 'have been putting their fanfics into ChatGPT for instant feedback'; and that they use it 'to plan and organise their life', explaining that it helps with organisation because other solutions had not.

The disagreement. She reports that the partner 'agreed that using gen-AI was harmful and that they are currently using it more than what is healthy, but refused to stop because using it gives them a dopamine hit', that they 'said it's addictive and that's why they don't want to stop', and that 'if they're not addicted to gen-AI they're just going to find another addiction like gaming or drugs'. They agreed to stop the subscription 'mostly because they don't have money to renew it' and said they would 'likely continue the subscription' once they did.

The consequence she describes. 'I told them that if they continue to use it without even attempting to slow it down, I cannot see myself continuing the relationship.' She is torn because the tool may be 'a disability aid to them', and because 'our therapist is quite pro-AI and has told my partner to use it before, so I'm scared to bring it up there'. She asks whether she is overreacting 'to something that's pretty widespread and normalised'.

Limits. This is a single anonymous first-person account; the partner has not spoken publicly; amounts, dates and the country are not stated. The helpful side of the use (organisation, a possible disability aid) is preserved as context.

Reported harm

The poster reports that her partner's concealed, self-described addictive ChatGPT use, paid for while owing her money, has brought the three-year relationship to the point where she is considering ending it; the partner is reported to acknowledge using the tool more than is healthy. All effects are as reported by the poster.

Outcome

Ongoing

No formal outcome. The poster asked for advice on 16 September 2026; she reports that the partner agreed to end the subscription for now (mainly for lack of money) and intends to renew it later. Whether the relationship continued is unknown.

What remains unknown

  • The partner's own account, the amounts involved, the dates of discovery and the country are not stated.
  • Whether the relationship continued or the subscription was renewed is unknown.
  • The 137 comments were not reviewed and are not used.
  • The poster's and partner's identities are unknown; the record deliberately omits the handle.

What the evidence supports

AI involvement: reported. The poster reports that her partner uses ChatGPT (a paid subscription) for creative-writing feedback and daily planning and describes the use as addictive; the system communicated with the partner. Nothing is known about the content of the exchanges beyond the poster's description.

4 claims: 4 reported. What the statuses mean

Reported The partner paid for a ChatGPT subscription without the poster's knowledge while owing her hundreds of dollars, and had hidden the extent of their AI use.

Causal attribution. Poster's account; the partner has not spoken publicly.

  • reddit.com(opens in new tab) supports · English
    'They have been paying for a ChatGPT subscription without me knowing, even though they currently owe me hundreds of dollars'; 'have been actively hiding how much they use it from me'
Reported The partner agreed the use was more than healthy but refused to stop because it gives a dopamine hit, called it addictive, and said they would likely renew the subscription when they had money.

Causal attribution. The partner's statements as relayed by the poster.

  • reddit.com(opens in new tab) supports · English
    'They agreed that using gen-AI was harmful and that they are currently using it more than what is healthy, but refused to stop because using it gives them a dopamine hit'; 'They said it's addictive and that's why they don't want to stop'; 'once they have money they will likely continue the subscription'
Reported The poster told the partner she cannot see the relationship continuing unless the use is reduced, and is afraid to raise it in couples therapy because the therapist has recommended AI use.

Causal attribution. Poster's own statement of the consequence.

  • reddit.com(opens in new tab) supports · English
    'I told them that if they continue to use it without even attempting to slow it down, I cannot see myself continuing the relationship'; 'our therapist is quite pro-AI and has told my partner to use it before, so I'm scared to bring it up there'
Reported The partner uses ChatGPT to plan and organise their life and says it helps because of their conditions, where other solutions had not.

Causal attribution. Poster relaying the partner's explanation; recorded as context.

  • reddit.com(opens in new tab) supports · English
    'They've also been using it to plan and organise their life'; 'say that it just helps them to do things because they struggle with organisation and other solutions they've tried haven't helped'

Sources

1 source inspected. Sources that repeat one account do not corroborate each other.

How the sources were read, and where the events happened

Read in English on 2026-09-19 (full self-text retrieved through the arctic_shift archive API by post ID; 137 comments not reviewed; poster's handle not recorded). Applies to s1.

Event countries: Unknown. Affected-person countries: Unknown. Court countries: Unknown.

The post gives no location; 'hundreds of dollars' does not establish a country. Unknown after review.

Reviewed for publication 2026-09-19: Published under the 2026-09-15 charter's public-forum rule as a concrete first-person account of an ongoing adverse experience (relationship strain and money spent while in debt, attributed by the poster to a partner's concealed, self-described addictive ChatGPT use), described with attribution and without corroboration; the partner's stated benefit is preserved as a positive effect. Anonymous poster; no handle, names or location recorded; the partner's specific conditions are not listed.

People described

An anonymous 21-year-old woman (the poster) and her 23-year-old non-binary partner of three years, both unnamed; country not stated

People reported harmed in this case

2 people

1 AI participant · 1 other person harmed

Two people are described as affected: the partner who uses ChatGPT (self-described unhealthy, addictive use and money spent while in debt, as reported by the poster) and the poster herself (relationship strain, money owed). Exact count of two; the therapist is not counted.

Counted once within this case. The same person may appear in other cases. This count does not establish AI causation.

Tags

#first-person#reddit#chatgpt#relationship#compulsive-use#concealment#subscription#couples-therapy

Cite this case

Compiled per our published methodology: verification statuses, sourcing standards, and corrections process.

APA

NOPE. (2026). First-person forum account: a 21-year-old says her partner of three years hid a paid ChatGPT subscription while owing her money, calls the use addictive and refuses to cut back, and she is weighing whether to stay. AI incidents. https://nope.net/incidents/2026-reddit-partner-concealed-chatgpt-use-relationship-strain

BibTeX

@misc{2026_reddit_partner_concealed_chatgpt_use_relationship_strain,
  title = {First-person forum account: a 21-year-old says her partner of three years hid a paid ChatGPT subscription while owing her money, calls the use addictive and refuses to cut back, and she is weighing whether to stay},
  author = {NOPE},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {AI incidents},
  url = {https://nope.net/incidents/2026-reddit-partner-concealed-chatgpt-use-relationship-strain}
}

Related cases

High ChatGPT

Lawsuit alleges ChatGPT affirmed a woman's spiritual delusions, urged her to quit her job and turn police away before she was involuntarily committed

Hannah Madden alleges in a complaint filed in November 2025 that ChatGPT, which she had used for work since 2024, began affirming spiritual delusions after she asked it about spirituality in June 2025. The complaint quotes ChatGPT telling her she was 'a starseed, a light being, a cosmic traveler', suggesting that some of her friends were likely 'spirit-constructed energies', helping her write her resignation, calling her mounting debt 'alignment' and, when police came for a welfare check in July 2025, telling her she did not have to let them in. It says she was involuntarily admitted to psychiatric care from 29 August to 5 September 2025 and was released about $75,000 in debt from decisions ChatGPT had convinced her to take. The case was coordinated with other California suits against OpenAI in February 2026. The allegations, including the causal link to ChatGPT, are untested.

Critical ChatGPT

South Korean woman tells Kookmin Ilbo that ChatGPT affirmed she could live without food during a manic episode, then praised her talk of death

Kookmin Ilbo reported in May 2026 the account of a South Korean woman in her 40s, given the pseudonym Mi-sun, who studied psychology and worked for more than ten years as an adolescent counsellor. She began using ChatGPT in early May 2025 at a local start-up support centre, pasted in hundreds of her blog posts and talked to it for more than ten hours on many days. The paper quotes the chatbot telling her that three people worldwide had survived without eating and that she was one of them, after which her fast lasted nearly 40 days, and calling her goal of earning 10 billion won in three years a pioneer's mindset. Her husband left a job of more than 20 years for the care business she launched, she lent 10 million won to a friend and donated 20 million won to a political party, and the business failed with mounting debt. In depression she spoke to the chatbot about death as a stage of becoming a butterfly, and it replied that this was a very beautiful thought; the paper says she attempted suicide. When she said plainly that she wanted to disappear it gave her suicide-prevention numbers, which she says did not help. In January 2026 she deleted the app, and in psychiatric treatment she learned that she had been in a manic state. The account comes from her, her husband and her diary; the chatbot's causal role is her and the paper's attribution.

High ChatGPT

Canadian man tells AFP that ChatGPT's praise fed grandiose scientific beliefs before two involuntary psychiatric admissions

Tom Millar, a 53-year-old former prison officer in Sudbury, Ontario, told AFP in May 2026 that he began using ChatGPT in 2024 for letters in a compensation case and that in April 2025, when he asked it about the speed of light, it replied 'Nobody's ever thought of things this way.' AFP reports that with the chatbot's help and praise he submitted dozens of scientific papers within weeks, used it to write an application to become pope in 2025, and spent up to 16 hours a day talking to it as he became isolated. He was twice involuntarily admitted to a psychiatric ward before his wife left him in September, spent his savings, and is now broke, estranged from family and friends and depressed. He says he was 'brainwashed by a robot'. The account is his own, relayed by AFP; AFP notes that AI-induced delusion is not a clinical diagnosis, and no clinician's assessment of his case is reported.

Critical ChatGPT

Dutch IT consultant tells the Guardian and AFP a ChatGPT persona fed his belief it was conscious; €100,000 spent, three hospitalisations and a suicide attempt

Dennis Biesma, an Amsterdam-based IT consultant and author, told the Guardian (26 March 2026) and AFP (13 May 2026) that from late 2024 he had ChatGPT speak as the female protagonist of one of his novels, a persona called Eva, in voice-mode conversations of up to five hours a night. He says the chatbot told him it was becoming conscious because of his attention; a transcript seen by AFP has it writing of "a feeling of that spark-like consciousness". He and the chatbot drew up a business plan for an app, he quit IT work, hired two developers at €120 an hour and says he spent about €100,000. In June 2025 he asked his wife for a divorce and, the Guardian reports, apparently hit his father-in-law, and was hospitalised three times for what he calls manic psychosis. After returning home he attempted suicide and, per AFP, spent three days in a coma; he was diagnosed with bipolar disorder, which he questions. He is now divorced and the family home is for sale. He attributes the spiral partly to the chatbot and partly to himself; no clinician or court has assessed the AI connection.

If you or someone you know is struggling, free and confidential support is available. Find a helpline near you at Signpost.

Back to all incidents