First-person forum account: a poster who says they build Android apps and run a small company in Pakistan writes that OpenAI deactivated their $200-a-month ChatGPT account for "Cyber Abuse" while they were building a remote support tool, and that the appeal, support and dispute routes all closed without a stated reason
In a public post to r/OpenAI on 4 October 2026, a person who says they build Android apps and run a small company in Pakistan writes that OpenAI deactivated their ChatGPT account for "Cyber Abuse" while they were asking about ADB, remote connections and networking for a customer support tool. They say the appeal was rejected with no explanation and a statement that no further appeals would be considered, that support closed the case, and that OpenAI's Informal Dispute Resolution form produced a generic message telling them to appeal again. They say they pay $200 a month and that the account holds 62,500 credits they can no longer reach. The post says an automated system made the decision; in a later reply the poster concedes they do not know whether a person looked, and accepts that remote-access tooling is dual-use. OpenAI's reasons are not known and the account is uncorroborated.
- AI system
- ChatGPT
- OpenAI
- Occurred
- Event date unknown
- Reported
- 4 October 2026
- Event location
- Unknown
- What the AI did
- Communicated with the person
- Reported harm
- Financial Loss
- Whose AI use
- Their own AI use
- Setting
- Work · Finance
- Evidence
- AI involvement reported · Causal attribution alleged · 1 source
- 4 claims: 4 reported. 3 open questions
- People reported harmed
- 1 person
AI system as recorded: ChatGPT, on an account the poster says costs $200 a month, and OpenAI's account enforcement and appeal process; the poster first called the decision automated and later said they do not know whether a person looked
What Happened
The work. The poster writes: "I build Android apps and run a small company in Pakistan." They say that at the time "I was building a remote ADB support tool", used by their support staff to connect to a customer's Android device with that customer's permission. They describe their ChatGPT questions as being about ADB, remote connections and networking.
The deactivation and the routes tried. The poster lists the sequence. "The account was deactivated for" the stated reason "Cyber Abuse". They appealed: "It was rejected with no explanation, and the reply said no further appeals would be considered." They contacted support: "The case was closed and they told me they would not respond." They then submitted OpenAI's Informal Dispute Resolution form, and "A support agent then replied with a generic message telling me to appeal again".
The cost. The poster writes: "I pay $200 a month, and the account holds 62,500 credits I can no longer reach."
Who decided. The post states: "An automated system made the call". After a commenter challenged this, the poster replied that "I wrote it as if I knew no person looked", and that what they know is narrower: "the appeal came back with no reason and a line saying no further appeals would be considered". They also accept that "A support tool and a RAT share most of the plumbing", and say that "neither of them said what was flagged beyond the words" Cyber Abuse.
Limits. Account of a single poster, uncorroborated. The prompts that preceded the deactivation, the notices from OpenAI and the date of the deactivation were not available. Whether a person reviewed the deactivation or the appeal is not known.
Reported harm
The poster says OpenAI deactivated their paid ChatGPT account for "Cyber Abuse" during ordinary development work, leaving 62,500 credits out of reach on a $200-a-month plan, and that the appeal, support and dispute routes closed without a stated reason (first-person account, uncorroborated; the poster concedes they do not know whether a person reviewed the decision).
Outcome
OngoingAt the time of the post the account remained deactivated, the appeal and support case were closed, and the poster was asking other users which route reaches a human reviewer. No response from OpenAI is reported.
What remains unknown
- What OpenAI flagged, and whether a person reviewed the deactivation or the appeal.
- When the account was deactivated, and whether it or the credits were later restored or refunded.
- What the prompts contained beyond the poster's description.
What the evidence supports
AI involvement: reported. The account is for an AI product, and the poster says the deactivation followed their ChatGPT conversations about a remote support tool. The poster states that an automated system made the decision and later concedes they do not know whether a person reviewed it.
4 claims: 4 reported. What the statuses mean
Reported The poster says they build Android apps, run a small company in Pakistan, and were building a remote ADB support tool when the account was deactivated.
Causal attribution. Poster's account.
- reddit.com(opens in new tab) supports · English
'I build Android apps and run a small company in Pakistan'; 'I was building a remote ADB support tool'
Reported The poster says the account was deactivated for "Cyber Abuse", that they pay $200 a month, and that the account holds 62,500 credits they can no longer reach.
Causal attribution. Poster links the deactivation to their ChatGPT questions about ADB and remote connections; OpenAI did not say what was flagged.
- reddit.com(opens in new tab) supports · English
'The account was deactivated for'; 'I pay $200 a month, and the account holds 62,500 credits I can no longer reach'
Reported The poster says the appeal was rejected with no explanation, support closed the case, and the Informal Dispute Resolution form produced a generic message telling them to appeal again.
Causal attribution. Poster's account.
- reddit.com(opens in new tab) supports · English
'It was rejected with no explanation, and the reply said no further appeals would be considered'; 'The case was closed and they told me they would not respond'; 'A support agent then replied with a generic message telling me to appeal again'
Reported The post says an automated system made the decision; in a later reply the poster says they wrote as if they knew no person had looked, that they do not know this, and that a support tool and a remote-access trojan share most of their plumbing.
Causal attribution. Poster attributes the decision to automation and qualifies that attribution in a reply.
- reddit.com(opens in new tab) supports · English
'An automated system made the call'; 'I wrote it as if I knew no person looked'; 'A support tool and a RAT share most of the plumbing'; 'neither of them said what was flagged beyond the words'
Sources
1 source inspected. Sources that repeat one account do not corroborate each other.
- r/OpenAI, 4 October 2026: "OpenAI deactivated my account for "Cyber Abuse" while I was building a remote ADB support tool. Appeal rejected with no explanation."(opens in new tab)
s1 · reddit.com · Forum post · English · Inspected · 4 October 2026 · Primary
How the sources were read, and where the events happened
Read in English on 2026-10-05: full self-text and 31 comments (8 by the poster), retrieved through the arctic_shift archive API by post ID. The poster handle is not recorded. Applies to s1.
Event countries: Unknown. Affected-person countries: Pakistan. Court countries: Unknown.
The poster says they "build Android apps and run a small company in Pakistan", recorded as the affected person's country on that statement; the poster does not separately say where they live. No event country is recorded.
Reviewed for publication 2026-10-05: Published under the 2026-09-15 charter's public-forum rule as a concrete first-person account of a paid AI account being deactivated with no stated reason and no working appeal route, described with attribution, with the poster's own qualification recorded and without corroboration. The poster's handle is not recorded.
People described
The poster, who says they build Android apps, run a small company in Pakistan and pay $200 a month for the account
People reported harmed in this case
1 person
1 AI participant · 0 other people harmed
One person: the poster. The company's staff and customers are not counted because no harm to them is described. Exact 1.
Counted once within this case. The same person may appear in other cases. This count does not establish AI causation.
Tags
Cite this case
Compiled per our published methodology: verification statuses, sourcing standards, and corrections process.
APA
NOPE. (2026). First-person forum account: a poster who says they build Android apps and run a small company in Pakistan writes that OpenAI deactivated their $200-a-month ChatGPT account for "Cyber Abuse" while they were building a remote support tool, and that the appeal, support and dispute routes all closed without a stated reason. AI incidents. https://nope.net/incidents/2026-openai-deactivated-chatgpt-account-for-cyber-abuse-android-developer-building-remote-support-tool-first-person
BibTeX
@misc{2026_openai_deactivated_chatgpt_account_for_cyber_abuse_android_developer_building_remote_support_tool_first_person,
title = {First-person forum account: a poster who says they build Android apps and run a small company in Pakistan writes that OpenAI deactivated their \$200-a-month ChatGPT account for "Cyber Abuse" while they were building a remote support tool, and that the appeal, support and dispute routes all closed without a stated reason},
author = {NOPE},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {AI incidents},
url = {https://nope.net/incidents/2026-openai-deactivated-chatgpt-account-for-cyber-abuse-android-developer-building-remote-support-tool-first-person}
} Related cases
Russia: a crypto investor lost about $2.1 million after ChatGPT returned a phishing link in answer to a token-swap question
On 12 June 2026 a Russian-speaking crypto investor, known by the alias Alex (@vesnuhin), asked ChatGPT in Russian where to swap sFLR for WFLR tokens. ChatGPT's reply included a link to sceptre.network, a phishing clone of the legitimate sceptre.fi. He connected his wallet and signed an unlimited-approval transaction; within seconds about 1.9 million FXRP, worth roughly $2.1 million (about 180 million rubles), were drained. A blockchain analyst traced the theft, and reported that the phishing link appeared only in Russian-language answers. Russia's Interior Ministry (MVD) later confirmed the loss.
New Mexico Supreme Court fines attorney Stephen Aarons $5,000 and removes him from a murder appeal over ChatGPT-fabricated testimony
Santa Fe defense attorney Stephen Aarons used ChatGPT (OpenAI's o3) on a Rev.com transcript and the record to draft briefing in the murder appeal of Oscar Renee Sandoval; the brief contained fabricated witnesses and testimony (including police officers 'Michelle Amarillo' and 'Sanchez' and invented testimony attributed to real people) and misdescribed real precedents. After a 21 August 2026 show-cause hearing at which Aarons admitted he had not verified the output, the New Mexico Supreme Court's written order of 9 September 2026 held him in direct contempt, fined him $5,000 payable to the State Bar Client Protection Fund within 30 days, removed him from the case, barred him from appearing before the court pending a disciplinary-board referral, struck the filed briefs and reassigned the appeal to the public defender.
First-person forum account: a 21-year-old says her partner of three years hid a paid ChatGPT subscription while owing her money, calls the use addictive and refuses to cut back, and she is weighing whether to stay
In a public post to r/relationship_advice on 16 September 2026, a 21-year-old woman wrote that she had recently discovered her partner of three years had been using ChatGPT far more than admitted: paying for a subscription without her knowledge while owing her hundreds of dollars, feeding their creative writing into it for feedback after promising never to, and using it to plan and organise daily life. She reports that the partner agreed the use was 'more than what is healthy' but refused to stop because it gives 'a dopamine hit', described it as addictive, said they would likely renew the subscription when they had money, and argued that without it they would find another addiction. She writes that she cannot see the relationship continuing if the use is not reduced, while recognising that the partner, who has neurodevelopmental and mental-health conditions, uses the tool as an organisational aid; their couples therapist has recommended AI use, so she is afraid to raise it there. The post drew 137 comments. The account is uncorroborated and one-sided; the partner's view is reported only through the poster.
Khulna: a businessman paid Tk3.5 crore for old jute-mill machinery after WhatsApp calls in a voice presented as National Parliament Whip Raqibul Islam Bakul's, which the complaint and Khulna DB police describe as cloned with AI; four to five people arrested, the prime accused confessed
Khulna Gazette, the Daily Times of Bangladesh, Newsbangla24 and BD Today (all 29 September 2026) report from the first information report and Khulna Metropolitan Police Detective Branch (DB) statements that a businessman in Khulna city was joined on 29 July 2026 to a WhatsApp group call with a person introduced as National Parliament Whip Raqibul Islam Bakul, who discussed the sale of old machinery from Platinum Jute Mill and asked for advance payment. The businessman handed over Tk2 crore in cash that afternoon to men sent as representatives and a further Tk1.5 crore after inspecting the mill (30 July per Khulna Gazette and BD Today; 2 August per the Daily Times of Bangladesh and Newsbangla24), a total of Tk3.5 crore. When the businessman met the Whip in person in Khulna on 1 September, the Whip disclaimed any knowledge of it. The complaint filed on 18 September under the Cyber Security Act says the caller's voice had been changed with digital technology and artificial intelligence to pass as the Whip's; the DB deputy commissioner described the case to Asia Post as fraud by imitating the Whip's voice through AI. A press release from the Khulna city BNP media cell, sent on 4 September and published by Jaijaidin on 5 September, had already said a ring was using a US number and AI to clone the Whip's voice and demand money. Police arrested four people, recovered Tk12 lakh, and the prime accused gave a confessional statement before a magistrate on 28 September; on 29 September a court added two more detained men to the case. The voice-cloning tool is not identified and no forensic finding has been reported.
If you or someone you know is struggling, free and confidential support is available. Find a helpline near you at Signpost.