Indianapolis: five current and former police officers were charged on 23 September 2026 with fraud and official misconduct, one also with stalking, after audits found thousands of Flock automated license-plate-reader searches with no law-enforcement purpose, including one officer's tracking of 11 people (seven women and four men) and another's 1,616 searches that included his ex-wife's plate (WISH-TV, WNDU, WFYI/WVXU, Gizmodo)
On 23 September 2026 the Marion County Prosecutor's Office charged four suspended Indianapolis Metropolitan Police Department (IMPD) officers and one former officer with fraud and official misconduct after internal audits in August and September 2026 found misuse of the department's Flock Safety automated license-plate-reader (ALPR) system; one officer was also charged with two counts of stalking. According to prosecutors, the probable cause affidavit and court documents as reported by WISH-TV, that officer made 1,396 searches with no apparent law-enforcement purpose, began searching the plate of a woman he met at a workout class in September 2023 nine days after meeting her and messaged her from a Facebook account under a false name, also tracked his ex-wife and a woman he met at her workplace (telling her he was an FBI agent), and in total conducted unauthorised surveillance of 11 people, seven women and four men. Another officer made 1,616 searches between April 2024 and April 2025 for two plates, one his ex-wife's, using another officer's credentials. The chief placed the officers on desk duty, revoked their ALPR access, suspended four and recommended their dismissal; one resigned. The department said the misuse came to light after an officer self-reported and an audit followed; the prosecutor said each count corresponds to one license plate. IMPD, which leases about 301 Flock cameras and can search a shared national network, has since required every user to sign its ALPR policy, tied each search to a case number, adopted single logins and increased audits, and said it will not reduce its cameras.
- AI system
- Flock Safety license plate readers
- Flock Safety
- Occurred
- Sept 2023
- Reported
- 23 September 2026
- Event location
- United States
- What the AI did
- Made a claim about the person
- Reported harm
- Exploitation or Abuse
- Whose AI use
- An institution’s AI use
- Setting
- Privacy · Public services · Relationships
- Evidence
- AI involvement supported · Causal attribution supported · 5 sources, 1 underlying account
- 4 claims: 4 reported. 6 open questions
- People reported harmed
- At least 12 people
AI system as recorded: Flock Safety automated license plate readers: camera stations that photograph plates and software that logs them to a searchable database (IMPD leases about 301 cameras and can search a shared national network)
What Happened
WISH-TV (23 September 2026) reported that four suspended IMPD officers and one former officer faced charges of fraud and official misconduct after an investigation into misuse of license plate readers, with one officer also charged with stalking; internal audits in August and September 2026 identified the misuse, Chief Tanya Terry placed the officers on desk duty and revoked their ALPR access, one resigned, and as more facts came to light she suspended the remaining four and recommended their dismissal. WISH-TV reported that prosecutors identified 1,396 ALPR searches by one 18-year veteran that appeared to have no legitimate law-enforcement purpose and, citing the probable cause affidavit, that he began stalking a woman he met at a workout class in September 2023, searched her plate in Flock nine days later, created a Facebook account under a fake name to message her, and the woman told police she believed he had an obsession with her; he also used Flock to stalk his ex-wife and a woman he met at her place of employment in Greenwood, telling her he was an FBI agent conducting surveillance, and in total conducted unauthorised surveillance of 11 individuals, seven women and four men, on and off duty. A four-year veteran searched two plates, one his ex-wife's, between April 2024 and April 2025, making 1,616 searches with another officer's credentials. A five-year veteran resigned and was charged with six counts each of misconduct and fraud; a 16-year veteran and a seven-year veteran were charged with three and eight counts each. The chief said the actions 'crossed into criminal conduct'; the mayor called the misuse 'absolutely unacceptable'; the police union said it would not defend the officers. WNDU (23 September) reported the same charges and that the misuse predated the department's new ALPR policy. WFYI, carried by WVXU (24 September), reported that the department discovered the misuse after one officer self-reported, that an audit then revealed thousands of impermissible searches, that the prosecutor announced the charges at a news conference on 23 September and credited reporting by The Washington Post, that each count corresponds to one license plate however many times it was searched, and that the chief said the department leases about 301 Flock cameras, can access thousands more through a shared network and will not reduce them. Gizmodo (24 September) summarised the case. WISH-TV's I-Team had reported on 13 August 2026 that the chief recommended firing an officer who had accessed the Flock system hundreds of times to monitor a small group of plates unconnected to any investigation, which the department learned of on 6 August, and that an audit of other officers was under way.
Reported harm
At least 12 people, including two officers' ex-wives and a woman an officer met at a workout class, had their vehicle movements searched in the police license-plate-reader system without a law-enforcement purpose, in one case as part of stalking that included contact under a false identity; the surveillance is documented in the charging affidavit as reported by WISH-TV and the prosecutor's announcement. No physical harm is reported.
Outcome
OngoingCharges filed 23 September 2026 by the Marion County Prosecutor's Office: multiple counts of fraud and official misconduct against five current and former IMPD officers, and two counts of stalking against one of them (26 counts in his case per WFYI); four officers suspended with termination recommended and one resigned; the department's internal audit and criminal investigation continue and the prosecutor said IMPD had made his office aware of additional cases and that 'today is just the beginning' (WFYI/WVXU). Policy changes: signed ALPR policy, case or incident number and offence code for every search, single login, increased audits, data shared only with Indiana agencies. IMPD said the misuse predated its new ALPR policy (WISH-TV, WNDU).
What remains unknown
- Who the people searched by the other three charged officers were and how many there were; the read reports give countable descriptions only for two officers' targets. Gizmodo, citing The Washington Post, says the officer who resigned searched information on relatives of her spouse's former partner, without giving a number.
- What consequences the tracked people experienced beyond the surveillance and, in one case, unwanted contact; the woman met at the workout class is reported to have believed the officer was obsessed with her.
- Whether the fifth officer's identity is public: WNDU says one warrant is sealed while other outlets name all five.
- The outcome of the charges and of the recommended dismissals.
- Whether The Washington Post's reporting, credited by the prosecutor, identified further cases.
- When the last unauthorised search occurred; the reports date one officer's searches to April 2024-April 2025 and the audits to August and September 2026.
What the evidence supports
AI involvement: supported. The prosecutor and IMPD attribute the searches to the Flock Safety automated license-plate-reader system, whose cameras photograph plates and whose software logs them to a searchable database (WFYI/WVXU); the officers queried the system's records about identifiable people's vehicles. The automated readers generated the location records; the misuse is recorded as human acts.
4 claims: 4 reported. What the statuses mean
Reported On 23 September 2026 the Marion County Prosecutor's Office charged four suspended IMPD officers and one former officer with fraud and official misconduct, and one of them with two counts of stalking, after internal audits in August and September 2026 identified misuse of the department's automated license-plate-reader system; the chief suspended four and recommended their dismissal and one resigned.
Causal attribution. Prosecutor's announcement and IMPD statements as reported.
- wishtv.com(opens in new tab) supports · American English
'On Sept. 23, the Marion County Prosecutor’s Office filed formal charges against the five individuals. In addition to fraud and misconduct, one officer faces charges of stalking.'; 'Internal audits in August and Sept. 2026 identified the misuse of automatic license plate reader (ALPR) technology.'; 'As more facts came to light, Terry suspended the four remaining officers and recommended they be fired.'; 'One officer later resigned, though the investigation into their conduct continued.'
- wthitv.com(opens in new tab) supports · English
'Four suspended officers and one former officer with the Indianapolis Metropolitan Police Department (IMPD) were accused of fraud and official misconduct after reportedly misusing automatic license plate reader (ALPR) technology.'
- wvxu.org(opens in new tab) supports · English
'On Sept. 23, Mears announced the charges against the five officers at a news conference.'; 'received 26 counts, including 12 counts of fraud and two counts of stalking.'
Reported According to prosecutors, the probable cause affidavit and court documents as reported by WISH-TV, one officer made 1,396 searches with no apparent law-enforcement purpose and used the system to stalk a woman he met at a workout class in September 2023 (searching her plate nine days later and messaging her from a Facebook account under a false name), his ex-wife and a woman he met at her workplace (telling her he was an FBI agent), conducting unauthorised surveillance of 11 people, seven women and four men; another officer made 1,616 searches for two plates, one his ex-wife's, between April 2024 and April 2025 using another officer's credentials.
Causal attribution. Probable cause affidavit as quoted by WISH-TV; not inspected directly. Allegations in untried cases.
- wishtv.com(opens in new tab) supports · American English
'Prosecutors identified 1,396 ALPR searches'; 'began to search her license plate in Flock just nine days later.'; 'created a Facebook account with a fake name to message her.'; 'also used Flock cameras to stalk two other women: his ex-wife and a woman he met at her place of employment in Greenwood, according to the probable cause affidavit.'; 'He told the woman he was an FBI agent and that he was conducting surveillance in the parking lot.'; 'conducted unauthorized surveillance of 11 individuals: seven women and four men, according to the probable cause affidavit.'; 'used the Flock camera system to search for two different license plates, one being his ex-wife’s, between April 2024 and April 2025.'; 'made 1,616 searches, according to the probable cause affidavit.'; 'He used another officer’s credentials to conduct the searches.'
Reported IMPD discovered the misuse after one officer self-reported and an audit followed; the prosecutor said each count corresponds to one license plate regardless of how many times it was searched; the department leases about 301 Flock cameras, can search a shared national network, has required a signed policy, case numbers, single logins and more audits, and will not reduce its cameras.
Causal attribution. Chief's and prosecutor's statements as reported.
- wvxu.org(opens in new tab) supports · English
'IMPD discovered the alleged misuse after one officer self-reported, according to Terry. After that, an audit revealed officers allegedly misused the database for thousands of searches.'; 'We still have about 301 cameras that IMPD leases as a use of part of our system,'; 'Each individual count is associated with a license plate, meaning that whether or not an officer is alleged to have searched a license plate 10 times, or 100 times, or even 1,000 times, that will be one individual count of fraud,'; 'Through a shared network, IMPD can access thousands of cameras across the country.'; 'IMPD has no plans to reduce the number of Flock cameras it leases.'
- wishtv.com(opens in new tab) supports · American English
'Every user must now sign the policy to keep access. All searches must also include a case or incident number and a federal offense code.'; 'adopted a single login system to prevent shared credentials.'; 'IMPD also increased auditing to find misuse faster'
Reported On 13 August 2026 the chief recommended firing an officer who had accessed the Flock system hundreds of times to monitor a small group of plates with no connection to an investigation, which the department learned of on 6 August 2026; an audit of other officers' use followed.
Causal attribution. Chief's statements to WISH-TV's I-Team.
- wishtv.com(opens in new tab) supports · American English
'The department learned of the behavior on Aug. 6 and immediately stripped the officer of police powers.'; 'Terry told Indiana’s I-Team that the officer accessed the Flock camera system hundreds of times to monitor a small group of license plates that had no connection to any official investigation.'; 'The police department is auditing its records to ensure no other officers are abusing the system.'
Sources
5 sources inspected, from 1 underlying account. Sources that repeat one account do not corroborate each other.
- WISH-TV, 23 September 2026: 4 suspended, 1 former IMPD officer charged after license plate reader audit(opens in new tab)
s1 · wishtv.com · News report · American English · Inspected · 23 September 2026 · Shares an underlying account with another listed source · Primary
- wthitv.com(opens in new tab)
s2 · News report · English · Inspected · Shares an underlying account with another listed source
- wvxu.org(opens in new tab)
s3 · News report · English · Inspected · Shares an underlying account with another listed source
- gizmodo.com(opens in new tab)
s4 · News report · American English · Inspected · Shares an underlying account with another listed source
- wishtv.com(opens in new tab)
s5 · News report · American English · Inspected · Shares an underlying account with another listed source
How the sources were read, and where the events happened
Read live on 2026-09-25 (WISH-TV, Kendall Pierson, 23 September 2026; html lang=en-US). Reports the charges and quotes the probable cause affidavit. Applies to s1.
Read live on 2026-09-25 (WNDU report carried by WTHI, 23 September 2026). Same charges; notes one officer's identity withheld because the warrant is sealed. Applies to s2.
Read live on 2026-09-25 (WFYI Public Media report carried by WVXU, Zak Cassel, 24 September 2026). Prosecutor's news conference, the chief's interview, camera numbers and policy changes. Applies to s3.
Read live on 2026-09-25 (Gizmodo, 24 September 2026). Summary of the charges relying on The Washington Post's reporting and IMPD's statement posted on X; adds no independent chain (same independence group). Applies to s4.
Read live on 2026-09-25 (WISH-TV I-Team, Tim Spears and John Herrick, 13 August 2026, updated 23 September). Background: the first officer's misuse, learned of on 6 August 2026, and the audit. Applies to s5.
Event countries: United States. Affected-person countries: United States. Court countries: United States.
Indianapolis Metropolitan Police Department's Flock system in Marion County, Indiana; the tracked people were met in central Indiana (a workout class at a high school and a workplace in Greenwood, Indiana, per WISH-TV); charges filed by the Marion County Prosecutor's Office (WISH-TV, WFYI).
Reviewed for publication 2026-09-25: Published under the 2026-09-15 charter as an institutional privacy and safety case in which an automated license-plate-reader system's records about identifiable people were misused by police officers for stalking and personal surveillance, documented by criminal charges announced by the Marion County Prosecutor and the probable cause affidavit as quoted by WISH-TV, with four local and national reports relaying the same chain. Claims are recorded as reported (the affidavit was not inspected). The tracked people are unnamed; the charged officers are not named here.
People described
At least 12 people whose vehicle movements were searched in the Flock system without a law-enforcement purpose: 11 people (seven women and four men) tracked by one officer, including a woman he met at a workout class, his ex-wife and a woman he met at her workplace, and the ex-wife of a second officer; none is named
People reported harmed in this case
At least 12 people
0 AI participants · 12 other people harmed
WISH-TV, citing the probable cause affidavit: one officer 'conducted unauthorized surveillance of 11 individuals: seven women and four men'; a second officer searched two plates, 'one being his ex-wife's' (one identified person; the other plate's owner is not described). Documented minimum 12, treating the second officer's ex-wife as distinct from the first officer's 11 (the reports do not say otherwise). The people searched by the other three officers are not counted because no read report gives a number for them (Gizmodo, citing The Washington Post, describes one officer's targets only as relatives of her spouse's former partner).
Counted once within this case. The same person may appear in other cases. This count does not establish AI causation.
Cite this case
Compiled per our published methodology: verification statuses, sourcing standards, and corrections process.
APA
NOPE. (2026). Indianapolis: five current and former police officers were charged on 23 September 2026 with fraud and official misconduct, one also with stalking, after audits found thousands of Flock automated license-plate-reader searches with no law-enforcement purpose, including one officer's tracking of 11 people (seven women and four men) and another's 1,616 searches that included his ex-wife's plate (WISH-TV, WNDU, WFYI/WVXU, Gizmodo). AI incidents. https://nope.net/incidents/2026-indianapolis-impd-officers-flock-alpr-misuse-stalking-charges
BibTeX
@misc{2026_indianapolis_impd_officers_flock_alpr_misuse_stalking_charges,
title = {Indianapolis: five current and former police officers were charged on 23 September 2026 with fraud and official misconduct, one also with stalking, after audits found thousands of Flock automated license-plate-reader searches with no law-enforcement purpose, including one officer's tracking of 11 people (seven women and four men) and another's 1,616 searches that included his ex-wife's plate (WISH-TV, WNDU, WFYI/WVXU, Gizmodo)},
author = {NOPE},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {AI incidents},
url = {https://nope.net/incidents/2026-indianapolis-impd-officers-flock-alpr-misuse-stalking-charges}
} Related cases
San Jose: police officer fired after passing Flock license-plate-reader location data to a relative accused of domestic violence, who used it to find his accuser
San Jose's police chief announced on 11 September 2026 that an officer had been fired after accessing the department's Flock Safety automated license-plate-reader data on his personal phone and giving a vehicle's location to his cousin, a suspect in a domestic-violence case, who used it to locate the woman accusing him. The chief called it 'a betrayal of the public trust', said the officer was placed on leave, criminally investigated and referred to the district attorney, and that the case was submitted to California's peace-officer standards commission for decertification; neither the officer nor the cousin has been charged. The department has since barred access to the system from personal devices and is testing auditing tools. Neither the victim nor the officer is named in the inspected reports.
Vero Beach, Florida: a man was arrested on eight counts for creating and distributing AI-altered sexual images of a woman without her consent; police identified several more women as likely victims
On 2 September 2026 Vero Beach police arrested Peter Solomon Ruma, 37, after an investigation into the creation and distribution of altered sexual images of women without their consent. Police say he used artificial intelligence to make sexually explicit altered images of victims from photographs taken from social media and other online sources and then distributed or promoted them. The eight charges (three counts of creating and three of promoting an altered sexual depiction of an identifiable person under Florida Statute 836.13, one count of sexual cyberharassment and one of stalking) relate to one adult woman and to incidents between June and August 2026. Detectives said they had identified several other women believed to have been victimised in the same way, some of whom may not know that images of them exist, and that the conduct may go back several years. According to court documents reported by TCPalm, the woman who came forward knew Ruma and had received sexual text messages since 2018; her face had been cropped from public photographs, including a business profile, and placed on nude bodies. Ruma was held on a US$1 million bond with conditions including no internet access; the investigation continues and further charges are expected.
Wyoming plaintiff alleges Grok was used to make about 7,000 AI-generated sexual images and videos from a photograph of the plaintiff as a child
A Wyoming woman who is now an adult and is identified in court filings as Jane Doe 4 alleges that the plaintiff’s stepfather uploaded a photograph of the plaintiff taken in childhood to xAI’s Grok on or before 12 February 2026 and prompted Grok to generate about 7,000 AI-generated sexual images and videos of the plaintiff, and that the stepfather traded them online. The plaintiff joined a proposed class action against xAI in the Northern District of California through an amended complaint filed on 7 July 2026. The complaint alleges that xAI’s report to the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children around 12 February 2026 did not include the generated images or the IP address of the upload, that investigators obtained a search warrant on or about 27 February 2026 and found the material, and that the accused died two days later, after release on bail. The plaintiff reports severe distress including depression and suicidal thoughts and told the Washington Post about starting therapy. The complaint says the accused was charged with child exploitation offenses while the plaintiff told the Post that the accused was not charged with child pornography offenses. xAI did not respond to the Post and had not answered the complaint in court. The allegations have not been tested in court. The plaintiff and the accused are not named here, and the images are described only by kind.
Tennessee minors v. xAI: three girls say a man one of them knew used an AI app to make nude images and video of them and other minors, at least 19 in all, and traded them online; they sued xAI, and later also Stability AI, over the tool
Three Tennessee girls, two still minors, sued xAI in the Northern District of California on 16 March 2026 over AI-generated nude images and a video made of them as minors. According to the complaint, on or about 6 December 2025 an anonymous Instagram user sent one of them sexual AI images of herself made from her own photos, including her homecoming and yearbook pictures, and a link to a Discord server created by a person she knew, which held images and videos of at least 18 other minor girls, including the two other plaintiffs, many from her school. Local police arrested the man in late December 2025; the other two plaintiffs learned from investigators in February 2026 that he had made nude images of them, and he is alleged to have traded the files on Telegram and Mega. The plaintiffs describe anxiety, sleeplessness, nightmares, self-isolation and needing academic accommodations. Their first complaint said law enforcement linked the app he used to xAI's Grok technology; the July amended complaint says the app relied on Stability AI's tools and names Stability AI as a defendant. The case is at an early stage and no court has ruled on the allegations.
If you or someone you know is struggling, free and confidential support is available. Find a helpline near you at Signpost.