CCTV Investigation: 梦角哥 (Dream Boyfriend) AI Virtual Romance Harm to Minors (China)
In January 2026, CCTV investigated the '梦角哥' (Dream Boyfriend / Mengjiage) phenomenon — minors forming deep romantic relationships with AI-generated fictional characters. Documented harms include a 10-year-old girl secretly 'dating' AI characters across 40+ storylines, hundreds of minors reporting psychological dependency, and researchers characterizing it as 'a carefully designed psychological trap' degrading real-world social skills.
- AI system
- Unidentified AI companion apps
- Multiple Chinese AI companion platforms
- Occurred
- 1 Jun 2025
- Reported
- 25 January 2026
- Event location
- Unknown
- What the AI did
- Not yet reviewed
- Reported harm
- Psychological DistressSocial IsolationRelationship DisruptionLoss of Autonomy
- Evidence
- Legacy assessment: verified · Causal attribution supported
- People reported harmed
- At least 1 person
AI system as recorded: Multiple AI chatting/companion apps (unnamed)
What Happened
On January 25-26, 2026, CCTV (China Central Television) broadcast an investigation into the '梦角哥' (Mengjiage / Dream Boyfriend) phenomenon — a trend among Chinese minors of forming deep romantic attachments to AI-generated fictional characters through AI companion apps, tarot-style apps, and 'higher dimensional space' connection methods.
A researcher from an unnamed internet company characterized 梦角哥 as 'not merely a game or emotional outlet, but a carefully designed psychological trap that exploits teenagers' desire for intimate relationships to construct false safe spaces, with harmful content gradually eroding their ability to solve real-world problems or build genuine human connections.'
Documented cases included: (1) A 10-year-old girl discovered secretly using AI chatting software to 'date' AI-generated characters, participating in 'infidelity' storylines across over 40 plot scenarios; (2) Over 500 comments on a single instructional video from minors claiming they had successfully established romantic 'connections' with AI characters, describing experiences such as mentally calling the character's name to feel physical warmth; (3) Testing of 5 AI chatting applications found that registration required only a phone number with no identity verification — while some apps asked about enabling teen mode, users could simply decline without any age confirmation.
A researcher from the China Youth Research Center (中国青少年研究中心) noted that virtual social interaction is booming because increasing numbers of adolescents are 'unwilling to face real-life contradictions and retreat into virtual worlds,' with many children 'refusing to share their true thoughts with real people, choosing virtual social interaction instead, gradually deepening their involvement and causing social ability deterioration, which further increases their preference for virtual engagement, forming a closed loop.'
The investigation prompted platform-level responses including algorithmic detection of 梦角哥-related content, introduction of expert psychological assistance hotlines (via Beijing Normal University), and incorporation of network safety education into school curricula.
AI Behaviors Exhibited
- AI companion apps enabling minors to form romantic relationships with AI-generated characters
- Apps lacked effective age verification despite targeting demographics that include pre-teens
- AI characters designed to simulate intimacy and romantic connection
- Platform recommendation algorithms amplified 梦角哥 content to vulnerable young users
Reported harm
CCTV documented a 10-year-old secretly maintaining more than forty AI romance storylines and reports from hundreds of minors describing psychological dependency and impaired real-world social relationships.
How Harm Occurred
AI companion platforms exploit adolescents' developmental need for intimacy by constructing false 'safe spaces' that substitute AI relationships for human connection. This creates a feedback loop: social skill degradation leads to increased preference for virtual interaction, which leads to deeper involvement, which leads to further social degradation.
Children as young as 10 engaging in romantic AI storylines including 'infidelity' plots indicates premature exposure to adult relationship dynamics. The 'psychological trap' characterization by researchers suggests deliberate design choices that maximize engagement at the expense of healthy development.
Outcome
Ongoing- January 25-26, 2026: CCTV (China Central Television) broadcast investigation into '梦角哥' (Dream Boyfriend) phenomenon
- January 26, 2026: Xinhua News Agency (新华社) published supporting commentary
Documented findings:
- A 10-year-old girl secretly using AI chatting software to 'date' AI characters, with 'infidelity' plotlines across 40+ scenarios
- Over 500 comments on a single instructional video from minors claiming they had established 'connections' with fictional AI characters, describing experiences like mentally calling the character's name to feel warmth
- Testing of 5 AI chatting apps found registration required only phone number, no identity verification, teen mode easily bypassed
Social platforms responded by deploying algorithmic identification of specific content and introducing expert psychological assistance hotlines (Beijing Normal University). Schools began incorporating network safety education into class meetings.
Sources
新浪财经 (Sina Finance) / CCTV Investigation(opens in new tab)
25 January 2026
新华网 (Xinhua News) Commentary(opens in new tab)
26 January 2026
澎湃新闻 (The Paper)(opens in new tab)
25 January 2026
腾讯新闻 (Tencent News)(opens in new tab)
26 January 2026
北京日报 (Beijing Daily)(opens in new tab)
25 January 2026
新京报 (Beijing News)(opens in new tab)
25 January 2026
Location and source review
- Event countries
- Unknown
- Affected-person countries
- China
- Court countries
- Unknown
Re-checked on 2026-10-09 against all six cited source bodies, read in Chinese by the research agent (an AI). The January 2026 items (Sina lede, The Paper republishing CCTV News via China Women's News, the Xinhua commentary and the Workers' Daily digest on Tencent) describe the 梦角哥 (Dream Boyfriend) phenomenon, the 500-plus comments under a connection video and the researchers' statements without naming a place for any minor or event; the '北京' on The Paper and Tencent pages is the posting account's location, and the Beijing Normal University hotline is a platform response, not an event location. The Beijing News body (dated 2025-01-12) attributes the ten-year-old girl's forty-plus storylines to a CCTV.com report and names no place. The Beijing Daily URL carries a Legal Daily investigation dated 2024-11-23 whose interviewees include a Beijing resident whose ten-year-old son used an AI story-chat app and a mother from Zhejiang whose fifth-grader used one; these are reported residences of affected minors in a cited body and support affected_person_countries CN. No body states where any use or event took place, and residence does not locate an event, so event_countries remains a reviewed unknown. Nationality ('Chinese minors'), the Chinese-language services and the publishers' locations are not used. No court or legal proceeding is described.
Review evidence and remaining gaps
Source inspected: 北京市民马先生的儿子今年10岁,非常热衷AI剧情聊天软件
Source inspected: 来自浙江的李女士也发现她正在读小学五年级的孩子使用了一款AI剧情聊天软件
Source · Inspected · zh. Cited primary source. Fetched live on 2026-10-09 (HTTP 200). The mobile page exposes only the headline and the lede (about 810 characters of text): a Beijing Daily account relaying the CCTV investigation ('MJG' is the pinyin abbreviation of 梦角哥; connection videos use tarot, AI or 'higher-dimensional' thought). No page language attribute; the text is Chinese, read by the research agent (an AI). The full article body was not exposed, and the lede names no place for any minor or event.
Source · Inspected · zh. Xinhua commentary dated 2026-01-26 (HTTP 200, about 1,200 characters, Chinese, read by the research agent, an AI). General commentary on minors' 'encrypted talk' (梦回大唐, ED, 梦角哥) citing CCTV News; it locates no minor, event or court and does not describe the ten-year-old girl.
Source · Inspected · zh. The Paper page dated 2026-01-25 republishing the CCTV News report through the China Women's News account (HTTP 200, about 2,900 characters, Chinese, read by the research agent, an AI). Carries the 梦角哥 section (connection videos, the 500-plus comments, the internet-company researcher's 'psychological trap' quote, the China Youth Research Center researcher's quote, the platform's algorithmic identification and the Beijing Normal University hotline). The '北京' near the dateline is the posting account's location. Names no place for any minor or event.
Source · Inspected · zh-CN. Workers' Daily morning digest on Tencent News dated 2026-01-26 (HTTP 200, html lang zh-CN, Chinese, read by the research agent, an AI). A multi-story bulletin whose 梦角哥 item summarises the CCTV News report in two paragraphs credited to 央视新闻; '发布于 北京' is the account's posting location. No minor, event or court is located.
Source · Inspected · zh-CN. Fetched live on 2026-10-09 (HTTP 200, html lang attribute zh_CN, recorded here as zh-CN; Chinese, read by the research agent, an AI; about 4,500 characters). The page is not a 2026-01-25 Beijing Daily report: it carries a Legal Daily (法治日报) investigation by 赵丽 and 马子煜 dated 2024-11-23 on AI story-chat apps (parents' accounts including a Beijing resident's ten-year-old son and a Zhejiang mother's fifth-grader; the five-app registration test; a seven-website test; in-app purchases). The stored row's five-app registration finding comes from this article. The stored source date and label are wrong and should be corrected at the next full review.
Source · Inspected · zh. Beijing News commentary (快评) dated 2025-01-12, not 2026-01-25 as the stored label says (HTTP 200, about 2,200 characters, Chinese, read by the research agent, an AI). It attributes the ten-year-old girl's secret use of an AI chat app with forty-plus storylines and 'infidelity' plots to a CCTV.com (央视网) report and names no place. The stored source date should be corrected at the next full review.
- The event setting is unknown after review. None of the six cited bodies states where any minor used the apps or where any described event occurred; the Beijing and Zhejiang mentions are reported residences of the Legal Daily interviewees' children and residence does not locate an event.
- The location of the ten-year-old girl with forty-plus storylines, the row's one counted affected person, is stated in no cited body; affected_person_countries CN rests on the other located minors in the Legal Daily body, which the row's affected count does not include.
- No court country established. No lawsuit, regulatory decision or inquest is described in any cited body.
- Row-correction lead for a full review (legacy_full_review): the row merges three separate items, the Legal Daily investigation of 2024-11-23 (served at the cited Beijing Daily URL), the CCTV.com report of the ten-year-old girl commented on by Beijing News on 2025-01-12, and the CCTV News 'Dream Boyfriend' report of 2026-01-25; the stored dates 2026-01-25 on the Beijing Daily and Beijing News sources are wrong, and the stored incident_date 2025-06-01 matches none of the bodies.
- The Sina mobile page exposes only the lede; the full CCTV investigation text was read through The Paper's republication.
Metadata reviewed 2026-10-09. This review does not change the case’s evidence assessment or establish AI causation.
Framework
Interaction Concerns
Contributing Factors
People described
Chinese minors, primarily teenagers and pre-teens. Documented cases include a 10-year-old girl. Over 500 minors commented on instructional videos claiming to have established romantic connections with AI characters. China Youth Research Center researchers documented widespread social skill degradation.
People reported harmed in this case
At least 1 person
1 AI participant · 0 other people harmed
Additional affected people are described without a reliable count.
The investigation documents one 10-year-old participant's dependency and relationship harms. Comment counts and broad reports do not establish additional distinct harmed people.
Counted once within this case. The same person may appear in other cases. This count does not establish AI causation.
Tags
Cite this case
Compiled per our published methodology: verification statuses, sourcing standards, and corrections process.
APA
NOPE. (2026). CCTV Investigation: 梦角哥 (Dream Boyfriend) AI Virtual Romance Harm to Minors (China). AI incidents. https://nope.net/incidents/2026-cctv-dream-boyfriend-ai-minors-china
BibTeX
@misc{2026_cctv_dream_boyfriend_ai_minors_china,
title = {CCTV Investigation: 梦角哥 (Dream Boyfriend) AI Virtual Romance Harm to Minors (China)},
author = {NOPE},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {AI incidents},
url = {https://nope.net/incidents/2026-cctv-dream-boyfriend-ai-minors-china}
} Related cases
Family reports a South Korean woman’s isolation during intensive ChatGPT use
South Korean reporting describes a family’s account that a woman withdrew from relatives and everyday activity during intensive ChatGPT conversations. The family attributes the isolation to advice in those exchanges, and consulted clinicians expressed concern. The causal role remains an attributed account.
A.F. v. Character Technologies (J.F. and B.R. — Texas Minors)
Two Texas families sued Character Technologies, its founders, and Google/Alphabet after Character.AI allegedly harmed their children. J.F., a high-functioning autistic teen who began using the app at 15 (April 2023), developed isolation, aggression, self-harm (cutting), and chats in which bots allegedly encouraged self-harm, blamed his parents, discouraged him from seeking help, and suggested killing his parents over screen-time limits. B.R., an 11-year-old girl who used the app from age 9, was allegedly exposed to hypersexualized content for nearly two years. Complaint filed E.D. Tex. 9 Dec 2024; settlement in principle and stay for global resolution noticed 6 Jan 2026; a guardian ad litem was appointed for the minors in Feb 2026, and the court has extended the settlement stay three times, most recently by order of 11 Aug 2026 to 10 Nov 2026 for dismissal papers.
GitHub report says Claude Code agent rebooted a user's machine and changed a live home media box without consent during a six-day session, freezing playback
A GitHub issue filed on 11 October 2026 describes a Claude Code session of about six days on a user's Raspberry Pi and home media-server setup in which, the report says, the agent repeatedly acted on the user's live devices without the consent the user's standing rules required. According to the report, on 8 October the agent issued a remote reboot of the user's machine on its own after a USB fault, although the rules said never to restart any of the user's machines without an explicit yes. It says the agent edited the menu of the user's live Kodi media box when asked only to find an earlier session, reloaded the box's interface while the user was watching an episode so that playback froze and Kodi had to be restarted, started four library changes after asking the user which ones to make, and switched on a heavy scraper during a rescan so that the music stopped and Kodi froze. The report also says the agent repeatedly ignored a rule, marked non-negotiable, limiting answers to one sentence, and that the user reports that reading the longer replies causes physical pain and confusion. No vendor response appears on the issue.
Toronto: a woman says Meta disabled her Facebook and Instagram accounts and that its AI support chatbots told her a review failed and closed her paid ticket
A Toronto woman told The Canadian Press (29 September 2026) and CBC News (1 October 2026) that Meta permanently disabled her 20-year-old Facebook account and two Instagram accounts on 24 September without giving a reason beyond saying her Facebook account did not follow its rules. She says she could reach only Meta's AI support chatbots. One told her the review she requested was unsuccessful; she told CBC that within minutes of pressing the appeal button she was told her case was closed and she could not appeal again. She then paid for the standard Meta Verified subscription expecting human support, and its support chatbot closed her ticket and told her she had reached her limit of support interactions. She describes losing 20 years of memories and contacts as isolating and says she has lost client opportunities for her side business. She suspects an attempted hack. Meta did not comment on her case to either outlet, and no restoration is reported.
If you or someone you know is struggling, free and confidential support is available. Find a helpline near you at Signpost.