Skip to main content
High reported severity Criminal Charges

Begusarai, Bihar: a 22-year-old woman says a man who had pursued her made a fake nude video of her with AI months earlier to blackmail her, then on 27 September 2026 he and a relative took her to a hotel room where she was beaten and raped and the videos were circulated; FIR registered, SIT formed, both accused arrested

A 22-year-old woman in Begusarai district, Bihar, told police, her lawyer and Dainik Bhaskar that a man from the village of her maternal relatives, who had pursued her and been refused, made a nude video of her with AI about four to five months earlier and sent it to her in an attempt to blackmail her. On the morning of 27 September 2026, she says, his brother-in-law, her neighbour, gave her a motorcycle lift while she was out collecting self-help-group dues and took her to meet him, and the two men led her into a hotel room 'to talk' about the video. In her account the room was locked, she was threatened with a knife, beaten and raped, the assault was filmed, a noose was put round her neck, and the AI-made video and the assault video were sent to WhatsApp groups, including her self-help group's; she hid in the bathroom until the man left. A video of the beating spread on social media. After she spent 28 September going between police stations, an FIR was registered at Begusarai Nagar police station late that night (case 451/26); the SP formed a special investigation team, seized hotel CCTV and the entry register, and one accused was reported arrested by the evening of 29 September (Prabhat Khabar; NewsTak). Dainik Bhaskar reported on 30 September that the main accused had been arrested while fleeing towards Nepal. The AI element rests on the complainant's account; the police statements read describe the assault video and the arrests without characterising the earlier video.

AI system
Unidentified video tool
Occurred
27 Sept 2026
Reported
29 September 2026
Event location
India
What the AI did
Depicted or impersonated the person
Reported harm
Exploitation or AbusePhysical InjuryPsychological Distress
Whose AI use
Someone else’s AI use
Setting
Everyday life · Privacy · Justice
Evidence
AI involvement reported · Causal attribution alleged · 5 sources, 2 underlying accounts
5 claims: 1 corroborated, 4 reported. 3 open questions
People reported harmed
1 person

AI system as recorded: AI-generated fake nude video of the complainant, sent to her months before the assault (her account; tool not identified)

What Happened

The earlier AI video. In the account she gave Dainik Bhaskar (30 September 2026), the woman says the man knew her through her maternal relatives' village and his sister's marriage into her neighbourhood, wanted to meet her alone, and was refused. Four or five months earlier, she says, he made a nude video of her with AI and sent it to her to blackmail her; she did not give in. Her lawyer, who wrote her complaint, told NewsTak that he sent a fake AI-generated obscene video and pressured her to talk to him, and kept blackmailing her with it. The newstrack report of her complaint says the accused threatened to make the video public and demanded money.

27 September. She says she left home at about 7:30 am to collect self-help-group dues; the second accused, her neighbour and the first man's brother-in-law, gave her a lift on his motorcycle and took her to where the first man was waiting. Both men, she says, took her into a room at a hotel by the highway on the pretext of talking about the video. The second man left; the first locked the door, threatened her with a knife, beat her and raped her while filming, and put a noose around her neck. She locked herself in the bathroom, and after he left she went home and told her family. She says he took her phone and shared the AI-made video and the assault video to WhatsApp groups; her lawyer says the video was posted to her self-help group's group and that her phone was broken because it held the AI video. Police told Prabhat Khabar that hotel CCTV shows the first man entering the room alone at 7:01 am, the woman entering the hotel at 7:33 am, and both leaving the room at 12:33 pm.

Reporting and police response. Her lawyer told NewsTak that she spent 28 September going from police station to police station, and that the FIR was registered late that night at Nagar police station on the SP's order. Prabhat Khabar reports the complaint alleged rape at knifepoint, the making and circulation of an obscene video on social media and WhatsApp groups, and an attempt to kill her; police began inquiries after the beating video went viral. A special investigation team was formed, one accused was reported arrested by the evening of 29 September (Prabhat Khabar; NewsTak), and the second, per Dainik Bhaskar on 30 September, was arrested while fleeing towards Nepal. The video of the beating, showing a man pulling her hair and hitting her with slippers, circulated on social media; newstrack notes it had not independently verified it.

Limits. The AI-generated video is described only by the complainant and her lawyer; no police statement read here characterises it, and the video was not inspected. The accused have not responded in the read reporting.

Reported harm

A woman says she was blackmailed with an AI-made fake nude video and then beaten and raped in a hotel room, with the AI video and the assault video circulated to WhatsApp groups (her complaint and account via Dainik Bhaskar, NewsTak and newstrack; police confirm the FIR, SIT and arrests).

Outcome

Ongoing

FIR registered at Begusarai Nagar police station late on 28 September 2026 (case 451/26) on the woman's written complaint; the SP formed a special investigation team under the Sadar SDPO; hotel CCTV footage and the entry register were seized (Prabhat Khabar; Dainik Bhaskar) and an FSL team examined the room (Prabhat Khabar; NewsTak). One accused was reported arrested by the evening of 29 September (Prabhat Khabar; NewsTak). Dainik Bhaskar reported on 30 September that the main accused had been arrested while fleeing towards Nepal and that the WhatsApp number used to circulate the video had been blocked. The SP said the woman's medical examination and court statement were being arranged and that a speedy trial would be sought.

What remains unknown

  • Which tool made the earlier video and whether police have examined it.
  • Whether the accused have been charged or produced in court, and any response from them.
  • How widely the videos spread and whether they have been taken down.

What the evidence supports

AI involvement: reported. The complainant says the first accused made a nude video of her 'with the help of AI' four to five months earlier and sent it to her (Dainik Bhaskar); her lawyer calls it a fake AI-generated obscene video (NewsTak); her complaint as reported by newstrack and Dynamite News says the same. The police statements read (Prabhat Khabar; the SP via NewsTak and Dainik Bhaskar) describe the assault video and the arrests and do not characterise the earlier video. The video was not inspected and no tool is named.

5 claims: 1 corroborated, 4 reported. What the statuses mean

Reported Four to five months before 27 September 2026 (three to four months, per her lawyer), a fake nude video of the woman was made with AI and sent to her to blackmail her. In her interview she attributes it to the first accused (Dainik Bhaskar); her complaint as reported by newstrack and Dynamite News attributes it to both accused and adds that they threatened to make it public and demanded money.

Causal attribution. The complainant's account, her lawyer's account and her complaint as reported; the video was not inspected and police have not characterised it in the read sources.

  • bhaskar.com(opens in new tab) supports · Hindi
    'AI की मदद से मेरा न्यूड वीडियो बनाया और मुझे भेज दिया। वह मुझे ब्लैकमेल करना चाहता था'
  • newstak.in(opens in new tab) supports · Hindi
    'पीड़िता को एक फेक AI जेनरेटेड अश्लील वीडियो बनाकर भेज दिया और उससे बातचीत करने के लिए दबाव बनाने लगा'; 'लगातार AI वीडियो के जरिए ब्लैकमेल करता रहा'
  • newstrack.com(opens in new tab) supports · Hindi
    'दोनों आरोपियों ने पहले AI की मदद से उसका एक फर्जी अश्लील वीडियो तैयार किया था'; 'इसी वीडियो को सार्वजनिक करने की धमकी देकर उससे पैसे मांगे गए'
  • dynamitenews.com(opens in new tab) supports · English
    'the two men had earlier used artificial intelligence to create a fake nude video of her and threatened to circulate it'
Reported On 27 September 2026 the two men took her to a hotel room in Begusarai on the pretext of talking about the video; she says the first accused locked the door, threatened her with a knife, beat her, raped her while filming, and put a noose round her neck, and that she survived by locking herself in the bathroom.

Causal attribution. Her account and complaint; Prabhat Khabar relays the complaint through the police. Hotel CCTV timings reported by police place the first accused and the woman in the room between about 7:33 am and 12:33 pm; the accused have not responded in the read reporting.

  • bhaskar.com(opens in new tab) supports · Hindi
    'गेट बंद कर दी और चाकू का डर दिखाकर जबरदस्ती करने लगा'; 'तो उसने मेरा रेप किया और पूरी घटना का वीडियो भी बना लिया'; 'गले में फंदा लगाकर मेरी हत्या की कोशिश भी की'
  • prabhatkhabar.com(opens in new tab) supports · Hindi
    'होटल के कमरे में ले जाकर आरोपियों ने दरवाजा बंद कर दिया तथा चाकू का भय दिखाकर पीड़िता के साथ जबरन दुष्कर्म किया और वीडियो बनाकर वायरल कर दिया'
  • newstrack.com(opens in new tab) supports · Hindi
    'उसे धारदार हथियार दिखाकर डराया गया और उसके साथ दुष्कर्म किया गया'
Corroborated A video showing the woman being beaten circulated on social media; police said inquiries began after it went viral, and newstrack said it had not verified the video.

Causal attribution. Police (via Prabhat Khabar) and newstrack independently report the circulating video; newstrack says it had not verified it. The complainant says the accused filmed and posted it.

  • prabhatkhabar.com(opens in new tab) supports · Hindi
    'मामले से संबंधित मारपीट का वीडियो सोशल मीडिया पर वायरल होने के बाद पुलिस ने जांच शुरू की थी'
  • newstrack.com(opens in new tab) supports · Hindi
    'घटना से जुड़ा एक वीडियो भी सोशल मीडिया पर सामने आया है'; 'वीडियो की स्वतंत्र पुष्टि नहीं हुई है'
  • bhaskar.com(opens in new tab) supports · Hindi
    'टेबल पर मोबाइल एडजस्ट कर खुद पिटाई का वीडियो बनाया और उसे सोशल मीडिया पर पोस्ट कर दिया'
Reported She says the AI-made video and the assault video were sent from her phone to WhatsApp groups, including her self-help group's group, and that her phone was broken because it held the AI video.

Causal attribution. Her account and her lawyer's; the police statement that the WhatsApp number used to circulate the video was blocked (Dainik Bhaskar) does not say which videos it carried.

  • bhaskar.com(opens in new tab) supports · Hindi
    'पहले से AI के जरिए बनाए गए वीडियो और मारपीट के वीडियो को अलग-अलग वॉट्सएप ग्रुप में शेयर कर दिया'
  • newstak.in(opens in new tab) supports · Hindi
    'समूह के ग्रुप में डालकर वायरल कर दिया'; 'आरोपी ने पीड़िता का मोबाइल फोन भी तोड़कर खराब कर दिया, क्योंकि उसमें उसका भेजा हुआ AI वीडियो मौजूद था'
Reported An FIR was registered at Begusarai Nagar police station late on 28 September 2026 (case 451/26) after she spent the day going between police stations; the SP formed a special investigation team, hotel CCTV and the entry register were seized, one accused was reported arrested by the evening of 29 September (Prabhat Khabar; NewsTak) and the other, per Dainik Bhaskar on 30 September, while fleeing towards Nepal.

Causal attribution. Police statements relayed by three outlets (the SP is quoted by NewsTak and Dainik Bhaskar); the delay in registering the FIR is her lawyer's account.

  • prabhatkhabar.com(opens in new tab) supports · Hindi
    'आवेदन के आधार पर नगर थाना कांड संख्या 451/26 दर्ज किया गया'; 'पुलिस ने एक नामजद आरोपी को गिरफ्तार किया है, जबकि दूसरे की गिरफ्तारी के लिए छापेमारी जारी है'
  • newstak.in(opens in new tab) supports · Hindi
    '28 सितंबर को दिन भर पीड़िता थानों का चक्कर लगाती रही बाद में एसपी के आदेश पर देर रात प्राथमिकी नगर थाने में दर्ज की गई'; 'दो नामजद आरोपी में से एक को गिरफ्तार कर लिया गया है'
  • bhaskar.com(opens in new tab) supports · Hindi
    'मामले की जांच को लेकर विशेष जांच टीम (SIT) का गठन किया गया है'; 'को नेपाल भागने के दौरान और उसके रिश्तेदार'

Sources

5 sources inspected, from 2 underlying accounts. Sources that repeat one account do not corroborate each other.

How the sources were read, and where the events happened

Read live in Hindi on 2026-09-30 (Dainik Bhaskar, Begusarai correspondent, 30 September 2026): the woman's first-person account, her lawyer, and the SP. Researcher translation. Applies to s1.

Read live in Hindi on 2026-09-30 (Prabhat Khabar, 29 September 2026): police account of the complaint, FIR number, SIT, CCTV and the first arrest. Researcher translation. Applies to s2.

Read live in Hindi on 2026-09-30 (NewsTak, 29 September 2026): the complainant's lawyer's account and the SP's statement. Researcher translation. Applies to s3.

Read live in Hindi on 2026-09-30 (newstrack.com, 29 September 2026, AMP page): the complaint as reported and the circulating video. Researcher translation. Applies to s4.

Read live in English on 2026-09-30 (Dynamite News, 29 September 2026); relays the complaint and cites the Times of India for the video. Applies to s5.

Event countries: India. Affected-person countries: India. Court countries: Unknown.

The hotel is in Begusarai town, Bihar, and the FIR was registered at Begusarai Nagar police station (Prabhat Khabar; Dainik Bhaskar); the complainant lives in the same district (Dainik Bhaskar). No court proceeding is reported yet.

Reviewed for publication 2026-09-30: Published under the 2026-09-15 charter as a core case (an AI-made fake nude video depicting a real person, used to blackmail her, followed by a reported violent sexual assault and circulation of the videos). The account is the complainant's, through her interview, her lawyer and her FIR, with police confirming the FIR, investigation team and arrests. The woman is not named; the accused, hotel and room are not identified here; no sexual detail beyond the complaint's substance is reproduced.

People described

A 22-year-old woman in Begusarai district, Bihar, who worked with a women's self-help group (not named)

People reported harmed in this case

1 person

0 AI participants · 1 other person harmed

One person, the complainant (Dainik Bhaskar; Prabhat Khabar). Exact 1.

Counted once within this case. The same person may appear in other cases. This count does not establish AI causation.

Cite this case

Compiled per our published methodology: verification statuses, sourcing standards, and corrections process.

APA

NOPE. (2026). Begusarai, Bihar: a 22-year-old woman says a man who had pursued her made a fake nude video of her with AI months earlier to blackmail her, then on 27 September 2026 he and a relative took her to a hotel room where she was beaten and raped and the videos were circulated; FIR registered, SIT formed, both accused arrested. AI incidents. https://nope.net/incidents/2026-begusarai-bihar-ai-video-blackmail-sexual-assault-complaint

BibTeX

@misc{2026_begusarai_bihar_ai_video_blackmail_sexual_assault_complaint,
  title = {Begusarai, Bihar: a 22-year-old woman says a man who had pursued her made a fake nude video of her with AI months earlier to blackmail her, then on 27 September 2026 he and a relative took her to a hotel room where she was beaten and raped and the videos were circulated; FIR registered, SIT formed, both accused arrested},
  author = {NOPE},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {AI incidents},
  url = {https://nope.net/incidents/2026-begusarai-bihar-ai-video-blackmail-sexual-assault-complaint}
}

Related cases

Medium Unidentified video tool

Rajasthan: a social-media influencer's video of a Ganga dip at Haridwar was manipulated with AI into an objectionable reel that went viral; she says she is mentally disturbed and cannot leave her house, and filed a cyber-crime complaint on 16 September 2026

A Rajasthan social-media influencer visited Haridwar with her family in June 2026 and on 6 June uploaded to Instagram a short video, recorded by relatives, of herself taking a dip in the Ganga at Har Ki Pauri wearing a salwar suit. About two months later she found that the video had been manipulated with AI into an objectionable version showing the same movements with her face and body portrayed 'in a shameful manner'; the fake reel went viral in the week before 20 September and drew objectionable comments and re-sharing. In a public appeal she asked whoever uploaded it to remove it, saying it was a matter of her dignity, that she was mentally very disturbed and had reached a point where she could not step out of her house. She filed a complaint with the cyber-crime police on 16 September 2026; the investigating Rajasthan Police Service officer said they were trying to identify who created and circulated the video and to have it removed, and that identifying the accused would take time. Dainik Bhaskar's English edition reported the case on 20 September in a 'Sunday Big Story' that does not name her.

High Unidentified video tool

São Paulo: a 37-year-old influencer used AI 'deepfake' tools to insert photographs of young women and adolescent girls of the Congregação Cristã do Brasil, taken from their social-media profiles without consent, into sexualised videos set inside churches; a 16-year-old and a 17-year-old filed police reports and the Civil Police investigate under the child-protection statute

A humorist and tyre repairer from Lençóis Paulista, São Paulo state, who posts on YouTube, Instagram, Facebook and TikTok as an impersonator of a television presenter, used AI tools to turn photographs that young women and adolescent girls of the Congregação Cristã do Brasil (CCB) had posted from inside churches into videos in which they appear dancing sensually beside women in short skirts, with the presenter inserted and the influencer commenting on their clothes. A 16-year-old congregant and her parents went to the 8ª Delegacia de Defesa da Mulher in São Paulo in February 2026; g1 made the case public on 22 April 2026 and Folha de S.Paulo confirmed the investigation. The girl told g1 the photograph had been taken in 2025 in front of the altar of a CCB church, that she was very shy, had not wanted to be exposed and was afraid the exposure would affect her social life, and that she had stopped taking photographs of herself; her family sued for moral damages. On 30 April 2026 the mother of a second girl, aged 17, registered a police report at the 4ª DDM Norte; g1 reported that the exposure had affected the girl psychologically. The São Paulo Civil Police investigate under article 241-C of the Estatuto da Criança e do Adolescente (simulating a sex or pornography scene with a minor by digital means) and for defamation of adult women in the videos; the inquiry was sent at the prosecutor's request to Lençóis Paulista, where the suspect lives, and the total number of people depicted was still being established. The influencer admitted making the videos with AI, said through his lawyer that they were satire and criticism of customs in a context of humour, said he did not know some of those depicted were minors, denied in his police statement linking the adolescent's image to sexualised content and said he had taken her for an adult, and posted an apology video (dated 5 April by g1's first report, which says it does not mention the deepfakes; described as posted after his police statement in g1's second report). The CCB said it had identified him, was taking internal measures and supports legal measures by the authorities. No later development was found on 2026-09-22.

High Unidentified video tool

Netherlands: the Public Prosecution Service will prosecute a 74-year-old man from Noord-Holland for making deepfake sex videos of dozens of Dutch public figures, including presenters, politicians and a member of the royal family (images of about sixty people were found on his devices), after the 2024 revelations about the MrDeepFakes platform

In March 2024 the newspaper AD revealed that a large number of Dutch women in public life, including artists, television presenters, Olympic athletes, current and former ministers, mayors and members of the royal family, appeared in manipulated pornographic videos on an online platform with 13 million monthly visitors, later identified as MrDeepFakes. Dozens of women filed police complaints and several spoke publicly: one presenter said she was preparing a complaint, a party leader said the video felt like 'digital rape', another presenter said she would file a complaint 'because tomorrow it could happen to young girls of sixteen', a presenter-entrepreneur did so 'to prevent new, young victims', and a member of parliament, told of a video by the House security service, went public rather than 'keep it small'. On 19 and 20 September 2026 AD, and the Public Prosecution Service (OM) confirming to NOS, reported that after more than a year of investigation the OM will prosecute a 74-year-old man from Noord-Holland, who is not in custody, for making the videos (Hart van Nederland, citing AD, says he is suspected of making and distributing them); images of about sixty well-known Dutch people and politicians were found on his devices, AD reported that he had been the platform's most active Dutch user, and he faces up to two years' imprisonment. The platform's Canadian operator, who removed material at the OM's request and blocked Dutch IP addresses before the site went offline, will not be prosecuted. One of the presenters reported to be among the depicted told AD she was relieved the case would go to court, having experienced the impact of such images herself. No hearing date has been set.

High Unidentified video tool

Bansdih, Ballia (Uttar Pradesh): a father reports that a local youth made a fake Instagram account in his 17-year-old daughter's name and an AI-generated obscene video from her photograph, sent it to her classmates, friends and relatives, and threatened to kill the family when they objected; police register a case under the IT Act (22-23 September 2026)

The father of a 17-year-old Class 12 student in Bansdih, Ballia district, Uttar Pradesh, gave the Bansdih police a written complaint that a young man from the town, a former schoolmate who had been expelled from the school and bore a grudge against the family, took screenshots of his daughter's social-media account, created a fake Instagram ID in her name with a matching photograph, used AI technology to make an obscene video from her photo and circulated it to her classmates, friends and relatives; the complaint says the youth had earlier made two fake accounts using her and her mother's photographs and threatened to kill the whole family and to spread the video further when they objected (Dainik Bhaskar, Hindustan). The father submitted screenshots of the fake account and his daughter's mark-sheet as proof of her age. The station house officer said a case had been ordered registered and the investigation begun; Jagran reports the case under the Information Technology Act. The reports give no dates for the fake accounts, the video or its circulation; September 2026 is the month of the complaint (about 21-22 September) and of the circulation and threats the family describes as continuing, so the event date is recorded as unknown. The family is described as frightened. No arrest is reported.

If you or someone you know is struggling, free and confidential support is available. Find a helpline near you at Signpost.