Skip to main content
Medium reported severity Involving minors

Female students at a Victorian secondary school reportedly depicted in AI-generated sexual images circulated online

In a report published on 21 February 2025 about a Victoria Police press conference, an Australian regional outlet stated that sexually explicit AI-manipulated images of teenage girls had been circulated online and that two Year 11 students had been suspended. Police were quoted saying the images allegedly involved formal photos of female students. Police were still working to establish how many students were victims. The Department of Education said wellbeing support had been offered to students who needed it. The creation date, the AI tool, the number of affected students and the outcome of the investigation are not reported in the cited source.

AI system
Unidentified image tool
Unknown
Occurred
Event date unknown
Reported
21 February 2025
Event location
Australia
What the AI did
Depicted or impersonated the person
Reported harm
Exploitation or Abuse
Whose AI use
Someone else’s AI use
Setting
Education · Privacy
Evidence
AI involvement reported · Causal attribution alleged · 1 source
5 claims: 5 reported. 5 open questions
People reported harmed
Not reliably quantifiable from the sources

AI system as recorded: Unspecified AI image-manipulation tool

Reported harm

The outlet reports that AI-manipulated sexually explicit images of female students were circulated online, and the Department of Education said wellbeing support had been offered to students who needed it. No affected student's own account and no count of victims is reported.

What remains unknown

  • When the images were created and first circulated is not stated. The source gives no date, so the event start date is unknown.
  • The AI tool or platform used and the platforms on which the images were shared are not reported in the cited source.
  • The number of affected students is unknown. Police were still establishing it, and other uncited coverage quotes a police detective saying as many as 60 students could be impacted. That upper bound is not counted.
  • How individual students were affected is not described beyond the offer of wellbeing support.
  • The identity of those who created and circulated the images is not established. The outcome of the police investigation is not reported.

What the evidence supports

AI involvement: reported. The outlet reported, in its own voice after Victoria Police statements, that the images had been inappropriately manipulated using AI technology and released online. No tool is named and the images were not seen by the reviewer.

5 claims: 5 reported. What the statuses mean

Reported The outlet reported that sexually explicit AI-generated images of teenage female students were circulated online, and that police said the images allegedly involved formal photos of female students.

Causal attribution. A regional news report of a Victoria Police press conference. Police are quoted on the alleged use of formal photos and on the investigation. The AI manipulation is stated by the outlet. The images and the AI tool were not verified by the reviewer.

Reported Two Year 11 students were suspended over the incident. At the time of the report police had not interviewed them because they could not be located.

Causal attribution. Police and school statements as relayed by the outlet. The suspensions do not establish who created or circulated the images, and police had not yet interviewed the two suspended students.

Reported Victoria Police was still working to establish the number of victims when the report was published.

Causal attribution. A police statement of an investigative status. It gives no count of affected students.

Reported A Victorian Department of Education spokesperson said the school had taken disciplinary action and that wellbeing support had been offered to any student who needed it.

Causal attribution. A department statement about support offered. No affected student is quoted and no individual effect on a student is described.

Reported A police detective said the incident involved production, possession and distribution of child exploitation material.

Causal attribution. A detective characterisation at a press conference. It is not a charge or a court finding.

Sources

1 source inspected. Sources that repeat one account do not corroborate each other.

How the sources were read, and where the events happened

Syndicated regional copy of Australian Community Media reporting on a Victoria Police press conference. The body was read in full (a subscription prompt follows the first sentence and the full text is present). Applies to s1.

Event countries: Australia. Affected-person countries: Australia. Court countries: Unknown.

The source describes a Victorian school, Victoria Police, the Victorian Department of Education and the Victorian Premier. No court proceeding is reported.

Reviewed for publication 2026-09-29: One February 2025 regional news report of a Victoria Police press conference and a Department of Education statement. All claims are reported. Other outlets covering the same press conference are not cited because their URLs contain the school name. The school, students and suspended students are not named and no image detail is given. The creation date is unknown, so the case is published undated and outside the 2025 event-year count.

People reported harmed in this case

Not reliably quantifiable from the sources

The cited source says police were still working to establish the number of victims. Other coverage read by the reviewer and not cited (its URLs contain the school name) quotes a police detective saying as many as 60 students could be impacted. That is an upper bound with no stated minimum and is not counted. Zero is a placeholder and does not state that nobody was harmed.

Counted once within this case. The same person may appear in other cases. This count does not establish AI causation.

Cite this case

Compiled per our published methodology: verification statuses, sourcing standards, and corrections process.

APA

NOPE. (2026). Female students at a Victorian secondary school reportedly depicted in AI-generated sexual images circulated online. AI incidents. https://nope.net/incidents/2025-victoria-secondary-school-reported-ai-sexual-images-of-female-students

BibTeX

@misc{2025_victoria_secondary_school_reported_ai_sexual_images_of_female_students,
  title = {Female students at a Victorian secondary school reportedly depicted in AI-generated sexual images circulated online},
  author = {NOPE},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {AI incidents},
  url = {https://nope.net/incidents/2025-victoria-secondary-school-reported-ai-sexual-images-of-female-students}
}

Related cases

Medium Unidentified image tool

Female students at a Sydney high school reportedly depicted in AI-generated sexual images circulated online

On 9 January 2025 outlets reported that NSW Police had begun an investigation on 6 January after a report that inappropriate images were being produced and distributed online. The Guardian reported the allegation that a student at a Sydney high school used AI platforms to create explicit deepfake images of female students and circulated them through fake social media accounts. The Department of Education said it was helping affected students with wellbeing support and referred the matter to the eSafety Commissioner. The creation date, the AI tool, the number of affected students and the outcome of the investigation are not reported.

Medium Unidentified image tool

Sydney schoolgirls reportedly targeted with deepfake images circulated online

ABC News reports that digitally altered sexual images using the faces of girls from a Sydney high school circulated online. Families went to police, who confirmed an investigation, while the school and education department said they were working with police. A follow-up report says the eSafety Commissioner was also in talks with investigators. The school is not identified, and the number of affected students, creation date and later inquiry outcome are unknown.

Low Unidentified image tool

Queensland school teacher charged over alleged AI-generated explicit images of staff and students

ABC reported on 23 and 24 July 2026 that police in Queensland, Australia charged a former secondary school teacher at a school there with child exploitation and computer misuse offences. Police allege the teacher used AI software on a work-issued laptop to generate explicit images depicting staff members and students. Police say a nine-month investigation began in October after they were notified of the material, and the school says it dismissed the teacher in October 2025, notified police and regulators, and that there is no evidence the material was shared. The number of people depicted and the creation date are not stated.

Medium Unidentified image tool

Girls at a Tasmanian school reportedly depicted in AI-generated sexual images shared in a boys' group chat

Police in Tasmania received a report about alleged illegal online activity involving a group of students at a school in the south of the state, and on 19 March 2026 a local outlet reported that the incident may have involved AI-generated content. On 29 April 2026 the ABC reported, citing Tasmania Police, that girls at the school had their likenesses used to make AI-generated sexual images. Two parents told the ABC that police said 21 girls had been identified as victims, that the AI-altered photos were shared in a boys' group chat and that the images appeared to have been taken from social media. Five boys are alleged to have created the images and have left the school. Tasmania Police said no charges were laid and the five youths were dealt with under the Youth Justice Act. The parents said their daughters felt isolated and unsupported, and the school principal denied that families were advised to withhold information from their children. The creation date and the AI tool are not reported.

If you or someone you know is struggling, free and confidential support is available. Find a helpline near you at Signpost.