Female students at a Sydney high school reportedly depicted in AI-generated sexual images circulated online
On 9 January 2025 outlets reported that NSW Police had begun an investigation on 6 January after a report that inappropriate images were being produced and distributed online. The Guardian reported the allegation that a student at a Sydney high school used AI platforms to create explicit deepfake images of female students and circulated them through fake social media accounts. The Department of Education said it was helping affected students with wellbeing support and referred the matter to the eSafety Commissioner. The creation date, the AI tool, the number of affected students and the outcome of the investigation are not reported.
- AI system
- Unidentified image tool
- Unknown
- Occurred
- Event date unknown
- Reported
- 9 January 2025
- Event location
- Australia
- What the AI did
- Depicted or impersonated the person
- Reported harm
- Exploitation or Abuse
- Whose AI use
- Someone else’s AI use
- Setting
- Education · Privacy
- Evidence
- AI involvement reported · Causal attribution alleged · 3 sources, 1 underlying account
- 5 claims: 5 reported. 6 open questions
- People reported harmed
- Not reliably quantifiable from the sources
AI system as recorded: Unspecified AI image-generation platforms
Reported harm
Outlets report that AI-generated sexual images of female students were circulated online and the Department of Education said it was helping affected students with wellbeing support. No affected student's own account and no count of victims is reported.
What remains unknown
- The event start date is unknown. Creation is reported as during the school holidays, and no cited source says when the holidays began. The only dated fact is the police report and investigation start on 6 January 2025, so creation may have been in December 2024.
- The AI tool or platform, the platforms on which the images were shared and the number of images are not reported.
- The number of affected students is not reported by any inspected source.
- The ages of the affected students are not stated. The student alleged to have created the images is described as a senior student and a teenage boy.
- How individual students were affected is not described beyond the offer of wellbeing support.
- The outcome of the police investigation and of any disciplinary action is not reported in the inspected sources.
What the evidence supports
AI involvement: reported. Outlets report, as an allegation, that a student used AI platforms to create explicit deepfake images. The police statement quoted refers only to inappropriate images produced and distributed online. No tool is named and the images were not seen by the reviewer.
5 claims: 5 reported. What the statuses mean
Reported A high school student in Sydney was reported to police after allegedly using AI platforms to create explicit deepfake images of female students and circulating them using fake social media accounts.
Causal attribution. Allegations relayed by two outlets from police and department statements. The police statement quoted refers only to inappropriate images. The images, the AI tool and the alleged creator's role were not verified by the reviewer. ABC and Information Age describe the fake social media profiles as depicting students, and the Guardian describes fake accounts used to circulate the images.
- theguardian.com(opens in new tab) supports · English
has been reported to police after allegedly using artificial intelligence platforms to create pornography featuring other students
- theguardian.com(opens in new tab) supports · English
The student is alleged to have created explicit deepfake images of female students and circulated them using fake social media accounts.
- abc.net.au(opens in new tab) supports · English
The senior student is accused of allegedly using artificial intelligence to create deepfake pornographic images of female students and making fake social media profiles.
Reported NSW Police began an investigation on 6 January 2025 after a report that inappropriate images were being produced and distributed online.
Causal attribution. One NSW Police statement carried by two outlets. It dates the investigation and the report, not the creation of the images.
- theguardian.com(opens in new tab) supports · English
began an investigation on 6 January after reports of inappropriate images being produced and distributed online.
- abc.net.au(opens in new tab) supports · English
NSW Police confirmed they had commenced an investigation after receiving a report on Monday
Reported Authorities were reported to believe the images were created at home during the school holidays and not on school grounds.
Causal attribution. A belief attributed to unnamed authorities by one trade-press outlet. No source states when the holidays began or on what date the images were created.
- ia.acs.org.au(opens in new tab) supports · English
Authorities believe the images were created at home during the school holidays, and not on school grounds.
Reported The NSW Department of Education said it was helping affected students with wellbeing support and would do so as long as required, and the incident was referred to the eSafety Commissioner.
Causal attribution. Department statements as relayed by two outlets. No affected student is quoted and no individual effect on a student is described.
- theguardian.com(opens in new tab) supports · English
We are helping affected students with appropriate wellbeing support and will do so as long as required.
- abc.net.au(opens in new tab) supports · English
We are helping affected students with appropriate wellbeing support and will do so as long as required.
- theguardian.com(opens in new tab) supports · English
The incident had also been referred to the eSafety commissioner.
Reported The NSW education minister said there would be disciplinary action for the student.
Causal attribution. A ministerial statement of intended action. It does not establish what the student did.
- theguardian.com(opens in new tab) supports · English
But there will be disciplinary action for the student.
Sources
3 sources inspected, from 1 underlying account. Sources that repeat one account do not corroborate each other.
- The Guardian, 9 January 2025, Sydney teenager allegedly used AI to create deepfake pornography of students(opens in new tab)
s1 · theguardian.com · News report · English · Inspected · Shares an underlying account with another listed source · Primary
- ABC News, 9 January 2025, Sydney high school senior investigated by police over reported deepfake images of female students(opens in new tab)
s2 · abc.net.au · News report · English · Inspected · Shares an underlying account with another listed source
- Information Age (ACS), 10 January 2025, Sydney teen allegedly made explicit deepfakes of students(opens in new tab)
s3 · ia.acs.org.au · News report · English · Inspected · Shares an underlying account with another listed source
How the sources were read, and where the events happened
Trade-press report. It cites the ABC report for the minister's remarks and quotes a department statement given to it that repeats the Guardian and ABC wording. The "created at home during the school holidays" sentence appears only here. Applies to s3.
Event countries: Australia. Affected-person countries: Australia. Court countries: Unknown.
The sources describe a Sydney high school, NSW Police, the New South Wales Department of Education and the NSW education minister. No court proceeding is reported.
Reviewed for publication 2026-09-29: Three January 2025 reports (Guardian, ABC, Information Age) that rest on one NSW Police statement and one Department of Education statement, plus one unattributed belief of authorities reported only by Information Age. All claims are reported. The school, the students including the student alleged to have created the images, and the police command are not named, and no image detail is given. The event date is unknown (only the 6 January 2025 police report is dated), so the case is published undated and outside the 2025 event-year count.
People reported harmed in this case
Not reliably quantifiable from the sources
No inspected source gives a number of affected students. Zero is a placeholder and does not state that nobody was harmed.
Counted once within this case. The same person may appear in other cases. This count does not establish AI causation.
Cite this case
Compiled per our published methodology: verification statuses, sourcing standards, and corrections process.
APA
NOPE. (2026). Female students at a Sydney high school reportedly depicted in AI-generated sexual images circulated online. AI incidents. https://nope.net/incidents/2025-sydney-school-reported-ai-sexual-images-of-female-students
BibTeX
@misc{2025_sydney_school_reported_ai_sexual_images_of_female_students,
title = {Female students at a Sydney high school reportedly depicted in AI-generated sexual images circulated online},
author = {NOPE},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {AI incidents},
url = {https://nope.net/incidents/2025-sydney-school-reported-ai-sexual-images-of-female-students}
} Related cases
Sydney schoolgirls reportedly targeted with deepfake images circulated online
ABC News reports that digitally altered sexual images using the faces of girls from a Sydney high school circulated online. Families went to police, who confirmed an investigation, while the school and education department said they were working with police. A follow-up report says the eSafety Commissioner was also in talks with investigators. The school is not identified, and the number of affected students, creation date and later inquiry outcome are unknown.
Female students at a Victorian secondary school reportedly depicted in AI-generated sexual images circulated online
In a report published on 21 February 2025 about a Victoria Police press conference, an Australian regional outlet stated that sexually explicit AI-manipulated images of teenage girls had been circulated online and that two Year 11 students had been suspended. Police were quoted saying the images allegedly involved formal photos of female students. Police were still working to establish how many students were victims. The Department of Education said wellbeing support had been offered to students who needed it. The creation date, the AI tool, the number of affected students and the outcome of the investigation are not reported in the cited source.
Queensland school teacher charged over alleged AI-generated explicit images of staff and students
ABC reported on 23 and 24 July 2026 that police in Queensland, Australia charged a former secondary school teacher at a school there with child exploitation and computer misuse offences. Police allege the teacher used AI software on a work-issued laptop to generate explicit images depicting staff members and students. Police say a nine-month investigation began in October after they were notified of the material, and the school says it dismissed the teacher in October 2025, notified police and regulators, and that there is no evidence the material was shared. The number of people depicted and the creation date are not stated.
Girls at a Tasmanian school reportedly depicted in AI-generated sexual images shared in a boys' group chat
Police in Tasmania received a report about alleged illegal online activity involving a group of students at a school in the south of the state, and on 19 March 2026 a local outlet reported that the incident may have involved AI-generated content. On 29 April 2026 the ABC reported, citing Tasmania Police, that girls at the school had their likenesses used to make AI-generated sexual images. Two parents told the ABC that police said 21 girls had been identified as victims, that the AI-altered photos were shared in a boys' group chat and that the images appeared to have been taken from social media. Five boys are alleged to have created the images and have left the school. Tasmania Police said no charges were laid and the five youths were dealt with under the Youth Justice Act. The parents said their daughters felt isolated and unsupported, and the school principal denied that families were advised to withhold information from their children. The creation date and the AI tool are not reported.
If you or someone you know is struggling, free and confidential support is available. Find a helpline near you at Signpost.