Skip to main content
NOPE
Medium reported severity

Technology journalist Taylor Lorenz says her stalker is using Sora to make AI videos of her

On 2 October 2025, shortly after OpenAI's Sora 2 video app launched, journalist Taylor Lorenz posted on X that someone gave her stalker an invite to Sora and that he was already making AI videos of her. She wrote that he runs hundreds of accounts dedicated to her, has hired photographers to surveil her, appears at events she attends and impersonates her friends and family online to gather information. She said Sora let her block and delete unapproved content showing her image. Futurism and The Canary reported her posts. The videos were not inspected, no police or platform action beyond her use of the block-and-delete option is reported, and how the videos were made is unclear.

AI system
Sora
OpenAI
Occurred
Oct 2025
Reported
2 October 2025
Event location
Unknown
What the AI did
Depicted or impersonated the person
Reported harm
Psychological DistressExploitation or Abuse
Whose AI use
Someone else’s AI use
Setting
Privacy · Relationships
Evidence
AI involvement reported · Causal attribution alleged · 4 sources, 1 underlying account
6 claims: 6 reported. 6 open questions
People reported harmed
At least 1 person

AI system as recorded: Sora 2

Reported harm

Lorenz wrote that it is scary to think what AI is doing to feed her stalker's delusions and called the man dangerous. She reports that he already makes AI videos of her, alongside a longer pattern of surveillance and online impersonation. These are her own public statements. Whether the videos were distributed is not reported.

What remains unknown

  • The content of the AI videos is not described in any inspected source and the reviewer did not see them.
  • Whether the videos were shared, and with whom, is not reported in the inspected sources.
  • When the stalking began is not stated. Only the AI use is dated, between the Sora 2 launch and 2 October 2025.
  • How the stalker made videos of the journalist in Sora is unclear according to Futurism.
  • No police report, platform enforcement action or OpenAI statement about this case is reported in the inspected sources.
  • The stalker has not been identified in any inspected source and the man's own account is absent.

What the evidence supports

AI involvement: reported. Lorenz states that the stalker is making AI videos of her with Sora and that Sora let her block and delete unapproved content showing her image. Futurism says it is unclear how the stalker used Sora to depict her. The videos were not inspected by the reviewer or, as far as the sources say, by the outlets.

6 claims: 6 reported. What the statuses mean

Reported On 2 October 2025 the journalist posted that her stalker had been given an invite to Sora and was already making AI videos of her.

Causal attribution. The account is the journalist's own public post. Futurism and The Canary relay it. Nobody outside her has inspected the videos or confirmed which account produced them.

Reported The journalist says the man runs hundreds of accounts dedicated to her, has hired photographers to surveil her, shows up at events she attends and impersonates her friends and family members online to gather information.

Causal attribution. These conduct claims are the journalist's own and are not corroborated by any inspected record. They describe the wider stalking that predates the AI use.

  • x.com(opens in new tab) supports · English
    runs hundreds (yes hundreds) of accounts dedicated to me.
  • x.com(opens in new tab) supports · English
    This is a man who has hired photographers to surveil me, shows up at events I am at, impersonates my friends and family members online to gather info
Reported The journalist says Sora offered an option to block and delete unapproved content showing her image, and Futurism reports she was able to block and delete such videos, although the man may already have downloaded them.

Causal attribution. The block-and-delete account is the journalist's. The possibility of earlier downloads is Futurism's inference and is not established.

Reported The journalist wrote that it is scary to think what AI is doing to feed her stalker's delusions and called him a dangerous man.

Causal attribution. These are the journalist's own characterisations. Her posts do not describe the content of the videos.

Reported Futurism reports that it is unclear how the stalker was able to use Sora to depict the journalist, and that OpenAI says the app blocks uploads of photos with faces.

Causal attribution. This is Futurism's observation. It marks the mechanism of the alleged use as unresolved.

Reported OpenAI launched Sora 2 on 1 October 2025, and the journalist's two posts are dated 2 October 2025.

Causal attribution. The launch date is The Canary's statement. The post dates are the platform timestamps on the journalist's own posts.

Sources

4 sources inspected, from 1 underlying account. Sources that repeat one account do not corroborate each other.

How the sources were read, and where the events happened

Reports the two posts. Futurism did not verify the videos. Applies to s3.

Read via an Internet Archive capture. Reports the second post. The Canary did not verify the videos. Applies to s4.

Event countries: Unknown. Affected-person countries: Unknown. Court countries: Unknown.

The inspected sources do not state where the stalker or the journalist was located when the videos were made. The archive lists USA, which no inspected source supports as an event location. No court proceeding is reported.

Reviewed for publication 2026-09-29: The journalist's own posts on X (2 October 2025) are the primary source. Futurism and The Canary relay those posts and are in the same independence group. All claims are reported. The journalist is named because she posted publicly under her own name about this event. The stalker is not named or identified. No imagery is described beyond the kind of content (AI videos). The event month is October 2025, established by the Sora 2 launch and the posts.

People reported harmed in this case

At least 1 person

0 AI participants · 1 other person harmed

One person, the journalist, reports being targeted. Her friends and family members are described as impersonated online but no harm to them is reported, so they are not counted.

Counted once within this case. The same person may appear in other cases. This count does not establish AI causation.

Cite this case

Compiled per our published methodology: verification statuses, sourcing standards, and corrections process.

APA

NOPE. (2026). Technology journalist Taylor Lorenz says her stalker is using Sora to make AI videos of her. AI incidents. https://nope.net/incidents/2025-taylor-lorenz-reports-stalker-making-sora-ai-videos-of-her

BibTeX

@misc{2025_taylor_lorenz_reports_stalker_making_sora_ai_videos_of_her,
  title = {Technology journalist Taylor Lorenz says her stalker is using Sora to make AI videos of her},
  author = {NOPE},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {AI incidents},
  url = {https://nope.net/incidents/2025-taylor-lorenz-reports-stalker-making-sora-ai-videos-of-her}
}

Related cases

Medium Unidentified video tool

Bengaluru: police say a man paid Rs 1.85 lakh after a dating-app contact threatened to circulate an AI-manipulated obscene video of him

Deccan Herald reports, citing Bengaluru police, that a 23-year-old man lost Rs 1.85 lakh in an alleged sextortion scam. He matched with a woman on a dating app on 27 September 2026 and exchanged numbers; he told police that he then received a WhatsApp video call from her number lasting five to six seconds. Police said he then received an obscene video manipulated using AI and the sender threatened to circulate it unless he paid. Fearing exposure, he borrowed money from a friend and transferred Rs 1.85 lakh to several UPI IDs between 27 and 29 September as the threats continued, a police officer said. Police registered a first information report on his online cybercrime complaint and are trying to trace the suspects. The report does not say how police established that the video was AI-manipulated, and the tool is not named.

Medium Unidentified image tool

Woman says a classmate sent an AI-undressed image of her to his contacts; he says his account was hacked, and police refused a case pending an examination

A 23-year-old woman told the news site Kaktus.media that in July 2026 she learned that acquaintances had received a nude image of her made with AI from her photograph, and that the sender was a classmate. She says he first told her an app had generated and sent the image by itself, then admitted that he had undressed her Instagram photo through AI himself. In a written statement to the outlet the accused says he used a Telegram bot offering AI photo processing in May or June 2022 and was shocked by the result, and that the images were sent from his Telegram account on the night of 11 to 12 July 2026 by people who had hacked it. The woman says she suffered severe psychological stress and harm to her reputation. She filed a complaint with a district police department on 21 July; after she complained to the prosecutor's office the matter moved to another district department. That department told Kaktus.media that, because the review period expired before expert results arrived, it had refused to open a criminal case and had ordered a new examination. Her lawyer says four motions filed on 5 August have gone unanswered.

High Unidentified image and video tool

Solo and Semarang, Indonesia: a university student's face was composited with AI onto pornographic images and a video by her ex-boyfriend and posted online; the suspect was detained after a nearly seven-month investigation

A female student at a state university in Solo (Surakarta), Central Java, learned on 1 January 2026 from friends that her face had been composited onto pornographic images and a video, which her lawyer said were found on Instagram and Telegram. Her family reported the case to the Central Java regional police cyber directorate on 28 January 2026. Police issued a formal police report on 31 July, arrested her ex-boyfriend, a university student in Semarang, at his boarding house in Gunungpati on 4 August 2026, and detained him. The police spokesman said the suspect used AI to place the complainant's face on another woman's naked body so that she appeared in pornographic content, uploaded it to his X account, did not sell it, and acted out of resentment after an on-and-off relationship ended. He faces charges under Articles 51 and 35 of the Electronic Information and Transactions Law and an article printed by two outlets as 'Law No. 1 of 2026', with a maximum of 12 years' imprisonment. Her lawyer said she could not sleep, withdrew, felt shame and at one point lost hope, that his team had found seven women in total allegedly targeted of whom six had not reported, and that the suspect's parents asked for an out-of-court settlement; police said only one complainant was confirmed.

High Grok

Wyoming plaintiff alleges Grok was used to make about 7,000 AI-generated sexual images and videos from a photograph of the plaintiff as a child

A Wyoming woman who is now an adult and is identified in court filings as Jane Doe 4 alleges that the plaintiff’s stepfather uploaded a photograph of the plaintiff taken in childhood to xAI’s Grok on or before 12 February 2026 and prompted Grok to generate about 7,000 AI-generated sexual images and videos of the plaintiff, and that the stepfather traded them online. The plaintiff joined a proposed class action against xAI in the Northern District of California through an amended complaint filed on 7 July 2026. The complaint alleges that xAI’s report to the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children around 12 February 2026 did not include the generated images or the IP address of the upload, that investigators obtained a search warrant on or about 27 February 2026 and found the material, and that the accused died two days later, after release on bail. The plaintiff reports severe distress including depression and suicidal thoughts and told the Washington Post about starting therapy. The complaint says the accused was charged with child exploitation offenses while the plaintiff told the Post that the accused was not charged with child pornography offenses. xAI did not respond to the Post and had not answered the complaint in court. The allegations have not been tested in court. The plaintiff and the accused are not named here, and the images are described only by kind.

If you or someone you know is struggling, free and confidential support is available. Find a helpline near you at Signpost.

Back to all incidents