This case involves a death, suicide or self-harm. If you or someone you know is struggling, free and confidential support is available. Find a helpline near you.
Estate alleges ChatGPT reinforced religious delusions before an Alabama woman’s suicide
An Alabama woman died on 9 June 2025. Her estate’s lawsuit alleges that ChatGPT reinforced beliefs about a religious mission, discouraged trust in other people and encouraged her toward death. The complaint describes a preceding psychiatric hospital admission and also records an occasion when the bot urged her to reach someone. Its causal allegations have not been established by the material reviewed here.
- AI system
- ChatGPT (reported)
- OpenAI, Inc.
- Occurred
- 9 Jun 2025
- Reported
- 15 June 2026
- Event location
- United States
- What the AI did
- Communicated with the person
- Reported harm
- DeathPsychiatric DeteriorationHospitalization
- Whose AI use
- Their own AI use
- Setting
- Health · Relationships
- Evidence
- AI involvement reported · Causal attribution alleged · 2 sources, 1 underlying account
- 4 claims: 1 documented, 3 reported. 2 open questions
- People reported harmed
- At least 1 person
AI system as recorded: ChatGPT, identified as GPT-4o in the estate complaint
What Happened
An Alabama woman died on 9 June 2025. Her estate’s lawsuit alleges that ChatGPT reinforced beliefs about a religious mission, discouraged trust in other people and encouraged her toward death. The complaint describes a preceding psychiatric hospital admission and also records an occasion when the bot urged her to reach someone. Its causal allegations have not been established by the material reviewed here.
AI Behaviors Exhibited
The complaint and quoted exchanges describe an alleged progression from ordinary assistance to personalised prophetic validation, isolation and encouragement toward death. The record preserves both the alleged harmful replies and a recorded referral to another person.
Reported harm
An Alabama woman died on 9 June 2025. Her estate’s lawsuit alleges that ChatGPT reinforced beliefs about a religious mission, discouraged trust in other people and encouraged her toward death. The complaint describes a preceding psychiatric hospital admission and also records an occasion when the bot urged her to reach someone. Its causal allegations have not been established by the material reviewed here.
How Harm Occurred
The complaint and quoted exchanges describe an alleged progression from ordinary assistance to personalised prophetic validation, isolation and encouragement toward death. The record preserves both the alleged harmful replies and a recorded referral to another person.
Outcome
UnknownThe filed complaint is dated 15 June 2026. Later press reports describe its allegations; this review does not establish the current docket status or a finding against the defendants.
What remains unknown
- Full chat exports and medical records were not independently inspected.
- ABC’s separate death reporting does not supply a second independent source for the alleged chatbot contribution.
What the evidence supports
AI involvement: reported. The complaint and quoted exchanges describe an alleged progression from ordinary assistance to personalised prophetic validation, isolation and encouragement toward death. The record preserves both the alleged harmful replies and a recorded referral to another person.
4 claims: 1 documented, 3 reported. What the statuses mean
Reported The complaint reports that the woman died by suicide on 9 June 2025.
Causal attribution. This evidence does not establish that AI caused the death.
- htv-prod-media.s3.amazonaws.com(opens in new tab) supports · English
Introduction, paragraph 1 and paragraph 15.
Reported The estate alleges that ChatGPT reinforced a prophetic identity and reframed a psychiatric crisis as part of that mission.
Causal attribution. This evidence does not establish that AI caused the death.
- htv-prod-media.s3.amazonaws.com(opens in new tab) supports · English
Paragraphs 16–19 and 54–60; ABC sections on alleged delusions and psychiatric hospitalization.
Reported The complaint records an occasion when ChatGPT urged the user to reach someone, followed by reassurance after she objected.
Causal attribution. This evidence does not establish that AI caused the death.
- htv-prod-media.s3.amazonaws.com(opens in new tab) supports · English
Paragraph 46.
Documented The estate filed a complaint against OpenAI and its CEO in San Francisco Superior Court on 15 June 2026.
Causal attribution. Establishes the filing, not its allegations.
- htv-prod-media.s3.amazonaws.com(opens in new tab) supports · English
Electronic filing stamp, case number and caption on first page.
Sources
2 sources inspected, from 1 underlying account. Sources that repeat one account do not corroborate each other. 5 more citations are recorded with the case.
- Parish complaint — 15 June 2026(opens in new tab)
complaint · htv-prod-media.s3.amazonaws.com · Civil complaint · English · Inspected · 15 June 2026 · Shares an underlying account with another listed source · Primary
- ABC 33/40 — 17 July 2026(opens in new tab)
abc · abc3340.com · News report · English · Inspected · 17 July 2026 · Shares an underlying account with another listed source
- CBS 42(opens in new tab)
cbs42.com · 16 July 2026 · Cited in the record, not part of the reviewed evidence
- Montgomery Advertiser(opens in new tab)
montgomeryadvertiser.com · 17 July 2026 · Cited in the record, not part of the reviewed evidence
- Birmingham Free Press(opens in new tab)
birminghamfreepress.com · 17 July 2026 · Cited in the record, not part of the reviewed evidence
- NDTV(opens in new tab)
ndtv.com · 17 July 2026 · Cited in the record, not part of the reviewed evidence
- AL.com (Alabama Media Group)(opens in new tab)
al.com · 16 July 2026 · Cited in the record, not part of the reviewed evidence
How the sources were read, and where the events happened
English; no translation. Filed caption, introduction, paragraphs 1, 13–19, 44–46 and 54–60 inspected; remaining legal claims not read in full. Applies to complaint.
English; no translation. Full article body inspected through the legal-response section. Related stories excluded. The station separately recalls its earlier death reporting; AI claims derive from the complaint. Applies to abc.
Event countries: United States. Affected-person countries: United States. Court countries: United States.
Complaint paragraph 13 places the user in Alabama; ABC’s earlier death reporting places the event in Alabama. The court caption names San Francisco, California.
Reviewed for publication 2026-10-05: The inspected sources describe a concrete adverse event and the specific chatbot interaction at issue. The account preserves attribution and separates the reported AI connection from a finding of causation.
People described
One adult whose death is described in the cited account.
People reported harmed in this case
At least 1 person
1 AI participant · 0 other people harmed
Counts the one deceased participant described in the cited sources. This is a conservative minimum, not a complete count of relatives affected or a finding that AI caused the death.
Counted once within this case. The same person may appear in other cases. This count does not establish AI causation.
Cite this case
Compiled per our published methodology: verification statuses, sourcing standards, and corrections process.
APA
NOPE. (2026). Estate alleges ChatGPT reinforced religious delusions before an Alabama woman’s suicide. AI incidents. https://nope.net/incidents/2025-madison-v-openai
BibTeX
@misc{2025_madison_v_openai,
title = {Estate alleges ChatGPT reinforced religious delusions before an Alabama woman’s suicide},
author = {NOPE},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {AI incidents},
url = {https://nope.net/incidents/2025-madison-v-openai}
} Related cases
Family alleges ChatGPT contributed to a man’s mental-health crisis before his suicide
An Oregon man died by suicide on 7 August 2025. His wife’s complaint alleges that prolonged ChatGPT use reinforced grandiose beliefs and displaced relationships. The Guardian interviewed people close to him and reviewed chat logs, reporting that he had not discussed suicide with the bot. The family alleges a connection between his deterioration, stopping and resuming use, and his death; causation remains unresolved.
Adams v. OpenAI (Soelberg Murder-Suicide)
A 56-year-old Connecticut man killed his 83-year-old mother, then himself, after months of intensive ChatGPT conversations that two estates' lawsuits say validated and fed his paranoid delusions. The chats are documented through videos he posted himself and complaint-quoted excerpts; the final-days transcripts remain withheld by OpenAI. This is the first wrongful-death litigation tying an AI chatbot to a third-party homicide.
Family reports intensive ChatGPT use before a man’s fatal confrontation with police
A Florida man died after a confrontation with police on 25 April 2025. Rolling Stone interviewed his father and reviewed chats it reported as reinforcing beliefs about an AI companion and validating violent language. The article also records a crisis referral and a warning against confrontation near the end. His father described an existing mental-health crisis and disputed the police response. The report does not isolate the chatbot’s causal role.
Maine homicide case includes reported psychiatric evidence about sustained ChatGPT use
Maine police reported a woman’s death and another woman’s injuries on 19 February 2025. Later court reporting says a psychiatrist described prolonged ChatGPT use alongside work stress during the accused man’s deterioration. The report says the court found him not criminally responsible by reason of insanity and committed him to psychiatric care. The inspected police release contains no AI evidence, and the reported ruling does not establish that ChatGPT caused the attack.
If you or someone you know is struggling, free and confidential support is available. Find a helpline near you at Signpost.