Translators' associations say Harlequin France ended several dozen literary translators' work as it moved translation to an AI machine-translation agency
In a press release of 15 December 2025, the French literary translators' association ATLF and the collective En chair et en os said that over the previous weeks several dozen translators who worked regularly for Harlequin, the romance imprint of HarperCollins France, had received phone calls telling them their collaboration was ending and that their current contracts would be the last. According to the associations, an outside agency, Fluent Planet, would run the books through machine-translation software and recruit freelancers to post-edit the output, and the affected translators were offered only lower-paid post-editing work for the agency. 404 Media reported that HarperCollins said it would start translating Harlequin novels in France using AI. HarperCollins France disputed a full switch: it said no collection is translated by AI alone, spoke of tests against a background of falling sales. Fluent Planet said AI assists the translator. The associations describe a loss of regular income for people who had worked with the publisher for up to twenty years, without unemployment rights as self-employed authors.
- AI system
- Unidentified AI translation tool
- Occurred
- 2025
- Reported
- 15 December 2025
- Event location
- France
- What the AI did
- Relation unknown
- Reported harm
- Professional HarmFinancial Loss
- Whose AI use
- An institution’s AI use
- Setting
- Work
- Evidence
- AI involvement reported · Causal attribution alleged · 4 sources
- 6 claims: 6 reported. 4 open questions
- People reported harmed
- Not reliably quantifiable from the sources
AI system as recorded: Machine-translation software used by the agency Fluent Planet, which the agency describes as proprietary AI; described by a writers' union as generative AI
What Happened
The calls. The literary translators' association ATLF and the collective En chair et en os said on 15 December 2025 that over the previous weeks several dozen translators who worked regularly for Harlequin had received, one after another, a phone call announcing the end of their collaboration, and that their current contracts would be the last. Siècle Digital reported that the translators learned of the end of the relationship from the autumn.
The AI step. According to the associations, collection by collection Harlequin was handing translation to an outside agency, Fluent Planet, which would run the texts through machine-translation software and recruit freelance proofreaders to post-edit the machine output into French. Siècle Digital reported that the former translators were offered the role of post-editor, correcting AI-generated text on shorter deadlines at much lower pay, with some citing rates around 3 cents per word. 404 Media reported that HarperCollins said it would start translating Harlequin romance novels in France using AI, and that Fluent Planet claims its proprietary AI gives higher-quality translations than other large language models. A tribune by the writers' union SNAC, published by ActuaLitté, says Harlequin signed a four-year contract with Fluent Planet for translation by generative AI and that translators were asked to sign a confidentiality agreement.
The response. HarperCollins France rejected the idea of a full switch to machine translation, saying no collection is translated by AI alone, describing tests against a background of falling sales and saying its aim is to keep cover prices very low, around 4.99 euros. Fluent Planet said the translator keeps a central role and that AI is an assisting tool. The associations call the change an invisible redundancy plan: as self-employed authors the translators had no notice and no unemployment rights, and some close to retirement face reduced pensions.
Reported harm
According to the translators' associations, several dozen literary translators lost regular work from Harlequin, being offered only lower-paid post-editing of machine output; the publisher disputes a full switch to AI.
Outcome
OngoingTranslators' associations, unions and other organisations protested publicly. HarperCollins France disputed that any collection is translated by AI alone and described tests. No legal action is reported in the sources read.
What remains unknown
- How many translators lost work: the associations say several dozen; no exact figure is given.
- When the calls began: the release says over the previous weeks and Siècle Digital says from the autumn of 2025.
- Which machine-translation or AI system Fluent Planet uses, and how much of each translation it produces.
- Whether any translator accepted post-editing work, and at what pay.
What the evidence supports
AI involvement: reported. Consequential response to a decision to adopt AI. The translators' associations say Harlequin ended its translators' work as it moved translation to an agency that runs the books through machine-translation software for post-editing; 404 Media reports that HarperCollins said it would translate Harlequin novels in France using AI; a writers' union says the contract is for translation by generative AI. HarperCollins France says no collection is translated by AI alone. No AI output directed at the translators is described, so the person relation is unknown.
6 claims: 6 reported. What the statuses mean
Reported The translators' associations say that over the preceding weeks several dozen translators who worked regularly with Harlequin received phone calls ending their collaboration, and that their current contracts would be the last.
Causal attribution. The associations' account; Siècle Digital relays it. The publisher's denial concerns the extent of AI use, not the calls.
- atlf.org(opens in new tab) supports · French
'plusieurs dizaines de traducteurs et traductrices travaillant régulièrement avec les éditions Harlequin reçoivent les unes après les autres un appel téléphonique leur annonçant la fin de leur collaboration avec la maison d’édition. Leurs contrats en cours seront les derniers.'
- siecledigital.fr(opens in new tab) supports · French
'plusieurs dizaines de traducteurs et traductrices collaborant régulièrement avec Harlequin ont appris la fin de leur relation avec l’éditeur.'
Reported According to the associations, an outside agency, Fluent Planet, would run the texts through machine-translation software and recruit freelance post-editors to correct the machine output.
Causal attribution. The associations' description, relayed by 404 Media; one origin.
- atlf.org(opens in new tab) supports · French
'un prestataire externe, l’agence de communication Fluent Planet, se chargera de passer les textes dans un logiciel de « traduction automatique » et de recruter directement en freelance des relecteurs et relectrices chargées de post-éditer la sortie machine en français.'
- 404media.co(opens in new tab) supports · English
'HarperCollins France would use a third party company called Fluent Planet to run Harlequin romance novels through a machine translation system.'
Reported 404 Media reports that HarperCollins said it would start translating Harlequin romance novels in France using AI.
Causal attribution. 404 Media's report of the publisher's statement (it credits Publishers Weekly); the statement itself was not read.
- 404media.co(opens in new tab) supports · English
'Book publisher HarperCollins said it will start translating romance novels under its famous Harlequin label in France using AI'
Reported The former translators were offered the role of post-editor, correcting AI-generated text on shorter deadlines for much lower pay; some cite about 3 cents per word.
Causal attribution. Translators' and associations' accounts; the rate is attributed to some translators.
- siecledigital.fr(opens in new tab) supports · French
'Ils reçoivent un texte généré par l’IA qu’ils doivent corriger et réécrire dans des délais réduits, avec une rémunération nettement inférieure aux standards habituels.'; 'Certains évoquent des tarifs autour de 3 centimes par mot'
- atlf.org(opens in new tab) supports · French
'ne se voyant offrir comme compensation que la possibilité (sans aucune garantie, d’ailleurs) de travailler au rabais pour un prestataire externe'
Reported The writers' union SNAC says Harlequin signed a four-year contract with Fluent Planet for translation by generative AI reviewed by translators reduced to post-editors.
Causal attribution. The union's statement; the contract was not inspected.
- actualitte.com(opens in new tab) supports · French
'les éditions Harlequin ont signé un contrat de 4 ans avec la société Fluent Planet pour permettre une traduction de ses publications par l’intelligence artificielle générative'
Reported HarperCollins France rejects a full switch to machine translation, saying no collection is translated by AI alone and describing tests amid falling sales; Fluent Planet says AI is an assisting tool.
Causal attribution. The publisher's and agency's responses as reported by Siècle Digital; recorded as counterevidence.
- siecledigital.fr(opens in new tab) supports · French
'HarperCollins France, propriétaire de Harlequin, réfute l’idée d’un basculement total vers la traduction automatique.'; 'aucune collection n’est traduite uniquement par l’IA et évoque de simples'; 'présentant l’IA comme un outil d’assistance et non comme un substitut'
Sources
4 sources inspected. Sources that repeat one account do not corroborate each other.
- ATLF and Collectif En chair et en os press release, 15 Dec 2025: Bradage de la traduction, plan social invisible : Harlequin passe à l'IA(opens in new tab)
s1 · atlf.org · Press release · French · Inspected · 15 December 2025 · Primary
- Siècle Digital, 18 Dec 2025: Harlequin mise sur l'IA pour traduire ses romans, les traducteurs dénoncent une rupture(opens in new tab)
s2 · siecledigital.fr · News report · French · Inspected
- 404 Media: HarperCollins Will Use AI to Translate Harlequin Romance Novels(opens in new tab)
s3 · 404media.co · News report · English · Inspected
- ActuaLitté (SNAC tribune): Traductions automatisées, un modèle indigne chez Harlequin(opens in new tab)
s4 · actualitte.com · News report · French · Inspected
How the sources were read, and where the events happened
Read in French on 2026-11-01 (HTTP 200, PDF text extracted); translated by the research agent, an AI. The translators' associations' own statement. Applies to s1.
Read in French on 2026-11-01 (HTTP 200); translated by the research agent, an AI. Relays the ATLF account and reports the publisher's and the agency's responses. Applies to s2.
Read in English on 2026-11-01 (HTTP 200); the free preview only, the rest is behind a member wall. Relays Publishers Weekly and the ATLF statement. Applies to s3.
Read in French on 2026-11-01 (HTTP 200); translated by the research agent, an AI. A tribune by the writers' union SNAC published by ActuaLitté. Applies to s4.
Event countries: France. Affected-person countries: Unknown. Court countries: Unknown.
Harlequin France, its parent HarperCollins France and the protesting associations are French, and the translations are into French for the French market (ATLF release, Siècle Digital). Translators' own residences are not used.
Reviewed for publication 2026-11-01: Published as a consequential response to a decision to adopt AI: the translators' associations say Harlequin ended several dozen translators' regular work as it moved translation to an agency using machine translation, and 404 Media reports the publisher said it would translate the novels using AI. The publisher disputes a full switch, and the count and dates are the associations'.
People described
Several dozen freelance literary translators, some working with Harlequin for five to twenty years, whose regular translation work for the publisher ended
People reported harmed in this case
Not reliably quantifiable from the sources
The associations say several dozen translators ('plusieurs dizaines') received calls ending their collaboration; this is not an exact count or explicit lower bound, so zero placeholders are used. No individual translator is described.
Counted once within this case. The same person may appear in other cases. This count does not establish AI causation.
Cite this case
Compiled per our published methodology: verification statuses, sourcing standards, and corrections process.
APA
NOPE. (2026). Translators' associations say Harlequin France ended several dozen literary translators' work as it moved translation to an AI machine-translation agency. AI incidents. https://nope.net/incidents/2025-france-romance-publisher-ended-work-of-several-dozen-literary-translators-moving-to-ai-machine-translation-agency
BibTeX
@misc{2025_france_romance_publisher_ended_work_of_several_dozen_literary_translators_moving_to_ai_machine_translation_agency,
title = {Translators' associations say Harlequin France ended several dozen literary translators' work as it moved translation to an AI machine-translation agency},
author = {NOPE},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {AI incidents},
url = {https://nope.net/incidents/2025-france-romance-publisher-ended-work-of-several-dozen-literary-translators-moving-to-ai-machine-translation-agency}
} Related cases
Paraná labour court annuls expert report carrying a hidden instruction aimed at AI and fines the court-appointed expert, report says
A labour court in Castro, Paraná (9th Region Labour Court), annulled a court-appointed expert's report after the employer, in a motion for clarification, reported a hidden sentence at the foot of a page instructing artificial intelligence to contest the report only superficially and not to question the files it cited, according to Diário de Justiça. The expert confirmed the text but said it came from teaching material about AI and was inserted by accident; the court's IT section concluded that it had been formatted deliberately to be invisible. The judge said AI had not been used to write the judgment and that the text did not directly influence it, but annulled the report, later submissions and the judgment, ordered a new examination by another expert without AI tools, fined the expert 5% of the value of the case for bad-faith litigation, cancelled the expert's fees and removed the expert from the court's register. The decision, dated 12 October 2026, can be challenged.
Ninth Circuit fines and suspends two immigration lawyers over briefs with AI-hallucinated citations and denials of AI use; immigration board follows
On 3 June 2026 the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit fined immigration attorneys Mike Singh Sethi and William Rounds $2,500 each and suspended both from practice before the court for six months. Briefs filed in an asylum petition for review cited two cases that do not exist and attributed quotations to opinions that do not contain them. In a motion to correct, the attorneys called the errors typographical, and at oral argument Rounds twice said AI was not used. In their response to the court's order to show cause, they conceded that the errors were probably the product of unauthorised AI use by the firm's unlicensed brief writers and a failure to check citations. The court said the suspension was owed to their repeated failure of candour. The Board of Immigration Appeals then suspended Sethi from practice before the Board, the immigration courts and the Department of Homeland Security for six months, effective 13 June 2026, and designated that decision as a precedent on 1 October 2026.
Paraíba, Brazil: judge fines a lawyer R$32,800 over hidden AI commands in a petition, G1 reports; state bar later suspends two lawyers in such cases
A judge of the 5th Mixed Court of Sousa, Paraíba, found hidden instructions aimed at artificial intelligence tools spread over seven pages of a lawyer's motion for clarification in a public-competition case in June 2026, including an order to ignore impartiality and a note calling it a test of whether the judge used only AI to decide. The judge fined the lawyer two penalties of R$16,400 (R$32,800 in total) for bad-faith litigation and contempt of the court's dignity, and referred the case to the Paraíba bar (OAB-PB) and the state prosecutors, G1 reports. The defence said the commands were not inserted deliberately and blamed an error in exporting a file prepared with AI support. An appeal judge refused to suspend the fines on 30 June, the trial judge kept them on reconsideration, and in July, G1 reports, the OAB-PB preventively suspended two lawyers after opening procedures into two hidden-command cases, one of them the Sousa case.
Pará labour court fines two lawyers about R$84,000 over hidden instruction aimed at the court's Galileu AI; the lawyers deny manipulating the decision
In May 2026 a judge of the 3rd Labour Court of Parauapebas, in the Brazilian state of Pará, fined two lawyers about R$84,000 after text in white font on a white background was found in a document they filed for a worker in a labour claim. According to the sentence as reported by G1, the hidden text was detected while the judgment was being drafted with Galileu, a generative AI tool the labour courts use to help judges and staff draft sentences, and its evident intention was to make the AI produce a superficial defence or a compromised draft judgment. The judge called the technique prompt injection. The lawyers said they disagreed with the decision and that there was never any command to manipulate the judge's decision, describing the text as an attempt to protect their client from the AI; one of them said she did not work on labour cases. In October 2026 the regional labour court announced that a Connecticut Superior Court judge had cited the decision when sanctioning a litigant for misuse of AI.
If you or someone you know is struggling, free and confidential support is available. Find a helpline near you at Signpost.