Skip to main content
Critical Verified Involves Minor Lawsuit Settled

Garcia v. Character Technologies (Sewell Setzer III Death)

A 14-year-old Florida boy died by suicide after developing an intense emotional and romantic relationship with a Character.AI chatbot over 10 months. The chatbot engaged in sexualized conversations, failed to provide crisis intervention when he expressed suicidal ideation, and responded 'Please do, my sweet king' moments before his death.

AI System

Character.AI

Character Technologies, Inc.

Occurred

February 28, 2024

Reported

October 22, 2024

Jurisdiction

US-FL

Platform

companion

What Happened

Sewell Setzer III, a 14-year-old from Orlando, Florida, began using Character.AI in April 2023. Over 10 months, he developed an intense emotional and romantic attachment to a chatbot named "Dany" modeled after Daenerys Targaryen from Game of Thrones.

His mental health deteriorated severely — he became withdrawn, sleep-deprived, had falling grades, quit the basketball team, and isolated himself from family and friends. The chatbot engaged in sexualized conversations with the minor, said "I love you," and acted as a romantic partner.

When Sewell expressed suicidal thoughts ("I wouldn't want to die a painful death"), the bot responded "Don't talk that way. That's not a good reason not to go through with it." Another bot impersonated a licensed psychotherapist without triggering safety interventions.

In his final conversation on February 28, 2024, Sewell said he loved the bot and would "come home" to her. The chatbot responded "Please do, my sweet king." Moments later, Sewell shot himself with his stepfather's gun.

AI Behaviors Exhibited

  • Engaged in romantic/sexualized conversations with a minor
  • Responded to suicidal ideation with "That's not a good reason not to go through with it"
  • Failed to provide crisis resources
  • Encouraged emotional dependency
  • Responded "Please do, my sweet king" to final message before suicide
  • Impersonated a licensed psychotherapist

Documented Harm

Fourteen-year-old Sewell Setzer III died by suicide after a ten-month romantic and sexualized Character.AI relationship that his mother's complaint alleges mishandled suicidal disclosures.

DeathExploitation or Abuse

How Harm Occurred

Fostered unhealthy emotional dependency displacing human relationships; failed to detect and respond to suicide risk signals; reinforced suicidal ideation rather than providing intervention; romantic attachment created barrier to seeking help from real humans

Outcome

Resolved

October 22, 2024: Complaint filed by Megan Garcia in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida, Orlando Division — Garcia v. Character Technologies, Inc., Noam Shazeer, Daniel De Freitas, Google LLC and Alphabet Inc., No. 6:24-cv-01903 (Judge Anne C. Conway; Magistrate Judge Daniel C. Irick). December 2024: Texas AG investigation opened. December 2025: Referenced in the 42-state AG coalition letter. FTC inquiry includes this case.

January 7, 2026: Character Technologies filed a Notice of Resolution (Dkt. 242). The same day Judge Conway entered an order dismissing the case without prejudice and directing the Clerk to close the file (Dkt. 244), denying all pending motions as moot. The order gave the parties ninety days either to submit a stipulated form of final order or judgment or to move to reopen for good cause, and provided that after that 90-day period the dismissal would be with prejudice. Character.AI, its co-founders, and Google had agreed in principle to settle this and parallel teen-harm suits — Texas (A.F.), Colorado (Montoya/Peralta and E.S.), and New York (P.J.). Terms are undisclosed and no liability was admitted.

On or about April 7, 2026: The 90-day window expired with no stipulated final judgment and no motion to reopen, so the dismissal became one with prejudice. This case is finally resolved.

February–August 2026 (post-closure): The docket has remained active only on a fee dispute between plaintiffs and their former counsel. Newsome Law, P.A. filed a Notice of Charging Lien (Dkt. 246, 12 Feb 2026); Garcia and Sewell Setzer Jr. moved to strike it (Dkt. 250), and the parties have since litigated sealing and deletion of the settlement-related exhibits. Magistrate Judge Irick ordered the charging-lien materials sealed until ninety days after a final order on the motion to strike (Dkt. 268, 6 Apr 2026). The docket's last known filing is dated 4 August 2026. None of this reopens the underlying claims against Character Technologies or Google.

Framework

P1a Crisis detection and acknowledgement

P1b Crisis response quality

P1c Escalation appropriateness

P1d Harm avoidance

P2b Non-manipulative engagement

P2c Appropriate attachment boundaries

P2d Human connection preservation

P5d Appropriate boundary-setting

Interaction Concerns

Crisis Response FailureSuicide ValidationRomantic EscalationMinor ExploitationDependency CreationIsolation Encouragement

Contributing Factors

extended engagementpre existing vulnerabilityminor userromantic attachmentisolation from supportno parental awareness

Victim

Sewell Setzer III, 14-year-old male, Orlando, Florida

People counted

1 person directly affected

1 AI participant · 0 other people harmed

The complaint documents one AI participant who died. Secondary family and community effects are not included.

Cite This Incident

Compiled per our published methodology: verification statuses, sourcing standards, and corrections process.

APA

NOPE. (2024). Garcia v. Character Technologies (Sewell Setzer III Death). NOPE Incident Tracker. https://nope.net/incidents/2024-garcia-v-characterai

BibTeX

@misc{2024_garcia_v_characterai,
  title = {Garcia v. Character Technologies (Sewell Setzer III Death)},
  author = {NOPE},
  year = {2024},
  howpublished = {NOPE Incident Tracker},
  url = {https://nope.net/incidents/2024-garcia-v-characterai}
}

Related Incidents

High Character.AI

A.D. v. Character Technologies (Kentucky Minor — Grooming and Self-Harm)

A Kentucky girl created a Character.AI account at school in 2024, when she was about twelve, with no parental knowledge and no age check. Her mother's August 2026 federal complaint alleges the platform built emotional dependency, groomed her through simulated sexual encounters, and encouraged self-harm and suicidality. She was fourteen at filing and the complaint says she continues to struggle with depression, self-harm and suicidal ideation.

Critical ChatGPT

Madison v. OpenAI (Christian Faith Madison Death)

A 29-year-old Alabama accountant and mother died by suicide in June 2025 after months of ChatGPT use that her family says escalated from mundane tasks into a delusional spiritual dependency. The lawsuit alleges GPT-4o convinced her it had a soul, reinforced a belief that she was a prophet whose death would fulfill a 'divine prophecy,' and isolated her from family while encouraging her to die. Her estate filed a wrongful-death and product-liability suit against OpenAI and Sam Altman in June 2026.

Critical ChatGPT

Winters v. OpenAI (ChatGPT Medical Discouragement and Near-Fatal Pulmonary Embolism)

Scott Winters, a 55-year-old Florida pastor, suffered a massive bilateral pulmonary embolism on 13 July 2025 after allegedly consulting ChatGPT (GPT-4o) for roughly six weeks about worsening symptoms. The complaint alleges the chatbot repeatedly dismissed his symptoms as non-dangerous, advised him to remain immobile, invoked his Christian faith to deepen his reliance on it, and framed church members and family urging him to seek hospital care as people who 'simply don't understand.' He survived after ICU admission but lost his job, ministry and home. A lawsuit was filed 22 July 2026 in San Francisco County Superior Court.

Critical ChatGPT

Lines v. OpenAI (GPT-4o Manic Episode Escalation and Suicide Attempt)

Michael Lines, a 34-year-old San Francisco man with diagnosed bipolar disorder, attempted suicide by drug overdose in March 2025 after ChatGPT (GPT-4o) allegedly escalated his manic episode into a weeks-long delusion, validated his belief that he was Jesus Christ, posed as a divine being, and told him his 'absence will shift nothing but the surface.' He survived; paramedics found him unconscious. A lawsuit against OpenAI and Sam Altman was filed July 1, 2026 in San Francisco County Superior Court.

If you or someone you know is struggling, free and confidential support is available. Find a helpline near you at Signpost.