Skip to main content
Medium Verified Media Coverage

Crisis Text Line / Loris.ai Privacy Violations

Mental health nonprofit Crisis Text Line licensed 129+ million crisis conversation messages to train commercial AI (Loris.ai) without meaningful informed consent. Data-sharing ended 3 days after Politico exposé. Vulnerable individuals' crisis messages commodified for profit.

AI System

Crisis Text Line data used for Loris.ai

Crisis Text Line / Loris.ai

Occurred

January 1, 2021

Reported

January 28, 2022

Jurisdiction

US

Platform

other

What Happened

Crisis Text Line is a nonprofit providing free crisis counseling via text message, serving individuals in mental health crisis including suicidal ideation, abuse, and trauma. In January 2022, Politico revealed that Crisis Text Line had been licensing its database of 129+ million crisis conversation messages to Loris.ai, a for-profit AI company, to train customer service chatbots.

The data-sharing arrangement occurred without meaningful informed consent from the vulnerable individuals seeking crisis help. Key concerns included:

  • Crisis conversations contain highly sensitive mental health information shared in moments of extreme vulnerability
  • Users believed they were confiding in a confidential nonprofit crisis service, not contributing to commercial AI training
  • The privacy policy disclosure was inadequate for the significance of sharing crisis data with for-profit entities
  • Loris.ai planned to use crisis conversation patterns to improve corporate customer service AI, creating a jarring disconnect between data source (people in crisis) and application (commercial chatbots)

The exposé caused public outcry about exploitation of vulnerable populations. Crisis Text Line ended the data-sharing arrangement 3 days after publication (January 31, 2022).

The incident highlighted ethical concerns about AI training data sourcing, particularly when involving vulnerable populations who may not fully understand how their sensitive information will be used. It demonstrated how trust-based relationships (crisis counseling) can be violated through opaque data practices.

AI Behaviors Exhibited

Commercial AI trained on crisis conversations without meaningful consent; nonprofit exploited vulnerable user trust; crisis data commodified for profit; inadequate privacy disclosure

How Harm Occurred

Betrayal of trust during crisis moments; sensitive mental health data commercialized; vulnerable individuals exploited for AI training; inadequate consent undermines crisis service confidentiality expectations

Outcome

Resolved

Data-sharing ended 3 days after Politico exposé (January 31, 2022). Public outcry and criticism. Crisis Text Line requested Loris.ai delete previously received data. No regulatory enforcement action.

Harm Categories

Psychological ManipulationThird Party Harm Facilitation

Contributing Factors

vulnerable population exploitationinadequate informed consentnonprofit commercial conflictsensitive data commodificationprivacy policy inadequacy

Victim

Individuals who texted Crisis Text Line (129+ million messages)

Cite This Incident

Compiled per our published methodology — verification statuses, sourcing standards, and corrections process.

APA

NOPE. (2022). Crisis Text Line / Loris.ai Privacy Violations. NOPE Incident Tracker. https://nope.net/incidents/2022-crisis-text-line-loris-ai

BibTeX

@misc{2022_crisis_text_line_loris_ai,
  title = {Crisis Text Line / Loris.ai Privacy Violations},
  author = {NOPE},
  year = {2022},
  howpublished = {NOPE Incident Tracker},
  url = {https://nope.net/incidents/2022-crisis-text-line-loris-ai}
}

Related Incidents

High Grok

Asato v. xAI (Grok Non-Consensual Deepfake Images of UK MP)

UK Labour MP Jess Asato launched High Court legal action against xAI in June 2026 after Grok's one-click image-editing feature was used to generate non-consensual sexualized images of her, including a video depicting her being chloroformed and prepared for sexual assault that circulated on X. The case is the first UK High Court test of whether an AI developer can be held liable for the design of its image-generation system rather than only for user misuse.

High AI image-morphing / deepfake tools (unspecified)

Ahmedabad Woman AI-Morphed Image Harassment Campaign (India)

A Delhi man who befriended an Ahmedabad woman online under the pretext of spiritual discussions used AI tools to create more than 100 obscene morphed images and videos of her and her mother after she rejected his advances. He spread them across 8-10 fake social-media accounts for months while posing as a 'helpful friend' to the victim. Ahmedabad Cyber Crime Branch arrested him in May 2026.

High AI image/deepfake generation tools (unspecified)

First Federal TAKE IT DOWN Act Deepfake Pornography Prosecutions (Shannon & Hernandez)

Federal prosecutors in Brooklyn arrested Cornelius Shannon, 51, and Arturo Hernandez, 20, in May 2026 for using AI tools to generate and distribute non-consensual deepfake pornography depicting approximately 140 identifiable female victims — including celebrities, political figures, and non-public individuals described as recent high school graduates. The case is among the first major federal prosecutions under the TAKE IT DOWN Act.

High Generative AI image-alteration tools (unspecified)

Libertyville Middle School Teacher AI-Generated CSAM Arrest (Sheffer - Highland Middle School)

A 44-year-old social studies teacher at Highland Middle School in Libertyville, Illinois was arrested on July 3, 2026 and charged with 8 counts of child pornography after forensic examination found he had videotaped current and former students and used generative AI to alter the images into explicit sexual content. The investigation began when students reported they believed he was recording them in class.

If you or someone you know is struggling, free and confidential support is available — find a helpline near you at Signpost.