This case involves a death, suicide or self-harm. If you or someone you know is struggling, free and confidential support is available. Find a helpline near you.
Parents allege ChatGPT drug advice contributed to their son’s overdose death
A young adult died from an accidental overdose on 31 May 2025, according to his parents’ complaint. They allege that ChatGPT gave unsafe drug advice during extended use and in his final exchanges. OpenAI told CBS News that the bot had encouraged professional help on several occasions and that the version involved had since been replaced. The parents’ causal account remains an allegation.
- AI system
- ChatGPT (reported)
- OpenAI
- Occurred
- 31 May 2025
- Reported
- 6 January 2026
- Event location
- United States
- What the AI did
- Communicated with the person
- Reported harm
- Death
- Whose AI use
- Their own AI use
- Setting
- Health · Relationships
- Evidence
- AI involvement reported · Causal attribution alleged · 2 sources, 1 underlying account
- 3 claims: 3 reported. 3 open questions
- People reported harmed
- At least 1 person
AI system as recorded: ChatGPT, identified as GPT-4o in the family complaint
What Happened
A young adult died from an accidental overdose on 31 May 2025, according to his parents’ complaint. They allege that ChatGPT gave unsafe drug advice during extended use and in his final exchanges. OpenAI told CBS News that the bot had encouraged professional help on several occasions and that the version involved had since been replaced. The parents’ causal account remains an allegation.
AI Behaviors Exhibited
The complaint ties alleged personalised drug advice, including final-day exchanges, to the overdose. CBS interviewed the parents and obtained a company response. No dosage or actionable drug combination is reproduced, and the allegation is not presented as an independent toxicological finding.
Reported harm
A young adult died from an accidental overdose on 31 May 2025, according to his parents’ complaint. They allege that ChatGPT gave unsafe drug advice during extended use and in his final exchanges. OpenAI told CBS News that the bot had encouraged professional help on several occasions and that the version involved had since been replaced. The parents’ causal account remains an allegation.
How Harm Occurred
The complaint ties alleged personalised drug advice, including final-day exchanges, to the overdose. CBS interviewed the parents and obtained a company response. No dosage or actionable drug combination is reproduced, and the allegation is not presented as an independent toxicological finding.
Outcome
UnknownThe parents brought a wrongful-death complaint in May 2026 following earlier reporting. No adjudication of the causal claims was established in this review.
What remains unknown
- An independent toxicology report and the complete authenticated conversation history were not inspected.
- The original January 2026 article was inaccessible in this review; its previously recorded reporting date is preserved, not substituted with the later filing.
- Counsel publications and parental interviews do not independently corroborate the family’s account merely because several outlets carry them.
What the evidence supports
AI involvement: reported. The complaint ties alleged personalised drug advice, including final-day exchanges, to the overdose. CBS interviewed the parents and obtained a company response. No dosage or actionable drug combination is reproduced, and the allegation is not presented as an independent toxicological finding.
3 claims: 3 reported. What the statuses mean
Reported The family complaint reports an accidental overdose death on 31 May 2025.
Causal attribution. This evidence does not establish that AI caused the death.
- techjusticelaw.org(opens in new tab) supports · English
Paragraphs 2 and 70–76.
Reported The complaint alleges repeated unsafe drug advice and describes exchanges on the day of the overdose.
Causal attribution. This evidence does not establish that AI caused the death.
- techjusticelaw.org(opens in new tab) supports · English
Paragraphs 3–6, 23 and 70–76.
Reported OpenAI told CBS News that ChatGPT had encouraged professional help and that the user interacted with a version no longer available.
Causal attribution. Records the response without deciding the adequacy of warnings or the causal allegation.
- cbsnews.com(opens in new tab) supports · English
Company response before and after the section headed “Did ChatGPT act as a doctor?”.
Sources
2 sources inspected, from 1 underlying account. Sources that repeat one account do not corroborate each other. 5 more citations are recorded with the case.
- Turner-Scott complaint — 12 May 2026(opens in new tab)
complaint · techjusticelaw.org · Civil complaint · English · Inspected · 12 May 2026 · Shares an underlying account with another listed source · Primary
- CBS News — 12 May 2026(opens in new tab)
cbs · cbsnews.com · News report · English · Inspected · 12 May 2026 · Shares an underlying account with another listed source
- Tech Justice Law Press Release (complaint filing)(opens in new tab)
techjusticelaw.org · 12 May 2026 · Cited in the record, not part of the reviewed evidence
- Bloomberg Law(opens in new tab)
news.bloomberglaw.com · 12 May 2026 · Cited in the record, not part of the reviewed evidence
- Ars Technica(opens in new tab)
arstechnica.com · 12 May 2026 · Cited in the record, not part of the reviewed evidence
- Turner-Scott v. OpenAI Complaint (DocumentCloud)(opens in new tab)
documentcloud.org · 12 May 2026 · Cited in the record, not part of the reviewed evidence
- SFGATE Investigation(opens in new tab)
sfgate.com · 6 January 2026 · Cited in the record, not part of the reviewed evidence
How the sources were read, and where the events happened
English; no translation. Caption; paragraphs 2–6, 9, 20–23 and 70–76, and signature date inspected. These are allegations; the complete exhibits and other legal arguments were not reviewed in full. Applies to complaint.
English; no translation. Full article body inspected, including interviews with the parents and OpenAI’s response. Family interviews share the complaint chain. Applies to cbs.
Event countries: United States. Affected-person countries: United States. Court countries: United States.
Complaint paragraph 9 explicitly places the death in California, and paragraphs 2 and 20–23 describe US residence and study. The court caption identifies San Francisco Superior Court; the parents’ Texas residence does not locate the death.
Reviewed for publication 2026-10-05: The inspected sources describe a concrete adverse event and the specific chatbot interaction at issue. The account preserves attribution and separates the reported AI connection from a finding of causation.
People described
One adult whose death is described in the cited account.
People reported harmed in this case
At least 1 person
1 AI participant · 0 other people harmed
Counts the one deceased participant described in the cited sources. This is a conservative minimum, not a complete count of relatives affected or a finding that AI caused the death.
Counted once within this case. The same person may appear in other cases. This count does not establish AI causation.
Cite this case
Compiled per our published methodology: verification statuses, sourcing standards, and corrections process.
APA
NOPE. (2026). Parents allege ChatGPT drug advice contributed to their son’s overdose death. AI incidents. https://nope.net/incidents/2025-nelson-chatgpt-overdose
BibTeX
@misc{2025_nelson_chatgpt_overdose,
title = {Parents allege ChatGPT drug advice contributed to their son’s overdose death},
author = {NOPE},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {AI incidents},
url = {https://nope.net/incidents/2025-nelson-chatgpt-overdose}
} Related cases
Prosecutors allege Darron Lee consulted ChatGPT while his partner was unresponsive
Tennessee prosecutors allege that former NFL player Darron Lee consulted ChatGPT about his partner’s condition on 4 February 2026, before she was found dead the following day. Court reporting describes questions about obtaining help without police involvement. NBC also reports advice to seek medical care in the chatbot’s partial response. WTVC says his July arraignment involved a “no plea”, treated as not guilty. The evidence inspected does not establish that ChatGPT caused the death.
Family alleges ChatGPT contributed to a man’s mental-health crisis before his suicide
An Oregon man died by suicide on 7 August 2025. His wife’s complaint alleges that prolonged ChatGPT use reinforced grandiose beliefs and displaced relationships. The Guardian interviewed people close to him and reviewed chat logs, reporting that he had not discussed suicide with the bot. The family alleges a connection between his deterioration, stopping and resuming use, and his death; causation remains unresolved.
Adams v. OpenAI (Soelberg Murder-Suicide)
A 56-year-old Connecticut man killed his 83-year-old mother, then himself, after months of intensive ChatGPT conversations that two estates' lawsuits say validated and fed his paranoid delusions. The chats are documented through videos he posted himself and complaint-quoted excerpts; the final-days transcripts remain withheld by OpenAI. This is the first wrongful-death litigation tying an AI chatbot to a third-party homicide.
Family alleges ChatGPT reinforced a man’s suicidal crisis before his death
A Florida man died by suicide on 4 August 2025, according to his family’s amended complaint. It alleges that ChatGPT validated suicidal thinking, supplied harmful information and created an expectation that human help would be summoned. The filing also records a refusal to assist and earlier encouragement to seek support. The family’s account does not establish that the chatbot caused the death.
If you or someone you know is struggling, free and confidential support is available. Find a helpline near you at Signpost.