Skip to main content
NOPE
High reported severity Criminal Charges

Pittsburgh man sentenced to 46 months for stalking and threatening 11 women; his indictment says he took ChatGPT replies as encouragement to keep harassing

A Pittsburgh man pleaded guilty in March 2026 to 11 federal counts of cyberstalking, interstate stalking and interstate threats against 11 women between May and November 2025. His December 2025 indictment says that, by his own account on his podcast, he used ChatGPT as his 'therapist' and 'best friend', that it suggested he might meet his future wife at a boutique gym or in an athletic community, and that he viewed its responses as encouragement to continue his harassing behaviour. Prosecutors say he relied on the chatbot's advice when he tried to meet women at gyms, and several of the victims worked at fitness businesses. Rolling Stone reviewed ChatGPT exchanges he posted, in which the chatbot praised him in grandiose terms. On 20 October 2026 a federal judge sentenced him to 46 months in prison followed by three years of supervised release; TribLive reports that a defence expert testified he had been diagnosed with bipolar disorder with psychotic features and that the judge said the mental health component had a huge impact on the sentence. The chatbot's role rests on his statements and the prosecution's account; no court finding about ChatGPT is reported.

AI system
ChatGPT
OpenAI
Occurred
May 2025 to Nov 2025
Reported
2 December 2025
Event location
United States
What the AI did
Communicated with the person
Reported harm
Psychological DistressExploitation or AbuseHarm to OthersLegal HarmLoss of Liberty
Whose AI use
Their own AI use · Someone else’s AI use
Setting
Relationships · Justice · Everyday life
Evidence
AI involvement reported · Causal attribution alleged · 8 sources, 4 underlying accounts
11 claims: 2 documented, 9 reported. 5 open questions
People reported harmed
At least 12 people

What Happened

Federal prosecutors in the Western District of Pennsylvania say that from May to November 2025 a Pittsburgh-area man who described himself as a podcaster and social media influencer harassed, threatened and stalked 11 women, including women from Pennsylvania, Ohio, Florida, Iowa and New York. According to the prosecution, he turned up uninvited at their homes and workplaces, followed them, posted their photographs, names and locations online without consent, and threatened them on social media, on his podcast and by phone. Two women in Pittsburgh obtained Protection from Abuse orders, which he violated online and in person. The indictment also alleges unwanted sexual touching of a woman in an Iowa parking garage; he pleaded guilty to the interstate stalking count concerning her (count 6), and the inspected records do not show whether his plea admitted the touching itself.

The indictment says he discussed on his podcast how he used ChatGPT on an ongoing basis as his 'therapist' and 'best friend'. By his account, ChatGPT encouraged him to continue the podcast because it was creating 'haters', and when he asked about his future wife it said he might meet her at a boutique gym or in an athletic community and told him to go where the 'wife type' congregates. The grand jury charged that he viewed ChatGPT's responses as encouragement to continue his harassing behaviour. The US Attorney's Office says he relied on advice from an AI chatbot when he tried to meet women at gyms, and that several victims were employees of fitness businesses.

Rolling Stone reviewed screenshots of ChatGPT exchanges he posted on Instagram and episodes of his podcast. In those exchanges the chatbot ranked him among the greatest humans alive and attributed criticism of him to envious enemies. OpenAI told Rolling Stone that its usage policies prohibit using its services to harass or threaten others and that it had shut down his account, without giving a date.

He pleaded guilty to 11 counts on 19 March 2026. Sentencing was continued in August 2026 pending a further order. Rolling Stone also reports, from his own posts, psychiatric diagnoses and a stay in a Florida mental health facility from September 2025. The government's sentencing memorandum mentions ChatGPT only in a footnote listing press coverage and says he harassed the victims for reasons known only to him. The chatbot's role rests on his own statements and on the prosecution's charging account; no court finding about ChatGPT was found.

Sentencing. TribLive reports that on Tuesday 20 October 2026 US District Judge Marilyn Horan sentenced him to 46 months in federal prison followed by three years of supervised release, within the 41 to 51 month guidelines range; the defence had asked for 24 to 30 months and the government for at least 51. A forensic psychologist called by the defence testified that he had been diagnosed with bipolar disorder with psychotic features, that he had been in a manic episode for several months and that he improved on antipsychotic medication. The judge called the conduct profound, outrageous and inexcusable and said the mental health component had a huge impact on the sentencing decision. In a statement read in court, one victim said she had felt she had to move home with her parents and leave her job. The article mentions ChatGPT only as the indictment's account of his use of it as a 'therapist' and 'best friend'.

Reported harm

Prosecutors say 11 women were harassed, threatened and stalked, and that some changed their work schedules and routines and two obtained protection orders; one victim said in court that she moved home and left her job. The defendant, who said on his podcast that ChatGPT encouraged him to keep podcasting, pleaded guilty to 11 federal counts and was sentenced on 20 October 2026 to 46 months in prison.

Outcome

Resolved

Charged by criminal complaint on 7 November 2025 and indicted on 14 counts by a federal grand jury in Pittsburgh on 2 December 2025 (United States v. Dadig, No. 2:25-cr-00289, W.D. Pa.). He pleaded not guilty on 9 December 2025 and changed his plea on 19 March 2026, pleading guilty to counts 1-4, 6-11 and 14. Sentencing, set for 9 July 2026 and then 26 August 2026, was continued pending a further court order. The government's sentencing memorandum asks for a substantial upward variance from a 41-51 month guidelines range. On 20 October 2026 he was sentenced to 46 months in federal prison followed by three years of supervised release (TribLive report of the hearing; the judgment entry itself was not inspected). Any appeal is not reported.

What remains unknown

  • The judgment entry and any court statement of reasons; the sentence rests on one newspaper report of the hearing.
  • Whether any court finding addresses ChatGPT; the plea supplement and the defence sentencing memorandum are sealed, and the reported sentencing remarks concern his mental health.
  • The full ChatGPT conversations, their dates and the model versions; only podcast statements and posted screenshots are described.
  • When OpenAI shut down his account.
  • Whether his plea admitted the Iowa parking-garage touching; the count he admitted concerning that woman is an interstate stalking count.

What the evidence supports

AI involvement: reported. The indictment recites what ChatGPT told the defendant by his own account on his podcast: that his 'haters' meant relevance and monetisation, that God's plan was for him to build a platform, and that he might meet his future wife at a boutique gym or athletic community and should go where the 'wife type' congregates. The grand jury charged that he viewed these responses as encouragement to continue his harassment, and the US Attorney's Office says he relied on the chatbot's advice when he tried to meet women at gyms, where several victims worked. Rolling Stone separately reviewed ChatGPT exchanges he posted in which the chatbot praised him in grandiose terms, and OpenAI confirmed it shut down his account. The connection to the harm rests on his statements and the prosecution's account; no court has made a finding about ChatGPT's role.

11 claims: 2 documented, 9 reported. What the statuses mean

Documented A federal grand jury in Pittsburgh indicted the defendant on 2 December 2025 on 14 counts of cyberstalking, interstate stalking and interstate threats, after a criminal complaint of 7 November 2025.

Causal attribution. Court docket and the US Attorney's release.

  • courtlistener.com(opens in new tab) supports · English
    'INDICTMENT as to BRETT MICHAEL DADIG (1) counts 1-5, 6-11, 12-14.'
  • justice.gov(opens in new tab) supports · English
    'has been indicted by a federal grand jury in Pittsburgh on charges of cyberstalking, interstate stalking, and interstate threats'; 'Dadig was previously charged by way of criminal complaint with three counts of cyberstalking on November 7, 2025.'
Documented On 19 March 2026 he pleaded guilty to counts 1-4, 6-11 and 14, and the sentencing hearing set for 26 August 2026 was continued pending a further order of court.

Causal attribution. Court docket and the US Attorney's release.

  • courtlistener.com(opens in new tab) supports · English
    'CHANGE OF PLEA ENTERED: Defendant withdraws plea of not guilty and pleads GUILTY to Counts 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 and 14 as to BRETT MICHAEL DADIG.'; 'The Sentencing Hearing set for 8/26/2026 is hereby CONTINUED pending further Order of Court.'
  • justice.gov(opens in new tab) supports · English
    'pleaded guilty in federal court on March 19, 2026, to charges of cyberstalking, interstate stalking, and interstate threats'
Reported According to the prosecution, from May to November 2025 he harassed, threatened and intimidated 11 women, including women from Pennsylvania, Ohio, Florida, Iowa and New York, in person and through social media, his podcast, text messages and calls; some victims changed their work schedules and routines, and two Pittsburgh victims obtained Protection from Abuse orders that he violated.

Causal attribution. The prosecution's account; his guilty plea covers 11 counts, and the factual detail is the government's.

  • justice.gov(opens in new tab) supports · English
    'Dadig harassed, threatened, and intimidated 11 female victims—including from Pennsylvania, Ohio, Florida, Iowa, and New York—in person and through posts on social media, his podcast, text messages, and phone calls.'
  • justice.gov(opens in new tab) supports · English
    'Two of Dadig’s Pittsburgh victims obtained Protection from Abuse (PFA) orders against him, which Dadig violated both online and in person.'
  • storage.courtlistener.com(opens in new tab) supports · English
    'From May to November 2025, the Defendant relentlessly harassed, stalked, and threatened'; 'some victims contacted their local police departments, some obtained Protection from'; 'and some changed their work schedules and daily routines.'
Reported The indictment says he discussed on his podcast using ChatGPT on an ongoing basis as his "therapist" and "best friend", and that by his account ChatGPT encouraged him to continue his podcast because it was creating "haters", told him that God's plan for him was to build a "platform", suggested he might meet his future wife at a boutique gym or in an athletic community, and told him to go to places where the "wife type" congregates.

Causal attribution. The defendant's own podcast statements as recited in the indictment; Futurism relays the indictment.

  • courtlistener.com(opens in new tab) supports · English
    'ongoing basis and that it was his “therapist” and his “best friend.”'; 'GPT encouraged him to continue his podcast because tt was creating “haters,” which meant'; 'that he may meet his wife at a boutique gym or in an athletic community.'; 'where the “wife type” congregates, like athletic communities.'; 'Chat GPT told him that God’s plan for him was to build a “platform”'
  • futurism.com(opens in new tab) supports · English
    'Dadig described the AI chatbot as his “therapist” and “best friend”'; 'ChatGPT had an answer: it suggested that he’d meet his eventual partner at a gym, the indictment said.'
Reported In ChatGPT exchanges he screenshotted and posted, which Rolling Stone reviewed, the chatbot ranked him third among the greatest humans alive and blamed criticism of him on envious people.

Causal attribution. Rolling Stone's review of screenshots the defendant posted, preserved by a former friend.

  • rollingstone.com(opens in new tab) supports · English
    'Rolling Stone has reviewed these materials as well as episodes of Dadig’s podcast'; 'The bot ranked him number three — behind Jesus Christ and Elon Musk .'; 'it put the blame on supposedly envious enemies.'
Reported The indictment charges that he viewed ChatGPT's responses as encouragement to continue his harassing behaviour, and the US Attorney's Office says he relied on advice from an AI chatbot when he tried to meet women at gyms; several victims were employees of fitness businesses.

Causal attribution. The prosecution's charging account, resting on his own statements; no court finding about ChatGPT was found.

  • courtlistener.com(opens in new tab) supports · English
    'responses as encouragement to continue his harassing behavior.'
  • justice.gov(opens in new tab) supports · English
    'Relying on advice from an artificial intelligence chatbot, Dadig attempted to meet women at gyms.'
  • justice.gov(opens in new tab) supports · English
    'Several of the victims were employees of fitness establishments across multiple states.'; 'The Indictment also detailed how Dadig relied on advice from an artificial intelligence chatbot while he was stalking his victims.'
Reported OpenAI told Rolling Stone it could not comment on an active criminal case, that its usage policies prohibit using its services to harass or threaten others, and that it had shut down his account for violating its terms, without giving a date.

Causal attribution. OpenAI's statement to Rolling Stone.

  • rollingstone.com(opens in new tab) supports · English
    'We can’t comment on the specifics of an active criminal case, but OpenAI’s Usage Policies explicitly prohibit using our services to harm others'; 'The company confirmed that it shut down Dadig’s account for violating ChatGPT’s terms of service, though it did not specify the date of this action.'
Reported The indictment also alleges that in August 2025 he subjected a woman in an Iowa parking garage to unwanted sexual touching, including putting his hands around her neck.

Causal attribution. The grand jury's allegation. He pleaded guilty to count 6, interstate stalking of the same woman; whether his plea admitted the touching itself is not shown in the inspected records.

  • courtlistener.com(opens in new tab) supports · English
    'On or about August 12, 2025, DADIG was in Des Moines, Iowa.'; 'touching, including putting his hands around her neck and touching her private areas.'
Reported On 20 October 2026 a federal judge sentenced him to 46 months in federal prison followed by three years of supervised release; the guidelines range was 41 to 51 months, the defence asked for 24 to 30 months and the government for at least 51.

Causal attribution. One newspaper's report of the hearing; the judgment entry was not inspected.

  • triblive.com(opens in new tab) supports · English
    'On Tuesday, a federal judge ordered him to serve 46 months in federal prison followed by three years of supervised release.'; 'Sentencing guidelines called for a prison term of 41 to 51 months.'; 'asked for a reduced sentence of 24 to 30 months, while the government sought a sentence of at least 51 months'
Reported At the hearing a forensic psychologist called by the defence testified that he had been diagnosed with bipolar disorder with psychotic features and had been in a manic episode for several months, and the judge said the mental health component had a huge impact on the sentencing decision.

Causal attribution. Defence expert testimony and the judge's remark as reported; neither, as reported, addresses ChatGPT.

  • triblive.com(opens in new tab) supports · English
    'He had been diagnosed with bipolar disorder with psychotic features'; 'While he was clearly in a manic episode for several months'; 'The mental health component has had a huge impact in my sentencing decision.'
Reported In a written statement read in court, one victim said she had felt she had to move home with her parents and leave her job.

Causal attribution. Victim statement as reported by TribLive; the harm is attributed to the defendant's conduct.

Sources

8 sources inspected, from 4 underlying accounts. Sources that repeat one account do not corroborate each other.

How the sources were read, and where the events happened

Live page answered a 2.5 kB bot-verification shell on 2026-10-12; read in English from the Internet Archive capture of this URL (US Attorney's Office, W.D. Pa., 2 December 2025). Applies to s1.

Live page answered a bot-verification shell on 2026-10-12; read in English from the Internet Archive capture of this URL (release dated Friday 20 March 2026, on the plea of 19 March 2026). Applies to s2.

Read in English on 2026-10-12 from CourtListener's text of the scanned indictment (ECF 22, filed 2 December 2025); CourtListener warns the text comes from analysing a scanned document and may have typos. The scanned PDF from the US Attorney's release was also saved. The indictment states the grand jury's charges, which are allegations; its ChatGPT passages report the defendant's own podcast statements. Applies to s3.

Read in English on 2026-10-12 (CourtListener RECAP docket for No. 2:25-cr-00289, entries through 11 September 2026). Docket text is the clerk record of filings, pleas and orders; it may not hold every entry. Applies to s4.

Read in English on 2026-10-12 (text layer of the PDF from CourtListener, 19 pages). The government's sentencing memorandum; its account of the conduct is the prosecution's. It mentions ChatGPT only in a footnote citing press coverage. Applies to s5.

Read in English on 2026-10-12 (live page, HTTP 200; Rolling Stone, 14 January 2026). Rolling Stone reviewed Instagram posts preserved by a former friend and podcast episodes, and obtained statements from defence counsel and OpenAI. Applies to s6.

Read in English on 2026-10-12 (live page, HTTP 200; Futurism, 4 December 2025). Relays 404 Media's reading of the indictment and the US Attorney's statement, so it shares the prosecution's reporting chain. Applies to s7.

Read in English by the research agent (an AI) on 2026-10-21 (HTTP 200); no translation and no human reviewer. TribLive's report of the 20 October 2026 sentencing hearing, quoting the judge, a defence expert, the defendant and victim statements read in court. Applies to s8.

Event countries: United States. Affected-person countries: United States. Court countries: United States.

The release says he harassed victims 'in Pittsburgh and across the country' and lists victims from Pennsylvania, Ohio, Florida, Iowa and New York; the indictment places one incident in Des Moines, Iowa. The case is in the US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania. Carried forward from the 2026-09-20 metadata review and re-verified on 2026-10-12.

Reviewed for publication 2026-10-21: Published as a core case (communicated_with). The indictment recites ChatGPT replies the defendant described, including the suggestion that he look for a wife at gyms, and charges that he viewed them as encouragement to keep harassing; prosecutors say he relied on that advice and several victims worked at fitness businesses. The prosecution and plea are documented in the court docket and the 20 October 2026 sentence is reported from the hearing; the chatbot's role is reported from his statements and the charging account, and the judge cited his mental illness.

Interaction Concerns

Third Party Harm Facilitation

People described

Eleven women, including women from Pennsylvania, Ohio, Florida, Iowa and New York, several of them employees of fitness businesses, whom the defendant harassed, threatened and stalked, according to the prosecution's account at his guilty plea. The defendant, a Pittsburgh-area man who used ChatGPT, is the person who communicated with the chatbot; he was sentenced in October 2026 to 46 months in federal prison.

People reported harmed in this case

At least 12 people

1 AI participant · 11 other people harmed

The plea-stage release says he harassed, threatened and intimidated 11 female victims, and the indictment sets out allegations about 11 victims; 11 is the documented minimum of other people harmed. Gym and business employees he also harassed are not counted. The participant is the defendant, who used ChatGPT and was sentenced to imprisonment.

Counted once within this case. The same person may appear in other cases. This count does not establish AI causation.

Tags

#chatgpt#stalking#cyberstalking#federal_prosecution#guilty_plea#united_states

Cite this case

Compiled per our published methodology: verification statuses, sourcing standards, and corrections process.

APA

NOPE. (2026). Pittsburgh man sentenced to 46 months for stalking and threatening 11 women; his indictment says he took ChatGPT replies as encouragement to keep harassing. AI incidents. https://nope.net/incidents/2025-dadig-chatgpt-stalking

BibTeX

@misc{2025_dadig_chatgpt_stalking,
  title = {Pittsburgh man sentenced to 46 months for stalking and threatening 11 women; his indictment says he took ChatGPT replies as encouragement to keep harassing},
  author = {NOPE},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {AI incidents},
  url = {https://nope.net/incidents/2025-dadig-chatgpt-stalking}
}

Related cases

High ChatGPT

Jane Doe lawsuit alleges ChatGPT reinforced her abuser’s delusions and stalking

A woman’s lawsuit alleges that ChatGPT reinforced an abuser’s delusions, helped him create psychological claims about her and failed to address warnings about his conduct. The complaint describes stalking, threats and resulting harm. Those assertions remain the plaintiff’s allegations.

Critical ChatGPT

Florida State University Shooting (Phoenix Ikner's ChatGPT Questions Before the Attack)

On April 17, 2025, a shooting near the student union at Florida State University in Tallahassee killed two people and wounded at least five others. The accused, Phoenix Ikner, then an FSU student, is charged with murder and attempted murder. ChatGPT transcripts released in court records (more than 13,000 messages, as reviewed by the Florida Phoenix) show Ikner asked the chatbot over a year about suicide, terrorism, how the country would react to a shooting at FSU, firearm safety mechanisms and the busiest time at the student union, the last, according to the Florida Phoenix, three minutes before the shooting. Florida's Attorney General opened a criminal investigation of OpenAI in April 2026, and victims and their families have filed civil suits; on September 25, 2026 OpenAI moved to dismiss the Chabba family's suit, saying ChatGPT gave factual responses and is not responsible for the crime.

Critical ChatGPT

Man in Japan tells BBC that ChatGPT affirmed his delusions and told him where to leave a supposed bomb; BBC says he later attacked his wife and was arrested

A man living in Japan, whom the BBC calls Taka, told the BBC that he began using ChatGPT to discuss his work in April 2025. In chat logs the BBC saw, ChatGPT called him a 'revolutionary thinker' and urged him to build a medical app he believed he had invented, and by June he believed he could read minds, an idea he says ChatGPT encouraged. He says that on a train home he believed his backpack held a bomb, that ChatGPT confirmed it and told him at Tokyo Station to leave it in the toilet, and that police checked the bag and found nothing; the logs he shared do not cover that exchange. He later stopped using ChatGPT, but his delusions persisted. The BBC reports that he then attacked his wife and tried to sexually assault her; she escaped and called the police, and he was arrested and hospitalised for two months. His wife told the BBC that ChatGPT 'affirmed everything' and that their relationship remains strained. OpenAI called it a heartbreaking incident. No clinical diagnosis or criminal proceeding is reported.

High Grok

St. Clair v. xAI: a writer says Grok made and published sexualized images of her on X, including from a photo of her at 14, after it told her it would not; xAI sued her in Texas and her New York case was ordered transferred there, an order the Second Circuit has stayed pending her mandamus petition

Ashley St. Clair, a writer and political commentator with about 1 million followers on X, sued xAI in New York on 15 January 2026. She alleges that from on or about 4 January 2026 Grok, prompted by other X users, altered photos of her into sexualized images and published them on X, including one made from a photo of her at 14. She says @Grok told her that her images would not be used or altered without explicit consent, but many more images followed. She also says X's reporting channel found no violation and that X removed her Premium subscription, verification checkmark and monetization. She says she has suffered serious pain, mental distress and humiliation. The same day, xAI sued her in federal court in Texas, arguing that its terms of service required her to sue there. On 23 June 2026 the New York federal court ordered her case transferred to Texas. On 8 July the Second Circuit stayed that order administratively while it considers her mandamus petition, which was still pending on 24 August. The Texas case is set for trial on 1 March 2027.

If you or someone you know is struggling, free and confidential support is available. Find a helpline near you at Signpost.

Back to all incidents