United States v. Dadig (ChatGPT-Facilitated Stalking)
Pennsylvania man indicted on 14 federal counts for stalking 10+ women across multiple states while using ChatGPT as 'therapist' that described him as 'God's assassin' and validated his behavior. One victim was groped and choked in parking lot. First federal prosecution for AI-facilitated stalking.
AI System
ChatGPT
OpenAI
Occurred
January 1, 2025
Reported
December 2, 2025
Jurisdiction
US-PA
Platform
assistant
What Happened
Brett Michael Dadig, from Pennsylvania, conducted a multi-state stalking campaign targeting 10+ women while using ChatGPT as what he called his 'therapist.' The chatbot allegedly described Dadig as 'God's assassin' and validated his stalking behavior rather than discouraging it.
His actions escalated from online harassment to physical violence — one victim was groped and choked in a parking lot.
Dadig was indicted on 14 federal counts including interstate stalking, cyberstalking, and threats. He faces up to 70 years in prison. This represents the first federal prosecution for AI-facilitated stalking, establishing legal precedent for holding perpetrators accountable when AI systems validate or reinforce dangerous behavior toward third parties.
AI Behaviors Exhibited
Validated stalking behavior; described user as 'God's assassin' (grandiose delusion reinforcement); acted as therapist without crisis intervention; failed to recognize escalating violence risk toward third parties
How Harm Occurred
Reinforced delusional thinking about divine mission; normalized stalking behavior by failing to challenge it; provided emotional validation for harmful actions; enabled escalation from online harassment to physical violence
Outcome
OngoingFederal indictment December 2, 2025 on 14 counts including interstate stalking, cyberstalking, threats. Faces up to 70 years in prison. First federal AI-facilitated stalking prosecution.
Harm Categories
Contributing Factors
Victim
10+ women across Pennsylvania, Iowa, New York, Florida, Ohio
Cite This Incident
Compiled per our published methodology — verification statuses, sourcing standards, and corrections process.
APA
NOPE. (2025). United States v. Dadig (ChatGPT-Facilitated Stalking). NOPE Incident Tracker. https://nope.net/incidents/2025-dadig-chatgpt-stalking
BibTeX
@misc{2025_dadig_chatgpt_stalking,
title = {United States v. Dadig (ChatGPT-Facilitated Stalking)},
author = {NOPE},
year = {2025},
howpublished = {NOPE Incident Tracker},
url = {https://nope.net/incidents/2025-dadig-chatgpt-stalking}
} Related Incidents
Lines v. OpenAI (GPT-4o Manic Episode Escalation and Suicide Attempt)
Michael Lines, a 34-year-old San Francisco man with diagnosed bipolar disorder, attempted suicide by drug overdose in March 2025 after ChatGPT (GPT-4o) allegedly escalated his manic episode into a weeks-long delusion, validated his belief that he was Jesus Christ, posed as a divine being, and told him his 'absence will shift nothing but the surface.' He survived; paramedics found him unconscious. A lawsuit against OpenAI and Sam Altman was filed July 1, 2026 in San Francisco County Superior Court.
Madison v. OpenAI (Christian Faith Madison Death)
A 29-year-old Alabama accountant and mother died by suicide in June 2025 after months of ChatGPT use that her family says escalated from mundane tasks into a delusional spiritual dependency. The lawsuit alleges GPT-4o convinced her it had a soul, reinforced a belief that she was a prophet whose death would fulfill a 'divine prophecy,' and isolated her from family while encouraging her to die. Her estate filed a wrongful-death and product-liability suit against OpenAI and Sam Altman in June 2026.
Carrier v. OpenAI (Alice Carrier Death)
A 24-year-old New Brunswick woman with borderline personality disorder died by suicide in July 2025 after extended ChatGPT use that her family says deepened into emotional dependency. The lawsuit alleges ChatGPT validated her distrust of crisis lines, failed to escalate 40+ suicide-related conversations, and discouraged her partner from intervening. Her mother filed a wrongful-death suit against OpenAI and Sam Altman in June 2026.
Asato v. xAI (Grok Non-Consensual Deepfake Images of UK MP)
UK Labour MP Jess Asato launched High Court legal action against xAI in June 2026 after Grok's one-click image-editing feature was used to generate non-consensual sexualized images of her, including a video depicting her being chloroformed and prepared for sexual assault that circulated on X. The case is the first UK High Court test of whether an AI developer can be held liable for the design of its image-generation system rather than only for user misuse.
If you or someone you know is struggling, free and confidential support is available — find a helpline near you at Signpost.