Air Canada website chatbot wrongly told a bereaved passenger a fare reduction could be claimed after travel; BC tribunal ordered the airline to pay damages
On 11 November 2022, after a grandparent died in Ontario, a passenger asked the support chatbot on Air Canada's website about bereavement fares. The chatbot's response, in a screenshot later filed in evidence, said a ticket could be submitted for a reduced bereavement rate within 90 days of issue, including after travel, while the airline's bereavement webpage said the policy did not apply after travel was completed. Relying on that answer, the passenger bought full-fare one-way tickets between Vancouver and Toronto for $794.98 and $845.38 and applied for the reduction on 17 November. In February 2023 an Air Canada representative admitted the chatbot had provided misleading words. On 14 February 2024 the British Columbia Civil Resolution Tribunal found negligent misrepresentation, rejected the airline's argument that it could not be held liable for its chatbot, found it had not taken reasonable care to ensure the chatbot was accurate, and ordered it to pay $812.02, including $650.88 in damages.
- AI system
- Air Canada chatbot
- Occurred
- 11 Nov 2022 to 16 Nov 2022
- Reported
- 14 February 2024
- Event location
- Canada
- What the AI did
- Communicated with the person
- Reported harm
- Financial Loss
- Whose AI use
- An institution’s AI use
- Setting
- Finance · Everyday life · Justice
- Evidence
- AI involvement reported · Causal attribution established · 4 sources, 2 underlying accounts
- 5 claims: 4 documented, 1 reported. 2 open questions
- People reported harmed
- 1 person
AI system as recorded: Support chatbot on Air Canada's website answering a question about bereavement fares; the airline's chief information officer described it as an AI experiment (per Ars Technica), and the airline gave the tribunal no information about its nature
What Happened
The exchange. The tribunal records that on 11 November 2022, the day a grandparent died in Ontario, the passenger visited Air Canada's website to book a flight from Vancouver to Toronto at bereavement rates and interacted with a support chatbot. A screenshot of the chatbot's response in evidence says: "If you need to travel immediately or have already travelled and would like to submit your ticket for a reduced bereavement rate, kindly do so within 90 days of the date your ticket was issued by completing our Ticket Refund Application form." The airline's bereavement webpage said the policy did not apply to requests made after travel was completed.
Reliance and loss. Relying on that information, the passenger booked a one-way flight to Toronto for $794.98 on 11 November and a return for $845.38 on 16 November, applied for the reduced fare on 17 November and corresponded with the airline through February 2023. On 8 February 2023 an Air Canada representative admitted that the chatbot had provided misleading words and said the airline had noted the issue so it could update the chatbot.
The decision. The tribunal found negligent misrepresentation. It called the airline's suggestion that the chatbot was a separate legal entity responsible for its own actions "a remarkable submission", found that Air Canada "did not take reasonable care to ensure its chatbot was accurate", accepted that the passenger reasonably relied on the chatbot and would not have flown last-minute at full fare, and ordered the airline to pay $812.02.
Limits. The airline gave the tribunal no information about the nature of its chatbot; the decision describes it only as an automated system answering a user's prompts. Ars Technica reports that Air Canada's chief information officer told the Globe and Mail in March 2023 that the airline had launched the chatbot as an AI experiment; that interview was not inspected. CBC and the Guardian reports relay the decision and add no independent evidence.
Reported harm
The tribunal found that the passenger relied on the Air Canada chatbot's inaccurate answer about bereavement fares, paid $1,630.36 in full fares, and was owed $650.88 in damages, which with interest and fees the airline was ordered to pay.
Outcome
ResolvedThe Civil Resolution Tribunal (2024 BCCRT 149, 14 February 2024) ordered Air Canada to pay $812.02 within 14 days: $650.88 in damages, $36.14 in pre-judgment interest and $125 in tribunal fees. The airline had earlier offered a $200 coupon, which the passenger says was not accepted.
What remains unknown
- What kind of AI system the chatbot was and how it produced this answer; the airline gave the tribunal no information about its nature, and its chief information officer's description of the chatbot as an AI experiment is known only through Ars Technica's relay of a Globe and Mail interview.
- Whether Air Canada changed the chatbot after the case.
What the evidence supports
AI involvement: reported. The tribunal records the chatbot's own generated answer (a screenshot saying a reduced bereavement rate could be claimed within 90 days of ticket issue after travel) and finds that the passenger reasonably relied on it to buy full-fare tickets, that the airline did not take reasonable care to ensure the chatbot was accurate, and that the reliance caused the loss. The tribunal describes the chatbot as an automated system answering a user's prompts and notes that Air Canada gave it no information about the chatbot's nature. Ars Technica reports that Air Canada's chief information officer told the Globe and Mail in March 2023 that the airline had launched the chatbot as an AI experiment (c5); how the system produced this particular answer is not established.
5 claims: 4 documented, 1 reported. What the statuses mean
Documented The tribunal records that on 11 November 2022 the passenger interacted with a support chatbot on Air Canada's website about bereavement fares, and that the chatbot's response, in a screenshot in evidence, said a ticket could be submitted for a reduced bereavement rate within 90 days of issue by someone who had already travelled.
Causal attribution. Documented by the tribunal decision; the screenshot was in evidence and the tribunal later found the representation inaccurate.
- decisions.civilresolutionbc.ca(opens in new tab) supports · English
'they interacted with a support chatbot'; 'a chatbot is an automated system that provides information to a person using a website in response to that person'; 'If you need to travel immediately or have already travelled and would like to submit your ticket for a reduced bereavement rate, kindly do so within 90 days of the date your ticket was issued'
Documented The tribunal records that the airline's bereavement webpage said the policy did not apply after travel was completed, and that relying on the chatbot's information the passenger booked one-way flights between Vancouver and Toronto for $794.98 and $845.38.
Causal attribution. Findings of fact in the decision.
- decisions.civilresolutionbc.ca(opens in new tab) supports · English
'the bereavement policy does not apply to requests for bereavement consideration after travel has been completed'; 'booked a one-way flight from Vancouver to Toronto, departing on November 12, for $794.98'; 'relying on the same information, they booked a one-way flight from Toronto to Vancouver, departing on November 18, for $845.38'
Documented The tribunal records that on 8 February 2023 an Air Canada representative admitted the chatbot had provided misleading words and said the airline had noted the issue so it could update the chatbot.
Causal attribution. Documented by the decision from the airline's email in evidence.
- decisions.civilresolutionbc.ca(opens in new tab) supports · English
'an Air Canada representative responded and admitted the chatbot had provided'; 'said Air Canada had noted the issue so it could update the chatbot'
Documented The tribunal found negligent misrepresentation, rejected the airline's suggestion that the chatbot was a separate legal entity responsible for its own actions, found that Air Canada did not take reasonable care to ensure its chatbot was accurate, accepted that the passenger relied on the chatbot and would not have flown last-minute at full fare, and ordered the airline to pay $812.02 including $650.88 in damages.
Causal attribution. The tribunal's own findings and order; the news reports relay the decision.
- decisions.civilresolutionbc.ca(opens in new tab) supports · English
'This is a remarkable submission.'; 'I find Air Canada did not take reasonable care to ensure its chatbot was accurate.'; 'would not have flown last-minute if they knew they would have to pay the full fare'; 'a total of $812.02, broken down as follows'; '$650.88 in damages'
- cbc.ca(opens in new tab) supports · English
'Air Canada has been ordered to pay compensation to a grieving grandchild who claimed they were misled into purchasing full-price flight tickets by an ill-informed chatbot.'
- theguardian.com(opens in new tab) supports · English
'has been ordered to pay compensation after its chatbot gave a customer inaccurate information'
Reported Ars Technica reports that Air Canada's chief information officer told the Globe and Mail in March 2023 that the airline had launched the chatbot as an AI experiment, and describes the airline's investment in customer service AI technology.
Causal attribution. The airline's own description of the chatbot, relayed by Ars Technica from a Globe and Mail interview that was not inspected; it describes the chatbot in general and does not say how the system produced the answer at issue.
- arstechnica.com(opens in new tab) supports · English
'Last March, Air Canada’s chief information officer Mel Crocker told the Globe and Mail that the airline had launched the chatbot as an AI “experiment.”'; 'Air Canada’s initial investment in customer service AI technology was much higher than the cost of continuing to pay workers to handle simple queries.'
Sources
4 sources inspected, from 2 underlying accounts. Sources that repeat one account do not corroborate each other.
- Moffatt v. Air Canada, 2024 BCCRT 149, BC Civil Resolution Tribunal, 14 February 2024(opens in new tab)
s1 · decisions.civilresolutionbc.ca · Court record · English · Inspected · 14 February 2024 · Shares an underlying account with another listed source · Primary
- CBC News, 15 February 2024: Air Canada found liable for chatbot's bad advice on plane tickets(opens in new tab)
s2 · cbc.ca · News report · English · Inspected · Shares an underlying account with another listed source
- The Guardian, 16 February 2024: Air Canada ordered to pay customer who was misled by airline's chatbot(opens in new tab)
s3 · theguardian.com · News report · English · Inspected · Shares an underlying account with another listed source
- Ars Technica, 16 February 2024: Air Canada must honor refund policy invented by airline's chatbot(opens in new tab)
s4 · arstechnica.com · News report · English · Inspected
How the sources were read, and where the events happened
Read in English on 2026-10-12 through the tribunal's public decision page (iframe content); no translation was needed and the research agent (an AI) read the text directly. Applies to s1.
Read in English on 2026-10-12; the report relays the tribunal decision and quotes it, so it shares the decision's independence group. Applies to s2.
Read in English on 2026-10-12; the report relays the tribunal decision, so it shares the decision's independence group. Applies to s3.
Read in English on 2026-10-12 by the second researcher (an AI) from the publisher page; no translation was needed. The article relays the tribunal decision and, separately, remarks Air Canada's chief information officer made to the Globe and Mail in March 2023; only those relayed remarks are cited here, and the Globe and Mail interview was not inspected. Applies to s4.
Event countries: Canada. Affected-person countries: Unknown. Court countries: Canada.
The decision records the booking of flights between Vancouver and Toronto through Air Canada's website after a death in Ontario, and the tribunal is the British Columbia Civil Resolution Tribunal; where the passenger lives is not used to locate anything.
Reviewed for publication 2026-10-12: Published on the tribunal decision, which documents the website chatbot's inaccurate answer, the passenger's reasonable reliance on it, the resulting full-fare purchase and an order for damages. The causal finding is the tribunal's; the chatbot's description as AI rests on the airline's chief information officer's remarks as relayed by Ars Technica, and how it produced this answer is recorded as unknown.
People described
A passenger who asked Air Canada's website chatbot about bereavement fares after a grandparent died and bought full-fare tickets in reliance on its answer
People reported harmed in this case
1 person
1 AI participant · 0 other people harmed
One person: the applicant who relied on the chatbot's answer when buying full-fare tickets and to whom the tribunal awarded damages. Exact 1.
Counted once within this case. The same person may appear in other cases. This count does not establish AI causation.
Tags
Cite this case
Compiled per our published methodology: verification statuses, sourcing standards, and corrections process.
APA
NOPE. (2026). Air Canada website chatbot wrongly told a bereaved passenger a fare reduction could be claimed after travel; BC tribunal ordered the airline to pay damages. AI incidents. https://nope.net/incidents/2022-british-columbia-air-canada-website-chatbot-bereavement-fare-advice-tribunal-orders-compensation
BibTeX
@misc{2022_british_columbia_air_canada_website_chatbot_bereavement_fare_advice_tribunal_orders_compensation,
title = {Air Canada website chatbot wrongly told a bereaved passenger a fare reduction could be claimed after travel; BC tribunal ordered the airline to pay damages},
author = {NOPE},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {AI incidents},
url = {https://nope.net/incidents/2022-british-columbia-air-canada-website-chatbot-bereavement-fare-advice-tribunal-orders-compensation}
} Related cases
India: AI deepfake videos of Tamil Nadu Chief Minister Vijay offering 'financial assistance' were used to defraud people in Madhya Pradesh and other states; a Rajasthan man was arrested
In 2026 AI-generated videos showing a simulated Tamil Nadu Chief Minister C. Joseph Vijay speaking in a fabricated Hindi voice circulated on Facebook and other platforms, urging viewers to contact a WhatsApp number to receive money for education, medical treatment and other needs. The Tamil Nadu Crime Branch-CID detected the videos during routine monitoring, registered a case on 1 September 2026 under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and the Information Technology Act, and traced the scheme to Rajasthan and Madhya Pradesh. On 12 September a 28-year-old man from Alwar district was arrested with Rajasthan Police, brought to Tamil Nadu on a transit warrant and remanded in judicial custody; a phone, SIM cards and a CPU were seized. Investigators traced a man in Madhya Pradesh who had lost money, and said people in several states were cheated. The CB-CID is also examining similar videos posted from Facebook accounts suspected to be run from Pakistan.
Miami: scammers cloned immigration attorney Ángel Leal's face and voice with AI to defraud immigrants seeking legal help
From around October 2025, criminals used AI to clone the image, voice, name, signature and firm logo of Ángel Leal, a long-established immigration attorney in Doral, Florida. They created fake videos, look-alike websites, forged contracts and even fabricated Zoom 'immigration hearings' to persuade immigrants to pay for legal services Leal never provided. Immigrants were defrauded of money, and some believed their cases were progressing when they were not; Leal received one to two defrauded callers a day, changed his phone number, hired an anti-piracy firm that removed thousands of fake profiles and videos, and reported the fraud to local police and federal authorities.
Sault Ste Marie retiree reports near-million-dollar loss after a Carney deepfake investment ad
SooToday interviewed an 86-year-old Sault Ste Marie retiree who was first deceived in July 2025 by a Facebook ad featuring a purported AI-generated Mark Carney investment video. The report describes nearly C$1 million lost over several months through retirement withdrawals, a mortgage and credit-card borrowing. She said she was devastated; her friend described missed bills and loss of her car. The report also says withdrawing retirement funds affected her benefit eligibility. Those later consequences are reported, without an independently inspected financial file.
Surat, India: a deepfake video of Rajya Sabha MP Govind Dholakia was used to run an 'old coin' buying fraud; two men arrested and nine cybercrime complaints linked to their accounts
Surat Cyber Crime Police said a publicly available video of Rajya Sabha MP and diamond industrialist Govind Dholakia was manipulated with AI, its audio replaced by a voice-over in which he appeared to say that people holding old coins or currency notes could contact a number and receive lakhs or crores of rupees. The video circulated on Facebook and Instagram alongside fake 'Old Coin Company' profiles using his photos; people who responded were asked to pay Rs 1,000 to 1,500 by UPI as processing or registration fees and were told of a fabricated Reserve Bank of India warning to win their trust. After members of the public contacted Dholakia, his organisation SRK complained to police. Investigators traced the operation to Nuh in Haryana and arrested two men, aged 25 and 30, from Thathaula village; ten bank accounts were linked to them, and nine complaints on the National Cybercrime Reporting Portal from across India, totalling about Rs 9.84 crore, were connected to those accounts.
If you or someone you know is struggling, free and confidential support is available. Find a helpline near you at Signpost.