Skip to main content
Medium reported severity Criminal Charges

Washington, Illinois: Snapchat flagged a student teacher's private joke to the FBI; she was arrested at her school and lost her placement

On 29 January 2025, a 22-year-old student teacher at a District 50 elementary school in Washington, Illinois, vented in a private Snapchat group chat with her boyfriend and two roommates after a third-grade student turned off her computer mid lesson-plan, asking whether she should 'shoot the child or just the whole school' (per sheriff's reports). Snapchat's systems flagged the message and warned the FBI, which notified the Tazewell County Sheriff's Office at 1:06 p.m. Deputies interviewed her at the school, confirmed she sent it as a joke, searched her phone and belongings with her consent and found no weapons, and arrested her on a disorderly conduct charge; they concluded she had spoken out of 'exasperation' with no intent to harm and no threat to the school. The district told parents she would not return to complete her educational assignment.

AI system
Snapchat content-flagging system
Snap Inc.
Occurred
29 Jan 2025
Reported
30 January 2025
Event location
United States
What the AI did
Made a decision about the person · Made a claim about the person
Reported harm
Legal HarmProfessional Harm
Whose AI use
An institution’s AI use
Setting
Education · Work · Justice · Privacy
Evidence
AI involvement supported · Causal attribution supported · 4 sources, 3 underlying accounts
5 claims: 4 corroborated, 1 reported. 5 open questions
People reported harmed
1 person

AI system as recorded: Snapchat automated content-flagging system

What Happened

The student teacher, an Illinois State University student placed at John A. Hensey School in Washington, Illinois (25News Now reported 'John L. Hensey Elementary School'), was in a private Snapchat group chat with her boyfriend and two roommates when a student pressed the power button on her computer while she composed a lesson plan, erasing her progress. She messaged the group asking whether she should 'shoot' the student — sheriff's reports obtained by the Peoria Journal Star under FOIA render it 'shoot the child or just the whole school'. According to the police reports, 'the social media site flagged the message and warned the FBI', which notified the Tazewell County Sheriff's Office on 29 January 2025 at 1:06 p.m.; the district's email to parents says 'the use of that obviously inappropriate language on the social media site triggered a report to law enforcement'. A deputy and a detective interviewed her in an empty classroom, read her Miranda rights, showed her the flagged message, and searched her phone and classroom belongings with her consent; nothing indicating possible violence was found. The main teacher described her as laid-back and not aggressive. Told she would be arrested, she said 'That's crazy'; the deputy referenced 'the current environment of maximum vigilance toward anything that could lead to a school shooting'. She was booked into the Tazewell County Jail for disorderly conduct. The Sheriff's Office and the district both concluded the remark was made out of exasperation with no actual intent and no threat to student safety; Superintendent Chad Allaman's letter said she would not return to District 50 to complete her assignment. The Peoria Journal Star's original 30 January 2025 report withheld her name; 25News Now named her from jail records a day later — she is not named in this public record. The disposition of the charge is not reported. In August 2026 the episode was rehashed by content farms (Thought Catalog and others) with embellishments ('within an hour', 'Snapchat AI sent a private chat to the FBI'), prompting this review; those versions add nothing and are recorded as derivative.

Reported harm

A private joke flagged by an automated system led to an armed-response interview at her workplace, arrest and jail booking on a disorderly conduct charge, and the loss of her student-teaching placement, although deputies and the district concluded she never intended harm.

How Harm Occurred

An automated platform moderation system flagged a sarcastic private message as a threat and escalated it to law enforcement; the institutional response (FBI referral, armed interview at her school, arrest, placement loss) produced the harm although no intent or threat was found.

Outcome

Unknown

Arrested 29 January 2025 on a disorderly conduct charge and booked into the Tazewell County Jail; the Sheriff's Office and the district concluded there was no intent and no threat. The disposition of the charge is not reported in the inspected sources. She did not return to District 50 to complete her assignment.

What remains unknown

  • The disposition of the disorderly conduct charge (dismissal, plea, supervision) is not reported in the inspected sources.
  • The flagging technology Snapchat used (automated classifiers, hash matching or otherwise) is not specified in the inspected records.
  • Whether she continued teacher training elsewhere is not reported.
  • The school's name appears as 'John A. Hensey School' (Peoria Journal Star) and 'John L. Hensey Elementary School' (25News Now); the discrepancy is unresolved.
  • The exact interval between sending the message and the FBI referral is not stated; content-farm claims of 'within an hour' are unverified.

What the evidence supports

AI involvement: supported. Police reports obtained under FOIA state 'the social media site flagged the message and warned the FBI', and the district's email says the language use 'triggered a report to law enforcement'; no human reporter was involved. The flagging technology (automated classifiers or otherwise) is not specified in the inspected records.

5 claims: 4 corroborated, 1 reported. What the statuses mean

Reported Snapchat's systems flagged the woman's private group-chat message and warned the FBI, which notified the Tazewell County Sheriff's Office on 29 January 2025 at 1:06 p.m.

Causal attribution. One outlet group (Peoria Journal Star) carrying two distinct records (sheriff's reports via FOIA; the district's email). The flagging technology is unspecified; no second independent outlet describes the mechanism, so the claim stays reported.

  • pjstar.com(opens in new tab) supports · English
    'The social media site flagged the message and warned the FBI, which then notified the Sheriff's Office'; 'the office had been informed on Jan. 29, 2025, at 1:06 p.m. that the FBI had received a threat via Snapchat involving someone at John A. Hensey School in Washington.'
  • pjstar.com(opens in new tab) context · English
    District email: 'The use of that obviously inappropriate language on the social media site triggered a report to law enforcement who subsequently interviewed the student teacher.'
Corroborated The flagged message asked whether she should 'shoot the child or just the whole school' (sheriff's reports' rendering); the district's email and 25News Now report her asking friends whether she should 'shoot' the student.

Causal attribution. Wordings differ slightly between the sheriff's reports and the district/25News accounts; both versions are attributed. She confirmed sending the message and said it was a joke.

  • pjstar.com(opens in new tab) supports · English
    'In a chat with her boyfriend and her two roommates, she advised whether she should "shoot the child or just the whole school?"' (sheriff's reports).
  • 25newsnow.com(opens in new tab) supports · English
    'Volpe sent the message to her friends, asking them whether she should "shoot" the student.'
Corroborated Deputies interviewed her at the school, read her Miranda rights, searched her phone and belongings with consent and found no weapons; they arrested her on a disorderly conduct charge and she was booked into the Tazewell County Jail.

Causal attribution. The arrest and booking are established by two independent local outlets; the interview detail comes from the FOIA body-cam footage and police reports.

  • pjstar.com(opens in new tab) supports · English
    Body-cam account: interview in an empty classroom, Miranda rights, the flagged message shown, consent forms, classroom search finding nothing; 'she would be arrested in Tazewell County'.
  • 25newsnow.com(opens in new tab) supports · English
    'deputies arrested [her] at John L. Hensey Elementary School around 1 p.m. Wednesday. She was booked into the Tazewell County Jail for disorderly conduct.'
Corroborated The Sheriff's Office and the district concluded the remark was made out of exasperation, with no intent to harm and no threat to the school.

Causal attribution. Both the district's letter and the deputies' own conclusion are attributed; no source reports any contrary finding.

  • 25newsnow.com(opens in new tab) supports · English
    'Deputies interviewed her and came to the conclusion that she made the comment out of "exasperation," had no intentions to harm anyone, and was not a threat to the school.'
  • pjstar.com(opens in new tab) supports · English
    District email: 'Law enforcement officers quickly determined that the student teacher made the statement out of exasperation... but did not have any actual intent to shoot anyone or otherwise cause harm.'
Corroborated The district told parents she would not return to District 50 to complete her educational assignment.

Causal attribution. The district's decision is attributed to its own letter carried by two outlets.

  • pjstar.com(opens in new tab) supports · English
    'it said the student teacher would not be returning to District 50 to complete her assignment.'
  • 25newsnow.com(opens in new tab) supports · English
    Superintendent Chad Allaman's letter: 'Volpe is not returning to the school to finish her educational assignment.'

Sources

4 sources inspected, from 3 underlying accounts. Sources that repeat one account do not corroborate each other.

How the sources were read, and where the events happened

Read in English on 2026-09-15 (datePublished 2026-04-10T11:15Z; 34 paragraphs). Based on sheriff's deputy and detective reports plus body-camera footage obtained by FOIA from the Tazewell County Sheriff's Office. Applies to s1.

Read in English on 2026-09-15 (datePublished 2025-01-30T23:13Z). Based on the District 50 email to parents; withheld the teacher's name. Applies to s2.

Read in English on 2026-09-15 (datePublished 2025-01-31T17:07Z). Attributes to deputies and the school district; names the teacher from jail records — the name is deliberately not carried into this public record. Applies to s3.

Read on 2026-09-15 (datePublished 2026-08-02). Two substantive paragraphs, 'reportedly' framing, no place, date or document; derivative of the 2025 local reporting with embellishments. Recorded for provenance; never cited as support. Applies to s4.

Event countries: United States. Affected-person countries: United States. Court countries: Unknown.

Event: John A. Hensey School, Washington, Illinois (25News Now renders the school name 'John L. Hensey Elementary School'), and the Tazewell County Jail. Affected person: the student teacher at that school. No court proceeding is reported, so court_countries is [].

Reviewed for publication 2026-09-15: Published under the 2026-09-15 charter as an institutional-use automated-moderation case: a consequential institutional response (arrest, placement loss) to an automated flag of a private message, documented by FOIA-based local reporting. She is an adult; although local TV named her from jail records, she is not named here because deputies cleared her of intent and republication adds reputational risk without evidential value.

People described

A 22-year-old student teacher (Illinois State University student) placed at a District 50 elementary school in Washington, Illinois; not named here — deputies concluded she had no intent to harm

People reported harmed in this case

1 person

0 AI participants · 1 other person harmed

One documented harmed person: the student teacher, subject to the platform's institutional automated flagging (counted under institutional use, not as an AI user). No student or staff member was aware of the conversation per the district; the referenced third-grade student is not counted as harmed (deputies found no threat and no one else saw the private message).

Counted once within this case. The same person may appear in other cases. This count does not establish AI causation.

Cite this case

Compiled per our published methodology: verification statuses, sourcing standards, and corrections process.

APA

NOPE. (2026). Washington, Illinois: Snapchat flagged a student teacher's private joke to the FBI; she was arrested at her school and lost her placement. AI incidents. https://nope.net/incidents/2025-washington-il-snapchat-flag-student-teacher-arrest

BibTeX

@misc{2025_washington_il_snapchat_flag_student_teacher_arrest,
  title = {Washington, Illinois: Snapchat flagged a student teacher's private joke to the FBI; she was arrested at her school and lost her placement},
  author = {NOPE},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {AI incidents},
  url = {https://nope.net/incidents/2025-washington-il-snapchat-flag-student-teacher-arrest}
}

Related cases

Medium GPT-5.4 and Claude Opus 5 (reported)

Massachusetts: fired teacher asks court to vacate an arbitration, saying the arbitrator improperly used AI tools to judge her AI-detector evidence

A kindergarten teacher at a public elementary school in Concord, Massachusetts, was dismissed in August 2025 after an unsatisfactory evaluation. In arbitration she argued that some of the principal's evaluations may have been produced with AI, relying on GPTZero estimates; the principal denied using AI beyond grammar checks. According to the arbitration decision as reported by The Concord Bridge, the arbitrator stated in an appendix that he used two AI tools, GPT-5.4 and Claude Opus 5, to research whether GPTZero was reliable, checked some of the sources they supplied, concluded that GPTZero's results deserved no weight, and upheld the dismissal on 27 August 2026. On 28 September 2026 the teacher asked Suffolk Superior Court to vacate the decision, alleging that the AI-assisted research was an improper investigation outside the hearing record that the parties were not told about or allowed to challenge. These are allegations in a complaint; the district declined to comment and no court has ruled.

Medium Unidentified AI tool

Ninth Circuit fines and suspends two immigration lawyers over briefs with AI-hallucinated citations and denials of AI use; immigration board follows

On 3 June 2026 the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit fined immigration attorneys Mike Singh Sethi and William Rounds $2,500 each and suspended both from practice before the court for six months. Briefs filed in an asylum petition for review cited two cases that do not exist and attributed quotations to opinions that do not contain them. In a motion to correct, the attorneys called the errors typographical, and at oral argument Rounds twice said AI was not used. In their response to the court's order to show cause, they conceded that the errors were probably the product of unauthorised AI use by the firm's unlicensed brief writers and a failure to check citations. The court said the suspension was owed to their repeated failure of candour. The Board of Immigration Appeals then suspended Sethi from practice before the Board, the immigration courts and the Department of Homeland Security for six months, effective 13 June 2026, and designated that decision as a precedent on 1 October 2026.

Medium Unidentified AI research tool

Alabama Supreme Court dismisses two siblings' family-trust appeal as a sanction after their lawyer admits using AI that produced fake citations

On 24 April 2026 the Supreme Court of Alabama dismissed an appeal by two siblings in a family dispute over living trusts because their lawyer, W. Perry Hall, had filed briefs in which most of the legal authorities were misquoted or did not exist. The court said they appeared to be AI hallucinations, and at a show-cause hearing in February 2026 Hall admitted that many authorities did not exist and that he had improperly used AI to obtain them. The court ordered Hall to pay the opposing party's fees and costs of $17,200 and double appeal costs, barred him from filing in the court without a co-signing attorney and referred him to the Alabama State Bar. It said the dismissal was imposed as a sanction because of the particularly egregious facts. One justice, concurring in part and dissenting in part, objected to dismissing the appeal as a sanction for the lawyer's conduct but would have affirmed the judgment against the clients on the merits.

Medium Unidentified OpenAI model (reported)

Employment tribunal refuses interim relief to manager who says he was fired for raising concerns about customer data sent to OpenAI; employer cites his AI use

A Head of Customer Service Platform at Apertum Online Ltd, a consumer internet company whose customer-service system passed customer request forms to a large language model, was dismissed on 11 March 2026 during his probation, two months after starting. According to an employment tribunal decision of 23 April 2026, he had told his manager in February that customers' personal data was being sent to OpenAI within support tickets and set out his concerns in a document; the chief technical officer called the document pure AI slop in a chat and said he would fire him. The employer says it dismissed him for underperformance, citing his reliance on AI to generate documents; he says he was dismissed for his disclosures. The judge refused interim relief, finding he had not shown a pretty good chance of success on the reason for dismissal while noting a significant coincidence in timing. No findings of fact were made, and the claim awaits a final hearing.

If you or someone you know is struggling, free and confidential support is available. Find a helpline near you at Signpost.