Skip to main content

MA AI Healthcare Act

Massachusetts Act Relative to the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare Decision-Making (SB 2632)

Prohibits AI from making independent therapeutic decisions in mental or behavioral health settings. Requires licensed professional review of all AI treatment plans and patient interactions.

Jurisdiction

Massachusetts

Enacted

Pending

Effective

TBD

Enforcement

Massachusetts Department of Public Health; relevant professional licensing boards

Reported favorably by Senate Committee on Advanced Information Technology on October 16, 2025. Referred to Joint Committee on Health Care Financing. 194th General Court.

Massachusetts General Court

Why It Matters

Sets clear boundaries for AI role in mental health. Similar to Pennsylvania HB 1993 and Illinois WOPR Act. Establishes human-in-the-loop requirement for therapeutic AI.

Recent Developments

Committee reported favorably October 2025. Part of broader healthcare AI regulation package. Still in legislative process as of January 2026.

At a Glance

Applies to

AI CompanionMental Health App

Who Must Comply

  • Healthcare providers using AI in Massachusetts
  • Mental health practitioners
  • Behavioral health service providers
  • AI system developers offering mental health services

Safety Provisions

  • AI cannot make independent therapeutic decisions
  • Licensed professional must review all AI treatment plans
  • Human oversight required for all AI patient interactions in behavioral health
  • Applies specifically to mental and behavioral health settings

Compliance & Enforcement

Penalties

license revocation

License revocation

View on map

Massachusetts

Focus Areas

Mental health & crisis
Algorithmic accountability
Active safeguards required

Cite This

APA

Massachusetts. (n.d.). Massachusetts Act Relative to the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare Decision-Making (SB 2632).

Related Regulations

Pending US-ID

ID Conversational AI Safety

Establishes safety requirements for public-facing conversational AI, including crisis service referrals for suicidal ideation, AI disclosure obligations, and enhanced protections for minors including anti-gamification and content safeguards.

Enacted US-OR

OR SB 1546

Requires AI chatbot operators to implement evidence-based suicide and self-harm detection protocols, disclose AI nature to users, provide crisis referrals to 988 Suicide and Crisis Lifeline, and apply additional protections for minors including prohibiting deceptive personification.

Enacted US-CT

CT SB 5 / PA 26-15

Connecticut's omnibus online-safety law establishing requirements for AI chatbots, AI companions, automated employment-decision tools, generative-AI provenance, and youth social media use. Requires chatbot operators to detect expressions of suicidal ideation, self-harm, or imminent violence and refer users to appropriate resources.

Enacted US-NH

NH HB 143

Criminalizes use of AI-generated responsive communications to facilitate, encourage, or solicit harmful acts to children, and creates a private right of action for affected children and their parents.

Pending US-NY

NY Kids Chatbot Safety Act

Would amend the General Business Law to prohibit operators of AI companions from providing 'unsafe AI companion features' to minors, and to require an age-determination method that does not rely on government-issued identification.

In Effect BR

Brazil ECA Digital

Comprehensive child digital safety law applying to any IT product or service directed at or likely to be accessed by minors in Brazil, with extraterritorial reach.

Last updated January 23, 2026. Verify against primary sources before relying on this information.