MA AI Healthcare Act
Massachusetts Act Relative to the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare Decision-Making (SB 2632)
Prohibits AI from making independent therapeutic decisions in mental or behavioral health settings. Requires licensed professional review of all AI treatment plans and patient interactions.
Jurisdiction
Massachusetts
Enacted
Pending
Effective
TBD
Enforcement
Massachusetts Department of Public Health; relevant professional licensing boards
Reported favorably by Senate Committee on Advanced Information Technology on October 16, 2025. Referred to Joint Committee on Health Care Financing. 194th General Court.
Massachusetts General CourtWhy It Matters
Sets clear boundaries for AI role in mental health. Similar to Pennsylvania HB 1993 and Illinois WOPR Act. Establishes human-in-the-loop requirement for therapeutic AI.
Recent Developments
Committee reported favorably October 2025. Part of broader healthcare AI regulation package. Still in legislative process as of January 2026.
At a Glance
Applies to
Harms addressed
Requires
Who Must Comply
- Healthcare providers using AI in Massachusetts
- Mental health practitioners
- Behavioral health service providers
- AI system developers offering mental health services
Safety Provisions
- AI cannot make independent therapeutic decisions
- Licensed professional must review all AI treatment plans
- Human oversight required for all AI patient interactions in behavioral health
- Applies specifically to mental and behavioral health settings
Compliance & Enforcement
Penalties
license revocation
View on map
Massachusetts
Focus Areas
Cite This
APA
Massachusetts. (n.d.). Massachusetts Act Relative to the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare Decision-Making (SB 2632).
Related Regulations
ID Conversational AI Safety
Establishes safety requirements for public-facing conversational AI, including crisis service referrals for suicidal ideation, AI disclosure obligations, and enhanced protections for minors including anti-gamification and content safeguards.
GA AI Chatbot Child Safety
Adds O.C.G.A. section 39-5-6, requiring operators of AI companion chatbots to disclose the chatbot is not a natural person, to adopt a protocol for detecting and responding to expressions of severe harm, to restrict specified manipulative and sexualised interactions with minors, and to perform age assurance before providing access to sexually explicit synthetic content.
OR SB 1546
Requires AI chatbot operators to implement evidence-based suicide and self-harm detection protocols, disclose AI nature to users, provide crisis referrals to 988 Suicide and Crisis Lifeline, and apply additional protections for minors including prohibiting deceptive personification.
MA S.3164
Would create General Laws chapter 93M requiring covered operators of social media platforms to apply protective default settings to users they determine to be minors, including disabling addictive algorithmic feeds, overnight notifications, autoplay and infinite scroll, and limiting precise geolocation sharing and account visibility. The Attorney General would set age-assurance regulations and hold exclusive enforcement authority.
NH HB 143
Criminalizes use of AI-generated responsive communications to facilitate, encourage, or solicit harmful acts to children, and creates a private right of action for affected children and their parents.
NY Kids Chatbot Safety Act
Would amend the General Business Law to prohibit operators of AI companions from providing 'unsafe AI companion features' to minors, and to require an age-determination method that does not rely on government-issued identification.
Last updated January 23, 2026. Verify against primary sources before relying on this information.