Skip to main content

CT SB 1295

Connecticut SB 1295 (Enhanced CTDPA)

Creates COMPLETE BAN on targeted advertising to under-18s regardless of consent. Requires AI impact assessments. Connecticut issued first CTDPA fine ($85,000) in 2025.

Jurisdiction

Connecticut

Enacted

Jun 25, 2025

Effective

Jul 1, 2026

Enforcement

Connecticut Attorney General

Connecticut General Assembly

Why It Matters

Complete advertising ban for minors is stricter than most states. Active enforcement shows teeth.

At a Glance

Applies to

Social PlatformOnline PlatformRecommender System Minors-focused

Harms addressed

Who Must Comply

  • Controllers processing Connecticut residents' data

Safety Provisions

  • COMPLETE BAN on targeted advertising to under-18s
  • AI impact assessments required
  • Profiling restrictions for minors
  • Dark pattern prohibitions
  • Enhanced consent requirements for sensitive data

Compliance & Enforcement

Key Dates

Jul 1, 2026

All provisions take effect

Penalties

$5K/violation

View on map

Connecticut

Focus Areas

Child safety
Algorithmic accountability
Active safeguards required

Compliance Help

Requires ZERO targeted advertising to minors; AI impact assessment documentation; no profiling of minors; no dark patterns.

See how NOPE helps

Cite This

APA

Connecticut. (2025). Connecticut SB 1295 (Enhanced CTDPA).

Related Regulations

Enacted US-NY

NY RAISE Act

Requires large AI developers of frontier models operating in New York to create safety protocols, report critical incidents within 72 hours, conduct annual reviews, and undergo independent audits. Creates dedicated DFS office funded by developer fees.

Enacted US-CO

Colorado AI Act

First comprehensive US state law regulating high-risk AI systems. Modeled partly on EU AI Act with developer and deployer obligations for consequential decisions.

In Effect US-CA

CA CPPA ADMT

California Privacy Protection Agency regulations establishing consumer rights and business obligations for Automated Decision-Making Technology (ADMT) that makes significant decisions including healthcare. Requires pre-use notice, opt-out rights, access rights, appeal rights, and risk assessments.

Enacted US-TX

TX Healthcare AI Law

Requires healthcare practitioners using AI for diagnosis to review all AI-generated records and disclose AI use to patients. Mandates EHR data localization (Texas patient data must be physically stored in US). Applies to covered entities and third-party vendors.

Pending US-LA

LA Healthcare AI Act

Regulates use of artificial intelligence by healthcare providers in Louisiana. Permits AI for administrative tasks but prohibits AI from making treatment/diagnosis decisions without licensed professional review, directly interacting with patients on treatment matters, or generating therapeutic recommendations without professional approval.

Enacted US-VT

VT AADC

Vermont design code structured to be more litigation-resistant: focuses on data processing harms rather than content-based restrictions. AG rulemaking authority begins July 2025.

Last updated February 17, 2026. Verify against primary sources before relying on this information.