Skip to main content

CT SB 1295

Connecticut SB 1295 (Enhanced CTDPA)

Creates COMPLETE BAN on targeted advertising to under-18s regardless of consent. Requires AI impact assessments. Connecticut issued first CTDPA fine ($85,000) in 2025.

Jurisdiction

Connecticut

Enacted

Jun 25, 2025

Effective

Jul 1, 2026

Enforcement

Connecticut Attorney General

Connecticut General Assembly

Why It Matters

Complete advertising ban for minors is stricter than most states. Active enforcement shows teeth.

At a Glance

Applies to

Social PlatformOnline PlatformRecommender System Minors-focused

Harms addressed

Who Must Comply

  • Controllers processing Connecticut residents' data

Safety Provisions

  • COMPLETE BAN on targeted advertising to under-18s
  • AI impact assessments required
  • Profiling restrictions for minors
  • Dark pattern prohibitions
  • Enhanced consent requirements for sensitive data

Compliance & Enforcement

Key Dates

Jul 1, 2026

All provisions take effect

Penalties

$5K/violation

View on map

Connecticut

Focus Areas

Child safety
Algorithmic accountability
Active safeguards required

Cite This

APA

Connecticut. (2025). Connecticut SB 1295 (Enhanced CTDPA).

Related Regulations

In Effect US-CT

CT SB 5 / PA 26-15

Connecticut's omnibus online-safety law establishing requirements for AI chatbots, AI companions, automated employment-decision tools, generative-AI provenance, and youth social media use. Requires chatbot operators to detect expressions of suicidal ideation, self-harm, or imminent violence and refer users to appropriate resources.

Enacted US-CO

Colorado AI Act

Colorado law regulating automated decision-making technology (ADMT) that materially influences consequential decisions in areas such as employment, housing, healthcare, financial services, and insurance. SB 26-189 repealed and replaced the 2024 Colorado AI Act framework, narrowing both scope and obligations.

Enacted US-NY

NY RAISE Act

Requires large AI developers of frontier models operating in New York to create safety protocols, report critical incidents within 72 hours, conduct annual reviews, and undergo independent audits. Creates dedicated DFS office funded by developer fees.

Enacted US-CA

CA AB 2246

Repeals and replaces the California Age-Appropriate Design Code Act. Requires a business providing an online service, product or feature likely to be accessed by children to estimate the age of child users with a reasonable level of certainty or extend child protections to all users, to configure high-privacy defaults, and to take reasonable steps to prevent specified harms including severe psychological harm. Removes the exceptions to the data-collection prohibitions, lets children void contracts entered through manipulative design features, and states that it creates no private right of action.

In Effect US-TX

TX Healthcare AI Law

Requires healthcare practitioners using AI for diagnosis to review all AI-generated records and disclose AI use to patients. Mandates EHR data localization (Texas patient data must be physically stored in US). Applies to covered entities and third-party vendors.

Failed US-LA

LA Healthcare AI Act

Regulates use of artificial intelligence by healthcare providers in Louisiana. Permits AI for administrative tasks but prohibits AI from making treatment/diagnosis decisions without licensed professional review, directly interacting with patients on treatment matters, or generating therapeutic recommendations without professional approval.

Last updated August 2, 2026. Verify against primary sources before relying on this information.