Skip to main content

Colorado AI Act

Colorado Artificial Intelligence Act (SB 24-205)

First comprehensive US state law regulating high-risk AI systems. Modeled partly on EU AI Act with developer and deployer obligations for consequential decisions.

Jurisdiction

Colorado

Enacted

May 17, 2024

Effective

Jun 30, 2026

Enforcement

Colorado Attorney General (exclusive; no private right of action)

Implementation delayed from February 1 to June 30, 2026 by SB 25B-004 (signed August 2025)

Colorado Legislature

Why It Matters

Template for US state AI regulation. "Consequential decisions" scope captures employment, healthcare, financial services — high-stakes contexts.

Recent Developments

SB 25B-004, signed during August 2025 special session, delayed all implementation deadlines from February 1 to June 30, 2026. Substantive obligations unchanged.

At a Glance

Applies to

Automated Decision SystemRecruitment AICredit ScoringHealthcare AI

Harms addressed

Who Must Comply

  • Developers of high-risk AI systems
  • Deployers using AI for consequential decisions in: employment, education, financial services, healthcare, housing, insurance, legal services, government services

Safety Provisions

  • Developers: reasonable care to avoid algorithmic discrimination
  • Developers: documentation including training data summaries, limitations
  • Deployers: risk management programs, annual impact assessments
  • Deployers: consumer notice that AI used for consequential decisions
  • Appeal mechanisms with human review where feasible

Compliance & Enforcement

Key Dates

Jun 30, 2026

All obligations take effect (delayed from Feb 1 by SB 25B-004)

Full enforcement begins

Penalties

Penalties pending regulatory determination

View on map

Colorado

Focus Areas

Algorithmic accountability

Cite This

APA

Colorado. (2024). Colorado Artificial Intelligence Act (SB 24-205).

Related Regulations

Pending US-CO

CO AI Healthcare Act

Regulates mental health companion chatbots and AI use in healthcare utilization review. Declares AI providers engage in unauthorized practice of psychotherapy if their chatbot misrepresents credentials, uses reserved professional titles, delivers unsupervised psychotherapy, or fails to disclose it is not human. Separately requires AI-driven insurance utilization review to consider individual clinical circumstances rather than solely group data.

Pending US-CO

CO HB 1263

Imposes obligations on conversational AI service operators including minor-user protections, suicide and self-harm protocols, prohibition on emotional dependence and engagement gamification, and annual safeguard reporting.

Enacted US-NY

NY RAISE Act

Requires large AI developers of frontier models operating in New York to create safety protocols, report critical incidents within 72 hours, conduct annual reviews, and undergo independent audits. Creates dedicated DFS office funded by developer fees.

In Effect US-TX

TX Healthcare AI Law

Requires healthcare practitioners using AI for diagnosis to review all AI-generated records and disclose AI use to patients. Mandates EHR data localization (Texas patient data must be physically stored in US). Applies to covered entities and third-party vendors.

Pending US-LA

LA Healthcare AI Act

Regulates use of artificial intelligence by healthcare providers in Louisiana. Permits AI for administrative tasks but prohibits AI from making treatment/diagnosis decisions without licensed professional review, directly interacting with patients on treatment matters, or generating therapeutic recommendations without professional approval.

Enacted US-VT

VT AADC

Vermont design code structured to be more litigation-resistant: focuses on data processing harms rather than content-based restrictions. AG rulemaking authority begins July 2025.

Last updated March 9, 2026. Verify against primary sources before relying on this information.