Skip to main content

CA SB 813

California Artificial Intelligence Safety Independent Verification Organizations (SB 813)

Creates a voluntary state designation for independent verification organizations: AI auditors that the Government Operations Agency recognises as having demonstrated expertise in assessing the risks posed by an AI system or model. The agency must establish application requirements, designation criteria and suspension procedures on or before January 1, 2028, and designated organizations report annually to the Legislature. Engaging a designated organization is not mandatory for AI developers or deployers.

Jurisdiction

California

Enacted

Sep 9, 2026

Effective

Jan 1, 2027

Enforcement

California Government Operations Agency, through designation, suspension and termination of independent verification organizations

Approved by the Governor on September 9, 2026 and chaptered as Chapter 179, Statutes of 2026. Adds Chapter 14 (Sections 8898 to 8898.4) to Division 1 of Title 2 of the Government Code, titled California Artificial Intelligence Safety Independent Verification Organizations. No urgency clause, so the act takes effect January 1, 2027 under Article IV, Section 8(c) of the California Constitution, but the operative machinery depends on Government Operations Agency rules that are due on or before January 1, 2028. Participation is voluntary: the act states it does not require a person, partnership or corporation that develops, deploys or operates an AI system or model to engage an independent verification organization. Obligated parties are AI auditors, a party type the obligated_parties taxonomy does not currently have a value for, so that field is left unset.

California Legislative Information: SB 813, Chapter 179, Statutes of 2026 (chaptered text)

Why It Matters

Designation is voluntary and creates no safe harbour, so the act supplies vocabulary and vetting for AI auditing rather than a compliance obligation. Its practical weight comes from other statutes: an operator that must commission an independent audit will look for a designated organization, and the act says explicitly that whether an audit happened is relevant to but not conclusive of harm litigation.

Recent Developments

Signed September 9, 2026 as Chapter 179, Statutes of 2026, paired with AB 1405 (Chapter 178), which creates a mandatory registry for AI auditors from January 1, 2029. Together they build the third-party assessment layer that California statutes requiring independent audits will draw on, including the biennial child safety audit that SB 1119 (Chapter 190) imposes on companion chatbot operators from January 1, 2029.

At a Glance

Who Must Comply

  • AI auditors seeking state designation as independent verification organizations
  • Developers, deployers and operators of AI systems or models that choose to engage a designated organization

Safety Provisions

  • Government Operations Agency designates independent verification organizations that demonstrate expertise in assessing AI system and model risks
  • Applicants may be persons, partnerships, academic institutions, nonprofits or corporations that conduct audits
  • Designated organizations must identify evaluation metrics and methodologies, employ technical personnel, manage conflicts of interest, and maintain independence from the parties they assess
  • Agency may suspend or terminate a designation for failure to adhere to standards, material misrepresentation, conflicts of interest, documentation lapses, conduct impairing integrity, or a cybersecurity breach
  • Designated organizations report annually to the Legislature, no sooner than 12 months after initial designation
  • Redacted information retained for five years
  • Whether an audit was performed is relevant to, but not conclusive of, litigation over harm caused by an AI system

Compliance & Enforcement

Key Dates

Jan 1, 2028

Government Operations Agency must have developed application requirements, designation criteria, and suspension and termination procedures for independent verification organizations, with stakeholder working groups feeding that process

Penalties

license revocation

License revocation

View on map

California

Focus Areas

Algorithmic accountability

Cite This

APA

California. (2026). California Artificial Intelligence Safety Independent Verification Organizations (SB 813).

Related Regulations

Enacted US-CA

CA AB 1405

Requires AI auditors to register with the Government Operations Agency and bars unregistered persons from offering, selling or conducting a covered AI audit from January 1, 2029. Registered auditors must maintain independence from the auditee, follow applicable audit protocols, report in detail, and keep records for at least 10 years. Certified public accountants licensed by the California Board of Accountancy are treated as satisfying the independence requirements if they comply with applicable professional standards.

Failed US-CA

CA SB 1047

Would have required safety testing and "kill switch" capabilities for frontier AI models above certain compute thresholds. Governor vetoed citing concerns about threshold-based approach.

In Effect US-IL

IL AI Employment Law

Amends Illinois Human Rights Act to make it a civil rights violation for employers to use AI that discriminates based on protected classes in employment decisions. Requires notice to employees and applicants when AI is used in hiring, firing, promotion, or discipline.

In Effect US-HI

HI Deepfake Civil Remedy Act

Creates a civil cause of action allowing individuals to sue over realistic digital imitations (deepfakes) depicting them without consent, with statutory damages available.

In Effect US-ND

ND Healthcare AI Act

Regulates AI use in healthcare prior authorization decisions. Requires adverse determinations be reviewed by licensed physicians qualified in relevant specialty. Sets decision timelines: 7 days for non-urgent, 72 hours for urgent services. Prohibits prior authorization for emergency services and opioid use disorder treatment.

In Effect US-TX

TX Social Media Deepfake Takedown

Requires social media platforms to provide accessible complaint system for explicit deepfake material. Platform must confirm receipt within 48 hours, investigate within 30 days (60 days if delayed), and provide mandatory updates to reporting user.

Last updated September 13, 2026. Verify against primary sources before relying on this information.