TCO Regulation
Regulation (EU) 2021/784 (Terrorist Content Online)
Requires hosting services to remove terrorist content within one hour of receiving a removal order. One of few regulations with real-time moderation mandates.
Jurisdiction
European Union
EU
Enacted
Apr 29, 2021
Effective
Jun 7, 2022
Enforcement
National competent authorities
What It Requires
Harms Addressed
Who Must Comply
This law applies to:
- • Hosting service providers offering services in the EU
Who bears obligations:
Safety Provisions
- • One-hour removal deadline for terrorist content
- • Transparency and reporting obligations
- • Specific measures for exposed services
Enforcement
Enforced by
National competent authorities
Quick Facts
- Binding
- Yes
- Mental Health Focus
- No
- Child Safety Focus
- No
- Algorithmic Scope
- No
Why It Matters
Rare example of mandated real-time content moderation. Sets precedent for rapid response requirements.
What You Need to Comply
You need: real-time or near-real-time content detection to meet one-hour removal deadline; 24/7 response capability; automated flagging systems (manual review alone cannot meet timeline)
NOPE can helpCite This
APA
European Union. (2021). Regulation (EU) 2021/784 (Terrorist Content Online). Retrieved from https://nope.net/regs/eu-tco
BibTeX
@misc{eu_tco,
title = {Regulation (EU) 2021/784 (Terrorist Content Online)},
author = {European Union},
year = {2021},
url = {https://nope.net/regs/eu-tco}
} Related Regulations
DSA
Comprehensive platform regulation with tiered obligations. VLOPs (45M+ EU users) face systemic risk assessments, algorithmic transparency, and independent audits.
AVMSD
EU directive setting baseline safety and minor-protection duties for audiovisual media services and video-sharing platform services, including measures to protect minors from harmful content.
Ireland OSMR
Establishes Coimisiún na Meán (Media Commission) with binding duties for video-sharing platforms. One of the cleaner examples of explicit self-harm/suicide/eating-disorder content duties in platform governance.
Poland Draft AI Act
Poland's draft law implementing EU AI Act domestically, creating KRiBSI (national AI authority), regulatory sandboxes, and binding opinions mechanism.
Finland AI Act
Finland's EU AI Act implementation using decentralized supervision model. Traficom serves as single point of contact and coordination authority. Ten market surveillance authorities share enforcement across sectors. New Sanctions Board handles fines over EUR 100,000.
Hungary AI Act
Hungary's comprehensive AI law implementing the EU AI Act. Designates the National Media and Infocommunications Authority (NMHH) as the primary supervisory authority, with sectoral regulators for specific domains.