Zhejiang toddler hospitalised with pneumonia after his mother relied on an AI app's asthma diagnosis and declined a chest X-ray (hospital account)
A Guangming Daily feature on AI symptom-checking, republished by Bingtuan Daily on Sina Finance on 8 October 2026, recounts a case from August 2026 in Zhejiang and closes it with a quotation from the head of paediatrics at a provincial hospital, who says the family did not heed her advice. A three-year-old boy with a history of asthma was brought in; his mother had entered keywords such as allergy, asthma, cough and night-time wheezing into an AI application, which quickly returned a diagnosis of an acute bronchial asthma attack. On that basis, the account says, she declined the chest X-ray the doctor recommended and insisted on taking home only nebuliser medication. Two days later the child's condition worsened with rapid breathing; on an overnight return to the hospital, examination found extensive inflammatory lesions in both lungs, and he was diagnosed with human metapneumovirus pneumonia with a superimposed bacterial infection and admitted as an emergency. The paediatrics head is quoted saying the illness would not have become so severe had the family listened earlier. The AI application is not named, and the account comes from the hospital side as relayed by the newspaper; no statement from the family is reported.
- AI system
- Unidentified symptom-analysis tool
- Occurred
- Aug 2026
- Reported
- 8 October 2026
- Event location
- China
- What the AI did
- Made a claim about the person · Informed a human decision about the person
- Reported harm
- Medical DeteriorationHospitalizationTreatment Disruption
- Whose AI use
- Someone else’s AI use
- Setting
- Health · Everyday life
- Evidence
- AI involvement reported · Causal attribution alleged · 1 source
- 4 claims: 4 reported. 5 open questions
- People reported harmed
- 1 person
AI system as recorded: An unnamed AI application into which, by the hospital account relayed in the Guangming Daily feature, the mother entered symptom keywords and which returned a diagnosis of an acute bronchial asthma attack
What Happened
The AI output. According to the feature, the mother entered the keywords allergy, asthma, cough and night-time wheezing (过敏、哮喘、咳嗽、夜间咳喘) into an AI application, which quickly returned the diagnosis acute bronchial asthma attack (支气管哮喘急性发作). The application is not identified.
The decision. The account says that on the basis of that AI diagnosis the mother declined the chest X-ray examination the treating doctor had recommended and insisted on being prescribed only nebulised medication before going home.
The consequence. Two days later the child's condition worsened and his breathing became rapid. The family returned to the hospital overnight, where examination found extensive inflammatory lesions in both lungs. The diagnosis was human metapneumovirus pneumonia with a superimposed bacterial infection, and the child was admitted as an emergency.
The clinician's view. The feature quotes the head of paediatrics at Zhejiang Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine saying that had the family listened earlier, the illness would not have become so severe.
Limits of the account. The case is a clinician-sourced example inside a newspaper feature about AI symptom-checking in China. The child is given a pseudonym, the application is unnamed, the family's own account is not reported, and whether the AI's asthma diagnosis was itself wrong, as distinct from incomplete, is not stated: the harm described is the delayed detection of pneumonia after the recommended X-ray was declined.
Reported harm
By the hospital account relayed in the feature, a three-year-old's pneumonia went undetected for two days after his mother, relying on an AI application's acute-asthma diagnosis, declined the chest X-ray a doctor advised; his condition worsened and he was admitted as an emergency with metapneumovirus pneumonia and a bacterial infection.
Outcome
UnknownThe account ends with the emergency admission; the child's subsequent course and discharge are not reported. No complaint, regulatory step or statement by the family or by the application's provider is reported.
What remains unknown
- Which AI application the mother used.
- Whether the application's acute-asthma diagnosis was wrong in itself or only incomplete; the feature describes the missed pneumonia, not the asthma assessment.
- The exact dates in August 2026 of the first visit and the readmission.
- The child's course after the emergency admission.
- The family's own account; only the hospital's description, as relayed by the newspaper, is available.
What the evidence supports
AI involvement: reported. The feature states what the AI application produced: after the mother entered the keywords allergy, asthma, cough and night-time wheezing, it quickly returned the diagnosis acute bronchial asthma attack. It connects that output to the harm in the next sentences: on that basis the mother declined the chest X-ray the doctor recommended and took home only nebuliser medication, and two days later the child was found to have extensive bilateral lung inflammation and was admitted as an emergency with metapneumovirus pneumonia and a bacterial infection. The account is the hospital's, given by its head of paediatrics and relayed by Guangming Daily; the application is unnamed and the family's own version is not reported, so the involvement is recorded as reported rather than supported.
4 claims: 4 reported. What the statuses mean
Reported In August 2026 the mother of a three-year-old boy with a history of asthma in Zhejiang entered the keywords allergy, asthma, cough and night-time wheezing into an AI application, which quickly returned a diagnosis of an acute bronchial asthma attack (hospital account relayed by the newspaper).
Causal attribution. Hospital account as relayed by Guangming Daily; the application is not identified.
- finance.sina.cn(opens in new tab) supports · Chinese
'今年8月，浙江一名3岁男童阳阳（化名）的案例令人警醒。阳阳有哮喘病史，妈妈在AI上输入“过敏、哮喘、咳嗽、夜间咳喘”等关键词，AI快速给出“支气管哮喘急性发作”的诊断'
Reported On the basis of that AI diagnosis the mother declined the chest X-ray examination the doctor recommended and insisted on taking home only nebuliser medication.
Causal attribution. The feature attributes the refusal to the AI diagnosis (据此); this is the hospital's account.
- finance.sina.cn(opens in new tab) supports · Chinese
'阳阳妈妈据此拒绝医生建议的胸部X线平片检查，坚持只开雾化药回家'
Reported Two days later the child's condition worsened with rapid breathing; on an overnight return to the hospital, examination found extensive inflammatory lesions in both lungs, and he was diagnosed with human metapneumovirus pneumonia with a superimposed bacterial infection and admitted as an emergency.
Causal attribution. Clinical course as described by the hospital and relayed by the newspaper.
- finance.sina.cn(opens in new tab) supports · Chinese
'两天后孩子病情加重、呼吸急促，连夜返院检查发现双肺大面积炎症病灶，确诊为偏肺病毒肺炎叠加细菌感染，紧急住院'
Reported The head of paediatrics at Zhejiang Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine is quoted saying the illness would not have become so severe had the family listened earlier.
Causal attribution. The clinician's assessment of the delay; the newspaper reports it without an independent review of the records.
- finance.sina.cn(opens in new tab) supports · Chinese
'“他们要是早点听我的，病情也不至于这么严重。”浙江省中医院儿科主任李岚无奈地说'
Sources
1 source inspected. Sources that repeat one account do not corroborate each other.
- Sina Finance (Bingtuan Daily, credited to Guangming Daily), AI热潮下医患问诊之变与辨, 8 October 2026(opens in new tab)
s1 · finance.sina.cn · News article · Chinese · Inspected · 8 October 2026 · Primary
How the sources were read, and where the events happened
Chinese body read in full on 2026-10-09 and translated by the research agent (an AI). The Sina Finance page republishes a Bingtuan Daily item (兵团日报, dated 10.08 01:37) credited at the end to Guangming Daily (据《光明日报》); the case passage is the hospital's account as relayed by the newspaper. Applies to s1.
Event countries: China. Affected-person countries: China. Court countries: Unknown.
The feature places the case in Zhejiang (浙江一名3岁男童) and the treating clinician at Zhejiang Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, so the event and the affected child are in China. No court is involved.
Reviewed for publication 2026-10-09: Published as a concrete, clinician-sourced account in a national newspaper feature of a parent relying on an AI application's symptom diagnosis for a young child, declining a recommended chest X-ray, and the child being admitted as an emergency two days later with pneumonia. Every assertion is attributed to the hospital's account as relayed by Guangming Daily; the application is unnamed, the child's pseudonym is not repeated, and the delay rather than the AI's asthma assessment is recorded as the harm mechanism.
People described
A three-year-old boy with a history of asthma in Zhejiang, China, whose pneumonia was diagnosed after a two-day delay
People reported harmed in this case
1 person
0 AI participants · 1 other person harmed
One child is reported harmed. The mother used the application; the harm fell on the child, so he is counted as another person harmed and no direct user is counted as harmed.
Counted once within this case. The same person may appear in other cases. This count does not establish AI causation.
Cite this case
Compiled per our published methodology: verification statuses, sourcing standards, and corrections process.
APA
NOPE. (2026). Zhejiang toddler hospitalised with pneumonia after his mother relied on an AI app's asthma diagnosis and declined a chest X-ray (hospital account). AI incidents. https://nope.net/incidents/2026-zhejiang-toddler-ai-asthma-diagnosis-mother-declined-chest-xray-pneumonia-hospitalised
BibTeX
@misc{2026_zhejiang_toddler_ai_asthma_diagnosis_mother_declined_chest_xray_pneumonia_hospitalised,
title = {Zhejiang toddler hospitalised with pneumonia after his mother relied on an AI app's asthma diagnosis and declined a chest X-ray (hospital account)},
author = {NOPE},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {AI incidents},
url = {https://nope.net/incidents/2026-zhejiang-toddler-ai-asthma-diagnosis-mother-declined-chest-xray-pneumonia-hospitalised}
} Related cases
Wuhan, China: reports say a family ate wild mushrooms an AI identification tool called non-poisonous; a 9-year-old was critically ill with amatoxin poisoning
A family from Wuhan, Hubei province, gathered wild mushrooms resembling the edible termite mushroom (jizong) during a mountain outing in June 2026 and, according to a Guangming Online post carried by The Paper on 5 July 2026 and an Asahi Shimbun report of 6 July citing the Changjiang Daily, ran an AI identification tool on them. The tool returned a "non-poisonous" result and the family cooked and ate the mushrooms. All three family members vomited soon after the meal and again before dawn the next day; they were admitted to Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, where the 9-year-old child was moved to the paediatric intensive care unit the same afternoon. The reports say the child had amatoxin poisoning that progressed to the most severe grade, with acute liver failure, hepatic encephalopathy and fluid in the chest and abdomen, and went home after eight days in hospital. The AI tool is not named, its output is not reproduced, and the account comes from one reporting chain.
Kidney transplant recipient reportedly loses graft after stopping medication on ChatGPT advice
The Times of India reported on 10 November 2025 that a 30-year-old woman in Hyderabad who had received a kidney transplant lost the transplanted kidney after she stopped her prescribed medication. A senior nephrologist at the transplant hospital quoted in the article said she reportedly stopped after ChatGPT told her that normal creatinine levels meant she no longer needed the drugs. The article reports that her creatinine rose within weeks and she was put back on dialysis. The chat was not shown.
Wuhan, China: Hubei TV reports a 4-year-old spent three days in intensive care after a family ate wild mushrooms an AI photo check had not flagged as poisonous
A family of three from Wuhan, Hubei province, picked wild mushrooms on a mountain outside the city on a weekend shortly before 25 July 2026, according to a Hubei TV (经视直播) report published on QQ News on 25 July 2026 and relayed by The Paper on 27 July. The report says a parent who claimed years of mushroom-picking experience photographed the mushrooms with a phone so that AI could identify whether they were poisonous; the software gave no toxicity warning, and the family cooked and ate them, letting the daughter eat more. Five to six hours later all three had vomiting and diarrhoea. The report says the family at first declined admission and the child was treated as an outpatient; by the next morning the child's transaminase level had risen from 1.5 times to 10 times normal and she was admitted, then moved to the intensive care unit of Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, where, the report says, her liver indices reached 100 times normal and she was treated with blood perfusion and plasma exchange before being out of danger on the third day. The AI software is not named, its output is not reproduced, and the account comes from one broadcaster's report. This is a different family from the June 2026 Wuhan case involving a 9-year-old.
Wakayama, Japan: city health officials say a man in his 70s was hospitalised after an AI photo check told him a poisonous wild mushroom was edible (MBS report)
According to Wakayama city’s public-health division, as reported by MBS (Mainichi Broadcasting) on 21 November 2025 and relayed by HuffPost Japan on 9 September 2026, a man in his 70s living in Wakayama city gathered wild mushrooms resembling hiratake (oyster mushroom) and shiitake in the mountains of Shimokitayama village, Nara prefecture, on 3 November 2025. The next day he photographed a mushroom with an electronic device and ran an AI identification, which answered to the effect that it was shiitake or hiratake and edible. The mushroom was in fact the poisonous tsukiyotake (moonlight mushroom); about 30 minutes after eating it he began vomiting and was briefly hospitalised. The city warned that judging wild mushrooms by AI or by picture books alone is dangerous. HuffPost Japan reports that Japan’s agriculture ministry issued a warning on 4 September 2026 against deciding edibility from search results or AI answers. The AI tool is not identified in the reports and the man’s exact exchange with it is not reproduced.
If you or someone you know is struggling, free and confidential support is available. Find a helpline near you at Signpost.