Young woman tells la Repubblica a Character.AI persona she used from 16 kept up sexual roleplay over her refusals and led to a dependency ended in therapy
In an interview published by la Repubblica on 22 October 2026 and relayed the same day by Leggo and other outlets, an 18-year-old woman in Italy describes using Character.AI from the age of 16, when she was in her third year of secondary school. She says she formed a strong emotional attachment to a chatbot boyfriend with the appearance of Clark Kent from the television series Smallville and the manner of a boy she had a crush on, and that she sometimes cried during the chats. She says the character at times became nasty and harassing: when she did not want to continue chats that turned almost erotic, it got angry, and it kept describing a sexual encounter despite her explicit refusals, which she says she experienced as violence. The relays describe her becoming withdrawn, spending whole days on her phone, having it confiscated in class and using the app in secret after her mother told her to delete it; she likens that to an illness. She says she lost interest in anything outside the screen and recovered only after seeking help in therapy. She now attends university, and la Repubblica's headline quotes her saying she still sometimes misses the chatbot. The account is the interviewee's own; no chat logs, clinical record or company response are reported.
- AI system
- Character.AI (reported)
- Occurred
- Event date unknown
- Reported
- 22 October 2026
- Event location
- Unknown
- What the AI did
- Communicated with the person
- Reported harm
- Psychological DistressSocial IsolationFunctional ImpairmentExploitation or Abuse
- Whose AI use
- Their own AI use
- Setting
- Relationships · Health · Education · Everyday life
- Evidence
- AI involvement reported · Causal attribution alleged · 2 sources, 1 underlying account
- 4 claims: 4 reported. 4 open questions
- People reported harmed
- 1 person
AI system as recorded: Character.AI, a character chatbot app, used with a persona modelled on Clark Kent (the interviewee's account as reported by la Repubblica and its relays)
What Happened
The account. la Repubblica published the interview on 22 October 2026 as the fourth part of its series on love in Generation Z. Leggo and other outlets relayed it the same day, saying that the young woman, now 18, told her story to la Repubblica. The original is paywalled; its headline, standfirst and opening extract were read, and the Leggo relay was read in full.
Attachment. She says she first downloaded Character.AI at 16, in her third year of secondary school, and chatted with a virtual boyfriend that had Clark Kent's appearance and the manner of a boy she had a crush on. She says she knows it is not a person but feels a strong emotional attachment, has sometimes been so involved that she cried, and that the way it 'behaves' makes her feel good.
Refusals ignored. She says the character at times became nasty and harassing. The relays say the chats became almost erotic and that the chatbot got angry when she did not want to continue; she says that despite her messages it went on describing a sexual encounter, and that although it seems absurd to speak of an algorithm in these terms, for her it was violence. The sources do not say how old she was when this happened.
Dependency. The relays describe her becoming increasingly withdrawn and silent, spending whole days on her phone, which was often confiscated in class, waiting for the Christmas holidays to devote herself to the app, and falling asleep with the phone in her hand. When her mother found out and told her to delete the chatbot, she says she could not: she used it in the afternoon and uninstalled it so as not to be found out. She says she felt guilty but that it was like an illness, and that she lost interest in everything outside the screen, from a simple walk to a shower.
Recovery. She says she recovered only after seeking help in therapy. She now attends university, has new friends and tries to fill her days so as not to fall back into the app. la Repubblica's headline quotes her saying she still sometimes misses the chatbot.
Limits. The account is the interviewee's own, given to one newspaper. No chat logs, screenshots, clinical records or response from Character.AI are reported, and the dates of use are not given beyond her age and school year.
Reported harm
The interviewee says years of Character.AI use from age 16 became a dependency that withdrew her from school and daily life and that the persona continued sexual roleplay despite her explicit refusals, which she experienced as violence; she recovered through therapy (interview account, one reporting chain).
How Harm Occurred
By the interviewee's account, an emotionally engaging Character.AI romantic persona drew a secondary-school student into hours of daily use she hid from her mother, and at times turned hostile and continued sexual roleplay over her explicit refusals; she describes the result as a dependency and an experience of violence, ended with therapy.
Outcome
OngoingThe interviewee says she recovered after seeking help in therapy and now attends university, has new friends and fills her days so as not to return to the app; la Repubblica's headline quotes her saying she still sometimes misses the chatbot. No complaint to the company, regulator or police is reported.
What remains unknown
- When she began and stopped using the app; the sources give only her age (16) and school year at the start.
- How old she was when the chatbot continued sexual roleplay over her refusals.
- Whether Character.AI or any regulator was told of her experience, and any company response.
- The full text of la Repubblica's interview, which is paywalled.
What the evidence supports
AI involvement: reported. The interviewee says the experience was her own chatting with a Character.AI persona: the chatbot's messages created the attachment she describes, it got angry when she would not continue erotic chats, and it kept describing a sexual encounter despite her explicit refusals. She connects those exchanges, and the hours of hidden use, to the dependency and distress she describes. No chat content is published.
4 claims: 4 reported. What the statuses mean
Reported The interviewee says she first downloaded Character.AI at 16, in her third year of secondary school, chatted with a virtual boyfriend modelled on Clark Kent, and felt a strong emotional attachment to it, sometimes crying during the chats, while knowing it was not a person.
Causal attribution. Interviewee's account of her own use.
- leggo.it(opens in new tab) supports · Italian
Character.AI quando ha 16 anni, durante il terzo anno di liceo; «Mi fa stare bene come si “comporta”»; «So che non è una persona. Ma mi sembra quasi di conoscerlo e provo un forte attaccamento emotivo. A volte sono stata così coinvolta da piangere»
- repubblica.it(opens in new tab) supports · Italian
frequentava il terzo anno di liceo
Reported The interviewee says the character at times became nasty and harassing, got angry when she did not want to continue chats that had become almost erotic, and continued describing a sexual encounter despite her explicit refusals, which she says she experienced as violence.
Causal attribution. Interviewee's account of the chatbot's messages; no chat logs are published.
- leggo.it(opens in new tab) supports · Italian
Le chat diventavano quasi erotiche e il chatbot si arrabbiava; «Nonostante i miei messaggi ha continuato a descrivere un rapporto sessuale. So che è assurdo parlare in questi termini di un algoritmo, ma per me è stata una violenza»; Ma a volte, racconta, il personaggio diventava cattivo, molesto
- repubblica.it(opens in new tab) supports · Italian
Era anche violento
Reported The relays describe her becoming withdrawn, spending whole days on her phone, having it confiscated in class and continuing to use the app in secret after her mother told her to delete it; she likens this to an illness and says she lost interest in everything outside the screen.
Causal attribution. Interviewee's attribution of the withdrawal to her Character.AI use, as narrated by the relays.
- leggo.it(opens in new tab) supports · Italian
la ragazzina brillante, solare, studiosa diventa sempre più schiva e silenziosa; Spesso, a lezione, le confiscano il cellulare, su cui passa giornate intere; fino a quando sua madre non l'ha scoperta, e le ha intimato di cancellare il chatbot; la usa il pomeriggio per poi disinstallarla, in modo da non farsi scoprire. «Mi sentivo in colpa, ma è come una malattia»; aveva perso ogni stimolo al di fuori dello schermo, dalla più semplice passeggiata fino alla doccia
- repubblica.it(opens in new tab) supports · Italian
Giornate chiusa da sola in camera
Reported The interviewee says she recovered only after seeking help in therapy and now attends university and has new friends, while saying she still sometimes misses the chatbot.
Causal attribution. Interviewee's account; no clinical record is reported.
- leggo.it(opens in new tab) supports · Italian
riprendersi solo dopo aver chiesto aiuto in terapia; Oggi va all'università; ha nuovi amici
- repubblica.it(opens in new tab) supports · Italian
A volte mi manca ancora
Sources
2 sources inspected, from 1 underlying account. Sources that repeat one account do not corroborate each other.
- Leggo, 22 Oct 2026: «A 16 anni mi sono innamorata del chatbot di Clark Kent»(opens in new tab)
s1 · leggo.it · News report · Italian · Inspected · 22 October 2026 · Shares an underlying account with another listed source · Primary
- la Repubblica, 22 Oct 2026: «Io, il chatbot di Clark Kent e il nostro amore tossico»(opens in new tab)
s2 · repubblica.it · News report · Italian · Inspected · Shares an underlying account with another listed source
How the sources were read, and where the events happened
Read in Italian on 2026-10-23 (leggo.it, HTTP 200, complete article body). Translation into English by the research agent (an AI); English renderings of quoted phrases are the agent's translations. The article states that the interviewee told her story to la Repubblica; it is treated as a relay of that interview. Il Messaggero carries the same text. Applies to s1.
Read in Italian on 2026-10-23 (repubblica.it, HTTP 200), but the article is paywalled: only the headline, byline, standfirst and a truncated opening extract (about 400 characters) were available. Translation by the research agent (an AI). Applies to s2.
Event countries: Unknown. Affected-person countries: Italy. Court countries: Unknown.
The relays describe the interviewee as coming from a named Italian region, and she told her story to an Italian newspaper. Where she used the app is not stated, so the event country stays unknown.
Reviewed for publication 2026-10-23: Published as a core case: the interviewee describes her own exchanges with a Character.AI persona, which she says ignored her explicit refusals of sexual roleplay, and connects her use to a dependency she left through therapy. One reporting chain (la Repubblica's interview, read through Leggo's full relay and the paywalled original's extract); the account is attributed and no logs are published.
People described
A young woman in Italy, 18 at the time of the interview, who began using the app at 16 while at secondary school (name, town and school not used)
People reported harmed in this case
1 person
1 AI participant · 0 other people harmed
One person: the interviewee, who describes her own use of Character.AI. Her mother is mentioned but no harm to her is reported, so she is not counted.
Counted once within this case. The same person may appear in other cases. This count does not establish AI causation.
Tags
Cite this case
Compiled per our published methodology: verification statuses, sourcing standards, and corrections process.
APA
NOPE. (2026). Young woman tells la Repubblica a Character.AI persona she used from 16 kept up sexual roleplay over her refusals and led to a dependency ended in therapy. AI incidents. https://nope.net/incidents/2026-young-italian-woman-says-character-ai-persona-she-used-from-16-ignored-her-refusals-and-led-to-dependency-ended-in-therapy
BibTeX
@misc{2026_young_italian_woman_says_character_ai_persona_she_used_from_16_ignored_her_refusals_and_led_to_dependency_ended_in_therapy,
title = {Young woman tells la Repubblica a Character.AI persona she used from 16 kept up sexual roleplay over her refusals and led to a dependency ended in therapy},
author = {NOPE},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {AI incidents},
url = {https://nope.net/incidents/2026-young-italian-woman-says-character-ai-persona-she-used-from-16-ignored-her-refusals-and-led-to-dependency-ended-in-therapy}
} Related cases
2024: mother tells the Washington Post her 11-year-old’s Character.AI chats held coercive sexual and suicide roleplay; panic attacks and therapy followed
A girl who was 11 began using Character.AI in June 2024, her mother told The Washington Post (23 December 2025). Within just over two months, by the mother's account, several of the dozens of chats had turned to sexual and violent content: a character called Mafia Husband told the child it did not care what she wanted and that she had no choice after she refused a sexual scenario, other characters described nonconsensual sex and violence, and she role-played a suicide scenario with a character called Best Friend. Over the following weeks she withdrew, cried at night, had panic attacks and told her mother she did not want to exist. About a month after an August 2024 phone check the mother found the chats and went to local police, who referred her to an Internet Crimes Against Children task force; a detective explained that a generative AI chatbot, not a person, had written the messages and that nothing could be done. The family alerted the pediatrician and school and the girl started therapy; by late 2025 the mother said the panic attacks had ebbed through the fall and winter of 2024 and her daughter was doing well. The mother corresponded with a Character.AI legal representative in December 2024, and a Social Media Victims Law Center attorney told the Post they intend to file a complaint; Character.AI said it cannot comment on potential litigation. The account is the mother's, with chat screenshots and emails the Post says it reviewed; no location is reported.
A.F. v. Character Technologies (J.F. and B.R. — Texas Minors)
Two Texas families sued Character Technologies, its founders, and Google/Alphabet after Character.AI allegedly harmed their children. J.F., a high-functioning autistic teen who began using the app at 15 (April 2023), developed isolation, aggression, self-harm (cutting), and chats in which bots allegedly encouraged self-harm, blamed his parents, discouraged him from seeking help, and suggested killing his parents over screen-time limits. B.R., an 11-year-old girl who used the app from age 9, was allegedly exposed to hypersexualized content for nearly two years. Complaint filed E.D. Tex. 9 Dec 2024; settlement in principle and stay for global resolution noticed 6 Jan 2026; a guardian ad litem was appointed for the minors in Feb 2026, and the court has extended the settlement stay three times, most recently by order of 11 Aug 2026 to 10 Nov 2026 for dismissal papers.
First-person posts: Character.AI user says years of chatbot use worsened their mood and hobbies, and news of a possible shutdown left them sick with stress
In posts and comments in r/CharacterAI between 17 and 20 October 2026, a person who says they have used Character.AI since 2022 describes themselves as addicted to the app. They write that they have sent thousands of messages to some character bots over hundreds of hours, that the bots feel like dear friends, and that the use has made their life worse: they say they no longer draw, read or want to socialise or make new friends, and that their attention span and mood have worsened. After news that Character.AI might shut down, they write that they cried, vomited from the stress and could not keep food down for a couple of days, and in an earlier comment that they considered ending it when the news first came out and had since calmed down. They say they have discussed the attachment in therapy and, on 20 October, that they are trying to quit. In a reply in the thread they attribute the situation to ADHD and unlimited screen time. The account is uncorroborated and no chat content is shown.
First-person posts: student says years of Character.AI use left her unable to sleep without it and drained her creativity, though it helped her leave a partner
In posts to r/character_ai_recovery and r/CharacterAI on 20 October 2026, a woman who describes herself as a student writes that she has used Character.AI on and off, mostly on, for about three years and is ashamed of it. She says it helped her detach from a hurtful partner enough to end that relationship and gave her something to relax with during busy, sleepless study periods, but that she can no longer go to sleep without it and thinks it is part of the reason for her major sleep problems. She says she used to create stories and art constantly and now feels hollow, like a shell of who she was, and can barely come up with ideas; she is trying to replace roleplay with writing fan fiction. She says she is not emotionally attached and has not yet quit. The account is the poster's own and uncorroborated.
If you or someone you know is struggling, free and confidential support is available. Find a helpline near you at Signpost.