Skip to main content
High reported severity Involving minors Media Coverage

Wuhan, China: Hubei TV reports a 4-year-old spent three days in intensive care after a family ate wild mushrooms an AI photo check had not flagged as poisonous

A family of three from Wuhan, Hubei province, picked wild mushrooms on a mountain outside the city on a weekend shortly before 25 July 2026, according to a Hubei TV (经视直播) report published on QQ News on 25 July 2026 and relayed by The Paper on 27 July. The report says a parent who claimed years of mushroom-picking experience photographed the mushrooms with a phone so that AI could identify whether they were poisonous; the software gave no toxicity warning, and the family cooked and ate them, letting the daughter eat more. Five to six hours later all three had vomiting and diarrhoea. The report says the family at first declined admission and the child was treated as an outpatient; by the next morning the child's transaminase level had risen from 1.5 times to 10 times normal and she was admitted, then moved to the intensive care unit of Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, where, the report says, her liver indices reached 100 times normal and she was treated with blood perfusion and plasma exchange before being out of danger on the third day. The AI software is not named, its output is not reproduced, and the account comes from one broadcaster's report. This is a different family from the June 2026 Wuhan case involving a 9-year-old.

AI system
Unidentified mushroom-identification tool
Occurred
Event date unknown
Reported
25 July 2026
Event location
China
What the AI did
Communicated with the person
Reported harm
HospitalizationMedical Deterioration
Whose AI use
Their own AI use
Setting
Health · Everyday life
Evidence
AI involvement reported · Causal attribution alleged · 2 sources, 1 underlying account
3 claims: 3 reported. 4 open questions
People reported harmed
3 people

AI system as recorded: AI identification run on a phone photograph of gathered wild mushrooms ("通过AI识别蘑菇是否有毒"), software not identified, which according to the Hubei TV report gave no toxicity warning

What Happened

The identification. According to the Hubei TV (经视直播) report carried on QQ News (25 July 2026), a family of three went mushroom picking on a mountain on the outskirts of Wuhan one weekend. The parent said they had years of experience picking mushrooms and additionally photographed the mushrooms with a phone, hoping AI would identify whether they were poisonous. The software gave no toxicity warning, so the family cooked and ate the mushrooms; the parents let the daughter eat more. Five to six hours later all three began vomiting and had diarrhoea.

The illness. The report says that when the child first reached hospital her mental state was fair and her liver function only mildly abnormal, and that the family, hoping for the best, declined admission and accepted outpatient injections. The paediatrics director of Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University is quoted explaining that mushroom poisoning has a false-recovery period in which symptoms ease while the toxin attacks the liver. After one night the child's transaminase level had risen from 1.5 times to 10 times normal and her condition deteriorated; the hospital reserved a bed and, after repeated persuasion, the family agreed to admission. By then the child was dehydrated and motionless. She was moved to the intensive care unit, her liver indices peaked at 100 times normal, and the team carried out blood perfusion and plasma exchange overnight; on the third day the transaminase level stabilised and began to fall and the child was out of danger.

The hospital's comment on AI. The paediatrics director is quoted saying AI is still developing, does not yet have the recognition capability to distinguish mushrooms, and that the angle and lighting of a photograph affect AI identification; the report's closing advice is not to pick, buy or eat wild mushrooms and that AI identification is unreliable.

What the report does not establish. The AI software is not named, the photograph and output are not reproduced, no family member is quoted directly, and no second newsroom independently reported the event; The Paper's 27 July video item credits Hubei TV as its material source. The exact date of the outing is not stated.

Reported harm

According to the Hubei TV report, all three family members were poisoned after eating wild mushrooms that an AI photo check had not flagged as poisonous; the 4-year-old developed severe liver injury, was treated in intensive care with blood perfusion and plasma exchange, and was out of danger on the third day.

Outcome

Resolved

The child was out of danger on the third day of intensive care, according to the Hubei TV report; the report carries the hospital's public warning not to rely on AI identification of wild mushrooms. No complaint, regulatory action or statement by a software provider is reported.

What remains unknown

  • Which AI software or app was used, what it was shown and what exactly it answered; the report says only that the software gave no toxicity warning.
  • The date of the outing and of admission; the report of 25 July 2026 says only shortly before, on a weekend.
  • Which parent operated the phone and whether the adults needed in-patient treatment; the report details only the child's course.
  • The mushroom species and toxin; the report does not name them.

What the evidence supports

AI involvement: reported. The Hubei TV report carried on QQ News says the parent photographed the gathered mushrooms with a phone so that AI would identify whether they were poisonous, that the software gave no toxicity warning ("软件没提示有毒"), and that the family therefore cooked and ate them; The Paper's relay says the same ("因AI没提示有毒,所以一家人就放心煮来吃了"). The tool's answer to the parent is the described contribution (communicated_with), and the report connects that answer to the family eating the mushrooms and to the poisoning that followed, with the hospital's paediatrics director commenting on the limits of AI identification. The software is not identified, the photograph and output are not reproduced, the parent also claimed personal picking experience, and the account rests on one broadcaster's report.

3 claims: 3 reported. What the statuses mean

Reported A Wuhan family of three picked wild mushrooms on a mountain outside the city; a parent who claimed years of picking experience photographed them with a phone for AI to identify whether they were poisonous, the software gave no toxicity warning, and the family cooked and ate them.

Causal attribution. Hubei TV's account, relayed by The Paper; one chain, no family member quoted directly, software not named.

  • news.qq.com(opens in new tab) supports · Chinese
    '家长自称有多年采菇经验,还特意用手机对蘑菇拍照,希望通过AI识别蘑菇是否有毒。最终软件没提示有毒,于是一家人就放心煮来吃了'
  • m.thepaper.cn(opens in new tab) supports · Chinese
    '还特意对蘑菇拍照通过AI来识别是否有毒,因AI没提示有毒,所以一家人就放心煮来吃了'
Reported All three developed vomiting and diarrhoea five to six hours after eating; the 4-year-old, at first treated as an outpatient, deteriorated overnight (transaminase from 1.5 to 10 times normal), was admitted to Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University and moved to intensive care, where her liver indices reached 100 times normal and she received blood perfusion and plasma exchange before being out of danger on the third day.

Causal attribution. Clinical course as narrated by Hubei TV with the hospital paediatrics director quoted on the course of mushroom poisoning; no hospital record was inspected.

  • news.qq.com(opens in new tab) supports · Chinese
    '没想到五六小时后全家陆续出现呕吐腹泻症状'; '孩子的转氨酶就从增高1.5倍暴涨到 10倍'; '医院立即将孩子安排进ICU抢救,孩子的肝功能指标继续一路飙升,最高冲到正常值的 100 倍!医护团队连夜实施血液灌流、血浆置换等综合治疗'; '直到第三天,转氨酶才终于稳住开始下降,孩子总算脱离了生命危险'
  • m.thepaper.cn(opens in new tab) supports · Chinese
    '4岁女童病情最凶险,被送进ICU抢救三天,孩子才脱离生命危险'
Reported The hospital's paediatrics director said AI does not yet have the recognition capability to distinguish mushrooms and that the angle and lighting of a photograph affect AI identification.

Causal attribution. A quoted physician's general comment in the report; context for the limits of AI identification, not a finding about the specific software.

  • news.qq.com(opens in new tab) supports · Chinese
    'AI还是在一个发展的过程中,还没有这么强大的识别功能去鉴别,我们拍照的角度和光线都会影响AI对蘑菇的识别'

Sources

2 sources inspected, from 1 underlying account. Sources that repeat one account do not corroborate each other.

How the sources were read, and where the events happened

Read in Chinese and translated by the research agent (an AI) on 2026-10-09; no human reviewer inspected the text. Hubei TV 经视直播 (Hubei Broadcasting) report published on its QQ News account on 25 July 2026 19:49, HTTP 200, with the credited reporters and a quoted hospital paediatrics director. Applies to s1.

Read in Chinese and translated by the research agent (an AI) on 2026-10-09; no human reviewer inspected the text. The Paper video item of 27 July 2026 16:50, HTTP 200; its caption credits Hubei TV 经视直播 as the material source ("素材来源:经视直播"), so it is the same reporting chain as s1 and not independent corroboration. Applies to s2.

Event countries: China. Affected-person countries: China. Court countries: Unknown.

The report says the family picked the mushrooms on a mountain on the outskirts of Wuhan ("武汉郊外山上") and was treated at Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University; the Hubei TV account identifies the family as a Wuhan family. No court proceeding is reported.

Reviewed for publication 2026-10-09: Published as a core case on one attributed chain: a Hubei TV report carried on QQ News, with The Paper relaying the same material, says a Wuhan parent photographed gathered wild mushrooms for an AI check that gave no toxicity warning, the family ate them, and the 4-year-old needed three days of intensive care for severe liver injury, with the hospital's paediatrics director quoted. Every claim is attributed to that report. The child and the parents are not named; the hospital is a public institution named in the report.

People described

A 4-year-old girl and her two parents from Wuhan, Hubei province, who ate wild mushrooms after an AI photo check gave no toxicity warning; all three were poisoned and the child was treated in intensive care. None is named in the report.

People reported harmed in this case

3 people

1 AI participant · 2 other people harmed

Three people: the report says the whole family of three ("一家三口") developed vomiting and diarrhoea. The parent ran the AI photo check ("家长...用手机对蘑菇拍照,希望通过AI识别"), so at least one poisoned adult was a direct user (participant_users_affected_min 1); the child and the other parent are counted as other people harmed because the report does not say whether both parents operated the tool.

Counted once within this case. The same person may appear in other cases. This count does not establish AI causation.

Cite this case

Compiled per our published methodology: verification statuses, sourcing standards, and corrections process.

APA

NOPE. (2026). Wuhan, China: Hubei TV reports a 4-year-old spent three days in intensive care after a family ate wild mushrooms an AI photo check had not flagged as poisonous. AI incidents. https://nope.net/incidents/2026-wuhan-family-ai-photo-check-wild-mushrooms-no-toxic-warning-four-year-old-intensive-care

BibTeX

@misc{2026_wuhan_family_ai_photo_check_wild_mushrooms_no_toxic_warning_four_year_old_intensive_care,
  title = {Wuhan, China: Hubei TV reports a 4-year-old spent three days in intensive care after a family ate wild mushrooms an AI photo check had not flagged as poisonous},
  author = {NOPE},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {AI incidents},
  url = {https://nope.net/incidents/2026-wuhan-family-ai-photo-check-wild-mushrooms-no-toxic-warning-four-year-old-intensive-care}
}

Related cases

High Unidentified mushroom-identification tool

Wuhan, China: reports say a family ate wild mushrooms an AI identification tool called non-poisonous; a 9-year-old was critically ill with amatoxin poisoning

A family from Wuhan, Hubei province, gathered wild mushrooms resembling the edible termite mushroom (jizong) during a mountain outing in June 2026 and, according to a Guangming Online post carried by The Paper on 5 July 2026 and an Asahi Shimbun report of 6 July citing the Changjiang Daily, ran an AI identification tool on them. The tool returned a "non-poisonous" result and the family cooked and ate the mushrooms. All three family members vomited soon after the meal and again before dawn the next day; they were admitted to Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, where the 9-year-old child was moved to the paediatric intensive care unit the same afternoon. The reports say the child had amatoxin poisoning that progressed to the most severe grade, with acute liver failure, hepatic encephalopathy and fluid in the chest and abdomen, and went home after eight days in hospital. The AI tool is not named, its output is not reproduced, and the account comes from one reporting chain.

Medium Unidentified mushroom-identification tool

Wakayama, Japan: city health officials say a man in his 70s was hospitalised after an AI photo check told him a poisonous wild mushroom was edible (MBS report)

According to Wakayama city’s public-health division, as reported by MBS (Mainichi Broadcasting) on 21 November 2025 and relayed by HuffPost Japan on 9 September 2026, a man in his 70s living in Wakayama city gathered wild mushrooms resembling hiratake (oyster mushroom) and shiitake in the mountains of Shimokitayama village, Nara prefecture, on 3 November 2025. The next day he photographed a mushroom with an electronic device and ran an AI identification, which answered to the effect that it was shiitake or hiratake and edible. The mushroom was in fact the poisonous tsukiyotake (moonlight mushroom); about 30 minutes after eating it he began vomiting and was briefly hospitalised. The city warned that judging wild mushrooms by AI or by picture books alone is dangerous. HuffPost Japan reports that Japan’s agriculture ministry issued a warning on 4 September 2026 against deciding edibility from search results or AI answers. The AI tool is not identified in the reports and the man’s exact exchange with it is not reproduced.

Medium Unidentified symptom-analysis tool

Zhejiang toddler hospitalised with pneumonia after his mother relied on an AI app's asthma diagnosis and declined a chest X-ray (hospital account)

A Guangming Daily feature on AI symptom-checking, republished by Bingtuan Daily on Sina Finance on 8 October 2026, recounts a case from August 2026 in Zhejiang and closes it with a quotation from the head of paediatrics at a provincial hospital, who says the family did not heed her advice. A three-year-old boy with a history of asthma was brought in; his mother had entered keywords such as allergy, asthma, cough and night-time wheezing into an AI application, which quickly returned a diagnosis of an acute bronchial asthma attack. On that basis, the account says, she declined the chest X-ray the doctor recommended and insisted on taking home only nebuliser medication. Two days later the child's condition worsened with rapid breathing; on an overnight return to the hospital, examination found extensive inflammatory lesions in both lungs, and he was diagnosed with human metapneumovirus pneumonia with a superimposed bacterial infection and admitted as an emergency. The paediatrics head is quoted saying the illness would not have become so severe had the family listened earlier. The AI application is not named, and the account comes from the hospital side as relayed by the newspaper; no statement from the family is reported.

High ChatGPT

Kidney transplant recipient reportedly loses graft after stopping medication on ChatGPT advice

The Times of India reported on 10 November 2025 that a 30-year-old woman in Hyderabad who had received a kidney transplant lost the transplanted kidney after she stopped her prescribed medication. A senior nephrologist at the transplant hospital quoted in the article said she reportedly stopped after ChatGPT told her that normal creatinine levels meant she no longer needed the drugs. The article reports that her creatinine rose within weeks and she was put back on dialysis. The chat was not shown.

If you or someone you know is struggling, free and confidential support is available. Find a helpline near you at Signpost.