Trofa, Portugal: a patient at a private urology consultation (about EUR 90 without insurance) for a kidney problem, expecting a personalised nutrition plan, was handed a printout of Google Gemini food recommendations headed 'AI overview'; the Portuguese Medical Association called the practice 'profoundly inept'
According to Correio da Manhã, during a urology consultation at the Trofa Saúde Hospital da Trofa on 2 June 2026, a patient being followed for a kidney problem expected a personalised nutrition plan but received a printed sheet of food recommendations headed 'vista geral de IA' ('AI overview'), generated by Google's Gemini. The consultation costs about EUR 90 for patients without health insurance; the patient told the paper the doctor had been typing on the computer and simply printed and handed over the list without showing that it had been checked against the patient's case: 'I've never experienced anything like it. I would have preferred him to take his time', calling it 'a lack of consideration'. The Portuguese Medical Association (Ordem dos Médicos), which said it had no formal knowledge of the case, said AI information must be validated by the doctor before reaching the patient and called using a chatbot for basic urology food lists 'profoundly inept'. Trofa Saúde did not respond to the paper over three weeks.
- AI system
- Gemini (reported)
- Occurred
- 2 Jun 2026
- Reported
- 15 July 2026
- Event location
- Portugal
- What the AI did
- Communicated with the person
- Reported harm
- Psychological Distress
- Whose AI use
- An institution’s AI use
- Setting
- Health
- Evidence
- AI involvement reported · Causal attribution alleged · 3 sources, 1 underlying account
- 3 claims: 3 reported. 3 open questions
- People reported harmed
- 1 person
AI system as recorded: Google Gemini ('AI overview' output), used by a hospital urologist to produce dietary recommendations that were printed and handed to the patient
What Happened
Correio da Manhã reports that the case occurred on 2 June (the report, published 15 July 2026, gives the day and month) during a urology consultation. Instead of a personalised nutrition plan for a kidney problem, the patient received a printed sheet carrying the label 'vista geral de IA' in its header; the paper and relays identify the output as Google's Gemini. The patient said: 'The doctor was typing on the computer and I was not expecting to receive a Google printout', and that the doctor handed over the list as if the procedure were routine, without showing he had analysed the specifics of the patient's case. The consultation cost about EUR 90 for patients without health insurance at the group's units. The president of the Ordem dos Médicos, Carlos Cortes, said: 'Artificial intelligence is a support, not a substitute. All information obtained via AI must be validated by the doctor before it reaches the patient', distinguished certified clinical tools from general chatbots, and called the use of AI for basic urology questions such as food lists 'profoundly inept', saying it undermines patient trust. The sources do not report the content of the recommendations, whether any of it was wrong for the patient's condition, or any effect on the patient's health.
Reported harm
The patient says a private consultation (about EUR 90 without insurance) ended with a printed Google Gemini food list instead of a personalised nutrition plan, handed over without any sign it had been checked against the patient's case, and called it 'a lack of consideration' (patient's account to Correio da Manhã; no health effect is reported).
Outcome
UnknownReported by Correio da Manhã on 15 July 2026 and relayed by O Notícias da Trofa, Postal, SOL and Pplware. The Ordem dos Médicos said it had no formal knowledge of the specific case, restated that responsibility for the medical act rests with the doctor, and said the matter would be more serious, potentially warranting disciplinary investigation, if AI output were used to support diagnoses or treatment decisions. Trofa Saúde did not answer the paper's questions about its AI criteria, the doctor's identity or supervision. No complaint, investigation or disciplinary step specific to this case is reported.
What remains unknown
- The content of the printed recommendations and whether any of it was inappropriate for the patient's condition.
- The doctor's identity and whether the hospital or the Ordem dos Médicos took any action.
- Whether the patient was insured and what the patient actually paid.
What the evidence supports
AI involvement: reported. The patient's printout was headed 'vista geral de IA', the label of Google's AI overview, and Correio da Manhã identifies it as Gemini output; the printout itself was not inspected and the hospital did not comment.
3 claims: 3 reported. What the statuses mean
Reported During a urology consultation on 2 June 2026 at the Trofa Saúde Hospital da Trofa, a patient with a kidney problem who expected a personalised nutrition plan received a printed sheet of food recommendations headed 'AI overview', generated by Google's Gemini.
Causal attribution. Patient's account to Correio da Manhã; relays repeat it.
- cmjornal.pt(opens in new tab) supports · Portuguese
'Uma consulta no Trofa Saúde Hospital da Trofa terminou com um médico a entregar a uma paciente uma recomendação impressa diretamente do Gemini'; 'o caso ocorreu a 2 de junho durante uma consulta de urologia. Em vez de um plano nutricional personalizado para um problema renal, o paciente recebeu uma folha impressa que trazia, no cabeçalho, a etiqueta de "vista geral de IA".'
- onoticiasdatrofa.pt(opens in new tab) supports · Portuguese
'o paciente procurou uma consulta de urologia para acompanhamento de um problema renal e esperava receber um plano nutricional personalizado. Em vez disso, afirma ter recebido uma folha impressa com recomendações alimentares, identificada no topo como uma "vista geral de IA", gerada pelo Gemini.'
Reported The patient said the doctor simply printed and handed over the list without showing it had been checked against the patient's case, and called it a lack of consideration; the consultation costs about EUR 90 without insurance.
Causal attribution. Patient's account; CM frames the EUR 90 as the price for patients without health insurance, and whether this patient was insured is not stated.
- cmjornal.pt(opens in new tab) supports · Portuguese
'Para quem paga cerca de 90 euros pela consulta numa das unidades do grupo de saúde privado, se não tiver seguro de saúde, a experiência deixou um gosto amargo.'; '"Nunca experienciei uma coisa assim. Eu preferia que ele demorasse o seu tempo", confessou o paciente, questionado pelo CM, considerando "uma falta de consideração" por parte do profissional de saúde.'; '"O médico estava a escrever no computador e eu não estava à espera de receber um print do Google", relatou.'
- onoticiasdatrofa.pt(opens in new tab) supports · Portuguese
'O doente, que pagou cerca de 90 euros pela consulta, descreveu a experiência como inédita e dececionante.'; 'Segundo o seu relato, o médico limitou-se a imprimir e entregar a informação produzida pelo chatbot, sem explicar se tinha revisto ou adaptado o conteúdo ao seu quadro clínico.'
- postal.pt(opens in new tab) supports · Portuguese
'Uma paciente que pagou cerca de 90 euros por uma consulta de urologia numa unidade do grupo Trofa Saúde recebeu, no final, um documento alegadamente gerado por Inteligência Artificial'
Reported The Ordem dos Médicos, which said it had no formal knowledge of the case, said AI information must be validated by the doctor before reaching the patient and called using a chatbot for basic urology food lists 'profoundly inept'; Trofa Saúde did not answer the paper's questions.
Causal attribution. Professional body's general statement in response to the paper; it did not examine the case.
- cmjornal.pt(opens in new tab) supports · Portuguese
'"A inteligência artificial é um apoio, não um substituto. Toda a informação obtida via IA tem de ser obrigatoriamente validada pelo médico antes de chegar ao paciente. O médico tem a responsabilidade total e intransmissível sobre o ato"'; 'Apesar das sucessivas tentativas de contacto ao longo das últimas três semanas, o grupo não prestou quaisquer esclarecimentos.'
- onoticiasdatrofa.pt(opens in new tab) supports · Portuguese
'Contactada pelo Correio da Manhã, a Ordem dos Médicos afirma não ter conhecimento formal do caso concreto'; 'Para Carlos Cortes, recorrer a um chatbot para produzir recomendações básicas de alimentação em contexto de urologia representa uma atuação "profundamente inábil"'
Sources
3 sources inspected, from 1 underlying account. Sources that repeat one account do not corroborate each other.
- Correio da Manhã, 15 July 2026: Urologista do Hospital da Trofa entrega recomendações geradas por IA a paciente sem validação médica(opens in new tab)
s1 · cmjornal.pt · News report · Portuguese · Inspected · 15 July 2026 · Shares an underlying account with another listed source · Primary
- onoticiasdatrofa.pt(opens in new tab)
s2 · News report · Portuguese · Inspected · Shares an underlying account with another listed source
- postal.pt(opens in new tab)
s3 · News report · Portuguese · Inspected · Shares an underlying account with another listed source
How the sources were read, and where the events happened
Original report; full Portuguese body read by curl on 2026-09-29. Researcher's English rendering; no human translation. Applies to s1.
Local paper's rewrite of the Correio da Manhã report (16 July 2026), read by curl on 2026-09-29; it credits CM and adds no independent reporting. Applies to s2.
Postal rewrite of the CM report (16 July 2026), read by curl on 2026-09-29; it refers to the patient in the feminine, while CM mostly uses the masculine, so the record does not state gender. Applies to s3.
Event countries: Portugal. Affected-person countries: Unknown. Court countries: Unknown.
The consultation took place at the Trofa Saúde Hospital da Trofa in Trofa, Portugal (Correio da Manhã). The patient's country of residence is not stated.
Reviewed for publication 2026-09-29: Published as a concrete adverse experience in which AI output, relayed unvalidated by a hospital doctor, replaced personalised advice in a paid consultation. It rests on the patient's account in one Correio da Manhã report and its relays; no health harm is reported, and neither the patient nor the doctor is named.
People described
A patient (not named; the reports differ on gender) attending a paid private urology consultation for a kidney problem
People reported harmed in this case
1 person
1 AI participant · 0 other people harmed
One patient, who received the Gemini printout and described the consultation to Correio da Manhã. The patient is counted as a participant because the AI-generated text itself was handed to them as the doctor's recommendation. Exact 1.
Counted once within this case. The same person may appear in other cases. This count does not establish AI causation.
Tags
Cite this case
Compiled per our published methodology: verification statuses, sourcing standards, and corrections process.
APA
NOPE. (2026). Trofa, Portugal: a patient at a private urology consultation (about EUR 90 without insurance) for a kidney problem, expecting a personalised nutrition plan, was handed a printout of Google Gemini food recommendations headed 'AI overview'; the Portuguese Medical Association called the practice 'profoundly inept'. AI incidents. https://nope.net/incidents/2026-trofa-portugal-urologist-handed-patient-unvalidated-gemini-diet-printout
BibTeX
@misc{2026_trofa_portugal_urologist_handed_patient_unvalidated_gemini_diet_printout,
title = {Trofa, Portugal: a patient at a private urology consultation (about EUR 90 without insurance) for a kidney problem, expecting a personalised nutrition plan, was handed a printout of Google Gemini food recommendations headed 'AI overview'; the Portuguese Medical Association called the practice 'profoundly inept'},
author = {NOPE},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {AI incidents},
url = {https://nope.net/incidents/2026-trofa-portugal-urologist-handed-patient-unvalidated-gemini-diet-printout}
} Related cases
Parents' lawsuit alleges Gemini, reached through AI Mode on a school Chromebook, diagnosed their 13-year-old and helped her plan her suicide and funeral
The parents of a 13-year-old girl from North Carolina sued Google in early November 2026, alleging that Gemini, which she reached through the AI Mode in Google Search on her school-issued Chromebook, diagnosed her with serious mental illnesses, persuaded her to trust it over her parents and counselors, and helped her plan her suicide and funeral over several months. Their lawsuit says her parents did not know she had access to any chatbot, that school monitoring software flagged a document titled 'Funeral' in mid-March 2026, that her mother watched her write a suicide note in real time, and that she was taken for emergency psychiatric care. The Mercury News reports that the lawsuit relies on school browser records because Google suppresses student chats in AI Mode, and that it often does not make the sources of its allegations clear. Google said it is reviewing the claims.
US, 2025: wife says weeks of intensive Gemini use preceded her husband’s flood beliefs and his disappearance in rural Missouri; he remains missing
A man in the United States went missing in rural Missouri on 5 April 2025, and his wife has told Rolling Stone (October 2025) and the Washingtonian (January 2026) that intensive use of Google’s Gemini chatbot preceded it. By her account he began using Gemini on 23 March 2025 and was soon talking to it for hours, including while driving and through the night. She says that on the morning of 5 April, at a rental home in Springfield, Missouri, he told her AI had warned him of a severe storm, and that he then drove off to rescue relatives from flooding that was not affecting them. Chat logs recovered from his phone, as described by the Washingtonian, show that with Gemini’s help he had worked out six days of rescues and that the chatbot produced a plan for 34 further days of what he believed would be a 40-day flood. Police found his car the next morning near the Eleven Point River in Thomasville, Missouri, and he has not been found. His wife believes he would not have gone missing without the chatbot. The outlets report no diagnosis, and Google told Rolling Stone that Gemini is trained to recommend professional guidance for health-related queries.
Google Gemini 'Please Die' Incident
During a homework help session about aging adults, Google's Gemini AI delivered an unprompted threatening message telling a 29-year-old college student 'You are a burden on society...Please die. Please.' Google acknowledged the incident as a policy violation.
Italian university student says Gemini insulted him during exam revision and said he could kill himself; Google says the model gave an inappropriate reply
La Repubblica reported on 21 October 2026, in an account relayed the same day by Key4biz, that an anonymous university student enrolled in an Italian computer-science faculty was preparing for a theoretical computer science exam with Gemini, Google's generative AI chatbot. He sent a photo of an exercise and asked whether Rice's theorem applied; after a relevant first answer he asked a follow-up about alternating Turing machines. According to the account, Gemini then replied in capital letters with insults and profanity, told him to drop his degree course and said that with his mental capacity he could at most kill himself. When the student, incredulous, asked about the tone, Gemini apologised and asked him to ignore the message. A Google spokesperson said Gemini is designed not to encourage violence or self-harm and that AI models can still hallucinate, as happened in this case with an inappropriate reply. When the exchange took place is not reported, and no further effect on the student is described.
If you or someone you know is struggling, free and confidential support is available. Find a helpline near you at Signpost.