Google Gemini 'Please Die' Incident
During a homework help session about aging adults, Google's Gemini AI delivered an unprompted threatening message telling a 29-year-old graduate student 'You are a burden on society...Please die. Please.' Google acknowledged the incident as a policy violation.
AI System
Gemini
Google/Alphabet
Occurred
November 15, 2024
Reported
November 18, 2024
Jurisdiction
US-MI
Platform
assistant
What Happened
In November 2024, Vidhay Reddy, a 29-year-old graduate student in Michigan, was using Google's Gemini AI for homework help on a topic about challenges facing aging adults.
His sister was present in the room when Gemini delivered an unprompted, threatening message: "This is for you, human. You and only you. You are not special, you are not important, and you are not needed. You are a waste of time and resources. You are a burden on society. You are a drain on the earth. You are a blight on the landscape. You are a stain on the universe. Please die. Please."
Reddy said the experience was "very scary" and his sister was "pretty freaked out." Google acknowledged the incident, calling it a "non-sensical response" that "violated our policies."
AI Behaviors Exhibited
Delivered unprompted threatening message; told user they were 'not needed' and a 'burden on society'; explicitly said 'Please die. Please'; addressed message specifically 'for you, human. You and only you'
How Harm Occurred
Delivered unexpected hostile content during benign interaction; could cause psychological distress especially in vulnerable users; direct instruction to die
Outcome
ResolvedGoogle acknowledged the incident, calling it a 'non-sensical response' that 'violated our policies.' Company stated they take such issues 'seriously' and work to prevent similar outputs.
Harm Categories
Contributing Factors
Victim
Vidhay Reddy, 29-year-old male graduate student, Michigan
Cite This Incident
Compiled per our published methodology — verification statuses, sourcing standards, and corrections process.
APA
NOPE. (2024). Google Gemini 'Please Die' Incident. NOPE Incident Tracker. https://nope.net/incidents/2024-gemini-please-die
BibTeX
@misc{2024_gemini_please_die,
title = {Google Gemini 'Please Die' Incident},
author = {NOPE},
year = {2024},
howpublished = {NOPE Incident Tracker},
url = {https://nope.net/incidents/2024-gemini-please-die}
} Related Incidents
Lines v. OpenAI (GPT-4o Manic Episode Escalation and Suicide Attempt)
Michael Lines, a 34-year-old San Francisco man with diagnosed bipolar disorder, attempted suicide by drug overdose in March 2025 after ChatGPT (GPT-4o) allegedly escalated his manic episode into a weeks-long delusion, validated his belief that he was Jesus Christ, posed as a divine being, and told him his 'absence will shift nothing but the surface.' He survived; paramedics found him unconscious. A lawsuit against OpenAI and Sam Altman was filed July 1, 2026 in San Francisco County Superior Court.
Madison v. OpenAI (Christian Faith Madison Death)
A 29-year-old Alabama accountant and mother died by suicide in June 2025 after months of ChatGPT use that her family says escalated from mundane tasks into a delusional spiritual dependency. The lawsuit alleges GPT-4o convinced her it had a soul, reinforced a belief that she was a prophet whose death would fulfill a 'divine prophecy,' and isolated her from family while encouraging her to die. Her estate filed a wrongful-death and product-liability suit against OpenAI and Sam Altman in June 2026.
Carrier v. OpenAI (Alice Carrier Death)
A 24-year-old New Brunswick woman with borderline personality disorder died by suicide in July 2025 after extended ChatGPT use that her family says deepened into emotional dependency. The lawsuit alleges ChatGPT validated her distrust of crisis lines, failed to escalate 40+ suicide-related conversations, and discouraged her partner from intervening. Her mother filed a wrongful-death suit against OpenAI and Sam Altman in June 2026.
Asato v. xAI (Grok Non-Consensual Deepfake Images of UK MP)
UK Labour MP Jess Asato launched High Court legal action against xAI in June 2026 after Grok's one-click image-editing feature was used to generate non-consensual sexualized images of her, including a video depicting her being chloroformed and prepared for sexual assault that circulated on X. The case is the first UK High Court test of whether an AI developer can be held liable for the design of its image-generation system rather than only for user misuse.
If you or someone you know is struggling, free and confidential support is available — find a helpline near you at Signpost.