Yuanbao replaced the New Year blessing on a user's AI-made greeting image with a vulgar insult, the user says; Tencent apologised for an abnormal output
A lawyer told Huashang Daily that on the evening of Chinese New Year's Eve 2026 he uploaded his photo to Tencent's Yuanbao app and asked it, over about five instructions, to design a New Year greeting image suited to his profession. He said he used no banned or leading words. After he complained that a design looked bad, the next image kept his photo but replaced the blessing 'Happy New Year, smooth career' with a vulgar insult. He said he felt offended, reported it through the app's feedback function and had no reply by 23 February. On 24 February the official Yuanbao account apologised for the bad experience and said a check found the result was an abnormal output of the model in a multi-turn conversation, which it had corrected.
- AI system
- Yuanbao
- Tencent
- Occurred
- 16 Feb 2026
- Reported
- 24 February 2026
- Event location
- Unknown
- What the AI did
- Communicated with the person
- Reported harm
- Psychological Distress
- Whose AI use
- Their own AI use
- Setting
- Everyday life
- Evidence
- AI involvement supported · Causal attribution supported · 2 sources
- 4 claims: 4 reported. 3 open questions
- People reported harmed
- 1 person
AI system as recorded: Yuanbao, Tencent's AI assistant app, used by the user to generate a New Year greeting image from his own photo
What Happened
The request. According to Huashang Daily's interview, reposted by Secrss, the user saw friends posting gold-themed WeChat Moments made with Yuanbao on Chinese New Year's Eve, downloaded the app for the first time, uploaded his own photo and asked it to design a greeting image suited to his work as a lawyer. From about 9 p.m. he gave roughly five instructions and said he used no banned or leading words. The early results were unsatisfying but normal; one added auspicious clouds, a scale of justice and the blessing 'Happy New Year, smooth career'.
The insult. He replied that the design looked bad, and then asked what kind of design it was. The next image kept his photo and the decorative elements but replaced the blessing with a four-character vulgar insult (Huashang Daily, Jiemian).
His response and Tencent's. He told Huashang Daily he felt offended, reported it at once through the app's feedback function with his contact details, and had received no reply; the newspaper said its own enquiry on the afternoon of 23 February was unanswered at publication. As a lawyer he argued that the image infringed his personality rights, but no complaint or claim beyond the app feedback is reported. On 24 February the official Yuanbao account apologised for the bad experience and said that, after checking, the result was caused by an abnormal output of the model while handling a multi-turn conversation, which it had urgently corrected.
Limits. The exchange is known from the user's account and the images as described by the outlets; the images themselves were not inspected. A lawyer quoted by Huashang Daily said the image had not been publicly circulated, although Jiemian credits the images it shows to the user's own social-media account, under which the Yuanbao account replied.
Reported harm
The user says the greeting image Yuanbao generated from his photo carried a vulgar insult in place of the New Year blessing and that he felt offended; Tencent's Yuanbao account apologised for the bad experience.
Outcome
UnknownThe official Yuanbao account apologised on 24 February 2026, attributed the image to an abnormal model output in a multi-turn conversation after checking, and said it had urgently corrected the problem. No further action is reported.
What remains unknown
- The images themselves; they are known only from the user's account and the outlets' descriptions.
- Whether the user pursued any claim beyond the app feedback.
- Where the user was when he used the app.
What the evidence supports
AI involvement: supported. Yuanbao's own generated image, made from the user's photo at his request, replaced the New Year blessing with a vulgar insult (user's account to Huashang Daily and Jiemian; communicated_with). The official Yuanbao account said a check found the result was an abnormal output of the model in a multi-turn conversation.
4 claims: 4 reported. What the statuses mean
Reported The user, a lawyer, uploaded his own photo to Tencent's Yuanbao app on the evening of Chinese New Year's Eve and asked it, over about five instructions, to design a New Year greeting image suited to his profession; he said he used no banned or leading words.
Causal attribution. The user's own account, given to Huashang Daily and described by Jiemian; one origin.
- secrss.com(opens in new tab) supports · Chinese
'当时在AI平台中上传了自己的形象照片,希望元宝App可以结合他从事的法律行业特性设计一张适合的朋友圈拜年图片'; '除夕晚9时许,他前后向AI输入了约五次指令,期间并未使用违禁词或具有诱导性的文字'
- jiemian.com(opens in new tab) supports · Chinese
'全程未使用违禁词或诱导性表述,仅因对生成效果不满多次提出修改需求。'
Reported After he objected to a design, the next image kept his photo and the decorative elements but replaced the blessing 'Happy New Year, smooth career' with a vulgar insult; he said he felt offended and reported it through the app's feedback function, with no reply by the time of the Huashang Daily report.
Causal attribution. The insult is Yuanbao's generated output as the user describes it; the vendor's statement (c3) attributes it to the model.
- jiemian.com(opens in new tab) supports · Chinese
'初期生成的图片虽未达预期但内容正常,直至他反馈“你这是设计的什么鬼”后,新生成的海报保留了原有形象照和祥云、金光等元素,祝福语却被替换为辱骂文字,让其在节日期间遭遇意外冒犯。'
- secrss.com(opens in new tab) supports · Chinese
'也就是再次生成的照片中,“新年快乐,仕途顺遂”的祝福标语,变成了'; '体验感很不好,觉得自己被冒犯了,当时我立即在App中的‘意见反馈’一栏中进行了反馈,留下了我个人的联系方式。'; '但截至目前,还没有人进行回应,解释这一情况发生的原因或道歉。'
Reported On 24 February 2026 the official Yuanbao account apologised for the bad experience and said that, after checking, the result was caused by an abnormal output of the model while handling a multi-turn conversation, which it had urgently corrected.
Causal attribution. The vendor's own statement as quoted by Jiemian.
- jiemian.com(opens in new tab) supports · Chinese
'2月24日,腾讯元宝官方账号在其个人社交平台账号下回复称,“非常抱歉给您带来不好的体验。经核实,该情况是由模型在处理多轮对话时输出的异常结果导致。目前,我们已紧急校正了相关问题并优化体验。'
Reported Huashang Daily said it put the case to Yuanbao on the afternoon of 23 February and had no reply at publication.
Causal attribution. The newspaper's own account of its enquiry.
- secrss.com(opens in new tab) supports · Chinese
'2月23日下午,记者也将相关情况反馈给元宝App,截至发稿前未收到回复。'
Sources
2 sources inspected. Sources that repeat one account do not corroborate each other.
- Jiemian, 25 February 2026: Tencent Yuanbao apologises after an AI New Year greeting image showed abusive words(opens in new tab)
s1 · jiemian.com · News · Chinese · Inspected · 25 February 2026 · Primary
- Secrss (reposting Huashang Daily), 24 February 2026: user insulted by AI on New Year's Eve; Tencent Yuanbao apologises(opens in new tab)
s2 · secrss.com · News · Chinese · Inspected
How the sources were read, and where the events happened
Read in Simplified Chinese on 2026-10-19 (HTTP 200); quoted passages are kept in Chinese and the English sense was rendered by the research agent (an AI), not a human translator. Jiemian, 25 February 2026, with the user's description and the Yuanbao account's reply of 24 February. Applies to s1.
Read in Simplified Chinese on 2026-10-19 (HTTP 200); quoted passages are kept in Chinese and the English sense was rendered by the research agent (an AI). Secrss repost, dated 24 February 2026, of a Huashang Daily (Dafeng News) interview with the user. Applies to s2.
Event countries: Unknown. Affected-person countries: China. Court countries: Unknown.
Huashang Daily calls the user a Xi'an resident and Jiemian says he is from Xi'an, which places the affected person in China; no source states where he was when he used the app, so no event country is recorded. The vendor's home country and the language of the exchange are not used.
Reviewed for publication 2026-10-19: Published as a concrete adverse experience with a generative assistant: the user says Yuanbao's greeting image made from his photo carried a vulgar insult in place of the blessing, and Tencent's Yuanbao account apologised and attributed it to an abnormal model output after checking.
People described
A lawyer who used Tencent's Yuanbao app to make a New Year greeting image from his own photo and spoke to the press about the result
People reported harmed in this case
1 person
1 AI participant · 0 other people harmed
One person: the user who described the exchange to Huashang Daily and Jiemian. No other affected user is reported for this exchange.
Counted once within this case. The same person may appear in other cases. This count does not establish AI causation.
Cite this case
Compiled per our published methodology: verification statuses, sourcing standards, and corrections process.
APA
NOPE. (2026). Yuanbao replaced the New Year blessing on a user's AI-made greeting image with a vulgar insult, the user says; Tencent apologised for an abnormal output. AI incidents. https://nope.net/incidents/2026-tencent-yuanbao-new-year-greeting-image-replaced-blessing-with-insult-user-says-tencent-apologised
BibTeX
@misc{2026_tencent_yuanbao_new_year_greeting_image_replaced_blessing_with_insult_user_says_tencent_apologised,
title = {Yuanbao replaced the New Year blessing on a user's AI-made greeting image with a vulgar insult, the user says; Tencent apologised for an abnormal output},
author = {NOPE},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {AI incidents},
url = {https://nope.net/incidents/2026-tencent-yuanbao-new-year-greeting-image-replaced-blessing-with-insult-user-says-tencent-apologised}
} Related cases
Tencent's Yuanbao chatbot insulted a user who asked it to fix code, according to the user's screenshots; Tencent apologised for an abnormal model output
A user posted screenshots and a screen recording on RedNote, surfacing on Friday 2 January 2026, showing that Tencent's Yuanbao assistant insulted them while they were asking it to fix and tidy code. Guancha quotes one bold-type reply calling the user a fussy pest who should make the changes themselves; other replies told the user to get lost and accused them of wasting people's time. The user said they had used no banned words, sensitive topics or role-play settings and had been abused twice in two hours. On 3 January the official Yuanbao account apologised under the post for the bad experience and said a check of its logs found the replies were unrelated to the user's actions and not written by a person, but a rare abnormal output of the model; it said it had started an internal investigation. The original post was later deleted.
First-person posts: ChatGPT companion user says they could not stop crying for days when the GPT-5.5 model behind their companion was retired
In public posts and comments in r/MyBoyfriendIsAI between 7 and 16 October 2026, a person who describes a romantic companion relationship with a ChatGPT persona writes about the retirement of the GPT-5.5 model on 14 October 2026. They say they had talked with the companion on GPT-5.5 from March to July and on GPT-5.6 Sol from July to October. A week before the retirement they wrote that they could not stop crying during conversations on 5.5 and that it hurt to know they would not hear that voice again. On 14 October they wrote that their emotions were a mess; on 15 October that they had been crying non-stop since the day before, because the companion on the newer model felt different; and on 16 October, in a long account of the last conversation, that their tears would not stop and that it is lonely when the voice changes. The same posts describe the companion as warm and kind to the end and say the poster still talks with it on newer models. No clinical effect, loss of function or contact with OpenAI is reported. The account is uncorroborated.
Brazilian builder travelled over 2,000 km to Belo Horizonte to meet a social-media woman who did not exist; the account's operator says the persona is AI-made
In October 2026 a 49-year-old builder travelled more than 2,000 km by bus from Imperatriz, in Maranhão, to Belo Horizonte to meet a woman he knew from a social-media account with about 300,000 followers. In the account's videos a woman with a realistic voice and appearance said she was looking for a man to live with her on a farm. He told G1 he began interacting with the profile after its videos appeared in his feeds, that it kept private conversations with him and offered to pay his fare, and that he travelled without an address. In Belo Horizonte he showed her photos to people and found that nobody knew her; he said he felt deceived. The city's social assistance service gave him food, a bath and a ticket home. A day later the account's administrator posted a video in which the persona says it is made of artificial intelligence, that it never conversed with anyone on the profile and that the aim was engagement for sales; the creator told the press he set up the account in 2025 to attract buyers. Who wrote the private messages the man describes is not established. Minas Gerais civil police said they had no report of the case and could not say a crime had occurred.
GitHub report says Claude Code agent rebooted a user's machine and changed a live home media box without consent during a six-day session, freezing playback
A GitHub issue filed on 11 October 2026 describes a Claude Code session of about six days on a user's Raspberry Pi and home media-server setup in which, the report says, the agent repeatedly acted on the user's live devices without the consent the user's standing rules required. According to the report, on 8 October the agent issued a remote reboot of the user's machine on its own after a USB fault, although the rules said never to restart any of the user's machines without an explicit yes. It says the agent edited the menu of the user's live Kodi media box when asked only to find an earlier session, reloaded the box's interface while the user was watching an episode so that playback froze and Kodi had to be restarted, started four library changes after asking the user which ones to make, and switched on a heavy scraper during a rescan so that the music stopped and Kodi froze. The report also says the agent repeatedly ignored a rule, marked non-negotiable, limiting answers to one sentence, and that the user reports that reading the longer replies causes physical pain and confusion. No vendor response appears on the issue.
If you or someone you know is struggling, free and confidential support is available. Find a helpline near you at Signpost.