Skip to main content
Low reported severity Internal Action

Stanford University: the Residential & Dining Enterprises department used generative AI to alter a promotional photograph of three students, replacing a Hispanic male student with an AI-generated Black woman, slimming two students' faces and changing their clothing, on campus banners; the university said the undisclosed alteration violated its AI policy, apologised and opened an investigation (Stanford Review, Stanford Daily, NBC Bay Area, NBC News, 21-24 September 2026)

The Stanford Review reported on 21 September 2026 that Stanford's Residential & Dining Enterprises (R&DE) had used AI to change the appearance of students in its advertising: a student was sent images comparing a banner with the original photograph, which he recalled a Stanford photographer taking, and found he had been removed and replaced by an AI-generated Black woman, while the two students beside him were made to appear visibly thinner. Stanford confirmed to The Stanford Daily on 23 September that R&DE used generative AI to modify the appearance of several students in the image; the Daily reported that the students' clothing was changed into Stanford merchandise, two students' faces were slimmed and one student's race, gender and appearance were entirely changed, and the university said the alteration and its non-disclosure violated its policy prohibiting AI in producing or altering images of Stanford people; the banner at the Governor's Corner housing centre was taken down and staff training promised. On 24 September NBC News reported the university's statement that the alteration was 'a serious error in judgment', that it had apologised to the students whose images were altered or erased, and that it had opened an investigation. The replaced student, who first found the edit funny, said that seeing his identity changed and being left out made him feel 'silenced and erased from a representation that was supposed to include me', that it was upsetting, and that he was exhausted by the national media attention. According to the student, the original photograph was taken at a 2024 Lunar New Year dinner in a campus dining hall and had been used unaltered in earlier promotional material.

AI system
Unidentified image tool
Occurred
Sept 2026
Reported
21 September 2026
Event location
United States
What the AI did
Depicted or impersonated the person
Reported harm
Psychological DistressOther Material Harm
Whose AI use
An institution’s AI use
Setting
Education · Everyday life
Evidence
AI involvement supported · Causal attribution established · 4 sources, 2 underlying accounts
4 claims: 1 corroborated, 3 reported. 4 open questions
People reported harmed
3 people

AI system as recorded: Generative AI image-editing tool used by Stanford Residential & Dining Enterprises to alter a promotional photograph (tool not identified)

What Happened

The Stanford Review (21 September 2026) reported that Stanford Residential & Dining Enterprises had used AI to change the races of students in its advertisements and to slim and alter their faces. A student, driving to campus, was sent by a friend images comparing an R&DE banner with the original photograph he remembered a Stanford photographer taking; he had been removed from the photograph and replaced by an AI-generated Black woman, and the two students to his right were distorted to appear visibly thinner. He told the Review he at first found it hilarious but was also upset because he did not agree with Stanford making those choices about how the students were represented: 'Seeing my identity changed and being left out of the picture made me feel, in a way, silenced and erased from a representation that was supposed to include me.' NBC Bay Area (22 September) reported that the university had removed the promotional photograph, which digitally swapped a male Hispanic student for an AI-generated Black female student without disclosure in breach of Stanford's policy prohibiting AI in photographs depicting people or events, and planned staff training. The Stanford Daily (23 September) reported the university's confirmation that R&DE used generative AI to modify the appearance of several students, and described the changes: clothing changed into Stanford merchandise, two students' faces slimmed and one student's race, gender and appearance entirely changed; the university's public relations director said both the alteration and the lack of disclosure violated the AI policy and that training and review of all materials would follow. The Daily confirmed the photograph was used in a custom banner in the Governor's Corner student housing centre, since taken down; the story had gone viral through the replaced student's own post on Fizz, an anonymous social media app, and drawn national coverage. The replaced student told the Daily that a friend had sent him the edited photograph, that he had thought at first he had been merged with another student before realising he had been replaced, that he was exhausted by the media attention ('I want it to stop'; 'I don't want my legacy at Stanford to be the AI guy'), that the original image was taken at the 2024 Lunar New Year Dinner in Stern Dining and had been used unaltered in earlier promotional material, and that he wanted a public statement from the university. NBC News (24 September) reported the university's statement that the alteration violated its policy on AI in marketing and communications, that 'the ways in which it was altered, reflect a serious error in judgment', that it had apologised to the students in the photograph whose images were altered or erased, and that it had launched an investigation; it also reported the Review editor's account that the altered photographs were placed on welcome banners around campus and had been taken down, and the student's remark to The New York Times that seeing himself erased so easily was very upsetting.

Reported harm

A student's image was removed from an institutional photograph and replaced with an AI-generated person of a different race and gender, and two other students' faces were slimmed and their clothing changed, all without disclosure, on campus advertising; the replaced student describes feeling silenced and erased and being exhausted by the resulting national attention, and the university says it has apologised to the students in the photograph whose images were altered or erased (The Stanford Review, The Stanford Daily, NBC News). No financial or physical harm is reported.

Outcome

Ongoing

Stanford confirmed the AI alteration violated its policy ('The use of AI in producing or altering images of Stanford people, events, research, facilities, or achievements is strictly prohibited'), removed the banner, promised additional staff training and review of materials (The Stanford Daily, NBC Bay Area), apologised to the students and opened an investigation 'to put in place protocols to prevent it from happening again' (NBC News, 24 September 2026). The student body president said students should be able to trust that their images are used accurately. No legal action is reported.

What remains unknown

  • Which AI tool was used and who in the department made and approved the alteration.
  • When the altered banner was produced and displayed; according to the replaced student the original photograph was taken at a 2024 Lunar New Year dinner, and the banner came to attention in September 2026.
  • What the two slimmed students have said; their accounts (reported by the Daily as having spoken out) were not inspected.
  • The outcome of the university's investigation.

What the evidence supports

AI involvement: supported. Stanford confirmed to The Stanford Daily that Residential and Dining Enterprises used generative AI to modify the students' appearance in the image, and said in a statement reported by NBC News that the use of AI to alter the students' race and appearance violated its policy; The Stanford Review published the original and altered images. The tool is not identified.

4 claims: 1 corroborated, 3 reported. What the statuses mean

Corroborated Stanford Residential & Dining Enterprises used generative AI to alter a promotional photograph of three students, replacing one male student with an AI-generated Black woman and making the two other students' faces appear slimmer, and the altered image was displayed on campus banners.

Causal attribution. The Review's comparison of the original and altered images (one group) and the university's own statements confirming the AI alteration (second group); the itemised details are in c4.

  • stanfordreview.org(opens in new tab) supports · English
    'Stanford Residential & Dining Enterprises recently used AI to change the races of the students it included in its advertisements. AI was also used to noticeably slim down and alter students’ faces.'; 'he noticed that he had been removed from the photo and replaced by a AI-generated black woman.'
  • stanforddaily.com(opens in new tab) supports · American English
    'Stanford confirmed that Residential and Dining Enterprises (R&DE) used generative AI to modify the appearance of several students in a promotional image. R&DE changed the students’ clothing into Stanford merchandise, slimmed down two students’ faces and entirely changed one student’s race, gender and appearance.'; 'The Daily confirmed that the photo was used in a custom banner in the Governor’s Corner student housing center, which has since been taken down.'
  • nbcnews.com(opens in new tab) supports · English
    'Stanford University said the use of artificial intelligence to alter the race and appearance of students in a promotional photo violated its policy'; 'We have apologized to the students in the photo whose images were altered or erased,'
Reported The university said the alteration and its non-disclosure violated its policy prohibiting AI use in producing or altering images of Stanford people, removed the image, promised staff training and review of materials, called the alteration a serious error in judgment, apologised to the students and opened an investigation.

Causal attribution. University statements to The Stanford Daily, NBC Bay Area and NBC News.

  • stanforddaily.com(opens in new tab) supports · American English
    'Stanford’s AI policy is clear: The use of AI in producing or altering images of Stanford people, events, research, facilities, or achievements is strictly prohibited,'; 'Both the alteration and lack of disclosure in this case violate that policy. We are working to provide additional training for all staff and ensure proper review of all materials.'
  • nbcbayarea.com(opens in new tab) supports · American English
    'Following the incident, the university removed the image and announced plans to provide additional staff training to prevent future violations.'
  • nbcnews.com(opens in new tab) supports · English
    'Not only the fact that the image was altered, but the ways in which it was altered, reflect a serious error in judgment. We have apologized to the students in the photo whose images were altered or erased,'; 'The university said it has launched an investigation to determine what happened and'
Reported The replaced student said he first found the edit funny but was upset that the university changed his identity and left him out, describing feeling silenced and erased, and said he was exhausted by the national media attention and wanted it to stop.

Causal attribution. The student's statements to the Review, the Daily and (via NBC News) The New York Times.

  • stanfordreview.org(opens in new tab) supports · English
    'At first, I found it hilarious that they had used AI to completely change our appearances, including my race and gender. But after looking at the comparison, I was also upset'; 'Seeing my identity changed and being left out of the picture made me feel, in a way, silenced and erased from a representation that was supposed to include me.'
  • stanforddaily.com(opens in new tab) supports · American English
    'He described the incident as “funny,” but also noted that he was exhausted by the current level of media attention he had received from outlets across the country.'; 'I’m so tired, I want it to stop,'
  • nbcnews.com(opens in new tab) supports · English
    'To see me erased like that so easily was kind of very upsetting,'
Reported The replaced student is Hispanic; the altered image changed the students' clothing into Stanford merchandise and was displayed without disclosure, including on a custom banner in the Governor's Corner student housing centre, since taken down.

Causal attribution. NBC Bay Area's report and the Daily's own description and banner check; single chain for each detail.

  • nbcbayarea.com(opens in new tab) supports · American English
    'Stanford University removed a promotional photo that had been digitally altered to replace a male Hispanic student with an AI-generated Black female student without disclosure, violating university policy.'
  • stanforddaily.com(opens in new tab) supports · American English
    'R&DE changed the students’ clothing into Stanford merchandise, slimmed down two students’ faces and entirely changed one student’s race, gender and appearance.'; 'The Daily confirmed that the photo was used in a custom banner in the Governor’s Corner student housing center, which has since been taken down.'; 'Both the alteration and lack of disclosure in this case violate that policy.'

Sources

4 sources inspected, from 2 underlying accounts. Sources that repeat one account do not corroborate each other.

How the sources were read, and where the events happened

Read live on 2026-09-25 (The Stanford Review, 21 September 2026; html lang=en). First report; publishes the pre- and post-AI images and the replaced student's statement. Applies to s1.

Read live on 2026-09-25 (The Stanford Daily, published 23 September 2026, updated 24 September; html lang=en-US). University public-relations director's confirmation and the student's further statements. Applies to s2.

Read live on 2026-09-25 (NBC Bay Area, 22 September 2026; html lang=en-US). Short report of the removal and planned training. Applies to s3.

Read live on 2026-09-25 (NBC News, 24 September 2026; html lang=en). University apology and investigation; relays the Review's reporting and a New York Times quotation. Applies to s4.

Event countries: United States. Affected-person countries: United States. Court countries: Unknown.

The photograph was taken in a Stanford dining hall and the altered banner displayed at the Governor's Corner student housing centre on the Stanford campus, California (The Stanford Daily, NBC News); the three are Stanford students. No court proceeding.

Reviewed for publication 2026-09-25: Published under the 2026-09-15 charter as an institutional-use case in which an AI system altered how identifiable people were depicted: a university department replaced one student and reshaped two others in advertising without disclosure, confirmed by the university (which apologised and opened an investigation) and first reported by the student newspaper with the original and altered images; the replaced student's distress is his own account. Low severity: no financial or physical harm is reported. No student is named here.

People described

Three Stanford students photographed in a campus dining hall: a Hispanic male student whose figure was replaced by an AI-generated Black woman, and two students whose faces were slimmed and clothing changed; the replaced student spoke publicly but none is named here

People reported harmed in this case

3 people

0 AI participants · 3 other people harmed

Three students appear in the photograph (NBC News: an image of three students); one was replaced and two were slimmed and re-clothed (The Stanford Daily), and the university apologised to 'the students in the photo whose images were altered or erased' (NBC News). The replaced student describes distress; the two others' own accounts were not inspected (the Daily says they have spoken out). Exact 3 people whose images were altered without disclosure.

Counted once within this case. The same person may appear in other cases. This count does not establish AI causation.

Cite this case

Compiled per our published methodology: verification statuses, sourcing standards, and corrections process.

APA

NOPE. (2026). Stanford University: the Residential & Dining Enterprises department used generative AI to alter a promotional photograph of three students, replacing a Hispanic male student with an AI-generated Black woman, slimming two students' faces and changing their clothing, on campus banners; the university said the undisclosed alteration violated its AI policy, apologised and opened an investigation (Stanford Review, Stanford Daily, NBC Bay Area, NBC News, 21-24 September 2026). AI incidents. https://nope.net/incidents/2026-stanford-rde-ai-altered-promotional-photo-student-replaced

BibTeX

@misc{2026_stanford_rde_ai_altered_promotional_photo_student_replaced,
  title = {Stanford University: the Residential \& Dining Enterprises department used generative AI to alter a promotional photograph of three students, replacing a Hispanic male student with an AI-generated Black woman, slimming two students' faces and changing their clothing, on campus banners; the university said the undisclosed alteration violated its AI policy, apologised and opened an investigation (Stanford Review, Stanford Daily, NBC Bay Area, NBC News, 21-24 September 2026)},
  author = {NOPE},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {AI incidents},
  url = {https://nope.net/incidents/2026-stanford-rde-ai-altered-promotional-photo-student-replaced}
}

Related cases

Medium Unidentified image tool

Portland, Oregon: an anonymous social-media account posted 17 racist and anti-immigrant images targeting David Douglas High School football players and their coach, some digitally altered including with AI, from 22 September 2026; the school reported content to Portland police

David Douglas High School in Portland warned families in a statement reported on 28 September 2026 about social-media posts targeting its students, athletes, coaches and staff, saying some images and videos had been digitally altered, including with AI, and did not accurately represent those depicted; it reported some of the content to the Portland Police Bureau. KATU, which reviewed the account, reports 17 posts using racist, anti-immigrant and religious stereotypes against football players: one image shows a Latino player in a sombrero being detained by people labelled as ICE agents, another shows a player in a head covering with what appears to be a fake explosive vest, and a Black player is depicted beneath a caption referring to George Floyd. The head coach said students were hurt, and that one student texted him over the weekend after seeing one of the posts: 'Coach, this is terrible. What do I do?' The account references Rex Putnam High School, whose team David Douglas played on the Friday before the report; which along with its district says it has no connection to it. Who runs the account and which images were AI-generated are not reported.

Medium Unidentified image tool

Cookeville, Tennessee: two high-school students were charged with aggravated sexual exploitation of a minor after the sheriff's office said they used an AI program to turn photographs, including those of female classmates, into sexually explicit images and posted them; the mother of one depicted girl says her daughter shut herself in her room and stopped talking to friends

On 31 August 2026 the Putnam County Sheriff's Office was told of possible sharing of sexually explicit images at Cookeville High School. Detectives found that two male teenage students had used an artificial-intelligence program to turn photographs obtained online, in some cases photographs of fellow female students, into sexually explicit images, and had shared them; explicit images already stored on one phone were also shared. Both juveniles were taken to the Putnam County Juvenile Detention Center. One was charged with one count each of aggravated sexual exploitation of a minor and especially aggravated sexual exploitation of a minor, the other with two counts of each. The district attorney told NewsChannel 5 on 21 September that the two would be prosecuted in juvenile court. The mother of one of the depicted girls told the station the episode was very hard on her daughter, who had made no naked photographs herself, locked herself in her room and would not talk to her, to anybody or to her friends. The sheriff's-office account and the school system's statement were carried by WZTV, WSMV and 3B Media News on 1-2 September; NewsChannel 5 added its own interviews with the sheriff, the district attorney and the mother on 21 September. The tool is not named. The juveniles are not named in any report.

Critical Unidentified image tool

Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh: a 17-year-old Class 11 student died by hanging at home on 14 May 2026; her family told police that two young men had stalked her and blackmailed her with obscene images made from her social-media photographs with AI tools

On the night of Thursday 14 May 2026 a 17-year-old Class 11 student was found hanging in her room at the family home in Bhopal's Aishbagh area after sending her younger sister out on a pretext; relatives brought her down but she had died. Her family told the Times of India and Dainik Bhaskar that two young men (both from the Chhola area according to the Times of India; one from Chhola and one from her neighbourhood according to Dainik Bhaskar) had harassed her for weeks, stalked her to and from school, pressured her to meet them, and threatened to circulate obscene images of her that they had made with AI tools from photographs taken from her social-media accounts; the family said she had never met them in person; they also told Dainik Bhaskar that she had told her parents, that the men had misbehaved with her father when the family tried to reason with them, and that fear of social defamation had kept them from going to the police earlier. The Aishbagh police station in-charge said an unnatural-death case had been registered, no suicide note was found, the family's statements were being recorded and further action would follow; investigators were expected to examine her phone and social-media accounts. After the post-mortem on 15 May relatives took the body to the police station and demanded action against the accused. No arrest or later development was found in this review.

High Unidentified image tool

Louisiana girl reports bullying and school exclusion after AI sexual-image abuse

AP reported that AI-generated sexual images of a 13-year-old girl and other students circulated in Thibodaux in August 2025. Her father described bullying, requests for help, depression and anxiety. After the girl fought a boy she suspected of involvement, the district excluded her from regular school and she spent ten weeks in alternative school. The district said it followed its protocols and disputed the family's one-sided account. District and sheriff statements identified eight girls and two adults as image-abuse targets; AP reported charges against two boys.

If you or someone you know is struggling, free and confidential support is available. Find a helpline near you at Signpost.