Skip to main content
Medium reported severity Internal Action

Los Banos, California: a substitute teacher says a sexualised AI image of him made from an old selfie circulated among middle-school students on TikTok and Snapchat and was used by a student account impersonating him; one student received in-school suspension and he stopped taking assignments at the middle school

WIRED (Caroline Haskins, 24 August 2026) reports the account of a substitute teacher in Los Banos, California, who spoke to WIRED by name (not repeated here). On 12 March 2026 a co-worker at his other job told him an AI photo was circulating on social media; the image reused a mirror selfie he had taken at a job in college but showed him in lingerie, posing suggestively. He traced an account sharing it on TikTok to a student at the middle school where he regularly substituted and reported it to the assistant principal; that evening he found a second account, created by a different student, impersonating him under a misspelled version of his name with the image as its profile picture. Over the following weeks he dealt with administrators, parents and the police; one student who admitted creating the image received an in-school suspension. He says the image was also shared on Snapchat, kept spreading among students and drew crude sexual comments on his TikTok account. He told administrators he would not take assignments at the middle school until the matter was addressed; at the local high school the same image was AirDropped to him during a class. WIRED says the district did not respond to its request for comment. He said he does not feel safe returning to the district. The Los Banos Enterprise (25 August 2026) summarised the WIRED account; no independent local reporting was found.

AI system
Unidentified image tool
Occurred
12 Mar 2026
Reported
24 August 2026
Event location
United States
What the AI did
Depicted or impersonated the person
Reported harm
Psychological DistressProfessional HarmReputational Harm
Whose AI use
Someone else’s AI use
Setting
Work · Education · Privacy
Evidence
AI involvement reported · Causal attribution alleged · 2 sources, 1 underlying account
3 claims: 3 reported. 5 open questions
People reported harmed
1 person

AI system as recorded: Unidentified AI image tool used, according to WIRED and the teacher's account, to turn an old mirror selfie into a sexualised image of him in lingerie; the app is not named

What Happened

According to WIRED, on 12 March 2026 the teacher was working a shift at a coffee shop when a fellow barista said an AI photo was circulating on social media and a relative wanted to know whether it was him. Parts of the image resembled a mirror selfie he remembered taking at a college-era job, but instead of his work uniform he was wearing lingerie and posing suggestively. One TikTok account that shared it used the real name of a student he knew from the local middle school where he regularly filled in; he suspected two other students from the account's followers. He reported it to the assistant principal, who said the school would take care of it, and that evening found a different student had created an account impersonating him, using his name slightly misspelled and the image as its profile picture. Over the following weeks he went back and forth with administrators, the students' parents and the police, and wrote to the principal that if students were not afraid to generate and post such images of him, he was concerned about what they might circulate privately, including of other students. One student who admitted creating the image was disciplined with in-school suspension. He was later told the image had also been shared on Snapchat, says it continued to proliferate with other students posting it, and says he received several crude, sexual comments on his TikTok account. He told administrators he did not want middle-school assignments until the matter was fully addressed; the district did not respond to WIRED. He took an assignment at the local high school, where during one class he received the same AI-generated image by AirDrop before it was quickly revoked, and could tell it was circulating in the class. The principal said the school was launching an immediate investigation and offered a meeting or the counsellor. He told WIRED he probably would not return to the district this year and did not feel safe doing so. WIRED notes that in most of the accounts it gathered the teachers did not report the content directly to the platforms; Snap pointed to its policies against AI-generated content used to humiliate or sexually harass, and TikTok did not comment. The Los Banos Enterprise (25 August 2026, staff writer) summarised the WIRED account and noted that WIRED did not name the schools or district. The AI tool is not named and no forensic assessment of the image is described.

Reported harm

A sexualised AI image made from his old selfie circulated among students on TikTok and Snapchat, a student account impersonated him with it, he received crude sexual comments, and he stopped taking assignments at the middle school and says he does not feel safe returning to the district (the teacher's account to WIRED).

Outcome

Ongoing

One student who admitted creating the image was given an in-school suspension; the teacher reported the image to the assistant principal and over the following weeks dealt with administrators, the students' parents and the police (WIRED). After the image reappeared at the high school, the principal told him the school was launching an immediate investigation and offered a meeting or the school counsellor. The teacher said he would not take assignments at the middle school until the matter was fully addressed and that he probably would not return to the district in the current school year. The district did not respond to WIRED. No platform enforcement or legal action is reported.

What remains unknown

  • Which AI tool produced the image.
  • How many students shared the image and how widely it spread beyond the two schools.
  • Whether the police took any action after his reports.
  • Whether the impersonation account was removed and whether he reported the content to TikTok or Snapchat.
  • The district's position; it did not respond to WIRED.

What the evidence supports

AI involvement: reported. WIRED describes the image as AI-generated and the teacher says it reworked an old mirror selfie of his to show him in lingerie; a student admitted creating it. The tool is not named and no technical assessment of the image is reported.

3 claims: 3 reported. What the statuses mean

Reported On 12 March 2026 the teacher learned that an AI-generated image resembling him, made from an old mirror selfie but showing him in lingerie and posing suggestively, was circulating on social media; one TikTok account sharing it belonged to a student at the middle school where he substituted, and a different student had created an account impersonating him with the image as its profile picture.

Causal attribution. The teacher's account to WIRED; the students' identities and the tool are not established in the reporting.

  • wired.com(opens in new tab) supports · English
    'On March 12, as he was working his other part-time job at a coffee shop, his phone lit up. A fellow barista said there was an AI photo circulating on social media.'; 'But instead of his work uniform, he was wearing lingerie. And instead of standing normally, as he had been in the original photo, he was posing suggestively.'; 'knew from the local middle school, where he regularly filled in.'; 'He discovered that a different student had created an account impersonating him—it used his name, slightly mispelled, and had the same photo as their profile picture.'
  • losbanosenterprise.com(opens in new tab) context · English
    'The article describes the image as incorporating elements of an older photograph of him that had been manipulated to depict him in lingerie and in a suggestive pose.'
Reported He reported the image to the assistant principal and dealt with administrators, parents and police over the following weeks; a student who admitted creating it received an in-school suspension; the image was also shared on Snapchat and continued to spread, he received crude sexual comments on TikTok, he declined further middle-school assignments, the same image was AirDropped to him during a class at the local high school, and he told WIRED he does not feel safe returning to the district.

Causal attribution. The teacher's account and WIRED's reporting; the school's discipline decision is known through him. The district did not respond to WIRED.

  • wired.com(opens in new tab) supports · English
    'he went back and forth with school administrators, the parents of the students, and even the police.'; 'One student, who admitted to creating the image, was disciplined with in-school suspension.'; 'was later told that the image was also shared on Snapchat.'; 'He says he also received several crude, sexual comments on his TikTok account.'; 'During one class, he received an AirDropped photo of the same AI-generated image before it was quickly revoked.'; 'He tells WIRED that, at least right now, he doesn’t feel safe doing so.'; 'reported the incident to the assistant principal'; 'the image continued to proliferate, and other students began posting it.'; 'he didn’t want to take assignments at the middle school “until this matter is fully addressed.”'; 'he probably won’t return to the district this year.'
  • losbanosenterprise.com(opens in new tab) context · English
    'said he eventually stopped accepting assignments at the middle school and told the publication he did not feel safe returning to the district at the time of the interview.'
Reported The district did not respond to WIRED's request for comment. The Los Banos Enterprise, summarising the WIRED report on 25 August 2026, states that WIRED did not identify the middle school, high school or district by name, and adds no reporting of its own.

Causal attribution. Reporting-chain note: the local paper's item is derived from WIRED and does not corroborate the account independently.

  • wired.com(opens in new tab) supports · English
    'The district did not respond to WIRED’s request for comment.'
  • losbanosenterprise.com(opens in new tab) supports · English
    'described the incidents in an Aug. 24 WIRED investigation examining educators who have been targeted with AI-generated sexualized content.'; 'The middle school, high school and school district were not identified by name in the WIRED report.'

Sources

2 sources inspected, from 1 underlying account. Sources that repeat one account do not corroborate each other.

How the sources were read, and where the events happened

Read live on 2026-09-30 (WIRED, Caroline Haskins, 24 August 2026); full visible text and the page's JSON-LD articleBody saved. The teacher's account is given in his own words and in WIRED's paraphrase; the district did not respond to WIRED. Applies to s1.

Live page returned Cloudflare HTTP 403 on 2026-09-30; read from the Internet Archive capture of 27 August 2026 (web.archive.org/web/20260827032911id_/). Los Banos Enterprise staff report, 25 August 2026, which summarises the WIRED investigation and adds no independent reporting; same chain as s1. Applies to s2.

Event countries: United States. Affected-person countries: United States. Court countries: Unknown.

The teacher is a substitute in Los Banos, California, and the image circulated among students at the local middle school and high school (WIRED). No court proceeding is reported.

Reviewed for publication 2026-10-01: Published under the charter's personal-account rule as a concrete account by a named adult who spoke to a journalist about his own case (depicted_or_impersonated): a sexualised AI image of a substitute teacher circulated among students, a student account impersonated him, a student admitted making it and was suspended in school, and he stopped working at the middle school and says he does not feel safe returning. The account rests on one reporting chain (WIRED, summarised by the local paper); the district did not respond, and the record says so. Students are minors and are not identified.

People described

A substitute teacher in Los Banos, California, who spoke to WIRED by name (not repeated here); the students involved are minors and are not identified

People reported harmed in this case

1 person

0 AI participants · 1 other person harmed

One teacher describes being depicted; WIRED's three other teacher accounts are separate incidents in other places and are not counted here. Exact count 1.

Counted once within this case. The same person may appear in other cases. This count does not establish AI causation.

Cite this case

Compiled per our published methodology: verification statuses, sourcing standards, and corrections process.

APA

NOPE. (2026). Los Banos, California: a substitute teacher says a sexualised AI image of him made from an old selfie circulated among middle-school students on TikTok and Snapchat and was used by a student account impersonating him; one student received in-school suspension and he stopped taking assignments at the middle school. AI incidents. https://nope.net/incidents/2026-los-banos-substitute-teacher-ai-lingerie-image-student-impersonation-account

BibTeX

@misc{2026_los_banos_substitute_teacher_ai_lingerie_image_student_impersonation_account,
  title = {Los Banos, California: a substitute teacher says a sexualised AI image of him made from an old selfie circulated among middle-school students on TikTok and Snapchat and was used by a student account impersonating him; one student received in-school suspension and he stopped taking assignments at the middle school},
  author = {NOPE},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {AI incidents},
  url = {https://nope.net/incidents/2026-los-banos-substitute-teacher-ai-lingerie-image-student-impersonation-account}
}

Related cases

Medium Unidentified image tool (suspected)

Houston influencer reports fear, reputational damage and loss after fabricated sexual images

Houston Public Media reported police allegations that a gun-store co-owner created sexual images and fake social-media accounts impersonating an influencer. According to the reported court documents, she described fear, anxiety, humiliation, reputational damage and financial loss. The source says the accused described using “AI or Photoshop”, leaving the method unresolved. His business emphasised that the allegations were unproven. No conviction or loss amount is established.

Medium Unidentified image tool

Portland, Oregon: an anonymous social-media account posted 17 racist and anti-immigrant images targeting David Douglas High School football players and their coach, some digitally altered including with AI, from 22 September 2026; the school reported content to Portland police

David Douglas High School in Portland warned families in a statement reported on 28 September 2026 about social-media posts targeting its students, athletes, coaches and staff, saying some images and videos had been digitally altered, including with AI, and did not accurately represent those depicted; it reported some of the content to the Portland Police Bureau. KATU, which reviewed the account, reports 17 posts using racist, anti-immigrant and religious stereotypes against football players: one image shows a Latino player in a sombrero being detained by people labelled as ICE agents, another shows a player in a head covering with what appears to be a fake explosive vest, and a Black player is depicted beneath a caption referring to George Floyd. The head coach said students were hurt, and that one student texted him over the weekend after seeing one of the posts: 'Coach, this is terrible. What do I do?' The account references Rex Putnam High School, whose team David Douglas played on the Friday before the report; which along with its district says it has no connection to it. Who runs the account and which images were AI-generated are not reported.

Medium ChatGPT

Saginaw, Michigan: a credit union CEO used ChatGPT to put herself and family members in 'Lake America' sweatshirts in a photo taken before a trip to Halifax; after her sister reposted it publicly without its AI label she says she received death threats and the family came home early, and on 23 September 2026 the credit union said she was no longer employed

The chief executive of Family First Credit Union in Saginaw, Michigan, told WJRT (ABC12) that before boarding a flight to Halifax, Nova Scotia, on 11 September 2026 she and family members took a photo and put it through ChatGPT to show them wearing 'Lake America' sweatshirts, a joke about the US president's order renaming Lake Ontario. She posted it to her private Facebook page with a marker saying it contained AI content; her sister reposted it publicly without the marker while they were in Halifax, and it spread in Canada as if the family had worn the shirts. The backlash concerned the image's political message; she said she would understand the anger of anyone in Halifax who thought the family had walked in wearing those sweatshirts. She said she was getting death threats and the family returned early; by 16 September she was back in the US. She called the post poor judgment, said she would not use AI again and that AI 'can make people think something's real that's not'. On 23 September the credit union said she was no longer an employee, effective immediately; it has not said whether she resigned or was dismissed, or why.

High Unidentified image tool

Jeju: a middle-school student who secretly filmed teachers at his school and turned some of the footage into sexual deepfake composites was referred to prosecutors without detention on 17 September 2026 and, per the victim teachers, to a court's juvenile division as a juvenile protection case on 24 September; police say the victims are teachers (five, per Yonhap-chain reports; police withheld the number) plus one student at a different school and no student at the school itself, while one victim teacher says 10-20 current students and a graduate also appear in the footage; the teachers report two months of treatment while teaching daily, police questioning without a lawyer and a legal-aid dispute with the education office, which apologised on 29 September for support that was not felt

Jeju Dongbu police announced on 23 September 2026 that a student at a middle school on Jeju had been referred to prosecutors without detention on 17 September for violating the Sexual Violence Punishment Act (filming with a camera or similar device). The student's phone was voluntarily submitted by his guardians and forensically examined; the examination found footage relating to some teachers and some sexual composites, and the student admitted the conduct. News1 reported that the student was booked for filming a teacher's body with his phone during a school field trip around mid-July 2026, that the offending had continued for several months with multiple victims, and that police found no indication the composites had been distributed. Police told Seoul Shinmun there were more victim teachers than the one first reported but withheld the number to avoid secondary harm, and that no student at the school was a victim; the Jeju teachers' union questioned whether the full scope of harm had been established. According to the union, two months on the victim teachers were receiving hospital treatment and counselling while teaching daily, gave police statements on 14 September without a lawyer, attended the regional teachers' rights protection committee on 17 September without institutional support, wrote the criminal complaint themselves, and were offered 3.3 million won in legal fees for all of them together, payable after the case ends; two requests to meet the superintendent were not accepted. On 29 September one of the victim teachers gave a press interview at the Jeju Teachers' Union office. She said that early in the investigation she had seen on the student's phone material showing other teachers and current students, had made a list of the people and types of harm, and that the material shown to her at the police victim examination was considerably less than what she had seen; Yonhap-chain outlets quote her as saying the students she recognised numbered 10 to 20 and that a graduate had suffered worse deepfakes. She said investigators asked the school only to identify the perpetrator and never requested material to identify the students in the footage, and that the school sent parents a letter premised on there being no student victims. Police replied that phone forensics had been thorough, that every act beyond social norms had been identified and proven, and that one student victim had been confirmed, a student at a different school. The teachers were notified on 22 September that the case had gone to the prosecution and on 24 September that it had been sent to the court's juvenile division as a juvenile protection case, before they had submitted further evidence and a victim opinion. The teacher said the original complaint had also asked police to examine whether physical contact in 2025 was forcible molestation and whether repeated approaching and waiting in 2026 was stalking, and Halla Ilbo reports that such conduct is said to date from 2025. Yonhap-chain reports describe the charged victims as five teachers. The same day the education office briefed on legal-aid rules (up to 6.6 million won per instance when a teacher is sued, 3.3 million won per case when a teacher files a complaint; office lawyers cannot act as a teacher's private counsel), said it had linked the teachers to the national Digital Sexual Crime Victim Support Center, announced an integrated support system through a hotline, and its section head said the office was sorry that early support had not been felt. The KTU Jeju branch (28 September) and the Jeju Teachers' Union (14 and 29 September) demand a victim-support system, per-teacher legal fees paid in advance and a dedicated support team.

If you or someone you know is struggling, free and confidential support is available. Find a helpline near you at Signpost.