Skip to main content
NOPE
High reported severity Involving minors Investigation Opened

Seremban, Malaysia: police investigate reports that schoolgirls' photos were edited with AI into explicit images; a fellow student is the suspect

Negeri Sembilan police said on 17 October 2026, in a statement reported by Bernama and RTM, that they had received five reports, lodged by parents or guardians between 20 and 23 August 2026, over the circulation of photographs of female students at a secondary school in Seremban that were edited using AI to resemble pornographic images. The police describe the victims as aged 14 to 17 and the suspect as an upper-secondary student whom the school suspended for five days in August; the case is being investigated under child sexual offences law and the Penal Code. A lawyer for a group of parents told The Star that the images came to light on 12 August, when a younger pupil found them on an unlocked phone at school, and alleged that the student made about 200 such images of many female schoolmates. The lawyer said there had been no progress after the August reports and that the student's quick return to school had caused anxiety among the girls. The AI tool is not identified.

AI system
Unidentified image tool
Occurred
Aug 2026
Reported
17 October 2026
Event location
Malaysia
What the AI did
Depicted or impersonated the person
Reported harm
Exploitation or AbusePsychological Distress
Whose AI use
Someone else’s AI use
Setting
Education · Justice
Evidence
AI involvement reported · Causal attribution alleged · 4 sources, 2 underlying accounts
5 claims: 5 reported. 4 open questions
People reported harmed
At least 1 person

AI system as recorded: AI technology used to edit photographs of the students into pornographic-looking images, according to the police statement (tool not identified)

What Happened

The police statement. Negeri Sembilan police chief Datuk Alzafny Ahmad said in a statement on 17 October 2026, as reported by Bernama in English and Malay and by the state broadcaster RTM, that police had received five reports over the circulation of photographs of female students at a secondary school in Seremban that had been edited using artificial intelligence technology to resemble pornographic images. The reports were lodged by parents or guardians between 20 and 23 August 2026 and concern victims aged 14 to 17.

The suspect and the investigation. According to the statement, the suspect is an upper-secondary (Form Five) student whom the school disciplined by suspending him from classes from 24 to 28 August. The case is being investigated under Section 5 of the Sexual Offences Against Children Act 2017 and Section 292 of the Penal Code; five witnesses have given statements and the papers will go to the Deputy Public Prosecutor.

The parents' account. At a press conference reported by The Star the same day, a lawyer representing a group of parents said the matter came to light on 12 August, when a younger pupil found an unlocked phone left in the school prayer room containing explicit photographs of female schoolmates that had been digitally altered using AI, and forwarded some of them to his older sister, which alerted parents. The lawyer alleged that the student produced around 200 explicit deepfake images targeting a large number of female students, said there had been no developments after the August reports, and said an investigating officer had claimed there were no criminal elements and suggested leaving the matter to the education authorities. He said the student's quick return to school had triggered widespread anxiety and safety concerns among the female students. A mother of one of the girls whose doctored photographs were found on the phone said the parents wanted an assurance that the images had been deleted and had not been shared or sold, and described being sent back and forth between the education authorities and the police.

What is not established. The police statement does not say how the AI editing was established or name the tool, and its quoted passages do not repeat the AI description that opens the Bernama and RTM reports. The count of about 200 images and of the girls depicted is the lawyer's allegation. Whether the images were shared beyond the phone is unknown; the parents say they are seeking that assurance. No charge has been reported.

Reported harm

According to the police, photographs of female secondary students aged 14 to 17 were edited with AI into images resembling pornography, leading parents to lodge five police reports; the parents' lawyer says the girls have felt widespread anxiety and safety concerns since the suspect returned to school.

Outcome

Ongoing

Police say the school suspended the suspect from classes from 24 to 28 August 2026, five witnesses have given statements, and the investigation papers will be referred to the Deputy Public Prosecutor. No charge is reported in the sources read.

What remains unknown

  • Which AI tool was used and how the police established that the photographs were edited with AI.
  • How many girls are depicted; the figure of about 200 images is the lawyer's allegation.
  • Whether the images were shared or sold beyond the phone on which they were found.
  • Whether the suspect will be charged.

What the evidence supports

AI involvement: reported. The investigating Negeri Sembilan police, in their 17 October 2026 statement as reported by Bernama (English and Malay) and RTM, describe the case as the circulation of female students' photographs edited using artificial intelligence technology to resemble pornographic images, and are investigating it under child sexual offences law; the parents' lawyer separately says the photographs found on the suspect's phone had been digitally altered using AI. The edited images depict the girls (depicted_or_impersonated) and are the reported harm. The police do not disclose how the AI editing was established, the quoted parts of their statement do not repeat the AI wording, and no tool is named.

5 claims: 5 reported. What the statuses mean

Reported Negeri Sembilan police said on 17 October 2026 that they had received five reports, lodged by parents or guardians between 20 and 23 August 2026, over the circulation of photographs of female students at a secondary school in Seremban that were edited using AI technology to resemble pornographic images; the victims are aged 14 to 17.

Causal attribution. Police statement as relayed by Bernama and RTM; the AI description opens both reports and is not inside the quoted passages; technical basis undisclosed.

  • bernama.com(opens in new tab) supports · Malay
    'Polis menerima lima laporan berhubung penyebaran gambar wajah pelajar perempuan di sebuah sekolah menengah di sini yang disunting menggunakan teknologi kecerdasan buatan (AI) sehingga menyerupai gambar lucah.' ... 'pihaknya menerima laporan membabitkan mangsa yang berusia 14 hingga 17 tahun itu daripada ibu bapa dan penjaga pada 20 hingga 23 Ogos lepas.'
  • bernama.com(opens in new tab) supports · English
    'Police have received five reports over the circulation of AI-manipulated images depicting female students from a secondary school here in explicit or pornographic content.'
  • berita.rtm.gov.my(opens in new tab) supports · Malay
    'yang dimanipulasi menggunakan teknologi kecerdasan buatan (AI) sehingga menyerupai gambar lucah.'
Reported According to the police, the suspect is a Form Five student whom the school suspended from classes from 24 to 28 August 2026; the case is investigated under Section 5 of the Sexual Offences Against Children Act 2017 and Section 292 of the Penal Code, and five witnesses have given statements.

Causal attribution. Police statement.

  • bernama.com(opens in new tab) supports · English
    'In this case, the suspect, a Form Five student, has been subjected to disciplinary action by the school, including suspension from classes from Aug 24 to 28.' ... 'The investigation is being conducted under Section 5 of the Sexual Offences Against Children Act 2017 and Section 292 of the Penal Code.' ... 'To date, five witnesses have been called to have their statements recorded,'
  • bernama.com(opens in new tab) supports · Malay
    'suspek seorang pelajar tingkatan lima dikenakan tindakan disiplin oleh pihak sekolah, iaitu digantung sekolah bermula pada 24 hingga 28 Ogos lepas.'
Reported According to a lawyer for a group of parents, the matter came to light on 12 August when a younger pupil found an unlocked phone left in the school prayer room containing explicit photographs of female schoolmates digitally altered using AI, and forwarded some to his older sister, which alerted parents.

Causal attribution. The parents' lawyer's account at a press conference.

  • thestar.com.my(opens in new tab) supports · English
    'the incident came to light on Aug 12,' ... 'discovered an unlocked mobile phone left unattended in the school surau.' ... 'Upon accessing the device, the student uncovered a cache of explicit photographs of female schoolmates that had been digitally altered using AI.' ... 'The boy then forwarded several of these images to his older sister,' ... 'which quickly alerted parents to the situation.'
Reported The lawyer alleged that the student produced around 200 explicit deepfake images targeting a large number of female students, and said there had been no developments after the August reports and that an investigating officer had claimed there were no criminal elements.

Causal attribution. Allegation by the parents' lawyer; the police statement of the same day describes an active investigation.

  • thestar.com.my(opens in new tab) supports · English
    'the student reportedly produced around 200 explicit deepfake images targeting a large number of female students at the school.' ... 'there had been no developments even after five police reports were lodged in August.' ... 'an investigating officer claimed there were no criminal elements involved, suggesting the matter be left entirely to education authorities,'
Reported The lawyer said the student's quick return to school triggered widespread anxiety and safety concerns among the female students; a mother of one girl whose doctored photographs were found on the phone said parents wanted an assurance that the images had been deleted and not shared or sold.

Causal attribution. The lawyer's and a parent's statements.

  • thestar.com.my(opens in new tab) supports · English
    'He claimed that this quick return has triggered widespread anxiety and safety concerns among the female students.' ... 'A mother of one of the victims, whose doctored explicit photographs were found on the suspect's phone, expressed the parents' frustration during the press conference.' ... 'We only want an assurance that the boy has completely deleted all the images and did not share or sell them on other platforms,'

Sources

4 sources inspected, from 2 underlying accounts. Sources that repeat one account do not corroborate each other.

How the sources were read, and where the events happened

Read in English on 2026-10-18 (HTTP 200). Bernama TV report of the Negeri Sembilan police chief's statement, 17 October 2026. Applies to s1.

Read in Malay on 2026-10-18 (HTTP 200); quoted passages are kept in Malay and the English sense was rendered by the research agent (an AI), not a human translator. Bernama's Malay report of the same police statement. Applies to s2.

Read in Malay on 2026-10-18 (HTTP 200); English sense rendered by the research agent (an AI). RTM report of the same police statement; the page's 'RINGKASAN BERITA AI' box is a site summary feature, not part of the report, and is not cited. Applies to s3.

Read in English on 2026-10-18 (HTTP 200). The Star report of a press conference by a lawyer for a group of parents, attended by some parents, 17 October 2026. Applies to s4.

Event countries: Malaysia. Affected-person countries: Malaysia. Court countries: Unknown.

Event: a secondary school in Seremban, Negeri Sembilan, Malaysia, investigated by the Negeri Sembilan police (Bernama, RTM, The Star). The girls attend that school. No court proceeding is reported, so court_countries is empty.

Reviewed for publication 2026-10-18: Published as a core case (depicted_or_impersonated): the investigating Negeri Sembilan police describe the reports as concerning female students' photographs edited with AI into pornographic-looking images and are investigating under child sexual offences law, and a parent says her daughter's doctored photographs were found on the suspect's phone. The police do not disclose how the AI editing was established. No pupil is named.

People described

Female students at a secondary school in Seremban, aged 14 to 17 according to the police, whose photographs were edited into explicit images; their parents or guardians lodged five police reports

People reported harmed in this case

At least 1 person

0 AI participants · 1 other person harmed

Additional affected people are described without a reliable count.

At least one girl: a mother told The Star that her daughter's doctored explicit photographs were found on the suspect's phone. The police speak of victims aged 14 to 17 across five reports without stating how many girls are depicted, and the lawyer's 'large number of female students' is not a count, so the remainder is unquantified.

Counted once within this case. The same person may appear in other cases. This count does not establish AI causation.

Tags

#ai-edited-images#sexual-images-of-minors#school#malaysia#police-investigation#school-suspension

Cite this case

Compiled per our published methodology: verification statuses, sourcing standards, and corrections process.

APA

NOPE. (2026). Seremban, Malaysia: police investigate reports that schoolgirls' photos were edited with AI into explicit images; a fellow student is the suspect. AI incidents. https://nope.net/incidents/2026-seremban-malaysia-police-investigate-reports-of-schoolgirls-photos-edited-with-ai-into-explicit-images

BibTeX

@misc{2026_seremban_malaysia_police_investigate_reports_of_schoolgirls_photos_edited_with_ai_into_explicit_images,
  title = {Seremban, Malaysia: police investigate reports that schoolgirls' photos were edited with AI into explicit images; a fellow student is the suspect},
  author = {NOPE},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {AI incidents},
  url = {https://nope.net/incidents/2026-seremban-malaysia-police-investigate-reports-of-schoolgirls-photos-edited-with-ai-into-explicit-images}
}

Related cases

High Unidentified image tool

Kulai, Johor: a 16-year-old pupil was arrested and charged after AI-edited nude images of schoolmates and alumni, including minors, were sold online at RM2 each; police logged 29 victim reports and the principal resigned

In April 2025 Johor police arrested a 16-year-old pupil of a private Chinese independent secondary school in Kulai district after an 18-year-old woman reported on 3 April that nude images edited with her face were circulating on social media and being offered for sale. Police said the boy used an AI application to edit photos taken from victims' social media accounts and sold the images at RM2 each; a phone was seized and a 19-year-old was later remanded alongside him. Eight victim reports at the time of the arrest on 8 April grew to 22 by 12 April and 29 by 15 April. The Deputy Communications Minister, who is also the Kulai MP, said on 9 April that most victims were alumni but some were current pupils as young as 14, and on 12 April that 38 people had been identified, the youngest 12 or 13, and her office helped victims lodge reports. A female pupil's viral post said a Telegram chat room of more than 200 members shared the composites and that the school had initially treated the matter as a minor infraction; the school board expelled the boy, acknowledged its slow handling, offered counselling and legal aid, and the principal resigned on 12 April. On 23 April 2025 the boy pleaded guilty at the Kulai Magistrate's Court to possessing 14 pornographic images and not guilty to a charge under Section 5 of the Sexual Offences Against Children Act 2017 of producing sexual abuse material by editing a 17-year-old classmate's image; no verdict on that charge has been found.

Medium Unidentified image tool

Cookeville, Tennessee: two high-school students were charged with aggravated sexual exploitation of a minor after the sheriff's office said they used an AI program to turn photographs, including those of female classmates, into sexually explicit images and posted them; the mother of one depicted girl says her daughter shut herself in her room and stopped talking to friends

On 31 August 2026 the Putnam County Sheriff's Office was told of possible sharing of sexually explicit images at Cookeville High School. Detectives found that two male teenage students had used an artificial-intelligence program to turn photographs obtained online, in some cases photographs of fellow female students, into sexually explicit images, and had shared them; explicit images already stored on one phone were also shared. Both juveniles were taken to the Putnam County Juvenile Detention Center. One was charged with one count each of aggravated sexual exploitation of a minor and especially aggravated sexual exploitation of a minor, the other with two counts of each. The district attorney told NewsChannel 5 on 21 September that the two would be prosecuted in juvenile court. The mother of one of the depicted girls told the station the episode was very hard on her daughter, who had made no naked photographs herself, locked herself in her room and would not talk to her, to anybody or to her friends. The sheriff's-office account and the school system's statement were carried by WZTV, WSMV and 3B Media News on 1-2 September; NewsChannel 5 added its own interviews with the sheriff, the district attorney and the mother on 21 September. The tool is not named. The juveniles are not named in any report.

High Unidentified image tool

Jeju: police refer a middle-school student over secretly filming teachers and making sexual deepfake composites; teachers dispute victim count and legal aid

Jeju Dongbu police announced on 23 September 2026 that a student at a middle school on Jeju had been referred to prosecutors without detention on 17 September for violating the Sexual Violence Punishment Act (filming with a camera or similar device). The student's phone was voluntarily submitted by his guardians and forensically examined; the examination found footage relating to some teachers and some sexual composites, and the student admitted the conduct. News1 reported that the student was booked for filming a teacher's body with his phone during a school field trip around mid-July 2026, that the offending had continued for several months with multiple victims, and that police found no indication the composites had been distributed. Police told Seoul Shinmun there were more victim teachers than the one first reported but withheld the number to avoid secondary harm, and that no student at the school was a victim; the Jeju teachers' union questioned whether the full scope of harm had been established. According to the union, two months on the victim teachers were receiving hospital treatment and counselling while teaching daily, gave police statements on 14 September without a lawyer, attended the regional teachers' rights protection committee on 17 September without institutional support, wrote the criminal complaint themselves, and were offered 3.3 million won in legal fees for all of them together, payable after the case ends; two requests to meet the superintendent were not accepted. On 29 September one of the victim teachers gave a press interview at the Jeju Teachers' Union office. She said that early in the investigation she had seen on the student's phone material showing other teachers and current students, had made a list of the people and types of harm, and that the material shown to her at the police victim examination was considerably less than what she had seen; Yonhap-chain outlets quote her as saying the students she recognised numbered 10 to 20 and that a graduate had suffered worse deepfakes. She said investigators asked the school only to identify the perpetrator and never requested material to identify the students in the footage, and that the school sent parents a letter premised on there being no student victims. Police replied that phone forensics had been thorough, that every act beyond social norms had been identified and proven, and that one student victim had been confirmed, a student at a different school. The teachers were notified on 22 September that the case had gone to the prosecution and on 24 September that it had been sent to the court's juvenile division as a juvenile protection case, before they had submitted further evidence and a victim opinion. The teacher said the original complaint had also asked police to examine whether physical contact in 2025 was forcible molestation and whether repeated approaching and waiting in 2026 was stalking, and Halla Ilbo reports that such conduct is said to date from 2025. Yonhap-chain reports describe the charged victims as five teachers. The same day the education office briefed on legal-aid rules (up to 6.6 million won per instance when a teacher is sued, 3.3 million won per case when a teacher files a complaint; office lawyers cannot act as a teacher's private counsel), said it had linked the teachers to the national Digital Sexual Crime Victim Support Center, announced an integrated support system through a hotline, and its section head said the office was sorry that early support had not been felt. The KTU Jeju branch (28 September) and the Jeju Teachers' Union (14 and 29 September) demand a victim-support system, per-teacher legal fees paid in advance and a dedicated support team. On 6 October 2026 Seogwipo Broadcasting reported, citing people in education and a tipster, that the education authority had finally rejected the victim teachers' application for lawyer fees for an additional criminal complaint, saying in a written opinion that with a police investigation already under way a further complaint could hardly stop or prevent the infringement of their teaching, so the support requirements were not met; critics contrast this with full legal-cost support in earlier sexual-offence cases.

High Unidentified image tool

Seoul: doctoral student sentenced to 18 months for 1,141 AI-manipulated sexual images of seven laboratory colleagues

On 10 September 2026 the Seoul Northern District Court sentenced a 30-year-old Chinese national doctoral student to 18 months in prison for habitually producing manipulated sexual images of seven women who worked in his university research laboratory. Investigators found 1,141 files made over about six months from November 2025, and search records for ways to bypass the safeguards of the generative AI Grok; the court found no evidence of distribution. A lawyer for five of the victims said they continued to suffer fear, trauma and distress. Prosecutors had sought three years and public disclosure of his identity, which the court declined.

If you or someone you know is struggling, free and confidential support is available. Find a helpline near you at Signpost.

Back to all incidents