Qatari courts order news channel to compensate woman whose photos it processed with AI into a virtual news presenter, newspaper reports
Al-Sharq reported on 25 June 2026, in an article quoting the woman's lawyers, that the Investment and Trade Court, in what the paper called the first case of its kind, ordered a news channel to compensate a woman whose personal photos and video clips it had processed with artificial intelligence, without her permission, to create a virtual character presented as a digital news presenter under an assumed name. The channel had launched the presenter with programmes, promotional material and a press conference, and removed the material after the woman's lawyer sent a legal warning. She also argued that news delivered by the character conflicted with her own convictions, which attributed views to her falsely. A court-appointed intellectual-property expert found the AI output to be an independent work, but the court held that the channel had exploited her images and simulated her with AI, violating her rights to her image and privacy. The appeal court reduced the award from 700,000 to 100,000 Qatari riyals, and the Court of Cassation declined the channel's further appeal, making the judgment final. The woman and the channel are not named, and the dates of the broadcasts and rulings are not given.
- AI system
- Unidentified video tool
- Occurred
- Event date unknown
- Reported
- 25 June 2026
- Event location
- Unknown
- What the AI did
- Depicted or impersonated the person
- Reported harm
- Reputational HarmOther Material Harm
- Whose AI use
- An institution’s AI use
- Setting
- Privacy · Justice
- Evidence
- AI involvement reported · Causal attribution supported · 1 source
- 6 claims: 6 reported. 4 open questions
- People reported harmed
- 1 person
AI system as recorded: AI processing of a woman's photos and video clips by a news channel to create a virtual news presenter shown on its platforms (tool not identified)
What Happened
The virtual presenter. According to al-Sharq, a news channel processed a woman's photos and video clips with artificial-intelligence techniques and derived from them a virtual character, which it presented under an assumed name as a digital news presenter on its media platforms and social-media accounts. The channel launched the character as a presenter of a news programme made with AI techniques, prepared a series of programmes and promotional material for it, and organised a large press conference.
The complaint. The woman had not given permission and was not told how the channel obtained her images. She argued that news delivered by the character did not match her personal convictions or the prevailing views in her home country, attributing positions to her falsely. After her lawyer sent a legal warning, the channel removed the material from all its platforms; she then sued for material and moral harm.
The defence and the expert. The channel argued that the AI output was an independent, original artistic work, a different persona in features, voice and language. A court-appointed intellectual-property expert agreed that the material carried no offence to the woman and that the AI-generated work was independent of her.
The rulings. The court set the expert's conclusion aside, holding that the processed videos derived from the woman's own images and that the channel had exploited her images and simulated her with AI and published them without permission, violating her rights to her image, privacy and personal rights under Law No. 7 of 2002 on copyright and related rights. The appeal court reduced the award from 700,000 to 100,000 Qatari riyals; the Court of Cassation declined the channel's appeal, and the judgment became final.
Limits. The account comes from one newspaper article that quotes the woman's lawyers; the judgments were not read. The channel, the woman, the tool used and the dates of the broadcasts and rulings are not given.
Reported harm
Al-Sharq reports that the courts found a news channel had used the woman's images and an AI simulation of her without permission, violating her image and privacy rights, and awarded her 100,000 Qatari riyals for material and moral harm on appeal.
How Harm Occurred
A news channel used AI to turn a woman's photos and video clips into a virtual news presenter and broadcast it without her permission, attaching her likeness to news she says conflicted with her views; the courts found a violation of her image and privacy rights and awarded compensation for material and moral harm.
Outcome
ResolvedAccording to al-Sharq, the Investment and Trade Court ordered the channel to pay compensation; the appeal court reduced the first-instance award of 700,000 Qatari riyals to 100,000 riyals covering material and moral harm; the Court of Cassation declined the channel's appeal, ordered it to pay costs and forfeited its deposit, making the judgment final. The channel had already removed the virtual presenter material from its platforms after a legal warning.
What remains unknown
- The identity of the news channel and the woman.
- When the virtual presenter was broadcast and when each ruling was given.
- Which AI tool was used and how the channel obtained her images.
- The text of the judgments.
What the evidence supports
AI involvement: reported. Al-Sharq reports that the channel processed the woman's photos and video clips with artificial-intelligence techniques to derive the virtual presenter it broadcast, which the channel itself defended as an AI-generated work, and that the court found the channel had exploited her images and an AI simulation of her without permission. The AI-generated likeness shown as a presenter is the depiction the courts compensated. The tool is not identified.
6 claims: 6 reported. What the statuses mean
Reported Al-Sharq reports that a news channel processed a woman's photos and video clips with AI to create a virtual character it presented as a digital news presenter under an assumed name, without her permission.
Causal attribution. Newspaper account of the court case; the AI processing is the courts' and parties' description, not disputed by the channel.
- al-sharq.com(opens in new tab) supports · Arabic
انتهت محكمة الاستثمار والتجارة إلى إلزام قناة إخبارية بأداء تعويض لسيدة استغلت القناة صورها الشخصية دون إذنها في إنتاج شخصية افتراضية ظهرت بوصفها مذيعة رقمية تحت اسم حركي، بثتها القناة على منصاتها الإعلامية وحساباتها على مواقع التواصل الاجتماعي. ... تعود وقائع الدعوى إلى قيام القناة الإخبارية بمعالجة صور سيدة ومقاطعها المرئية بتقنيات الذكاء الاصطناعي، واستخلاص شخصية افتراضية منها قدّمتها كمذيعة، ثم استمرارها في استعمال تلك الصور والمقاطع ونشرها والترويج لها على منصاتها دون إذنٍ أو موافقةٍ من صاحبتها
Reported The channel launched the character as a news-programme presenter with programmes, promotional material and a large press conference, and removed the material from all its platforms after the woman's lawyer sent a legal warning.
Causal attribution. Newspaper account.
- al-sharq.com(opens in new tab) supports · Arabic
وكانت القناة الإخبارية قد أطلقت هذه الشخصية الافتراضية بوصفها مذيعة تقدّم برنامجاً إخبارياً بتقنيات الذكاء الاصطناعي، وأعدّت لها سلسلة من البرامج والمواد الترويجية على منصات التواصل الاجتماعي، كما نظّمت مؤتمراً إعلامياً ضخماً للترويج لها ... فاستجابت القناة وأزالت المادة المتضمنة المذيعة الافتراضية عن جميع منصاتها، إلا أن الضرر المادي والأدبي الذي لحق بالسيدة جرّاء التعدي حداها إلى إقامة دعواها للمطالبة بالتعويض.
Reported The woman argued that news delivered by the character did not match her personal convictions or the prevailing views in her home country, attributing positions to her falsely.
Causal attribution. The plaintiff's argument as reported.
- al-sharq.com(opens in new tab) supports · Arabic
كما أثارت المدعية أنّ ما بثّته تلك الشخصية من أخبارٍ في برامجها لا يتوافق مع قناعاتها الشخصية، ولا مع الآراء السائدة في بلدها الأم، بما نُسب إليها على غير الحقيقة وضاعف من الضرر الواقع عليها.
Reported The channel argued that the AI output was an independent original work, and a court-appointed intellectual-property expert concluded that the material carried no offence to the woman and that the AI-generated work was independent of her.
Causal attribution. Defence argument and expert conclusion as reported; the court did not follow the expert.
- al-sharq.com(opens in new tab) supports · Arabic
وقدمت القناة دفاعاً أنّ العمل عمل فني مبتكر مستقل ويختلف اختلافاً تاماً عن الصور الأصلية. ... وقد ندبت المحكمة خبيراً مختصاً في الملكية الفكرية، وانتهى في تقريره إلى أن المادة التي تقدّمها المذيعة الافتراضية لا تحمل إساءةً للشخصية الحقيقية للمدعية، وأن العمل الفني الناتج عن معالجة صورها بالذكاء الاصطناعي عمل قائم بذاته ومستقل تماماً عنها.
Reported The court found that the channel exploited the woman's images and an AI simulation of her and published them without permission, violating her rights to her image, privacy and personal rights.
Causal attribution. Court finding as reported by the newspaper; the judgment was not read.
- al-sharq.com(opens in new tab) supports · Arabic
واستخلصت المحكمة من أوراق الدعوى أن القناة استغلت صور المدعية ومحاكاتها بالذكاء الاصطناعي ونشرها دون إذنها، وهو ما يشكل اعتداءً على حقها في صورتها وخصوصيتها وحقوقها الشخصية
Reported The appeal court reduced the award from 700,000 to 100,000 Qatari riyals for material and moral harm, and the Court of Cassation declined the channel's appeal, making the judgment final.
Causal attribution. Outcome as reported; the judgments were not read.
- al-sharq.com(opens in new tab) supports · Arabic
وقامت محكمة الاستئناف بتعديل مبلغ التعويض المحكوم به أول درجة من 700 ألف ريال قطري إلى 100 ألف ريال قطري شاملاً جابراً للأضرار المادية والأدبية ... وتقدمت القناة بطعن على الحكم إلا أن محكمة التمييز قضت بعدم قبول الطعن، وألزمت القناة الطاعنة بالمصروفات مع مصادرة الكفالة، فأصبح الحكم نهائياً وباتاً.
Sources
1 source inspected. Sources that repeat one account do not corroborate each other.
- Al-Sharq (Doha), 25 Jun 2026: news channel ordered to compensate woman over cloning her image as a virtual presenter(opens in new tab)
s1 · al-sharq.com · News report · Arabic · Inspected · 25 June 2026 · Primary
How the sources were read, and where the events happened
Read in Arabic by the research agent (an AI) on 2026-10-31 (HTTP 200, published 25 Jun 2026). Translated by the research agent (an AI); no human translator. The article quotes and appears to draw on the plaintiff's law firm; the judgments themselves were not read. Applies to s1.
Event countries: Unknown. Affected-person countries: Unknown. Court countries: Qatar.
The rulings were given by the Investment and Trade Court, an appeal court and the Court of Cassation applying Law No. 7 of 2002 on copyright and related rights, with the award in Qatari riyals, as reported by the Doha newspaper al-Sharq. Where the channel broadcast from and where the woman lives are not stated; the article refers only to her home country.
Reviewed for publication 2026-10-31: Published because a national newspaper reports final court rulings finding that a news channel used a woman's images and an AI simulation of her as a virtual presenter without permission, and awarding her compensation; the account is attributed to al-Sharq.
People described
A woman (not named) whose photos and video clips a news channel used without permission to create an AI virtual news presenter
People reported harmed in this case
1 person
0 AI participants · 1 other person harmed
One counted: the woman whose images were used and who won compensation (al-Sharq).
Counted once within this case. The same person may appear in other cases. This count does not establish AI causation.
Cite this case
Compiled per our published methodology: verification statuses, sourcing standards, and corrections process.
APA
NOPE. (2026). Qatari courts order news channel to compensate woman whose photos it processed with AI into a virtual news presenter, newspaper reports. AI incidents. https://nope.net/incidents/2026-qatar-court-orders-news-channel-to-compensate-woman-whose-photos-it-turned-into-ai-virtual-presenter
BibTeX
@misc{2026_qatar_court_orders_news_channel_to_compensate_woman_whose_photos_it_turned_into_ai_virtual_presenter,
title = {Qatari courts order news channel to compensate woman whose photos it processed with AI into a virtual news presenter, newspaper reports},
author = {NOPE},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {AI incidents},
url = {https://nope.net/incidents/2026-qatar-court-orders-news-channel-to-compensate-woman-whose-photos-it-turned-into-ai-virtual-presenter}
} Related cases
Rajasthan: a social-media influencer's video of a Ganga dip at Haridwar was manipulated with AI into an objectionable reel that went viral; she says she is mentally disturbed and cannot leave her house, and filed a cyber-crime complaint on 16 September 2026
A Rajasthan social-media influencer visited Haridwar with her family in June 2026 and on 6 June uploaded to Instagram a short video, recorded by relatives, of herself taking a dip in the Ganga at Har Ki Pauri wearing a salwar suit. About two months later she found that the video had been manipulated with AI into an objectionable version showing the same movements with her face and body portrayed 'in a shameful manner'; the fake reel went viral in the week before 20 September and drew objectionable comments and re-sharing. In a public appeal she asked whoever uploaded it to remove it, saying it was a matter of her dignity, that she was mentally very disturbed and had reached a point where she could not step out of her house. She filed a complaint with the cyber-crime police on 16 September 2026; the investigating Rajasthan Police Service officer said they were trying to identify who created and circulated the video and to have it removed, and that identifying the accused would take time. Dainik Bhaskar's English edition reported the case on 20 September in a 'Sunday Big Story' that does not name her.
Hampton, New Hampshire: police say a Massachusetts man harassed a Hampton resident for more than a year and posted an AI-generated deepfake video showing the resident being arrested and jailed, events police say never happened; he was indicted on four felony counts of fraudulent use of deepfakes and is held after his bail was revoked
Hampton police say a man from Worcester, Massachusetts harassed a Hampton resident for more than a year through phone calls, texts, emails and online posts, stemming from a perceived past disagreement, and kept going after the victim asked him to stop and after he was served with a stalking order of protection in October 2025. In November 2025 the victim showed police an AI-generated deepfake video that, according to the arrest-warrant affidavit, the man created to humiliate and defame him; it shows the victim being arrested and jailed and includes a structure resembling the victim's Hampton home and images of real people. A police sergeant said the depicted events never happened and that the video was posted on YouTube. A Rockingham County grand jury indicted the man on four Class B felony counts of fraudulent use of deepfakes under RSA 638:26-a, for creating, distributing and presenting a video of an identifiable person on 20 October, 31 October, 7 November and 13 November 2025. He turned himself in on 24 March, was released on bail, was arrested again on 26 August for alleged bail violations and is held at the Rockingham County House of Corrections. Police had the video removed. The AI tool is not named and the victim's own account is relayed only through the police.
Italy's privacy regulator warns broadcaster R.T.I. and bars further use of AI deepfakes of journalist Enrico Mentana in Striscia la Notizia segments
The satirical television programme Striscia la Notizia, published by R.T.I., aired segments in which the image and voice of the journalist Enrico Mentana, director of La7's news bulletin, were, according to the Garante, manipulated with AI systems so that he appeared in his own studio making statements he never made (its decision describes real footage from his studio altered by AI dubbing); a November 2024 preview describes one such segment. After Mentana complained, Italy's data protection authority (Garante) found on 23 July 2026 that the realism of the images, the low perceptibility of the alteration and the plausibility of the statements could lead the public to think the content authentic, and that the disclaimers were not clear enough. It found breaches of GDPR Articles 5 and 25, issued a warning to R.T.I. and prohibited further processing of his data in that way. The Garante noted the numerous mocking or offensive messages he received on social media. R.T.I. argued that the segments were satire, that it only dubbed licensed footage with a computer-generated voice, and that its disclaimers made the deepfake evident. No fine was imposed.
Netherlands: the Public Prosecution Service will prosecute a 74-year-old man from Noord-Holland for making deepfake sex videos of dozens of Dutch public figures, including presenters, politicians and a member of the royal family (images of about sixty people were found on his devices), after the 2024 revelations about the MrDeepFakes platform
In March 2024 the newspaper AD revealed that a large number of Dutch women in public life, including artists, television presenters, Olympic athletes, current and former ministers, mayors and members of the royal family, appeared in manipulated pornographic videos on an online platform with 13 million monthly visitors, later identified as MrDeepFakes. Dozens of women filed police complaints and several spoke publicly: one presenter said she was preparing a complaint, a party leader said the video felt like 'digital rape', another presenter said she would file a complaint 'because tomorrow it could happen to young girls of sixteen', a presenter-entrepreneur did so 'to prevent new, young victims', and a member of parliament, told of a video by the House security service, went public rather than 'keep it small'. On 19 and 20 September 2026 AD, and the Public Prosecution Service (OM) confirming to NOS, reported that after more than a year of investigation the OM will prosecute a 74-year-old man from Noord-Holland, who is not in custody, for making the videos (Hart van Nederland, citing AD, says he is suspected of making and distributing them); images of about sixty well-known Dutch people and politicians were found on his devices, AD reported that he had been the platform's most active Dutch user, and he faces up to two years' imprisonment. The platform's Canadian operator, who removed material at the OM's request and blocked Dutch IP addresses before the site went offline, will not be prosecuted. One of the presenters reported to be among the depicted told AD she was relieved the case would go to court, having experienced the impact of such images herself. No hearing date has been set.
If you or someone you know is struggling, free and confidential support is available. Find a helpline near you at Signpost.