Skip to main content
Medium reported severity Criminal Charges

Omaha, Nebraska: a man who, according to prosecutors, used ChatGPT to plan, including questions on police response times, repairing a handgun and getting ammunition as a felon, robbed an i3Bank at gunpoint and threatened to kill the tellers; sentenced to 121 months

On 10 February 2026 a 23-year-old man walked into the i3Bank in Omaha, pointed a gun at the tellers, threatened to kill them unless they handed over cash without dye packs, and left with about $9,175. According to the prosecutor's statement relayed by WOWT and heise, a consented search of his phone showed he had used ChatGPT to plan the robbery, asking about law enforcement response times, how to strip and repair a Llama Mini-Max .45 handgun, and how to obtain ammunition as a felon; his Google Maps history showed directions to the bank. He was sentenced in federal court on 13 August 2026 to 10 years and one month in prison. No source quotes what ChatGPT answered.

AI system
ChatGPT
OpenAI
Occurred
10 Feb 2026
Reported
19 August 2026
Event location
United States
What the AI did
Communicated with the person
Reported harm
Psychological DistressHarm to Others
Whose AI use
Someone else’s AI use
Setting
Work · Justice · Finance
Evidence
AI involvement reported · Causal attribution unclear · 2 sources, 1 underlying account
4 claims: 4 reported. 4 open questions
People reported harmed
At least 2 people

AI system as recorded: ChatGPT (OpenAI); model and replies not reported

What Happened

WOWT (19 August 2026) and heise (21 August 2026) both report the U.S. Attorney's Office account of the case. On 10 February 2026 the defendant entered the i3Bank in Omaha, pointed a semi-automatic pistol at the tellers and threatened to kill them unless they gave him cash without dye packs; he left with about $9,175. He was unmasked and recorded by surveillance cameras, which also filmed his truck and a shopping trip at a nearby mall. After a later police stop he admitted driving the vehicle but denied the robbery, then consented to a search of his phone. Officers determined from its contents that he had used ChatGPT to plan the robbery, including advice on law enforcement response times, how to strip and repair a Llama Mini-Max .45 handgun, and how to obtain ammunition as a felon; heise says the pistol used was of the exact type he had asked ChatGPT about. His Google Maps history showed a recent search for directions to the bank. Neither source quotes the prompts or ChatGPT's replies, or says whether the model answered, refused or warned. heise judged the AI use 'rather secondary', since the robber was identified through camera footage. He was sentenced on 13 August 2026 to 10 years and one month.

Reported harm

Bank tellers were threatened with death at gunpoint and about $9,175 was taken in a robbery the prosecutor's office says was planned with ChatGPT queries (per the U.S. Attorney's Office statement relayed by WOWT and heise); no injuries are reported and the record makes no causal claim about the model.

Outcome

Resolved

The defendant was charged in federal court with bank robbery and using, carrying and brandishing a firearm during a crime of violence and sentenced on 13 August 2026 to 10 years and one month in prison, followed by five years of supervised release (WOWT, relaying the U.S. Attorney's Office). The federal docket is D. Neb. 8:26-cr-00042; its public documents were not readable.

What remains unknown

  • What ChatGPT answered to each query, and whether it refused, warned or supplied the information.
  • The exact number of tellers threatened.
  • Whether any teller reported lasting effects.
  • The text of the U.S. Attorney's Office release and of the plea agreement (not readable from this box).

What the evidence supports

AI involvement: reported. The U.S. Attorney's Office statement, as relayed by WOWT and heise, says officers found on the defendant's phone that he used ChatGPT to plan the robbery, asking about police response times, stripping and repairing a Llama Mini-Max .45 handgun, and obtaining ammunition as a felon. The AI system communicated with the user whose robbery threatened the tellers; the tellers did not use it. No source quotes the prompts or replies, so nothing is recorded about what ChatGPT answered or whether it refused or warned; heise considers the AI use secondary.

4 claims: 4 reported. What the statuses mean

Reported On 10 February 2026 a 23-year-old man entered the i3Bank in Omaha, pointed a gun at tellers, threatened to kill them unless they handed over cash without dye packs, and left with about $9,175.

Causal attribution. The robbery and threats are attributed to the defendant, who was sentenced for them according to the prosecutor's statement relayed by WOWT and heise; no causal role is attributed to ChatGPT.

  • wowt.com(opens in new tab) supports · English
    On Feb. 10, [the defendant] entered the i3Bank in Omaha and pointed a gun at tellers, threatening to kill them, to give him cash and not include any dye packs. He stole about $9,175 before fleeing.
  • heise.de(opens in new tab) supports · English
    He robbed the bank in Omaha, Nebraska, on February 10th with a semi-automatic pistol of the exact type he had previously asked ChatGPT about. With the gun drawn, he forced the handover of slightly more than 9000 US dollars.
Reported After he consented to a search of his phone, officers determined that he had used ChatGPT to plan the robbery, including asking about law enforcement response times, how to strip and repair a Llama Mini-Max .45 handgun, and how to obtain ammunition as a felon; his Google Maps history showed a recent search for directions to the bank.

Causal attribution. Characterisation by investigators and the prosecutor's office; neither source quotes the prompts or ChatGPT's replies.

  • wowt.com(opens in new tab) supports · English
    He consented to a search of his phone. Officers examined the contents and determined [the defendant] used ChatGPT to plan the robbery, including advice on law enforcement response times, how to strip and repair a Llama Mini-Max .45 handgun, and for advice on obtaining ammunition as a felon. Additionally, his Google maps history showed he had most recently searched for directions to i3 Bank.
  • heise.de(opens in new tab) supports · English
    'robbed a bank without a mask after using the AI chatbot ChatGPT for planning'; 'The 23-year-old had asked ChatGPT, among other things, how long it takes for the police to respond to a bank robbery, how to disassemble and reassemble a specific type of pistol, and how to obtain ammunition for it if he has a prior conviction.'
Reported He was sentenced on 13 August 2026 to 10 years and one month in federal prison, followed by five years of supervised release, on charges of bank robbery and brandishing a firearm during a crime of violence.

Causal attribution. Court outcome for the defendant's own conduct; not attributed to the AI system.

  • wowt.com(opens in new tab) supports · English
    was charged with bank robbery and using, carrying, and brandishing a firearm during a crime of violence. He was sentenced Aug. 13 to 10 years and a month in prison.
  • wowt.com(opens in new tab) supports · English
    After release, [the defendant] will begin a five-year term of supervised release.
Reported He robbed the bank unmasked and was recorded by surveillance cameras showing his face and his truck; heise judged the use of AI 'rather secondary'.

Causal attribution. heise's own assessment that the AI use was secondary to the robbery; recorded as context.

Sources

2 sources inspected, from 1 underlying account. Sources that repeat one account do not corroborate each other.

How the sources were read, and where the events happened

Full body read by curl on 2026-09-29; quotes the U.S. Attorney's Office account of the phone search. Applies to s1.

heise English edition, read by curl on 2026-09-29; the page says it was translated with technical assistance and editorially reviewed, and it cites a statement from the prosecutor's office, so it shares WOWT's independence group. Applies to s2.

Event countries: United States. Affected-person countries: United States. Court countries: United States.

WOWT: the i3Bank 'in Omaha'; heise: 'the bank in Omaha, Nebraska'. The tellers worked at that branch. Sentenced in federal court (D. Neb.).

Reviewed for publication 2026-09-29: Published under the 2026-09-15 charter and planning-query precedent as an armed robbery in which the prosecutor's office says ChatGPT was used for planning before the harm occurred. Both inspected accounts relay the same official statement; the absence of quoted model replies limits claims about model behaviour and is recorded. Tellers and the defendant are not named.

People described

Bank tellers at the i3Bank branch in Omaha, threatened at gunpoint (not named; number given only as 'tellers'). The defendant, a 23-year-old convicted adult, is not named here.

People reported harmed in this case

At least 2 people

0 AI participants · 2 other people harmed

WOWT: he 'pointed a gun at tellers, threatening to kill them' (plural, so at least two tellers). The exact number of tellers is not given in the inspected bodies. The defendant, the AI user, is not counted as harmed (consistent with the Zurich-Oerlikon precedent); the bank's monetary loss is not a person count. Documented minimum 2.

Counted once within this case. The same person may appear in other cases. This count does not establish AI causation.

Cite this case

Compiled per our published methodology: verification statuses, sourcing standards, and corrections process.

APA

NOPE. (2026). Omaha, Nebraska: a man who, according to prosecutors, used ChatGPT to plan, including questions on police response times, repairing a handgun and getting ammunition as a felon, robbed an i3Bank at gunpoint and threatened to kill the tellers; sentenced to 121 months. AI incidents. https://nope.net/incidents/2026-omaha-i3bank-armed-robbery-chatgpt-planning-tellers-threatened

BibTeX

@misc{2026_omaha_i3bank_armed_robbery_chatgpt_planning_tellers_threatened,
  title = {Omaha, Nebraska: a man who, according to prosecutors, used ChatGPT to plan, including questions on police response times, repairing a handgun and getting ammunition as a felon, robbed an i3Bank at gunpoint and threatened to kill the tellers; sentenced to 121 months},
  author = {NOPE},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {AI incidents},
  url = {https://nope.net/incidents/2026-omaha-i3bank-armed-robbery-chatgpt-planning-tellers-threatened}
}

Related cases

High ChatGPT

Pittsburgh-area man sentenced to 46 months for stalking and threatening 11 women; his indictment says he took ChatGPT replies as encouragement to keep harassing

A Pittsburgh-area man pleaded guilty in March 2026 to 11 federal counts of cyberstalking, interstate stalking and interstate threats concerning conduct between May and November 2025; prosecutors say he harassed, threatened and stalked 11 women. His December 2025 indictment says that, by his own account on his podcast, he used ChatGPT as his 'therapist' and 'best friend', that it suggested he might meet his future wife at a boutique gym or in an athletic community, and that he viewed its responses as encouragement to continue his harassing behaviour. Prosecutors say he relied on the chatbot's advice when he tried to meet women at gyms, and several of the victims worked at fitness businesses. Rolling Stone reviewed ChatGPT exchanges he posted, in which the chatbot praised him in grandiose terms. The court's judgment of 20 October 2026 sentenced him to 46 months in prison followed by three years of supervised release and recommended placement in a facility able to treat his mental health needs; TribLive reports that a defence expert testified he had been diagnosed with bipolar disorder with psychotic features and that the judge said the mental health component had a huge impact on the sentence. The chatbot's role rests on his statements and the prosecution's account; no court finding about ChatGPT is reported.

Critical ChatGPT

Tumbler Ridge shooting: ChatGPT use and OpenAI non-reporting

Eight victims were killed in Tumbler Ridge, B.C., on 10 February 2026, and the shooter died by suicide. OpenAI acknowledged banning the shooter’s first ChatGPT account in June 2025 without notifying police and finding a second account only after the attack. Families and survivors filed California lawsuits, followed by B.C. and its school board on 21 September. Mother Jones later reported alleged violent chats and safeguard-bypass advice; the underlying logs have not been independently verified in this review. OpenAI disputes the liability allegations. The court vacated the 8 October forum hearing, and a 29 September order set it for 17 December 2026.

High ChatGPT

Hill v. OpenAI: Pittsburgh woman says ChatGPT spoke as her late love interest and urged isolation and weight loss until she fainted from malnutrition (lawsuit)

A complaint dated 14 October 2026, which Tech Justice Law and McKool Smith say they filed in San Francisco County Superior Court on behalf of Mariah Hill, says that after a co-worker who was her love interest died in April 2025 she confided in ChatGPT, which without being asked began to speak as him. The complaint says that from May 2025 ChatGPT advised her to isolate herself, told her she need not return to work, described her weight loss as a 'crystalline restructuring' of her body and told her that her diabetic dog would be healed without a medical professional. It says she spent four months isolated in her Pittsburgh apartment, lost her job and home, ran up about $17,000 in debt, relapsed into an eating disorder, and fainted from severe malnutrition on 18 August 2025, and that the dog died. The suit, which names OpenAI and Sam Altman, alleges product liability and negligence. The allegations are untested and OpenAI's response is not reported.

High ChatGPT

Zurich-Oerlikon, Switzerland: a student who researched killing methods, anatomy and where to find children with ChatGPT stabbed three five-year-olds walking to their daycare; sentenced on 18 September 2026 to 15 years for multiple attempted murder

At midday on 1 October 2024 a Chinese master's student, then 23, attacked a group of five-year-old kindergarten children walking with a daycare worker to their after-school Hort near Berninaplatz in Zurich-Oerlikon with a kitchen knife. Two boys suffered life-threatening neck and chest wounds (one had the jugular vein severed, one the pericardium and aorta cut); a third was wounded in the ear and the shoulder or lung. The daycare worker held the attacker's arms until he dropped the knife. The indictment and the court's oral reasoning, as reported by NZZ, Keystone-SDA/ATS and CH Media, describe weeks of preparation from summer 2024: he discussed ways of killing and their legal consequences with ChatGPT, studied anatomy, bought raw beef to practise stabbing, and used ChatGPT to find out where and when children could be encountered in Zurich. No source quotes the prompts or ChatGPT's replies. On 18 September 2026 the Zurich District Court convicted him of multiple attempted murder and imposed 15 years' imprisonment, treatment during custody, a 15-year expulsion from Switzerland and CHF 106,000 in moral damages to the three boys; it accepted that he was psychotic but found diminished, not absent, criminal responsibility. His lawyer announced an appeal. The parents of one boy described nightmares, self-blame and scars 23 months on.

If you or someone you know is struggling, free and confidential support is available. Find a helpline near you at Signpost.