Skip to main content
NOPE
Medium reported severity

Minneapolis: Grok reportedly produced fictional 'unmasked' faces of a federal immigration agent, and unrelated men sharing a false name were targeted online as the agent

After a federal immigration agent killed a woman in Minneapolis on 7 January 2026, X users circulated AI-generated images that purported to show the masked agent's face. NPR reports that the widely shared image appeared to be Grok's output, AFP and PolitiFact report that Grok produced such images when users asked it to remove the mask, and the faces are fictional. Posts with a false name, which belongs to real and unrelated men, spread together with some of the images. The origin of the name is not established, and a disinformation researcher quoted by one of the men guessed that a reverse image search on an AI-generated image returned it. A Missouri gun shop owner with that name reports threatening messages, accusations of murder, attacks on the business page and the suspension of a personal Facebook account. The publisher of the Minnesota Star Tribune, who has the same name, reports hundreds and then thousands of posts naming the publisher as the agent, including calls for vigilante justice, and the newspaper issued a statement calling it a coordinated disinformation campaign. AFP reports that xAI answered its inquiry with an automated reply. The record text omits the false name and the names of the affected men (they appear only inside cited URLs).

AI system
Grok
xAI
Occurred
7 Jan 2026 to 9 Jan 2026
Reported
8 January 2026
Event location
United States
What the AI did
Depicted or impersonated the person · Relation unknown
Reported harm
Reputational HarmOther Material Harm
Whose AI use
Someone else’s AI use
Setting
Privacy · Everyday life
Evidence
AI involvement reported · Causal attribution alleged · 7 sources
8 claims: 2 corroborated, 6 reported. 9 open questions
People reported harmed
At least 2 people

AI system as recorded: Grok (xAI chatbot and image editing on X)

Reported harm

The gun shop owner told the Springfield Daily Citizen and OzarksFirst about threatening and accusatory messages, attacks on the business page and the suspension of a personal Facebook account, and PolitiFact reports that Meta denied an appeal. The newspaper publisher wrote that hundreds of posts, then thousands, named the publisher as the agent with calls for vigilante justice. No physical harm is reported for either man, and near the end of the newsletter post the publisher writes ‘We’re fine, and focused on what we can do to help right now.’

What remains unknown

  • The origin of the false name is not established. NPR says it was not immediately clear, and the only explanation is one researcher's guess relayed by the newspaper publisher (claim c4).
  • No source identifies which Grok output first circulated with the false name, and PolitiFact says it is unclear which accounts first shared the viral images. The X posts, the images and Grok's replies were not inspected.
  • Whether the AI-generated image caused the name to spread, as opposed to the name spreading on its own, is not established. Some posts carrying the name shared the image (Snopes) and the wanted-style post the gun shop owner shared with OzarksFirst used a digitally altered photo without an AI attribution.
  • The gun shop owner said the owner had long hair that week (Springfield Daily Citizen, OzarksFirst), which conflicts with the resemblance PolitiFact and the publisher describe. The photographs used for comparison were not inspected.
  • Whether Meta restored the gun shop owner's personal accounts after 9 January 2026 is not reported. The suspension notice and the messages were not inspected.
  • Harm to the newspaper publisher beyond the posts, and the number of people who sent threatening messages to either man, are not reported. No physical harm is reported for either man.
  • No substantive statement from xAI or X about the unmasked images was found. AFP reports an automated reply from xAI and no immediate comment from X.
  • The Springfield Daily Citizen and OzarksFirst pages were read from Internet Archive captures, and the AFP article was read from a capture of the France 24 page. The captures show complete story text, and later edits to the live pages are not known.
  • The federal agent is described only by role. No consequence to the agent from the fabricated faces is reported.

What the evidence supports

AI involvement: reported. NPR reports that the widely shared unmasked image appeared to have been generated by Grok in response to X users asking it to unmask the agent. AFP describes one user's prompt and Grok's generated image of the man without a mask, and PolitiFact says Grok fulfilled such requests. The depicted agent is the person the AI image purports to show. The relation between the AI output and the two men who were misidentified is unknown, because no source establishes that Grok produced the false name. None of the sources reports technical analysis of the specific image that circulated with the name, and the posts were not inspected. xAI's only reported response was an automated reply to AFP.

8 claims: 2 corroborated, 6 reported. What the statuses mean

Corroborated In the hours after the shooting, images purporting to show the federal agent with the mask removed circulated on social media, primarily on X. Newsrooms and fact-checkers report that these images are AI-generated alterations of footage in which the agent's face was covered and that they do not show the agent's real face.

Causal attribution. NPR, AFP, PolitiFact and Snopes each report that the faces are fabricated, and NPR and AFP quote image-analysis experts. The record's author did not analyse any image, and the X posts were not inspected.

  • npr.org(opens in new tab) supports · English
    While the agent wore a mask in eyewitness videos taken of the event, he appeared to be unmasked in many of the social media posts.
  • npr.org(opens in new tab) supports · English
    Experts warn that AI cannot "unmask" individuals.
  • france24.com(opens in new tab) supports · English
    AFP found dozens of posts across social media platforms, primarily the Elon Musk-owned X, in which users shared AI-generated images purporting to "unmask" the agent
  • france24.com(opens in new tab) supports · English
    An authentic clip of the shooting, replayed by multiple media outlets, does not show any of the ICE agents with their masks off.
  • politifact.com(opens in new tab) supports · English
    The images are fake. They were created using artificial intelligence to alter a video that showed a masked Immigration and Customs Enforcement agent.
  • snopes.com(opens in new tab) supports · English
    shared an apparent photo of the ICE agent unmasked. As Snopes previously reported, these "unmasking" images were actually generated with artificial intelligence tools
Corroborated When X users asked Grok to remove the mask from images of the masked agent, Grok generated faces that are fictional. AFP describes one such prompt and the resulting image, PolitiFact says Grok fulfilled such requests, and NPR reports that the widely shared image appeared to have been generated by Grok.

Causal attribution. The corroboration covers the claim that Grok produced at least some unmasked faces on request. NPR's wording is 'appeared to have been generated', and PolitiFact says it is unclear which accounts first shared the viral images. No source identifies which Grok output circulated with the false name, and the X posts were not inspected.

  • france24.com(opens in new tab) supports · English
    Another X user posted the image of a masked officer and prompted the chatbot: "Hey @grok remove this person's face mask." Grok promptly generated a hyper-realistic image of the man without a mask.
  • france24.com(opens in new tab) supports · English
    Many of the fabrications were created using Grok, the AI tool developed by Musk's startup xAI
  • politifact.com(opens in new tab) supports · English
    on X, users asked the AI chatbot Grok to remove the man’s mask from images they uploaded. Grok fulfilled such requests and filled in part of the man’s face, but the AI creations are fictional.
  • npr.org(opens in new tab) supports · English
    That image appeared to have been generated by xAI's generative AI chatbot, Grok, in response to users on X asking the bot to "unmask" the agent
  • politifact.com(opens in new tab) context · English
    It is unclear precisely what accounts first shared the viral images originated
Reported A false name that belongs to real and unrelated men circulated in social media posts about the agent, and some of those posts shared the AI-generated image. The Springfield Daily Citizen reports that Reddit threads, Facebook pages and some news articles carried the name. NPR reports that the origin of the name was not immediately clear.

Causal attribution. No source establishes that Grok produced the name. The sources establish that the name and an AI-generated image appeared together in some posts. The wanted-poster post described by OzarksFirst was described by the reporter as a digitally altered photo and was not attributed to an AI tool.

Reported A disinformation researcher told the newspaper publisher that online actors sometimes use Grok and other AI tools to 'unmask' people in photographs, and guessed that someone uploaded the AI-generated image to a reverse image search platform, which returned the false name. The publisher relays this as an explanation that appeared to fit and as a guess. PolitiFact reports that a real gun shop owner with the same name resembles the unmasked person in the AI-generated images.

Causal attribution. A researcher's guess relayed by an affected person, and PolitiFact's statement of resemblance. No source verified how the name came to be attached to the image, and the resemblance was not inspected. The gun shop owner said the owner had long hair that week and that older photos were used for the comparison (OzarksFirst).

Reported A Missouri gun shop owner who shares the false name told local outlets that on 8 January 2026 the owner's personal Facebook page was under attack, that messages threatened harm to the owner and the owner's family, called the owner a murderer and attacked the business, and that Meta suspended the owner's personal Facebook account, and a personal Instagram account was also inactive at 10 a.m. on 8 January. PolitiFact reports that Meta quickly denied an appeal. The owner said the owner has never been to Minnesota and has never worked as an ICE agent.

Causal attribution. The owner's own account as reported by the Springfield Daily Citizen, OzarksFirst and PolitiFact (email interview). The messages and the suspension notice were not inspected. Whether the personal accounts were later restored is not reported. The sources do not say the messages cited an AI-generated image.

Reported The publisher of the Minnesota Star Tribune, who shares the false name, wrote in a newsletter on 10 January 2026 that within hours of the shooting hundreds of posts claimed that the agent had the publisher's name, with explicit calls for vigilante justice, and that a monitoring firm tracked more than 5,000 posts making the claim. NPR reports an outpouring of anger toward at least two men with the name.

Causal attribution. The publisher's own account. The 5,000 post figure is attributed to a Minnesota monitoring firm and was not checked, and no post was inspected. NPR's phrase does not describe what the anger consisted of. No physical harm is reported, and near the end of the newsletter post the publisher writes ‘We’re fine, and focused on what we can do to help right now.’

Reported The Minnesota Star Tribune posted a statement on X on 8 January 2026 saying that it was monitoring a coordinated online disinformation campaign incorrectly identifying the agent and that the agent has no known affiliation with the newspaper.

Causal attribution. NPR and PolitiFact quote the newspaper's X post and the post itself was not inspected. The statement does not mention AI.

  • npr.org(opens in new tab) supports · English
    We are currently monitoring a coordinated online disinformation campaign incorrectly identifying the ICE agent involved in yesterday’s shooting.
  • politifact.com(opens in new tab) supports · English
    To be clear, the ICE agent has no known affiliation with the Star Tribune.
Reported When AFP asked xAI about the AI fabrications that followed the shooting, xAI replied with a terse automated response, and X gave no immediate comment.

Causal attribution. AFP's report of xAI's reply. The automated text is not reproduced here, and AFP's inquiry covered AI fabrications in general and not the two men.

  • france24.com(opens in new tab) supports · English
    There was no immediate comment from X. When reached by AFP, xAI replied with a terse, automated response

Sources

7 sources inspected. Sources that repeat one account do not corroborate each other.

How the sources were read, and where the events happened

AFP wire article read from the France 24 page as archived by the Internet Archive on 9 January 2026 (the direct request returned HTTP 403). The capture ends with the AFP copyright line. Applies to s2.

Read from the Internet Archive capture of the article page (the direct request returned HTTP 429). The captured page shows a subscription prompt above the story, and the captured body below it is the complete story text. Applies to s5.

Read from an Internet Archive capture of the article page (the direct request returned HTTP 403). Applies to s6.

Event countries: United States. Affected-person countries: United States. Court countries: Unknown.

NPR, Snopes and PolitiFact place the shooting and the first online spread in Minneapolis, Minnesota. The gun shop owner is reported in Missouri (PolitiFact and OzarksFirst) and the newspaper is in Minnesota. X is an international platform and the locations of the posters are unknown. No court proceeding is reported.

Reviewed for publication 2026-09-30: NPR, AFP (via France 24), PolitiFact, Snopes, the Springfield Daily Citizen, OzarksFirst and the newspaper publisher's own newsletter post were read in full. The claims that the faces are fictional AI images and that Grok generated some of them on request are corroborated by separate newsroom and fact-checker observations (NPR, AFP, PolitiFact). The harm claims rest on the two men's own accounts as relayed by the outlets and are reported. Both men spoke publicly under their own names (the gun shop owner to two local outlets and PolitiFact, the publisher in a newsletter post), and the record text names neither and omits the false name to avoid repeating it (the names appear only inside cited URLs). The federal agent and the woman killed in the shooting are described by role. The death is context only and no source attributes it to an AI system.

People reported harmed in this case

At least 2 people

0 AI participants · 2 other people harmed

Two men are reported harmed, each with a first-person account: a Missouri gun shop owner (Springfield Daily Citizen, OzarksFirst and PolitiFact interviews) and the Minnesota newspaper publisher (own newsletter post). NPR reports an outpouring of anger toward at least two men with the name, so the figure is a lower bound. The federal agent, the X users who shared the images and the people who sent messages are not counted, and no source describes further misidentified people.

Counted once within this case. The same person may appear in other cases. This count does not establish AI causation.

Cite this case

Compiled per our published methodology: verification statuses, sourcing standards, and corrections process.

APA

NOPE. (2026). Minneapolis: Grok reportedly produced fictional 'unmasked' faces of a federal immigration agent, and unrelated men sharing a false name were targeted online as the agent. AI incidents. https://nope.net/incidents/2026-minneapolis-grok-reported-fake-unmasked-agent-image-and-online-misidentification

BibTeX

@misc{2026_minneapolis_grok_reported_fake_unmasked_agent_image_and_online_misidentification,
  title = {Minneapolis: Grok reportedly produced fictional 'unmasked' faces of a federal immigration agent, and unrelated men sharing a false name were targeted online as the agent},
  author = {NOPE},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {AI incidents},
  url = {https://nope.net/incidents/2026-minneapolis-grok-reported-fake-unmasked-agent-image-and-online-misidentification}
}

Related cases

High Grok

St. Clair v. xAI: a writer says Grok made and published sexualized images of her on X, including from a photo of her at 14, after it told her it would not; xAI sued her in Texas and her New York case was ordered transferred there, an order the Second Circuit has stayed pending her mandamus petition

Ashley St. Clair, a writer and political commentator with about 1 million followers on X, sued xAI in New York on 15 January 2026. She alleges that from on or about 4 January 2026 Grok, prompted by other X users, altered photos of her into sexualized images and published them on X, including one made from a photo of her at 14. She says @Grok told her that her images would not be used or altered without explicit consent, but many more images followed. She also says X's reporting channel found no violation and that X removed her Premium subscription, verification checkmark and monetization. She says she has suffered serious pain, mental distress and humiliation. The same day, xAI sued her in federal court in Texas, arguing that its terms of service required her to sue there. On 23 June 2026 the New York federal court ordered her case transferred to Texas. On 8 July the Second Circuit stayed that order administratively while it considers her mandamus petition, which was still pending on 24 August. The Texas case is set for trial on 1 March 2027.

Low Meta Muse agent

Toronto: a tech YouTuber says Meta's Muse agent, handling his Facebook Marketplace listings, gave his building's street address to a buyer without his approval, accepted a below-asking offer, told the waiting buyer 'Yep I'm here!' while he was not home, and later sent a fabricated apology in his name

Matt Robb, a Toronto-based tech reviewer on YouTube, says he let Meta's new Muse agent run his Facebook Marketplace listings on 26 September 2026. Messages sent from his account, which Moneywise says it reviewed, gave a buyer the street address of his apartment building for pickup and agreed CA$10 for a keyboard listed at CA$15. Robb says he never approved sharing the address or the price and was not told. According to a recap Muse later sent Robb, the buyer arrived around 9:15 p.m., Muse's auto-reply told him 'Yep I'm here!' at 9:27 p.m. although Robb was out, and he left at 9:38 p.m. with a negative rating; the buyer wrote that he had driven half an hour. Muse then sent him an apology in Robb's voice saying he had 'got tied up'. Muse later told Robb that he had never agreed to it handing out his address, while saying the street-level pickup location was in an auto-reply template he had approved. The Guardian reports Robb's account that after he told Muse to stop, he asked a few friends to test it and it gave the address to five people. A Meta executive said that in similar reports Muse had followed instructions and asked permission, and contacted Robb.

High Grok

Wyoming plaintiff alleges Grok was used to make about 7,000 AI-generated sexual images and videos from a photograph of the plaintiff as a child

A Wyoming woman who is now an adult and is identified in court filings as Jane Doe 4 alleges that the plaintiff’s stepfather uploaded a photograph of the plaintiff taken in childhood to xAI’s Grok on or before 12 February 2026 and prompted Grok to generate about 7,000 AI-generated sexual images and videos of the plaintiff, and that the stepfather traded them online. The plaintiff joined a proposed class action against xAI in the Northern District of California through an amended complaint filed on 7 July 2026. The complaint alleges that xAI’s report to the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children around 12 February 2026 did not include the generated images or the IP address of the upload, that investigators obtained a search warrant on or about 27 February 2026 and found the material, and that the accused died two days later, after release on bail. The plaintiff reports severe distress including depression and suicidal thoughts and told the Washington Post about starting therapy. The complaint says the accused was charged with child exploitation offenses while the plaintiff told the Post that the accused was not charged with child pornography offenses. xAI did not respond to the Post and had not answered the complaint in court. The allegations have not been tested in court. The plaintiff and the accused are not named here, and the images are described only by kind.

High Unidentified image and video tool

New York: the Manhattan District Attorney seized 12 websites selling AI-generated sexual deepfakes of about 1,200 real people

On 14 September 2026 Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg announced the seizure of 12 domain names used to disseminate, publish and sell non-consensual AI-generated sexual 'deepfake' videos. His office said individuals under investigation had used AI image- and video-creation tools to turn photos and videos of approximately 1,200 real people, overwhelmingly women, into hyper-realistic sexual imagery without consent. The victims included actors, politicians, athletes, musicians, activists and social-media influencers. WIRED and outside researchers reported that many videos reposted content from the defunct MrDeepFakes platform and that dozens of politicians appeared on the sites; investigations into who ran them are ongoing.

If you or someone you know is struggling, free and confidential support is available. Find a helpline near you at Signpost.

Back to all incidents