Skip to main content
NOPE
Medium reported severity Regulatory Action

Kanagawa education board suspends a high-school teacher for six months for making generative-AI swimsuit images of a female colleague that students could view

On 12 August 2026 the Kanagawa Prefectural Board of Education in Japan announced disciplinary action against four staff of prefectural schools. According to Fuji TV (FNN) and the Kanagawa Shimbun, one male high-school teacher was suspended for six months for making swimsuit images of a female colleague with generative AI and leaving them where students could view them. FNN reports that he made the images on a smartphone using an account issued by the school, did not know how to delete them, and that students are believed to have seen them in the account history on a shared computer. The teacher said he had a technical interest in sexual content. FNN reports that it was the first disciplinary case in the prefecture involving generative AI; the principal was reprimanded for supervisory responsibility. The colleague's own response is not reported, and the AI tool is not named.

AI system
Unidentified image tool
Occurred
Event date unknown
Reported
12 August 2026
Event location
Japan
What the AI did
Depicted or impersonated the person
Reported harm
Exploitation or Abuse
Whose AI use
Someone else’s AI use
Setting
Work · Education
Evidence
AI involvement reported · Causal attribution supported · 2 sources, 1 underlying account
3 claims: 3 reported. 4 open questions
People reported harmed
1 person

AI system as recorded: A generative AI image tool, not named in the reports, used by the teacher on a smartphone through a school-issued account to make swimsuit images of a colleague

What Happened

The finding. FNN (Fuji TV) reports that on 12 August 2026 the Kanagawa Prefectural Board of Education announced disciplinary action against four staff of prefectural schools. Among them, a male high-school teacher was suspended for six months for making swimsuit images of a female colleague with generative AI and creating a situation in which students could view them. The Kanagawa Shimbun's headline and lead describe the same finding.

How students saw them. According to FNN, the teacher made the images on a smartphone with an account issued by the school, did not know how to delete them, and students are believed to have viewed the images, which remained in the history, on a shared computer. The teacher said he had a technical interest in sexual content. FNN reports that it was the first disciplinary case in Kanagawa involving generative AI, and the school's principal was reprimanded.

Limits. The colleague's response, the number of students who saw the images and the AI tool are not reported. The board's announcement itself was not read; the Kanagawa Shimbun article was read only to its paywalled lead in an archive capture.

Reported harm

The Kanagawa board of education found that a teacher made swimsuit images of a female colleague with generative AI and left them where students could view them; FNN reports that students are believed to have seen them, and the teacher was suspended for six months.

How Harm Occurred

A teacher used a generative AI tool to make swimsuit images of a female colleague; because the images stayed in a school-issued account, students could view them on a shared school computer.

Outcome

Resolved

12 August 2026: the Kanagawa Prefectural Board of Education suspended the teacher for six months and reprimanded the principal for supervisory responsibility (FNN). Any criminal or civil proceedings are not reported.

What remains unknown

  • When the images were made, and how many images there were.
  • How many students saw the images.
  • The colleague's response and any effect on her.
  • Which generative AI tool was used.

What the evidence supports

AI involvement: reported. The Kanagawa board of education's disciplinary finding, as reported by FNN and the Kanagawa Shimbun, is that the teacher made the swimsuit images of his colleague with generative AI; FNN adds that he made them on a smartphone with a school-issued account and that it was the prefecture's first discipline case involving generative AI. The tool is not named, and the board's technical basis is not stated.

3 claims: 3 reported. What the statuses mean

Reported According to the Kanagawa Prefectural Board of Education's announcement of 12 August 2026 as reported, a male high-school teacher made swimsuit images of a female colleague with generative AI and created a situation in which students could view them, and was suspended for six months.

Causal attribution. The board's disciplinary finding as reported by two outlets relaying the same announcement.

  • fnn.jp(opens in new tab) supports · Japanese
    '同僚の女性教師の水着画像を生成AIで作成し、生徒が閲覧できる状況を作った'; '「停職6カ月」となりました'
  • kanaloco.jp(opens in new tab) supports · Japanese
    '生成人工知能（ＡＩ）で同僚女性の水着姿を作成'
Reported FNN reports that the teacher made the images on a smartphone using a school-issued account, did not know how to delete them, and that students are believed to have viewed them in the account history on a shared computer.

Causal attribution. FNN's account of the board's explanation; the viewing is stated as believed, not confirmed.

  • fnn.jp(opens in new tab) supports · Japanese
    '学校で支給されたアカウントを使ってスマートフォンで作った画像の削除の仕方がわからず、履歴に残っていたものを生徒が共用パソコンで閲覧したとみられています'
Reported The teacher said he had a technical interest in sexual content; FNN reports that this was the first disciplinary case in Kanagawa involving generative AI, and the principal was reprimanded for supervisory responsibility.

Causal attribution. The teacher's explanation, FNN's statement that it was the prefecture's first such case, and the principal's discipline as reported by FNN.

  • fnn.jp(opens in new tab) supports · Japanese
    '生成AIが使われた事案の処分は神奈川県で初めて'; '「性的な内容について技術的な興味を持った」'; '「戒告」となっています'

Sources

2 sources inspected, from 1 underlying account. Sources that repeat one account do not corroborate each other.

How the sources were read, and where the events happened

Read in Japanese on 2026-10-23 from the publisher page. Translated by the research agent (an AI); quotations are Japanese originals and English renderings are the agent's translations. FNN reports the board's announcement of 12 August 2026. Applies to s1.

Read in Japanese on 2026-10-23 from an Internet Archive capture (the publisher page returned a script challenge); only the headline and the paywalled lead were available. Translated by the research agent (an AI). The Kanagawa Shimbun reports the same board announcement, so it shares FNN's group. Applies to s2.

Event countries: Japan. Affected-person countries: Japan. Court countries: Unknown.

The images were made and viewed at a Kanagawa prefectural high school in Japan, where the depicted colleague works, according to the board's finding as reported.

Reviewed for publication 2026-10-23: Published as an education authority's disciplinary finding that a teacher made generative-AI swimsuit images of a colleague and left them where students could view them. The record rests on two news reports of the board's announcement; the announcement itself was not read. The colleague and the teacher are not identified.

People described

A female teacher at a Kanagawa prefectural high school depicted in AI-made swimsuit images by a male colleague

People reported harmed in this case

1 person

0 AI participants · 1 other person harmed

One person: the female colleague depicted in the AI-made swimsuit images (board finding as reported by FNN and the Kanagawa Shimbun). Exact 1. Students who may have seen the images are not counted.

Counted once within this case. The same person may appear in other cases. This count does not establish AI causation.

Tags

#education#workplace#generative-ai-image#non-consensual-imagery#disciplinary-action#japan#kanagawa

Cite this case

Compiled per our published methodology: verification statuses, sourcing standards, and corrections process.

APA

NOPE. (2026). Kanagawa education board suspends a high-school teacher for six months for making generative-AI swimsuit images of a female colleague that students could view. AI incidents. https://nope.net/incidents/2026-kanagawa-board-suspends-high-school-teacher-who-made-generative-ai-swimsuit-images-of-female-colleague

BibTeX

@misc{2026_kanagawa_board_suspends_high_school_teacher_who_made_generative_ai_swimsuit_images_of_female_colleague,
  title = {Kanagawa education board suspends a high-school teacher for six months for making generative-AI swimsuit images of a female colleague that students could view},
  author = {NOPE},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {AI incidents},
  url = {https://nope.net/incidents/2026-kanagawa-board-suspends-high-school-teacher-who-made-generative-ai-swimsuit-images-of-female-colleague}
}

Related cases

High Unidentified image tool

Jeju: police refer a middle-school student over secretly filming teachers and making sexual deepfake composites; teachers dispute victim count and legal aid

Jeju Dongbu police announced on 23 September 2026 that a student at a middle school on Jeju had been referred to prosecutors without detention on 17 September for violating the Sexual Violence Punishment Act (filming with a camera or similar device). The student's phone was voluntarily submitted by his guardians and forensically examined; the examination found footage relating to some teachers and some sexual composites, and the student admitted the conduct. News1 reported that the student was booked for filming a teacher's body with his phone during a school field trip around mid-July 2026, that the offending had continued for several months with multiple victims, and that police found no indication the composites had been distributed. Police told Seoul Shinmun there were more victim teachers than the one first reported but withheld the number to avoid secondary harm, and that no student at the school was a victim; the Jeju teachers' union questioned whether the full scope of harm had been established. According to the union, two months on the victim teachers were receiving hospital treatment and counselling while teaching daily, gave police statements on 14 September without a lawyer, attended the regional teachers' rights protection committee on 17 September without institutional support, wrote the criminal complaint themselves, and were offered 3.3 million won in legal fees for all of them together, payable after the case ends; two requests to meet the superintendent were not accepted. On 29 September one of the victim teachers gave a press interview at the Jeju Teachers' Union office. She said that early in the investigation she had seen on the student's phone material showing other teachers and current students, had made a list of the people and types of harm, and that the material shown to her at the police victim examination was considerably less than what she had seen; Yonhap-chain outlets quote her as saying the students she recognised numbered 10 to 20 and that a graduate had suffered worse deepfakes. She said investigators asked the school only to identify the perpetrator and never requested material to identify the students in the footage, and that the school sent parents a letter premised on there being no student victims. Police replied that phone forensics had been thorough, that every act beyond social norms had been identified and proven, and that one student victim had been confirmed, a student at a different school. The teachers were notified on 22 September that the case had gone to the prosecution and on 24 September that it had been sent to the court's juvenile division as a juvenile protection case, before they had submitted further evidence and a victim opinion. The teacher said the original complaint had also asked police to examine whether physical contact in 2025 was forcible molestation and whether repeated approaching and waiting in 2026 was stalking, and Halla Ilbo reports that such conduct is said to date from 2025. Yonhap-chain reports describe the charged victims as five teachers. The same day the education office briefed on legal-aid rules (up to 6.6 million won per instance when a teacher is sued, 3.3 million won per case when a teacher files a complaint; office lawyers cannot act as a teacher's private counsel), said it had linked the teachers to the national Digital Sexual Crime Victim Support Center, announced an integrated support system through a hotline, and its section head said the office was sorry that early support had not been felt. The KTU Jeju branch (28 September) and the Jeju Teachers' Union (14 and 29 September) demand a victim-support system, per-teacher legal fees paid in advance and a dedicated support team. On 6 October 2026 Seogwipo Broadcasting reported, citing people in education and a tipster, that the education authority had finally rejected the victim teachers' application for lawyer fees for an additional criminal complaint, saying in a written opinion that with a police investigation already under way a further complaint could hardly stop or prevent the infringement of their teaching, so the support requirements were not met; critics contrast this with full legal-cost support in earlier sexual-offence cases.

High Unidentified image tool

Nagoya, Japan: a former elementary-school teacher was sentenced on 4 June 2026 to three and a half years, including for possessing generative-AI nude images made from school photos of two girls; reported as Japan's first conviction applying the child-pornography law to AI deepfakes

On 4 June 2026 the Nagoya District Court sentenced a 35-year-old former Nagoya municipal elementary-school teacher to three years and six months in prison. Prosecutors had sought six years. He was one of seven current and former teachers from five prefectures charged over a group chat in which members shared secretly filmed images of girls. His offences included secret filming and sharing, and, under the child-pornography law, possessing two generative-AI images showing two real girls apparently naked. According to the police and the judgment summary, he sent photos of the girls from the school where he taught to another member of the group, who made the images on an AI image-editing website. The teacher kept them on his phone, and one was shared in the chat. The judge found the images realistic enough to be mistaken for photographs of the girls. Jiji called it the first case in Japan applying the law to possession of AI-generated sexual deepfakes, and Kyodo called it apparently the first such court finding. A lawyer and a former judge argue the law was stretched.

High Unidentified image tool

Incheon high-school student jailed for AI deepfake nude composites of his teachers posted online; a civil court later orders him to pay one teacher damages

In July 2024 a high-school student in Incheon, South Korea, composited the faces of two female teachers at his school and of others, including an academy senior and an instructor, onto nude photos and posted them on social media, according to the charges as reported by Yonhap, the Hankyoreh, the JoongAng Ilbo and the Kyunghyang Shinmun, which describe the technique as AI-based deepfake technology. He had also secretly photographed teachers in class. He was expelled after a teachers' rights committee hearing. On 27 August 2025 the Incheon District Court gave him an indeterminate prison term of one year to one year six months and took him into custody; the court said that as a result the victimised teacher had left teaching and had not returned. On 19 December 2025, after he had turned adult, the appeal division raised the sentence to three years, calling the offence close to 'character assassination' and the teachers' mental shock considerable; OBS reports the sentence is final. On 21 October 2026, according to the Incheon Teachers' Union, a civil judge at the Incheon District Court ordered him, now 20, to pay one teacher 17.7 million won of the roughly 72 million won she claimed.

Low Unidentified image tool

Villa Alemana, Chile: school says a sexualised image of a teacher, created or altered with AI, was shared without her consent in a fathers’ WhatsApp group

In a public statement reported on 8 October 2026 by BioBioChile, La Cuarta and MargaMargaTV, a subsidised private school in Villa Alemana, Valparaíso region, Chile, said that a sexualised image of one of its teachers, created or modified with artificial intelligence, had been shared without her consent in a WhatsApp group of male parents. The school said it had activated its institutional protocols and that the relevant institutional and legal actions should be taken; Radio Bío Bío reported that no legal action had been filed at the time of publication. The tool used is not identified, no outlet examined the image, and the account rests on the school’s statement.

If you or someone you know is struggling, free and confidential support is available. Find a helpline near you at Signpost.

Back to all incidents