Skip to main content
NOPE
Medium reported severity

Former iGaming designer tells Times of Malta employer decided an AI model the team had trained could replace about half the design team

Times of Malta reported on 18 October 2026, from interviews with anonymous former gambling-sector employees, that iGaming companies are laying off staff as they turn to AI. One former designer, who says they lost their job earlier in 2026, says their team had been told to train an AI model to make design and brand-guideline decisions, presented as a tool to help designers, and that the company later decided the model was fit enough to replace around half of the design team, including those who trained it. The designer says there was no notice, that they were asked to resign later that day and that the severance was the bare minimum. The outlet omitted company names, and the workers said they had signed non-disclosure agreements. GamingMalta, the industry promotion foundation, told the outlet it sees talent being redeployed rather than replaced by AI, and the article notes that others pointed to search-engine changes and higher UK gambling taxes. The account is a single anonymous worker's, relayed by one outlet; the employer and where the job was based are not stated.

AI system
Unidentified AI model
Occurred
2026
Reported
18 October 2026
Event location
Unknown
What the AI did
Relation unknown
Reported harm
Professional HarmFinancial Loss
Whose AI use
An institution’s AI use
Setting
Work
Evidence
AI involvement reported · Causal attribution alleged · 1 source
8 claims: 8 reported. 5 open questions
People reported harmed
At least 1 person

AI system as recorded: An AI model that, according to the former designer, the design team was told to train to make design and brand-guideline decisions; no product or vendor is named

What Happened

The account. Times of Malta reported that iGaming workers 'are being laid off in their hundreds as gambling companies increasingly turn to artificial intelligence to replace staff', based on what former employees told it. One former worker, described as a designer, says they lost their job earlier this year and that 'There was no notice; it happened very randomly.' According to the article, the designer's team had been told earlier in the year to start training an AI model to 'make design and brand guideline decisions', which was presented as a tool to help designers, and the company later 'decided the model was fit enough to replace around half of the design team', including those who had trained it.

The dismissal. The designer says they were asked to resign later the same day and that the severance package 'was barely enough for me not to take legal recourse.' The designer describes 'a big sense of uncertainty' and says it is 'a big thing to be replaced by a machine.' The outlet says all the workers said they had been forced to sign non-disclosure agreements about their dismissals, and it omitted company names to protect them.

Counterevidence. A GamingMalta spokesperson told the outlet that it sees 'talent being redeployed rather than replaced by AI' and is not seeing AI drive significant job losses in the sector. The article also reports that some people pointed to search-engine algorithm changes and higher UK gambling taxes as drivers of cuts. Neither statement addresses the designer's employer specifically.

Reported harm

A former iGaming designer says they lost their job, under pressure to resign with a minimal severance, when the employer decided an AI model the design team had trained could replace about half the team (the worker's account to Times of Malta; GamingMalta disputes that AI is driving significant job losses).

Outcome

Unknown

The designer says they were asked to resign and that the severance package was barely enough for them not to take legal recourse. No employer statement, legal claim or later employment is reported.

What remains unknown

  • The employer and where the designer's job was based.
  • The exact date of the dismissal (the designer says only 'earlier this year').
  • Which AI model was trained and what work it now does.
  • How many designers were dismissed in the same cut ('around half of the design team').
  • Whether the employer would give a different reason for the cut.

What the evidence supports

AI involvement: reported. The former designer told Times of Malta that the team had been told to train an AI model to make design and brand-guideline decisions and that the company then decided the model was fit enough to replace around half of the design team; the designer was dismissed in that cut. This is a reported institutional response to AI adoption. The evidence is one anonymous worker's account relayed by the outlet; the model is not named, no AI output toward the designer is described, and the employer gave no statement.

8 claims: 8 reported. What the statuses mean

Reported Times of Malta reports, from former employees it interviewed, that iGaming workers are being laid off as gambling companies turn to AI to replace staff; the outlet omitted company names to protect the workers.

Causal attribution. The outlet's report of what former employees told it; the scale is the workers' estimate and is disputed by GamingMalta (c7).

  • timesofmalta.com(opens in new tab) supports · English
    'iGaming workers are being laid off in their hundreds as gambling companies increasingly turn to artificial intelligence to replace staff, former employees have told Times of Malta'; 'The names of gambling companies were omitted to protect the identities of former employees'
Reported A former designer says their team was told earlier in 2026 to start training an AI model to make design and brand-guideline decisions, presented at the time as a tool to help designers.

Causal attribution. The designer's account as relayed by the outlet; no company statement.

  • timesofmalta.com(opens in new tab) supports · English
    'The designer was part of a team that earlier this year was told to start training an AI model to'; 'make design and brand guideline decisions'; 'positioned at the time as a tool to help designers'
Reported The designer says the company later decided the model was fit enough to replace around half of the design team, including the people who had trained it; the article's opening says one former employee had been assigned to train the AI model that eventually replaced them.

Causal attribution. Attributed to the designer; the company is not named and gave no statement. It records the employer's reported decision, not an established reason.

  • timesofmalta.com(opens in new tab) supports · English
    'decided the model was fit enough to replace around half of the design team'; 'including those who had trained the model'; 'And one former employee said they had been assigned to train the AI model that eventually replaced them.'
Reported The designer says they lost their job earlier this year without notice, were asked to resign later that day, and received a severance package that was the bare minimum.

Causal attribution. The designer's own account.

  • timesofmalta.com(opens in new tab) supports · English
    'said one former worker who lost their job earlier this year'; 'There was no notice; it happened very randomly'; 'adding they were asked to resign later that day'; 'The severance package wasn’t generous; it was barely enough for me not to take legal recourse'
Reported The designer describes a big sense of uncertainty and says being replaced by a machine is a big thing.

Causal attribution. The designer's description of their own reaction.

Reported According to Times of Malta, all the workers it spoke to said they had been forced to sign non-disclosure agreements about their dismissals.

Causal attribution. The workers' statements as summarised by the outlet.

Reported A GamingMalta spokesperson told Times of Malta that it sees talent being redeployed rather than replaced by AI and is not seeing AI drive significant job losses in Malta's gaming sector.

Causal attribution. Counterevidence from the industry promotion foundation; it addresses the sector, not this designer's employer.

  • timesofmalta.com(opens in new tab) supports · English
    'What we are seeing is talent being redeployed rather than replaced by AI'; 'not seeing AI drive significant job losses in Malta’s gaming sector'
Reported Times of Malta reports that not everyone blamed AI: some pointed to search-engine algorithm changes and higher UK gambling taxes as helping drive cuts.

Causal attribution. Context on other reported drivers of sector cuts; it does not concern the designer's employer specifically.

  • timesofmalta.com(opens in new tab) supports · English
    'Not all laid the blame squarely at the feet of AI, however, with some pointing to changing search engine algorithms hitting website traffic and higher UK gambling taxes reducing profit margins as helping drive cuts.'

Sources

1 source inspected. Sources that repeat one account do not corroborate each other.

How the sources were read, and where the events happened

Read in English on 2026-10-19 from the publisher's page (HTTP 200 with a link-preview crawler user agent; the browser user agent and the Internet Archive both failed). Published 18 October 2026 (article:published_time 06:26 +02:00). The outlet withheld company names; the interviewed workers are anonymous. Applies to s1.

Event countries: Unknown. Affected-person countries: Unknown. Court countries: Unknown.

The article concerns Malta's gambling sector, but it does not say where the designer's employer or job was based, and the designer mentions colleagues in offices around the world. The publisher's location is not evidence of the event's location.

Reviewed for publication 2026-10-19: Published as a consequential institutional response to AI adoption: a former worker's attributed account, in original reporting by Times of Malta, that the employer decided an AI model the design team had trained could replace about half of the team, and that the designer was dismissed in that cut. Described with attribution, with the industry foundation's denial and other reported causes kept; the employer and worker are not identified.

People described

A former designer at an unnamed iGaming company who says they were dismissed in a cut affecting about half the design team

People reported harmed in this case

At least 1 person

0 AI participants · 1 other person harmed

Additional affected people are described without a reliable count.

One person counted: the designer interviewed by Times of Malta. The designer says around half of the design team was replaced, which is not quantified. Other workers in the article (such as a content writer among 20 laid off) are not counted because their dismissals are not tied to an AI decision in the same way. Nobody is counted as a direct AI user: the harm is the employer's decision.

Counted once within this case. The same person may appear in other cases. This count does not establish AI causation.

Tags

#employment#job-loss#workplace-ai#consequential-response

Cite this case

Compiled per our published methodology: verification statuses, sourcing standards, and corrections process.

APA

NOPE. (2026). Former iGaming designer tells Times of Malta employer decided an AI model the team had trained could replace about half the design team. AI incidents. https://nope.net/incidents/2026-igaming-designer-tells-times-of-malta-employer-replaced-half-of-design-team-with-ai-model-they-trained

BibTeX

@misc{2026_igaming_designer_tells_times_of_malta_employer_replaced_half_of_design_team_with_ai_model_they_trained,
  title = {Former iGaming designer tells Times of Malta employer decided an AI model the team had trained could replace about half the design team},
  author = {NOPE},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {AI incidents},
  url = {https://nope.net/incidents/2026-igaming-designer-tells-times-of-malta-employer-replaced-half-of-design-team-with-ai-model-they-trained}
}

Related cases

Medium Unidentified AI tool

Ninth Circuit fines and suspends two immigration lawyers over briefs with AI-hallucinated citations and denials of AI use; immigration board follows

On 3 June 2026 the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit fined immigration attorneys Mike Singh Sethi and William Rounds $2,500 each and suspended both from practice before the court for six months. Briefs filed in an asylum petition for review cited two cases that do not exist and attributed quotations to opinions that do not contain them. In a motion to correct, the attorneys called the errors typographical, and at oral argument Rounds twice said AI was not used. In their response to the court's order to show cause, they conceded that the errors were probably the product of unauthorised AI use by the firm's unlicensed brief writers and a failure to check citations. The court said the suspension was owed to their repeated failure of candour. The Board of Immigration Appeals then suspended Sethi from practice before the Board, the immigration courts and the Department of Homeland Security for six months, effective 13 June 2026, and designated that decision as a precedent on 1 October 2026.

Low Unidentified AI drafting tool

Paraíba, Brazil: judge fines a lawyer R$32,800 over hidden AI commands in a petition, G1 reports; state bar later suspends two lawyers in such cases

A judge of the 5th Mixed Court of Sousa, Paraíba, found hidden instructions aimed at artificial intelligence tools spread over seven pages of a lawyer's motion for clarification in a public-competition case in June 2026, including an order to ignore impartiality and a note calling it a test of whether the judge used only AI to decide. The judge fined the lawyer two penalties of R$16,400 (R$32,800 in total) for bad-faith litigation and contempt of the court's dignity, and referred the case to the Paraíba bar (OAB-PB) and the state prosecutors, G1 reports. The defence said the commands were not inserted deliberately and blamed an error in exporting a file prepared with AI support. An appeal judge refused to suspend the fines on 30 June, the trial judge kept them on reconsideration, and in July, G1 reports, the OAB-PB preventively suspended two lawyers after opening procedures into two hidden-command cases, one of them the Sousa case.

Medium Galileu

Pará labour court fines two lawyers about R$84,000 over hidden instruction aimed at the court's Galileu AI; the lawyers deny manipulating the decision

In May 2026 a judge of the 3rd Labour Court of Parauapebas, in the Brazilian state of Pará, fined two lawyers about R$84,000 after text in white font on a white background was found in a document they filed for a worker in a labour claim. According to the sentence as reported by G1, the hidden text was detected while the judgment was being drafted with Galileu, a generative AI tool the labour courts use to help judges and staff draft sentences, and its evident intention was to make the AI produce a superficial defence or a compromised draft judgment. The judge called the technique prompt injection. The lawyers said they disagreed with the decision and that there was never any command to manipulate the judge's decision, describing the text as an attempt to protect their client from the AI; one of them said she did not work on labour cases. In October 2026 the regional labour court announced that a Connecticut Superior Court judge had cited the decision when sanctioning a litigant for misuse of AI.

Medium Unidentified AI research tool

Alabama Supreme Court dismisses two siblings' family-trust appeal as a sanction after their lawyer admits using AI that produced fake citations

On 24 April 2026 the Supreme Court of Alabama dismissed an appeal by two siblings in a family dispute over living trusts because their lawyer, W. Perry Hall, had filed briefs in which most of the legal authorities were misquoted or did not exist. The court said they appeared to be AI hallucinations, and at a show-cause hearing in February 2026 Hall admitted that many authorities did not exist and that he had improperly used AI to obtain them. The court ordered Hall to pay the opposing party's fees and costs of $17,200 and double appeal costs, barred him from filing in the court without a co-signing attorney and referred him to the Alabama State Bar. It said the dismissal was imposed as a sanction because of the particularly egregious facts. One justice, concurring in part and dissenting in part, objected to dismissing the appeal as a sanction for the lawyer's conduct but would have affirmed the judgment against the clients on the merits.

If you or someone you know is struggling, free and confidential support is available. Find a helpline near you at Signpost.

Back to all incidents