Skip to main content
NOPE
Medium Court orderNews report Lawsuit Ongoing

Créteil, France: a court suspended Gisi's (Infopro Digital) plan to cut eight sub-editor posts in favour of a generative-AI tool, finding a serious and characterised risk to the physical and mental health of several categories of staff

Gisi, the Infopro Digital subsidiary publishing L'Usine nouvelle, LSA and L'Argus de l'assurance (127 staff, 92 journalists), presented to its works council (CSE) on 4 May 2026 a reorganisation built around 'DIGI', an in-house generative-AI editorial tool, and on 12 May 2026 opened consultation on the reorganisation and on the resulting collective dismissal of its eight secrétaires de rédaction (sub-editors), to be replaced by two chefs d'édition, on the company's estimate that the tool would take over about 70% of sub-editor tasks. Some 250 journalists across Infopro Digital's 26 titles had struck in spring 2026 against a group-wide plan to cut 19 sub-editor posts, and according to Digital Watch (citing Stratégies) five of the eight Gisi sub-editors had received pre-dismissal interview letters. The CSE, relying on an expert report, went to the Créteil judicial court in July. On 15 September 2026 the référé judge found that deploying the plan without real-situation testing presented 'un risque grave et caractérisé sur la santé physique et mentale de plusieurs catégories de salariés', ordered the suspension of the reorganisation and the collective dismissal (including the redeployment processes) until real-situation tests and full pilot issues are produced, with a provisional penalty of 8,000 euros per day for three months, and refused the damages provision. Gisi said it would continue the tests and reserved the right to appeal.

AI System

'DIGI', Gisi's in-house generative-AI editorial tool (transcription of interviews, drafting and correction help; planned spelling, grammar and typography correction, editorial-coherence and fact-reliability checks)

Gisi (Groupe Industrie Service Infos), a subsidiary of Infopro Digital (deployer of the in-house 'DIGI' generative-AI tool)

Occurred

4 May 2026

Reported

15 September 2026

Event location

France

Platform

other

What the evidence supports

AI involvement: supported. The court order and AFP identify the generative-AI tool (DIGI) as the basis of the reorganisation and of the dismissal of the eight sub-editor posts, and the court's health-risk finding concerns deploying that tool without real-situation testing. The tool did not communicate with, decide about or depict the affected people; it was to take over their tasks, so none of the listed relations applies and the relation is recorded as unknown.

AI-to-person relation

  • Relation unknown

Core relations are communication, acting on someone’s behalf, and depiction or impersonation. Decision and claim relations are retained as contextual cases.

An institution’s AI use. Settings: Work, Justice.

Claim status: Documented

On 15 September 2026 the Créteil judicial court, sitting in référé on the application of Gisi's CSE, ordered the suspension of Gisi's reorganisation project and of the resulting collective dismissal of the eight secrétaires de rédaction, including the redeployment processes, until real-situation tests and pilot issues confirm what share of sub-editor tasks the generative-AI tool can take over; it imposed a provisional penalty of 8,000 euros per day of delay for three months, refused the damages provision and awarded 2,000 euros in costs.

Causal attribution: Established by the court order itself and confirmed by L'Informé and AFP, which each consulted the decision.

  • Court order (supports): Page 12: 'ORDONNONS la suspension du projet de réorganisation de la Société GISI et du projet de licenciement collectif (des 8 secrétaires de rédaction) en découlant, incluant la suspension des processus de reclassement, jusqu'à ce qu'il soit procédé à la réalisation des tests en situation réelle et à l'élaboration de numéros 0'; 'PRONONÇONS à l'encontre de la société GISI une astreinte provisoire de 8 000 euros par jour de retard pendant une durée de trois mois'; 'FAIT AU PALAIS DE JUSTICE DE CRETEIL, le 15 septembre 2026'. Page 1: 'ORDONNANCE DU : 15 Septembre 2026', 'N° RG 26/00991'.
  • News report (supports): "la suspension du projet de réorganisation (...) et du projet de licenciement collectif (des 8 secrétaires de rédaction)"; "par jour de retard sur trois mois"; "En revanche, les dommages et intérêts réclamés ont été rejetés."
  • News report (supports): "La justice a suspendu mardi en référé un projet de suppression de 8 postes au sein du groupe de presse Gisi (L'Usine nouvelle, LSA, L'Argus de l'assurance...), en lien avec le déploiement de l'intelligence artificielle"; "Il a par conséquent suspendu le plan jusqu'à la réalisation de tests complets. Contactée par l'AFP, la direction de Gisi a indiqué se réserver la possibilité de faire appel".

Claim status: Documented

The judge found that implementing the generative-AI project and the dismissal of all sub-editor posts on an approximate evaluation, without real-situation testing or participation of the staff concerned, presented a serious and characterised risk to the physical and mental health of several categories of Gisi staff, and that Gisi had not shown prevention measures although its 2025 risk register listed three AI-related risks including stress linked to AI-related job insecurity.

Causal attribution: The court's own finding; it concerns a risk to health created by the way the AI-based reorganisation was to be deployed, not an individually diagnosed injury.

  • Court order (supports): Page 11: 'représenter un risque grave et caractérisé sur la santé physique et mentale de plusieurs catégories de salariés de la société GISI'; 'la société GISI ne justifie pas de la mise en oeuvre des dispositifs de prévention du risque lié à l'introduction de la nouvelle technologie d'IA générative alors que dans le DUERP 2025 qu'elle produit (pièce 5) elle identifie 3 risques en lien avec l'introduction de l'IA (stress lié à l'insécurité de l'emploi lié à l'intelligence artificielle ; changements organisationnels liés à l'introduction de l'intelligence artificielle ; absence de repères liés à l'utilisation de l'IA et manque d'acculturation) mais ne les a pas côtés'. Page 10: 'sans aucune participation des salariés concernés, ni réalisation en situation réelle'; 'L'expert pronostique un risque d'intensification majeur du travail des rédacteurs'.
  • News report (supports): "un risque grave et caractérisé sur la santé physique et mentale de plusieurs catégories de salariés".
  • News report (supports): "Le tribunal judiciaire de Créteil, saisi par le Comité social et économique (CSE) de Gisi".
  • News report (supports): "des risques de surcharge de travail (...) et une baisse de la qualité du travail fourni, de l'autonomie et du conflit de valeur, de la perte de sens et de l'altération du collectif".

Claim status: Documented

Gisi (127 staff, 92 journalists) planned to remove its eight sub-editor posts and create two chef d'édition posts for the tasks its in-house generative-AI tool DIGI could not automate, estimating that the tool would perform about 70% of sub-editor tasks; the project was presented to the CSE on 4 May 2026 and consultation opened on 12 May 2026, after an earlier July 2025 order (confirmed on appeal on 21 May 2026) had required consultation before AI tools were used.

Causal attribution: Facts recited in the court order and reported by AFP from the company.

  • Court order (supports): Page 2: 'La société GISI emploie 127 salariés dont 92 journalistes'; 'un outil dénommé DIGI'; 'Le projet de la société GISI prévoit la suppression de 8 postes de secrétaires de rédaction (SR) et la création de 2 postes de chefs d'édition reprenant une partie des missions des SR, à savoir celles ne pouvant être automatisées par l'outil DIGI'; 'Le 4 mai 2026 le CSE était convié à une réunion dite R0 de présentation du projet'; 'Le 12 mai 2026 la société GISI convoquait le CSE à une première réunion d'information/consultation sur deux projets'; 'le CSE de la société GISI obtenait le 15 juillet 2025 une ordonnance de référé'; 'Par un arrêt du 21 mai 2026 la cour d'appel de Paris confirmait l'ordonnance de référé du 15 juillet 2025'. Page 10: 'la société GISI a évalué à environ 70 % la part des tâches des SR réalisées par l'outil IA'.
  • News report (supports): "Au sein de Gisi, 8 postes de SR sont menacés"; "la société estimant que 70% des tâches des SR peuvent être réalisées par l'IA"; "Des reclassements ont été proposés à tous les secrétaires de rédaction".
  • News report (supports): "avait déjà contrainte à ouvrir un processus d".

Claim status: Reported

Some 250 journalists across Infopro Digital's 26 titles struck in spring 2026 against the owner's plan to cut 19 sub-editor posts because of the AI deployment; after the order Gisi's president said the tests would continue with full pilot issues and that the company reserved the right to appeal.

Causal attribution: AFP reporting of the strike and of management's reaction; L'Informé carries management's written reply.

  • News report (supports): "Les quelque 250 journalistes de ces 26 titres au total avaient lancé une grève au printemps pour s'opposer au projet de leur propriétaire de supprimer 19 postes de secrétaires de rédaction".
  • News report (supports): "Nous allons poursuivre les tests et faire des numéros complets"; "la direction de Gisi a indiqué se réserver la possibilité de faire appel".
  • News report (supports): "nous suspendons le projet le temps de finaliser ces tests".

Claim status: Reported

Digital Watch, citing Stratégies, reports that five of the eight affected sub-editors had already received pre-dismissal interview letters and that Gisi had offered three chef d'édition roles and one technical editor-in-chief position, with newsroom posts offered to all affected sub-editors, some of whom declined.

Causal attribution: Secondary summary attributing the detail to Stratégies (not readable from this host); reported only. Its count of three chef d'édition roles differs from the two posts in the order.

  • News report (supports): "with five of the eight affected journalists having already received pre-dismissal interview letters"; "newsroom positions accompanied by training were offered to all affected editorial secretaries, although some declined them".

What remains unknown

  • Whether Gisi has appealed the order.
  • Whether the pre-dismissal procedure for the sub-editors has been formally withdrawn and whether all eight remain employed; individual health effects are not reported.
  • Pages 3-9 of the order (the parties' submissions) were not read.
  • The status of Groupe Moniteur's separate redundancy plan (PSE) covering the remaining sub-editor posts.
  • Digital Watch, citing Stratégies, reports three chef d'édition roles offered; the order and AFP record two chef d'édition posts. The difference (offers versus created posts, or a Stratégies error) is unresolved.
Source reading, translation and location

Court order · fr · Source inspected

Court record: Tribunal judiciaire de Créteil, section des référés, ordonnance de référé of 15 September 2026, RG 26/00991, CSE de la société Gisi v. SAS Gisi, published by L'Informé (watermarked, 12 scanned pages without a text layer). Pages 1, 2, 10, 11 and 12 read visually in French on 2026-09-19; pages 3-9 not read. Quotations are transcribed from the page images.

News report · fr · Source inspected

Read in French on 2026-09-19 (L'Informé, 15 Sep 2026, updated 16 Sep with Infopro Digital's reaction). The served page truncates the opening paragraph; the court's findings, the penalty, the union reaction and management's reply are readable. L'Informé published the order.

News report · fr · Source inspected

Read in French on 2026-09-19 (CB News, 16 Sep 2026, AFP dispatch). AFP states it consulted the decision; carries Gisi president Isabelle André's comments.

This source shares an underlying account with another listed source.

News report · fr · Source inspected

Read in French on 2026-09-19 (BFM Business with AFP, 16 Sep 2026). Same AFP dispatch with a definition of the sub-editor role.

This source shares an underlying account with another listed source.

News report · fr · Source inspected

Read in French on 2026-09-19 via the MSN content API copy (Libération, 16 Sep 2026, AFP). Same dispatch, adding the staff representative and SNJ-CGT reactions given to L'Informé.

This source shares an underlying account with another listed source.

News report · en · Source inspected

Read in English on 2026-09-19 (Digital Watch Observatory, 17 Sep 2026). A secondary summary that attributes the pre-dismissal-letter and redeployment details to Stratégies, whose own article returns 403 to this host.

Event countries: France. Affected-person countries: France. Court countries: France.

Gisi is registered in Créteil with its seat in Gentilly (Val-de-Marne) per the order; the staff work for its French titles; court: Tribunal judiciaire de Créteil.

Reviewed for publication 2026-09-19: Published under the 2026-09-15 charter as a work-lane case of an institutional AI decision with concrete consequences for identified staff: eight sub-editors were subject to a collective dismissal plan justified by a generative-AI tool, and a court found the deployment presented a serious and characterised risk to the physical and mental health of several categories of staff and suspended it. The court order (primary record), L'Informé and AFP copies read; the affected people are unnamed.

What Happened

The Créteil order (read as a scanned PDF published by L'Informé) records that Gisi introduced a generative-AI tool named DIGI, first for transcription, drafting and correction help, with planned functions for spelling, grammar and typography correction, fluency, editorial coherence and fact-reliability checks. Its project provided for the removal of the eight secrétaire de rédaction posts and the creation of two chef d'édition posts taking over the tasks that could not be automated by DIGI. Gisi estimated at about 70% the share of sub-editor tasks the tool would perform, on the basis of an experiment run by a project team and an external consultant without participation of the staff concerned and without real-situation testing; the CSE's expert (ADDHOC) found the workload assessment rested only on management exchanges, forecast a major intensification of work for rédacteurs, and judged the two chef d'édition posts under-sized. The judge held that implementing the generative-AI project and the dismissal of all sub-editor posts on this approximate basis presented a serious and characterised risk to the physical and mental health of several categories of Gisi staff, noted that Gisi's 2025 risk register (DUERP) listed three AI-related risks (stress linked to AI-related job insecurity, organisational change, lack of reference points) without rating them or showing prevention measures, and found a manifestly unlawful disturbance. AFP, which consulted the decision, and L'Informé, which published it, report the same findings; Digital Watch, citing Stratégies, adds that five of the eight sub-editors had already received pre-dismissal interview letters and that redeployment offers were made. Gisi's president Isabelle André told AFP the tests would continue with full pilot issues and that the company reserved the right to appeal; Infopro Digital's other subsidiary, Groupe Moniteur, has a less advanced AI deployment and its own redundancy plan.

Reported harm

Eight sub-editors at Gisi faced collective dismissal because a generative-AI tool was to take over most of their tasks (five had received pre-dismissal interview letters, per Digital Watch citing Stratégies), and a court found that the plan, deployed without real-situation testing, presented a serious and characterised risk to the physical and mental health of several categories of staff; the court suspended the dismissals pending tests.

Professional Harm

Outcome

Ongoing

15 July 2025: an earlier Créteil référé order (confirmed by the Paris Court of Appeal on 21 May 2026) had already required Gisi to suspend use of AI tools until the CSE was consulted. 4 and 12 May 2026: the reorganisation and collective-dismissal projects were presented to the CSE. July 2026: the CSE applied to the Créteil judicial court in référé; hearing 18 August 2026. 15 September 2026: order (RG 26/00991, judge Claire Allain-Feydy) suspending the reorganisation project and the collective dismissal of the eight sub-editors, including redeployment processes, until real-situation tests and 'numéros 0' confirm the share of sub-editor tasks the generative-AI tool can take over; provisional penalty 8,000 euros per day for three months; damages provision refused; 2,000 euros costs to the CSE; the order is enforceable immediately. Gisi reserves the right to appeal.

People described

The eight secrétaires de rédaction (sub-editors, journalists) at Gisi whose posts were subject to the collective dismissal plan; the court's health-risk finding also covers other categories of Gisi staff (rédacteurs, typographes, maquettistes, iconographes) without a count

People reported harmed in this case

At least 8 people

0 AI participants · 8 other people harmed

Additional affected people are described without a reliable count.

The order suspends 'le projet de licenciement collectif (des 8 secrétaires de rédaction)' and AFP reports eight sub-editor posts threatened at Gisi; Digital Watch, citing Stratégies, says five of the eight had received pre-dismissal interview letters. The court's health-risk finding extends to 'plusieurs catégories de salariés' without a number. Eight counted plus unquantified others: partial.

Counted once within this case. The same person may appear in other cases. This count does not establish AI causation.

Tags

#work#journalism#layoffs#generative-ai#newsroom-automation#france#creteil#labour-court#occupational-health#institutional-use

Cite this case

Compiled per our published methodology: verification statuses, sourcing standards, and corrections process.

APA

NOPE. (2026). Créteil, France: a court suspended Gisi's (Infopro Digital) plan to cut eight sub-editor posts in favour of a generative-AI tool, finding a serious and characterised risk to the physical and mental health of several categories of staff. NOPE: AI and people. https://nope.net/incidents/2026-gisi-infopro-digital-creteil-ai-dismissals-suspended

BibTeX

@misc{2026_gisi_infopro_digital_creteil_ai_dismissals_suspended,
  title = {Créteil, France: a court suspended Gisi's (Infopro Digital) plan to cut eight sub-editor posts in favour of a generative-AI tool, finding a serious and characterised risk to the physical and mental health of several categories of staff},
  author = {NOPE},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {NOPE: AI and people},
  url = {https://nope.net/incidents/2026-gisi-infopro-digital-creteil-ai-dismissals-suspended}
}

If you or someone you know is struggling, free and confidential support is available. Find a helpline near you at Signpost.

Back to all incidents