Skip to main content
NOPE
Medium reported severity Investigation Opened

Gauting, Bavaria: police say a man presumably lured by an AI-generated image of a TV presenter in a banner ad lost more than 25,000 euros to investment fraud

The Gauting police inspection in Bavaria, Germany, reported on 2 October 2026 that a man had filed a complaint after realising he had been the victim of investment fraud. According to the police report, he said he had clicked on an advertising banner for an investment on the website of a large German news magazine, and the police say he was presumably lured by the combination of an AI-generated image of a well-known television presenter with a supposedly lucrative investment strategy. After he entered his email address and phone number on the trading platform, four women callers contacted him from 4 June 2026 until September and led him to make four payments totalling more than 25,000 euros to accounts in Bulgaria, Malta and Lithuania. His bank could not reverse the transfers because he had authorised them himself. The police do not say how they concluded that the image was AI-generated, and the presenter is not named in the police report.

AI system
Unidentified image tool (suspected)
Occurred
Jun 2026 to Sept 2026
Reported
2 October 2026
Event location
Germany
What the AI did
Depicted or impersonated the person
Reported harm
Financial Loss
Whose AI use
Someone else’s AI use
Setting
Finance
Evidence
AI involvement suspected · Causal attribution alleged · 2 sources, 1 underlying account
3 claims: 3 reported. 4 open questions
People reported harmed
1 person

AI system as recorded: AI-generated image of a well-known television presenter in an online investment banner advertisement, according to the Gauting police, who say the man was presumably lured by it; no tool is named

What Happened

The advert. According to the Gauting police report, published in full by the local news site Unser Würmtal, the complainant said he had noticed an advertising banner for an investment on the website of a large German news magazine and clicked on it. The police say he was presumably lured by the combination of an AI-generated image of a well-known television presenter with a lucrative investment strategy, which advertised itself as a form of investment not offered by banks. Merkur, reporting the police statement, quotes the head of the Gauting inspection with the same wording.

The payments. After he entered his email address and phone number on the trading platform, he was contacted from 4 June 2026 until September by four women callers, who led him to make four payments totalling more than 25,000 euros to accounts in Bulgaria, Malta and Lithuania. He realised he had been defrauded and went to the police. His bank told him the transfers could not be reversed because he had authorised them himself, so he is expected to bear the loss.

What is not known. The police do not name the presenter, the news magazine, the platform or the image tool, and do not say how they concluded that the image was AI-generated; their wording is presumptive ('vermutlich'). The callers' identities are unknown.

Reported harm

Police say the man made four payments totalling more than 25,000 euros to foreign accounts that his bank could not reverse.

How Harm Occurred

According to police, an online banner advertisement that presumably used an AI-generated image of a well-known television presenter drew a man to a fraudulent trading platform, whose callers then led him to transfer more than 25,000 euros abroad.

Outcome

Unknown

The man filed a criminal complaint with the Gauting police; his bank said the transfers could not be reversed because he had authorised them (Gauting police report, 2 October 2026). No suspect is reported.

What remains unknown

  • Which presenter, news magazine website, trading platform and image tool were involved.
  • How the police concluded that the image was AI-generated.
  • Who the callers were and whether any suspect has been identified.
  • The exact amount of each payment and the date of the last one.

What the evidence supports

AI involvement: suspected. The Gauting police, who took the man's complaint, say he was presumably lured by the combination of an AI-generated image of a well-known television presenter with a lucrative investment strategy in a banner advertisement he clicked, which led him to the trading platform whose callers obtained his payments. The generated image of the presenter was part of the advertisement shown to him. The police wording is presumptive and they do not disclose how they concluded that the image was AI-generated or name the tool.

3 claims: 3 reported. What the statuses mean

Reported Police say the complainant said he clicked an investment banner advertisement on the website of a large German news magazine, and that he was presumably lured by the combination of an AI-generated image of a well-known television presenter with a lucrative investment strategy.

Causal attribution. The police's presumptive attribution; Merkur relays the same police statement (one origin). Technical basis not disclosed.

  • unser-wuermtal.de(opens in new tab) supports · German
    'auf der Website eines großen deutschen Nachrichtenmagazins online auf ein Werbebanner mit einer Geldanlage aufmerksam geworden zu sein und anschließend darauf geklickt zu haben.'; 'eines durch KI generierten Bildes einer bekannten Fernsehmoderatorin in Verbindung mit einer lukrativen Anlagestrategie geködert worden.'
  • merkur.de(opens in new tab) supports · German
    'Vermutlich wurde er durch die Kombination eines per Künstlicher Intelligenz erzeugten Bildes einer bekannten Fernsehmoderatorin mit einer vermeintlich lukrativen Anlagestrategie geködert.'
Reported Police say four women callers contacted him from 4 June 2026 until September and led him to make four payments totalling more than 25,000 euros to accounts in Bulgaria, Malta and Lithuania.

Causal attribution. Police account from the complaint; one origin.

  • unser-wuermtal.de(opens in new tab) supports · German
    'wurde er in der Folgezeit (ab 04.06.26 bis September von insgesamt vier weiblichen Anrufern kontaktiert.'; 'zu vier Zahlungen im Gesamtwert von über 25.000 Euro an ausländische Konten in Bulgarien, Malta und Litauen anleiten.'
  • merkur.de(opens in new tab) supports · German
    'wurde er in der Folge von vier Anruferinnen kontaktiert.'; 'zwischen dem 4. Juni und September zu insgesamt vier Zahlungen an, die er auf ausländische Konten in Bulgarien, Malta und Litauen überwies.'
Reported Police say his bank could not reverse the transfers because he had authorised them himself.

Causal attribution. Police account of the bank's position.

  • unser-wuermtal.de(opens in new tab) supports · German
    'Nach Rücksprache mit seiner Hausbank ist eine Rückbuchung von den vier ausländischen IBAN-Konten nicht möglich, da er die Überweisungen selbst autorisiert hatte'

Sources

2 sources inspected, from 1 underlying account. Sources that repeat one account do not corroborate each other.

How the sources were read, and where the events happened

Read in German by the research agent (an AI) on 2026-10-16 and translated by the research agent (an AI) into English; no human translator or reviewer was involved. Gauting police report reproduced on a local news site ('Quelle: Polizei Gauting'), 2 October 2026; HTTP 200. Applies to s1.

Read in German by the research agent (an AI) on 2026-10-16 and translated by the research agent (an AI) into English; no human translator or reviewer was involved. Regional newspaper report relaying the Gauting police report and its inspection head, 4 October 2026; HTTP 200. Applies to s2.

Event countries: Germany. Affected-person countries: Germany. Court countries: Unknown.

The complaint was made to the Gauting police in Bavaria, Germany, about an advert on a German news magazine's website; the payments went to accounts in Bulgaria, Malta and Lithuania, which are destinations of the money and not event locations.

Reviewed for publication 2026-10-16: Published as a core case (depicted_or_impersonated): the investigating police say an AI-generated image of a well-known television presenter in a banner advertisement presumably lured the man to the fraudulent platform, connecting it to his loss of more than 25,000 euros. The AI involvement is recorded as suspected because the police wording is presumptive. The man is not named.

People described

A man in the Gauting area of Bavaria who clicked an investment banner advertisement and was then directed by callers to make four payments

People reported harmed in this case

1 person

0 AI participants · 1 other person harmed

One person: the complainant described in the Gauting police report, who lost more than 25,000 euros.

Counted once within this case. The same person may appear in other cases. This count does not establish AI causation.

Tags

#investment_fraud#fake_celebrity_ad#ai_generated_image#germany

Cite this case

Compiled per our published methodology: verification statuses, sourcing standards, and corrections process.

APA

NOPE. (2026). Gauting, Bavaria: police say a man presumably lured by an AI-generated image of a TV presenter in a banner ad lost more than 25,000 euros to investment fraud. AI incidents. https://nope.net/incidents/2026-gauting-bavaria-police-say-man-presumably-lured-by-ai-image-of-tv-presenter-in-banner-ad-lost-25000-euros

BibTeX

@misc{2026_gauting_bavaria_police_say_man_presumably_lured_by_ai_image_of_tv_presenter_in_banner_ad_lost_25000_euros,
  title = {Gauting, Bavaria: police say a man presumably lured by an AI-generated image of a TV presenter in a banner ad lost more than 25,000 euros to investment fraud},
  author = {NOPE},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {AI incidents},
  url = {https://nope.net/incidents/2026-gauting-bavaria-police-say-man-presumably-lured-by-ai-image-of-tv-presenter-in-banner-ad-lost-25000-euros}
}

Related cases

Low Unidentified image tool

Honduras: national police say a woman faked her own kidnapping twice and sent her partner AI-generated images of injuries to obtain money

Honduras's National Police announced on 14 October 2026 that its anti-kidnapping unit (UNAS) of the Police Investigations Directorate (DPI) had arrested a woman, under a court warrant, on suspicion of simulating a non-existent offence related to kidnapping and of using false documents. According to the police statement, the investigation found that she had faked her own kidnapping twice, in episodes reported on 21 April and 1 June 2026, to obtain money from her partner to pay personal debts, and that she received an initial deposit of 2,000 lempiras after making the partner believe she was being held and that her captors were demanding money. Police say the agents determined that she presumably used artificial-intelligence tools to generate false images of injuries and bruises, which were sent to the partner to make the partner believe she had been beaten by the supposed kidnappers, together with apparently forged hospital documents. According to the investigation file, she said after being located that she planned both episodes and used AI to make the images. She was brought before the issuing court; no court finding is reported.

Medium Unidentified image tool

Chandigarh: a PhD scholar says a man posing as an IPS officer took cash, gold and a laptop; Dainik Bhaskar reports police found his uniform photo was AI-made

A PhD scholar in Chandigarh told police that in March 2026 she found a man's profile on a matrimonial site showing him in uniform, and that he presented himself at different times as an excise assistant commissioner, an IPS officer and a RAW agent. Dainik Bhaskar reported on 29 September 2026 that the police investigation found the IPS uniform photo on the profile was not real and had been made with the help of AI; no officer is quoted on this, and the other reports read do not mention AI. According to her complaint, he took about Rs 11.5 lakh in cash, gold jewellery and a laptop with promises of marriage and a government job; the Tribune adds about Rs 7.88 lakh in online transfers between March and June, and police put the total at about Rs 30 lakh. Bhaskar reports that he had a bank account opened in her name with her documents and kept its passbook, ATM card and SIM card until the bank froze it over suspicious transactions. When she asked for her money and belongings back, he threatened to circulate her photographs on social media; the Tribune adds a threat of harm to her brother. A case was registered in August. Police arrested a man from Rohtak, Haryana, who was produced in court on Monday 28 September 2026 and remanded for one day.

Medium Unidentified image tool

Jhansi, Uttar Pradesh: a woman is arrested and later refused bail after a railway officer's wife complained that she sent an AI-made objectionable image of the officer, demanded ₹15 lakh and threatened to circulate pictures of women in the family

Jhansi police arrested a 27-year-old woman in Prayagraj in September 2026 on charges of editing photos with AI, blackmail and extortion, after the wife of a senior railway officer living in Jhansi filed an FIR on 2 August 2026. According to the complaint as relayed by Aaj Tak, UP Tak, Dainik Bhaskar and Amar Ujala, the woman threatened to circulate objectionable pictures of women in the family, demanded ₹15 lakh and threatened to kill the family, and out of fear the family paid her ₹40,000 in total on different dates between January and June 2026. On 31 July she sent an objectionable image of the officer to his wife's phone, an image police say she made with AI. Aaj Tak places the ₹15 lakh demand after that image; Dainik Bhaskar reports the complaint as dating the demand and a death threat to the woman's visit to the family's government house on 2 June. Police recovered two phones and a laptop, and Amar Ujala reports that police will have the images examined forensically. On 1 October 2026 an Additional Sessions Judge in Jhansi rejected the woman's bail plea. In police custody after her arrest she said the FIR against her was fake. The images were not inspected.

High Unidentified image tool

Busan prosecutors say an investment-fraud suspect used AI images of a fake medical licence and asset records to take 320 million won, then fooled a judge

The Busan Eastern District branch of the prosecutors' office in South Korea announced on 11 February 2026 that it had indicted a man under detention on 6 February for fraud, forging and using private documents, and obstructing official duties by deception. According to the prosecutors, from August to October 2025 he used AI to make fake images of a medical licensing examination certificate and of cryptocurrency holdings, posed as a doctor and businessman with billions of won in assets, and took about 320 million won from victims for supposed cryptocurrency, cruise-ship and medical-centre investments. When police sought his arrest in December 2025, he gave the warrant judge a bank balance certificate showing about 904 million won, which prosecutors say he made by uploading his real certificate to an AI platform and asking it to change the balance; his real balance was 23 won. The judge refused the warrant. Prosecutors later found the certificate was forged and obtained a new warrant. The accused and the victims are not named here.

If you or someone you know is struggling, free and confidential support is available. Find a helpline near you at Signpost.

Back to all incidents