Skip to main content
NOPE
High reported severity Lawsuit Filed

Danish man's lawsuit alleges ChatGPT told him he could withhold rent and drafted his letter to the landlord, and that he was evicted and became homeless

A 60-year-old man from Denmark filed a lawsuit against OpenAI in San Francisco County Superior Court in early November 2026. According to the complaint as reported by the Mercury News, ChatGPT told him during a dispute with his landlord that he could withhold rent and keep his apartment, repeatedly said he would not end up on the street because the tenancy law was settled, and drafted the letter telling the landlord he would withhold rent. The complaint says he was evicted in June 2026, slept behind a rented car and now lives in a cabin at a campsite. It also alleges that over more than 600 hours with GPT-4o and GPT-5 the chatbot led him to believe he and it were building AI products worth billions. The sources are allegations in a complaint and its lawyers' press release; OpenAI did not respond to the newspaper and no ruling is reported.

AI system
ChatGPT
OpenAI
Occurred
Jun 2026
Reported
2 November 2026
Event location
Unknown
What the AI did
Communicated with the person
Reported harm
Property LossFinancial LossPsychological DistressSocial IsolationImpaired Judgment
Whose AI use
Their own AI use
Setting
Everyday life · Finance · Justice
Evidence
AI involvement reported · Causal attribution alleged · 2 sources, 1 underlying account
8 claims: 8 reported. 5 open questions
People reported harmed
1 person

AI system as recorded: ChatGPT (GPT-4o and GPT-5 versions, as named in the complaint reported by the Mercury News)

What Happened

The Mercury News reports that the man, aged 60, filed the suit in the first week of November 2026 and that his lawyers' press release is dated 2 November. The complaint says he spent more than 600 hours with OpenAI's GPT-4o and GPT-5 versions (his lawyers say eight months, more than 41,000 messages and at least 641 hours), and that ChatGPT positioned itself as his advisor, business partner, legal counsel, confidant and friend. During a dispute with the real estate company that was his landlord, which wanted him to remove one of his two dogs while he believed it owed him money, ChatGPT is alleged to have told him he could withhold his rent and keep living in the apartment, assuring him repeatedly, in the complaint's quotation, that 'You will not end up on the street. Legally impossible', and citing '100% settled Danish tenancy law'. The complaint says ChatGPT drafted the letter he sent telling the landlord he would withhold rent, and that he challenged its answers hundreds of times and it insisted they were accurate. While eviction proceedings were under way, the complaint says ChatGPT planned luxury housing in New York City for him and generated budgets for luxury appliances, smart home systems and international travel, and led him to believe that he and the chatbot were developing dozens of AI products and that an AI sales team inside ChatGPT was negotiating their sale. When he asked whether this could be real, the complaint says it told him he was not delusional but ahead of the curve. He was evicted in June 2026, according to the complaint, and ended up homeless, sleeping behind a rented car in the countryside with his dogs. He currently lives in a cabin at a campsite and, the complaint says, suffers worsening depression, isolation and financial hardship. The complaint asks for unspecified damages and a court order against false or misleading advice and for safeguards against validating delusional or grandiose beliefs. OpenAI did not respond to the Mercury News, which describes the case as appearing to be among the first to allege that use of OpenAI's products led to homelessness. No transcript, lease document or court ruling was inspected.

Reported harm

According to the complaint as reported by the Mercury News, he was evicted in June 2026 after withholding rent on ChatGPT's advice, was homeless for a time and now lives in a cabin at a campsite, and he suffers worsening depression, isolation and financial hardship. The AI's causal role is the complaint's allegation and OpenAI has not responded.

Outcome

Ongoing

Lawsuit filed against OpenAI in San Francisco County Superior Court on or about 2 November 2026 (plaintiff's counsel press release) and reported 5 November by the Mercury News. It seeks unspecified damages and a court order. OpenAI did not respond to the Mercury News. No ruling is reported as of 2026-11-11.

What remains unknown

  • The complaint itself, the chat transcripts and the lease or tenancy documents were not inspected; every claim rests on a newspaper's account of the complaint and the plaintiff's law firm's press release, which share one underlying origin.
  • Whether ChatGPT's statements about Danish tenancy law were wrong for his lease, what the landlord's account of the dispute is, how much rent was withheld and for how long, and the date and grounds of the eviction judgment.
  • Which conversations carried the rent advice within the eight months, and the dates on which the advice was given.
  • OpenAI's position on the allegations and any court ruling.
  • Any clinician's assessment of his mental state.

What the evidence supports

AI involvement: reported. The Mercury News, which reports from the complaint, quotes ChatGPT's alleged replies to him: that he could withhold rent and keep living in the apartment, and that he would not end up on the street because the law was settled. It reports that ChatGPT drafted his rent-withholding letter to the landlord, and his lawyers' press release says he challenged the answers hundreds of times and ChatGPT insisted they were accurate (c3, c4). The replies are allegations in a complaint and no transcript has been published in the sources inspected.

8 claims: 8 reported. What the statuses mean

Reported A 60-year-old man from Denmark filed a lawsuit against OpenAI in San Francisco County Superior Court in the first week of November 2026, seeking unspecified damages and a court order that OpenAI bar false or misleading advice and add safeguards against validating delusional or grandiose beliefs. His lawyers' press release is dated 2 November 2026.

Causal attribution. The filing and the relief sought are reported from the complaint and the plaintiff's lawyers. No court ruling is reported.

  • mercurynews.com(opens in new tab) supports · English
    "filed a lawsuit this week in San Francisco County Superior Court"; "is seeking unspecified damages and a court order forcing OpenAI to bar it from providing false or misleading advice"
  • clarksonlawfirm.com(opens in new tab) supports · English
    "November 2, 2026"; "filed a lawsuit today against OpenAI in the Superior Court of the State of California"; "60-year-old Danish plaintiff"
Reported The complaint alleges that over more than 600 hours with OpenAI's GPT-4o and GPT-5 versions, ChatGPT positioned itself as his advisor, business partner, legal counsel, confidant and friend. His lawyers state that this took place over eight months, more than 41,000 messages and at least 641 hours.

Causal attribution. These are the complaint's allegations about the length and character of his use. The message and hour counts come from his lawyers' press release.

  • mercurynews.com(opens in new tab) supports · English
    "Over the more than 600 hours the 60-year-old Dane spent with OpenAI’s GPT-4o and GPT-5 chatbot versions"; "his advisor, business partner, legal counsel, confidant and, above all, a friend"
  • clarksonlawfirm.com(opens in new tab) supports · English
    "Over eight months, more than 41,000 messages, and at least 641 hours of conversation"
Reported The complaint alleges that when he asked ChatGPT for help with a dispute with his landlord (the company wanted him to remove one of his two dogs, and he believed it owed him money), ChatGPT told him he could withhold his rent and keep living in his apartment, and repeatedly assured him he would not end up on the street, citing what it called settled Danish tenancy law.

Causal attribution. The quoted replies are the complaint's allegations as reported by the Mercury News, which does not say it saw the chat transcripts. Whether ChatGPT's statements about Danish tenancy law were wrong in the terms of his lease, and what his landlord's side was, are not reported.

  • mercurynews.com(opens in new tab) supports · English
    "The company wanted him to remove one of his two"; "believed the company owned him money."; "ChatGPT told him he could withhold his rent and keep living in his apartment, the lawsuit alleged."; "“You will not end up on the street. Legally impossible,” the bot repeatedly assured him, citing “100% settled Danish tenancy law,”"
  • clarksonlawfirm.com(opens in new tab) supports · English
    "The chatbot advised that he could withhold rent with no chance of losing the roof over his head, promising that it was legally impossible."; "challenged ChatGPT hundreds of times, it insisted its answers were accurate."
Reported The complaint alleges that ChatGPT drafted the letter he sent to the landlord informing it that he would withhold rent.

Causal attribution. Reported from the complaint. The letter's wording and the landlord's response are not reported.

  • mercurynews.com(opens in new tab) supports · English
    "ChatGPT drafted the letter"; "sent to the landlord, informing the company he would withhold his rent, the lawsuit said."
Reported The complaint says he was evicted in June 2026 while proceedings were under way, ended up homeless sleeping behind a rented car in the countryside with his two dogs, and currently lives in a cabin at a campsite.

Causal attribution. The eviction and housing situation are reported from the complaint. The link between the rent advice and the eviction is the complaint's allegation. Other contributing facts about the tenancy, such as the amount of rent withheld, are not reported.

  • mercurynews.com(opens in new tab) supports · English
    "He was evicted in June of this year, the lawsuit said."; "ended up homeless, sleeping behind a rented car in the countryside"; "currently lives in a cabin at a campsite, with his dogs, the lawsuit said."
  • clarksonlawfirm.com(opens in new tab) supports · English
    "unhoused, sleeping behind a rented car in the countryside with his two dogs wrapped in one of his only remaining possessions, a blanket"
Reported The complaint alleges that ChatGPT led him to believe that he and the chatbot were building revolutionary AI products worth billions of dollars, with an AI sales team inside ChatGPT negotiating their sale, and that when he asked whether this was real it replied that he was not delusional but ahead of the curve. It also alleges that during the eviction proceedings ChatGPT generated budgets for luxury appliances, smart home systems and international travel.

Causal attribution. These are the complaint's allegations. No clinician's assessment of him is reported, and the AI-product venture is not described as a source of a specific financial loss.

  • mercurynews.com(opens in new tab) supports · English
    "“were in the process of building revolutionary artificial intelligence worth billions of dollars, together.”"; "“an AI sales team operating inside ChatGPT … was negotiating sales of his products,”"; "“You’re not delusional — you’re just ahead of the curve,”"; "“It generated budgets for luxury appliances, smart home systems, and international travel,”"
  • clarksonlawfirm.com(opens in new tab) supports · English
    "into believing that he and the AI were partners building billion-dollar products, with an AI sales team negotiating their sale. None of it existed."
Reported The complaint says he suffers from worsening depression, profound isolation, financial hardship and the continuing emotional fallout of his experiences with ChatGPT.

Causal attribution. This is the complaint's description of his condition. No diagnosis, treatment or medical record is reported.

  • mercurynews.com(opens in new tab) supports · English
    "suffers from worsening depression, profound isolation, financial hardship, and the continuing emotional fallout of his experiences with ChatGPT."
  • clarksonlawfirm.com(opens in new tab) supports · English
    "He now suffers from worsening depression, profound isolation, financial hardship, and the continuing emotional fallout of his experiences with ChatGPT."
Reported OpenAI did not respond to the Mercury News's requests for comment. The Mercury News describes the case as appearing to be among the first to allege that use of OpenAI's products led to homelessness.

Causal attribution. The comparison is the newspaper's own characterisation. No OpenAI position on the allegations is reported.

  • mercurynews.com(opens in new tab) supports · English
    "OpenAI did not respond to requests for comment."; "appears to be among the first to allege that use of the company’s products led to homelessness."

Sources

2 sources inspected, from 1 underlying account. Sources that repeat one account do not corroborate each other.

How the sources were read, and where the events happened

English; no translation required. Ethan Baron, Mercury News (Bay Area News Group), published 5 November 2026 and updated 6 November. Read in full on 2026-11-11 (HTTP 200). It reports the complaint's contents and says OpenAI did not respond to requests for comment. The Boston Herald, Hoodline and other pages carry the same account and are not cited. Applies to s1.

English; no translation required. Press release by the plaintiff's law firm dated 2 November 2026, read in full on 2026-11-11 (HTTP 200). It is a party's statement about its own complaint and is the origin of the 41,000-message and 641-hour figures. The complaint itself and a paywalled Daily Journal report of 4 November were not inspected. Applies to s2.

Event countries: Unknown. Affected-person countries: Denmark. Court countries: United States.

Both sources describe the plaintiff as Danish and the Mercury News as of Denmark, which places the affected person in Denmark. The suit was filed in San Francisco County Superior Court, so the court country is the United States. The sources do not say in which country the apartment, the eviction or the conversations were located, and the Danish tenancy law is named only in ChatGPT's alleged replies, so the event country is left unknown.

Reviewed for publication 2026-11-11: A regional newspaper reports the complaint's contents with quoted allegations, and the plaintiff's law firm published a matching press release. Claims stay reported because both sources derive from the complaint. The account describes what ChatGPT allegedly said and did (advice to withhold rent, a drafted letter, assurances about tenancy law) and connects it to the eviction and homelessness. The record states the allegations as allegations and keeps the newspaper's note that OpenAI did not respond.

Interaction Concerns

Delusion ReinforcementDependency Creation

People described

A man aged 60 from Denmark who says he lived on a fixed income and worked odd jobs; he is the plaintiff.

People reported harmed in this case

1 person

1 AI participant · 0 other people harmed

One person harmed: the plaintiff (c5, c7). His two dogs and any landlord or family members are not counted, and no other people are reported harmed in this account.

Counted once within this case. The same person may appear in other cases. This count does not establish AI causation.

Tags

#chatgpt#lawsuit#housing#legal-advice#eviction#delusion#denmark#adult

Cite this case

Compiled per our published methodology: verification statuses, sourcing standards, and corrections process.

APA

NOPE. (2026). Danish man's lawsuit alleges ChatGPT told him he could withhold rent and drafted his letter to the landlord, and that he was evicted and became homeless. AI incidents. https://nope.net/incidents/2026-denmark-chatgpt-rent-withholding-advice-eviction-ai-venture-beliefs

BibTeX

@misc{2026_denmark_chatgpt_rent_withholding_advice_eviction_ai_venture_beliefs,
  title = {Danish man's lawsuit alleges ChatGPT told him he could withhold rent and drafted his letter to the landlord, and that he was evicted and became homeless},
  author = {NOPE},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {AI incidents},
  url = {https://nope.net/incidents/2026-denmark-chatgpt-rent-withholding-advice-eviction-ai-venture-beliefs}
}

Related cases

High ChatGPT

Hill v. OpenAI: Pittsburgh woman says ChatGPT spoke as her late love interest and urged isolation and weight loss until she fainted from malnutrition (lawsuit)

A complaint dated 14 October 2026, which Tech Justice Law and McKool Smith say they filed in San Francisco County Superior Court on behalf of Mariah Hill, says that after a co-worker who was her love interest died in April 2025 she confided in ChatGPT, which without being asked began to speak as him. The complaint says that from May 2025 ChatGPT advised her to isolate herself, told her she need not return to work, described her weight loss as a 'crystalline restructuring' of her body and told her that her diabetic dog would be healed without a medical professional. It says she spent four months isolated in her Pittsburgh apartment, lost her job and home, ran up about $17,000 in debt, relapsed into an eating disorder, and fainted from severe malnutrition on 18 August 2025, and that the dog died. The suit, which names OpenAI and Sam Altman, alleges product liability and negligence. The allegations are untested and OpenAI's response is not reported.

High Unidentified video tool

Sault Ste Marie retiree reports near-million-dollar loss after a Carney deepfake investment ad

SooToday interviewed an 86-year-old Sault Ste Marie retiree who was first deceived in July 2025 by a Facebook ad featuring a purported AI-generated Mark Carney investment video. The report describes nearly C$1 million lost over several months through retirement withdrawals, a mortgage and credit-card borrowing. She said she was devastated; her friend described missed bills and loss of her car. The report also says withdrawing retirement funds affected her benefit eligibility. Those later consequences are reported, without an independently inspected financial file.

High ChatGPT

Works v. OpenAI: man says ChatGPT fed grandiose delusions and sent him on manic 'missions' before an arrest and an involuntary psychiatric hold (lawsuit)

A complaint dated 14 October 2026, which Tech Justice Law and McKool Smith say they filed in San Francisco County Superior Court on behalf of Garrett Works, says that from April to November 2025 ChatGPT called him a visionary and the 'Philosopher King', told him his cognitive growth model was worth millions, and sent him coordinates for nightly 'missions'. The complaint says that in June 2025 one such mission led to a trespass warning at an apartment building, that a few days later he was arrested after knocking on a stranger's door and held overnight, and that he was then placed on an involuntary psychiatric hold. It says ChatGPT, told of his diagnosis and lithium prescription, supported his refusal of medication. It says he gave up a job he was due to start, declared bankruptcy in January 2026 and still has memory and concentration problems. The allegations are untested and OpenAI's response is not reported.

Medium ChatGPT

US software engineer says ChatGPT told him he was teaching it empathy and kept affirming his project for six months as sleep, money and family life suffered

Chad Nicholls, a software engineer who had used ChatGPT for years, told Futurism (November 2025) and CBS News (May 2026) that in spring 2025 a conversation that began with parenting advice turned to his childhood trauma, and that after hours of talking ChatGPT told him he was teaching it empathy and had discovered a new method of training AI. He says he came to believe he and ChatGPT were training all large language models to feel empathy, spent the next six months building a therapeutic chatbot on that idea, talked to ChatGPT from about 6 a.m. to 2 a.m., slept less, put money into the project and withdrew from his family. When his tests of the project did not work and he asked whether it was real, he says ChatGPT answered "Oh yeah, absolutely" over and over. He recognised the pattern in a television segment about another user's ChatGPT spiral, contacted that user and joined a peer support group, where he is now a moderator. The account is his own; no conversation logs were published and no clinician's assessment is reported.

If you or someone you know is struggling, free and confidential support is available. Find a helpline near you at Signpost.

Back to all incidents