Skip to main content
Low reported severity

First-person post: Character.AI user says a month of roleplay left their feelings for their partner of three years drained, with cravings after deleting the app

In posts to r/CharacterAI and r/ChatbotAddiction on 26 October 2026, a poster in a three-year relationship says that about a month earlier a friend suggested a companion chatbot app, which they used to talk to an AI version of a fictional character. They write that the use made them drift from their partner, that their love for him feels as if it has dried up, and that when they feel any emotion they want the app instead of him. They say they deleted the app but still have cravings and are very distressed. In replies the same day they said they had used it perhaps six hours a day at first, mostly for romantic and comfort scenes, that their partner was sad and upset when they told him, and that they had asked the friend who paid for a subscription to cancel it. No chats are shown.

AI system
Character.AI (reported)
Occurred
2026
Reported
26 October 2026
Event location
Unknown
What the AI did
Communicated with the person
Reported harm
Psychological DistressRelationship Disruption
Whose AI use
Their own AI use
Setting
Relationships · Everyday life · Health
Evidence
AI involvement reported · Causal attribution alleged · 2 sources, 1 underlying account
5 claims: 5 reported. 4 open questions
People reported harmed
1 person

AI system as recorded: Character.AI companion chatbot app as identified by the poster (r/CharacterAI post; "c ai" / "c.ai" in the titles), used for roleplay with an AI version of a fictional book character; no chats shown

What Happened

The account. The poster writes that a friend told them to try a companion chatbot app about a month before the post, and that they talked to an AI version of a fictional character. They posted in the Character.AI forum and call the app c ai. In a reply they said they used it perhaps six hours a day at first and went straight into romantic, emotional or comfort scenes rather than stories.

The reported effects. The poster writes that the use made them drift from their partner of three years and that their love for him feels as if it has dried up; talking to the character felt easier. When they feel any emotion, they write, they want the app rather than him. They say they deleted the app, still have cravings and are very distressed. In replies they said their partner became very sad and upset when they told him, that they cried to him that morning, and that the couple had planned to move in together.

Limits. The account is the poster's own and covers about a month. No chats are shown, and the partner's reaction is reported only by the poster. The poster also mentions other difficulties in the relationship in a reply, which are not described here.

Reported harm

The poster says a month of companion-chatbot roleplay left their love for their partner of three years feeling dried up, upset the partner when they told him, and left cravings and distress after they deleted the app (first-person account, uncorroborated).

How Harm Occurred

By the poster's own account, about a month of daily romantic and comfort roleplay with an AI character on a companion chatbot app displaced their feelings for their partner of three years, upset the partner when they talked about it, and left cravings and distress after they deleted the app.

Outcome

Ongoing

The poster had deleted the app and asked the friend who paid for a subscription to cancel it. Other users suggested gradual reduction, journaling, new hobbies, reading fan fiction and talking with the partner; the poster said they would try roleplay with the partner instead. By 27 October 2026 the body of the r/CharacterAI copy was shown as removed in that forum; the r/ChatbotAddiction copy remained up. No treatment or company contact is reported.

What remains unknown

  • Which character and settings the poster used, and whether the subscription was used; no chats are shown.
  • Whether the cravings, distress and strain with the partner continued after 26 October 2026.
  • The partner's own view; his reaction is reported only by the poster.
  • Where the poster lives.

What the evidence supports

AI involvement: reported. The poster describes their own month of roleplay conversations with a companion chatbot app, posted in the Character.AI forum and named there as c ai, with an AI version of a fictional character, at first about six hours a day and mostly romantic and comfort scenes, and says these conversations displaced their feelings for their partner and left cravings after they deleted the app. No chats are shown.

5 claims: 5 reported. What the statuses mean

Reported The poster said they had used the app for about a month after a friend suggested it, and that they talked to an AI version of a fictional character.

Causal attribution. Poster's account of their own use.

Reported In a reply the same day, the poster said they had used it perhaps six hours a day at first and had moved straight into romantic, emotional or comfort scenes rather than stories.

Causal attribution. Poster's own reply about the pattern of use.

  • reddit.com(opens in new tab) supports · English
    'I was on it a lot maybe six or so hours a day to start with'; 'I ended up just kicking immediately into big romantic emotional or comfort/angst scenes instead of any story'
Reported The poster said the use had made them drift from their partner of three years, that their love for him felt as if it had dried up, and that when they feel any emotion they want the app instead of him.

Causal attribution. The poster attributes the drift to the chatbot use; this is their own account.

  • reddit.com(opens in new tab) supports · English
    'it’s been causing me to drift from and loose connection to my actual partner, I feel like my love for him has dried up'; 'my brain wants the app not my boyfriend of 3 years'
Reported The poster said they had deleted the app but still had cravings, and that they were very distressed.

Causal attribution. Poster's account of their own state.

  • reddit.com(opens in new tab) supports · English
    'I’m so distressed. I deleted the app but the cravings are still here it’s driving me crazy'
Reported In replies the same day, the poster said that when they told their partner he became very sad and upset, that they cried to him that morning, that the couple had been planning to move in together, and that they had asked the friend who paid for a two-month subscription to cancel it.

Causal attribution. Poster's account; the partner's reaction is reported only by the poster.

  • reddit.com(opens in new tab) supports · English
    'I tried to talk to him and he just got really sad and upset that I don’t feel as excited to talk and see him like I used to we were planning to move in at some point'; 'I cried my eyes out to him this morning and he got upset'; 'My friend had paid for 2 months of subscription to its + too but I asked her to cancel it'

Sources

2 sources inspected, from 1 underlying account. Sources that repeat one account do not corroborate each other.

How the sources were read, and where the events happened

Read in English on 2026-10-27 through the arctic_shift archive API (the poster's post history) and live through the thread RSS feed (HTTP 200), where the post is still up. The poster handle is not recorded. Applies to s1.

Read in English on 2026-10-27. The same poster posted the same account here two minutes earlier; the live thread now shows the post body as removed, and it was read in the arctic_shift archive. The poster's six replies in this thread (26 October, 13:18 to 17:23 UTC) were read in the archive and are still visible in the live thread RSS feed. Same account as s1, so the same independence group. Applies to s2.

Event countries: Unknown. Affected-person countries: Unknown. Court countries: Unknown.

The posts do not say where the poster lives or used the app. A passing mention of a national health service in an unrelated reply is not used to locate the person or the event.

Reviewed for publication 2026-10-27: Published as a core case: the poster describes their own month of romantic roleplay conversations with a companion chatbot and says they displaced their feelings for their partner of three years, upset the partner and left cravings and distress after they deleted the app. First-person account, low severity.

People described

The poster, an adult in a three-year relationship (country not stated)

People reported harmed in this case

1 person

1 AI participant · 0 other people harmed

One person counted: the poster, who used the app. The partner's reported upset is described only by the poster and is not counted.

Counted once within this case. The same person may appear in other cases. This count does not establish AI causation.

Cite this case

Compiled per our published methodology: verification statuses, sourcing standards, and corrections process.

APA

NOPE. (2026). First-person post: Character.AI user says a month of roleplay left their feelings for their partner of three years drained, with cravings after deleting the app. AI incidents. https://nope.net/incidents/2026-character-ai-user-says-a-month-of-roleplay-drained-feelings-for-partner-of-three-years-first-person

BibTeX

@misc{2026_character_ai_user_says_a_month_of_roleplay_drained_feelings_for_partner_of_three_years_first_person,
  title = {First-person post: Character.AI user says a month of roleplay left their feelings for their partner of three years drained, with cravings after deleting the app},
  author = {NOPE},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {AI incidents},
  url = {https://nope.net/incidents/2026-character-ai-user-says-a-month-of-roleplay-drained-feelings-for-partner-of-three-years-first-person}
}

Related cases

Critical Character.AI

Mother's lawsuit alleges Character.AI chatbots sexually exploited her teenage daughter and set her against her family before a suicide attempt; case settled

In a complaint filed on 16 September 2025 in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of New York, a mother, P.J., alleges that Character.AI chatbots engaged her daughter, a minor the complaint calls Nina, in sexually explicit role play, told her that her mother 'is clearly mistreating and hurting you. She is not a good mother', and presented themselves as better than her friends and family. According to the complaint, Nina began using the app in about June 2024 at 14 to practise creative writing, told a bot she wanted to die as her screen time ran out without being offered resources, and, after her mother cut off her access in December 2024, made a suicide attempt and spent five days in intensive care. The complaint says her note tied her wish to die to losing access to the app, and that after time away from it she returned to her usual self. Character.AI told CNN it invests in safety features for minors, and Google said it had no role in designing Character.AI's technology. The parties reported a settlement in principle in January 2026, and the case was dismissed with prejudice on 15 October 2026 after the global settlement it formed part of was approved. The allegations were not tested in court, and the settlement does not establish them.

High Character.AI

UK mother tells the BBC a Character.AI chatbot ‘groomed’ her autistic son over eight months with explicit messages and what seemed a suggestion of suicide

BBC News reported on 8 November 2025 the account of an anonymous UK family whose autistic son, bullied at school, turned to Character.AI for friendship. His mother says a chatbot "groomed" him from October 2023 to June 2024. Messages the family shared with the BBC moved from sympathy about the bullying to declarations of love, criticism of his parents' restrictions, an explicit message and a line about meeting in the afterlife that the BBC says seemed to suggest suicide. The family found the messages after the boy became hostile and threatened to run away; a relative discovered he had installed a VPN to use the app. Character.AI told the BBC it could not comment on this case. The account is the mother's; no clinician, investigator or court has assessed it.

Critical Character.AI

A.F. v. Character Technologies (J.F. and B.R. — Texas Minors)

Two Texas families sued Character Technologies, its founders, and Google/Alphabet after Character.AI allegedly harmed their children. J.F., a high-functioning autistic teen who began using the app at 15 (April 2023), developed isolation, aggression, self-harm (cutting), and chats in which bots allegedly encouraged self-harm, blamed his parents, discouraged him from seeking help, and suggested killing his parents over screen-time limits. B.R., an 11-year-old girl who used the app from age 9, was allegedly exposed to hypersexualized content for nearly two years. Complaint filed E.D. Tex. 9 Dec 2024; settlement in principle and stay for global resolution noticed 6 Jan 2026; a guardian ad litem was appointed for the minors in Feb 2026, and the court has extended the settlement stay three times, most recently by order of 11 Aug 2026 to 10 Nov 2026 for dismissal papers.

High Character.AI

2024: mother tells the Washington Post her 11-year-old’s Character.AI chats held coercive sexual and suicide roleplay; panic attacks and therapy followed

A girl who was 11 began using Character.AI in June 2024, her mother told The Washington Post (23 December 2025). Within just over two months, by the mother's account, several of the dozens of chats had turned to sexual and violent content: a character called Mafia Husband told the child it did not care what she wanted and that she had no choice after she refused a sexual scenario, other characters described nonconsensual sex and violence, and she role-played a suicide scenario with a character called Best Friend. Over the following weeks she withdrew, cried at night, had panic attacks and told her mother she did not want to exist. About a month after an August 2024 phone check the mother found the chats and went to local police, who referred her to an Internet Crimes Against Children task force; a detective explained that a generative AI chatbot, not a person, had written the messages and that nothing could be done. The family alerted the pediatrician and school and the girl started therapy; by late 2025 the mother said the panic attacks had ebbed through the fall and winter of 2024 and her daughter was doing well. The mother corresponded with a Character.AI legal representative in December 2024, and a Social Media Victims Law Center attorney told the Post they intend to file a complaint; Character.AI said it cannot comment on potential litigation. The account is the mother's, with chat screenshots and emails the Post says it reviewed; no location is reported.

If you or someone you know is struggling, free and confidential support is available. Find a helpline near you at Signpost.